<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians</title>
        <author>Amalric</author>
        <author>Dehaene</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians</title>
          <date>2016</date>
          <publisher>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1603205113</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Amalric2016-origins-of-the-brain-networks-for-advanced-m</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Amalric2016-origins-of-the-brain-networks-for-advanced-m.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">ef83c308095a0a39a404004b950ca0eea83d69ec</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether advanced mathematical thought rests on the language faculty or on evolutionarily older circuits for number and space</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>which brain areas professional mathematicians engage when judging advanced mathematical statements, and whether they are language areas or number areas</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>shows a bilateral parietal, inferior temporal and prefrontal network active for all four branches of mathematics in experts only, sparing language areas and overlapping the circuits for numerals and arithmetic</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>high-level mathematical reasoning in expert mathematicians</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>fmri</label>
        <term>fmri</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Prolonged exposure to mathematical symbols reshapes ventral visual cortex, amplifying symbol responses and displacing face responses, in the same way reading expertise does for letters</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Because advanced mathematics and basic arithmetic share the same cortical circuit, early number skills and later mathematical achievement are developmentally linked through that shared substrate</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>expertise amplifies responses at sites that already respond to numerals and formulas in non-experts, rather than recruiting new territory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the ventral visual change mirrors literacy, where learning to read shifts responses toward letters and away from faces</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the enhanced formula response reflects a genuine increase in activated cortical volume, not just tighter anatomical alignment in the expert group</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>the caudate shifts its engagement to whichever domain the subject is expert in, consistent with a role in motivation and attention</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>language contributes transiently at the angular gyrus during sentence comprehension, and that area is deactivated during the reflection itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The group differences in ventral visual responses (formulas, tools, faces) cannot yet be tied to behaviour or shown to be caused by mathematical training.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the ventral visual group differences: THESE INTRIGUING DIFFERENCES MUST BE CONSIDERED WITH CAUTION BECAUSE THEIR BEHAVIORAL IMPACT AND CAUSAL LINK TO MATHEMATICAL TRAINING REMAINS PRESENTLY UNKNOWN</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The design cannot rule out a transient role of language areas during the acquisition of mathematical concepts; only learning studies could settle it.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that language areas are not involved: a transient role during acquisition is not excluded, and IMAGING STUDIES OF THE LEARNING PROCESS WOULD BE NEEDED TO RESOLVE THIS POINT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mathematicians and controls may differ on uncontrolled dimensions such as IQ or musical talent, which the authors argue is irrelevant to the within-group dissociation but is not measured.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the between-group comparison but not the within-mathematician one: MATHEMATICIANS AND CONTROLS MAY STILL DIFFER ON DIMENSIONS SUCH AS IQ, MUSICAL TALENT, HOBBIES ... SUCH PUTATIVE DIFFERENCES ARE IRRELEVANT TO OUR MAIN CONCLUSION OF A DISSOCIATION ... WITHIN THE MATHEMATICIANS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the authors flag the ventral visual group differences as needing caution, since their behavioural impact and causal link to mathematical training are unknown</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - the ventral visual differences are flagged by the authors as needing caution</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a small language-area overlap in left BA44 appeared only in smoothed group images and failed to reach significance in single subjects</label>
        <note>what this limits: the language-overlap result: THIS SMALL OVERLAP WAS PRESENT ONLY IN SMOOTHED GROUP IMAGES AND FAILED TO REACH SIGNIFICANCE IN HIGHER RESOLUTION analyses</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>controls were near chance on the mathematical statements, so the expertise interaction rests on a group that could not do the task</label>
        <note>what this limits: any expertise contrast that uses the control group&#x27;s maths performance: THEY FELL CLOSE TO CHANCE LEVEL WITH MATH (37% CORRECT, CHANCE LEVEL = 33%) ... COULD NOT IDENTIFY THEIR TRUTH VALUE (d&#x27; = 0.38, n.s.)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>objective performance was matched but each group rated its own domain as more comfortable</label>
        <note>what this limits: the matched-performance argument: OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE ON NONMATH PROBLEMS DID NOT DIFFER ... their SUBJECTIVE RATINGS ... REVEALED THAT EACH GROUP FELT MORE COMFORTABLE WITH ITS RESPECTIVE EXPERTISE DOMAIN</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the expertise-driven ventral visual shift toward symbols and away from faces, transposed from literacy to mathematics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>representational similarity, used to test whether math, arithmetic and numeral viewing share an activation topography within each subject</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an eighth stimulus category of circular checkerboards, built so that its retinotopic extent EXCEEDED that of every other category</label>
        <note>eliminates: a difference in retinotopic extent between conditions - the checkerboard is built to exceed every other category, so any area responding to sheer visual extent is exposed rather than counted as mathematical · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): absent-not-in-staged-text · would have ruled out, had it been run: low-level visual drive as the explanation of category-selective responses - a region that answers to mathematical formulas more than to a checkerboard covering MORE of the visual field is not responding to retinotopic extent</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>meaningful versus meaningless is the paper&#x27;s second, ORTHOGONAL criterion - it holds lexical content constant and so tests the same claim without the math-versus-nonmath comparison</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>difficulty here has an objective form (percent correct, matched) and a subjective form (rated, slightly higher for math), and the paper&#x27;s controls address the second</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the visual number form area is defined by responding to Arabic numerals more than letters or pictures, and was previously hard to detect because it sits near a zone of fMRI signal loss</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the multiple demand system is the rival account: a set of areas active in any hard task, which overlaps the math network and is why difficulty had to be excluded</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>language areas here are defined by an independent localiser in the same subjects, not by anatomy, so the sparing claim is about functionally identified voxels</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: auditory statement judgement in the scanner with matched non-mathematical statements, plus independent localisers for sentences, calculation and visual categories</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: fmri — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: the cortical network engaged during reflection on advanced mathematical statements</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: high-level mathematical reasoning in expert mathematicians — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → earlier observations of number-sense and number-form areas (cited as references 16, 18, 37)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the hypothesis that mathematics is an offshoot of language syntax, attributed in the article to Noam Chomsky (reference 1)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>contradicts → the hypothesis that mathematical capacity is an abstraction from linguistic operations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>supports → the account grounding mathematics in ancient nonlinguistic intuitions of number and space</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>extends → arithmetic imaging work, by answering the objection that number concepts are too simple to represent advanced mathematics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>confirms → prior reports of visual number form areas, using a sequence that overcomes the signal loss which made them hard to detect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → its own language-independence claim, by noting a transient angular gyrus contribution during comprehension</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F-test</label>
