<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Negative visuospatial priming in isolation-reared rats: Evidence of resistance to the disruptive effects of amphetamine</title>
        <author>Amitai</author>
        <author>Powell</author>
        <author>Weber</author>
        <author>Swerdlow</author>
        <author>Young</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Negative visuospatial priming in isolation-reared rats: Evidence of resistance to the disruptive effects of amphetamine</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>Cognitive, affective &amp; behavioral neuroscience</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3758/s13415-015-0369-0</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Amitai2015-negative-visuospatial-priming-in-isolation-r</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Amitai2015-negative-visuospatial-priming-in-isolation-r.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">c7ad6c8e0e84ddd7935cce30e6456ec1989369ba</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>null-result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>negative visuospatial priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Isolation rearing lowers dopamine responsivity in the prefrontal cortex, so amphetamine no longer pushes PFC dopamine past the level that disrupts negative priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Negative priming depends on an optimal (inverted-U) level of prefrontal dopamine transmission, which amphetamine shifts away from optimum</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Rats inhibit responding at the distractor location during the prime, and must overcome that inhibition when the target later appears there, which lowers accuracy on negative trials</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Blunted prefrontal serotonin release after amphetamine in isolates removes the drug-driven rise in premature responding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Only one amphetamine dose was tested, so hypo- versus hypersensitivity in isolates cannot be decided.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Because many more isolates failed to reach criterion and were excluded, a priming deficit in the excluded animals could have been missed.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The task may have a ceiling that hides group differences or drug-induced increases in priming.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proposed prefrontal monoaminergic explanation is not measured in this study.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>target and non-target locations varied pseudorandomly so each location held the stimuli an equal number of times per session while remaining unpredictable trial to trial</label>
        <note>eliminates: a location bias and an anticipation strategy at once - equal frequency removes the first, unpredictability removes the second, and the paper states both · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>baseline and negative trials alternated pseudorandomly, each type equally often per session and not predictable in advance</label>
        <note>eliminates: the animal preparing for the trial type it expects next, which would make the priming effect a preparation effect · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>negative visuospatial priming</label>
        <term>negative visuospatial priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>inhibitory information processing</label>
        <term>inhibitory information processing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>isolation rearing</label>
        <term>isolation rearing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>amphetamine</label>
        <term>amphetamine</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A NULL AGAINST THE AUTHORS&#x27; OWN HYPOTHESIS, WITH A POSITIVE CONTROL IN THE SAME ANIMALS: `In contrast with our hypothesis, however, Quotation withheld in rats, despite inducing PPI deficits consistent with various developmental and psychiatric disorders.` The manipulation demonstrably worked - prepulse inhibition was disrupted - and the measure demonstrably did not move. A null with an internal manipulation check is a different object from a null on its own, and this corpus should be able to tell them apart</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE SELECTION PROBLEM STATED IN THE SENTENCE THAT REPORTS THE RESULT: `