        <term>F-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>signal-detection sensitivity index</label>
        <term>signal-detection sensitivity index</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correction for multiple comparisons</label>
        <term>correction for multiple comparisons</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Student t tests</label>
        <term>Student t tests</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>F-test</label>
        <term>F-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>cluster P &lt; 0.05 corrected</label>
        <term>cluster P &lt; 0.05 corrected</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The activations evoked by mathematical reflection spared areas related to language and to general-knowledge semantics.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The same math network was engaged by all four tested branches of mathematics and even transiently by meaningless mathematical statements.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Non-mathematical general-knowledge reflection recruited a separate anterior temporal and angular gyrus semantic network.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A region-of-interest analysis of language areas showed mathematics engaged them no more, and often less, than general semantic reasoning did.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The high-level mathematics network overlapped the parietal and inferior temporal sites activated by simple calculation and by the mere sight of numerals, and this overlap survived removal of statements containing any numerical reference.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The math network was active even during simple mathematical reflection, and its greater activation for math than nonmath held irrespective of task difficulty.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mathematical expertise was accompanied by expanded number and formula responses in the left visual number form area.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>mathematicians performed equally on math and non-math statements, 63% against 65% correct</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>controls matched mathematicians on non-math but were near chance on math</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>all four domains of mathematics activated the math-responsive regions, in a significant intersection</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the network stayed active for about fifteen seconds after a math statement and deactivated for non-math</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>in controls the math contrast landed on the sites for meaningless statements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>essentially no intersection between the math and general-knowledge semantic networks, and none in perisylvian language cortex even at a lenient threshold</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>language regions defined by an independent localiser were engaged no more by math than by general reasoning, and often less</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the math network overlapped the areas for arithmetic and for merely viewing numerals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>responses to written formulas were larger in mathematicians, as extra activated volume rather than tighter alignment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>face responses were reduced in right inferior temporal cortex in mathematicians</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the caudate responded to whichever domain each group was expert in</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>CONFOUND REVERSED: easy math contrasted against difficult non-math still produced the same sites</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>CONTROL NULL: contrasting difficult against easy statements within each domain revealed no significant sites at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>ORTHOGONAL REPLICATION: the meaningful-versus-meaningless math contrast, which holds words constant, reproduced the whole result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>CONTENT REANALYSIS: excluding statements with any indirect numerical reference left the activation virtually unchanged</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>HAZARD NAMED ABOUT THEIR OWN RESULT: group-level overlap can arise from intersubject averaging, so the overlap was retested within subjects</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the within-subject pattern analyses confirmed that advanced math, arithmetic and numeral viewing share cortical sites in trained individuals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>visual number form area</label>
        <term>visual number form area</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>multiple demand system</label>
        <term>multiple demand system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>immediacy</label>
        <term>immediacy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>multiple demand system</label>
        <term>multiple demand system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>VNFA</label>
        <term>VNFA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>core knowledge</label>
        <term>core knowledge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>task difficulty</label>
        <term>task difficulty</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>meaningless</label>
        <term>meaningless</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>imageability</label>
        <term>imageability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>topology</label>
        <term>topology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>15 and 15 — sample size: professional mathematicians and academically matched humanities controls scanned with fMRI</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>63% and 65% correct — mathematicians&#x27; accuracy on math and on nonmath statements, showing the two problem types were matched in objective difficulty</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>37% correct, chance level = 33%; P = 0.014 — control subjects&#x27; accuracy on mathematical statements, barely above chance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>∼15 s — duration for which the fMRI signal stayed elevated in the math network after a mathematical statement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>52.4 ± 3.4 versus 40.0 ± 4.5; t = 2.4, P = 0.03 — mathematicians&#x27; subjective difficulty ratings (0–100 scale) for math versus nonmath statements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t = 4.72 — whole-brain effect size for reduced face responses in right inferior temporal cortex in mathematicians relative to controls</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>72 and 18 — number of mathematical statements (18 per domain) and of nonmathematical statements presented in the auditory runs</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>15 and 15 — professional mathematicians and non-mathematician controls of equal academic standing</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>63% and 65% — mathematicians&#x27; accuracy on math and non-math, the basis for calling the two matched in difficulty</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>37% against 33% chance — controls&#x27; accuracy on mathematical statements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>52.4 against 40.0 — subjective difficulty for math and non-math on a 0-100 scale, the only difficulty difference found</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>about 15 s — how long the math network stayed active after a statement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603205113.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
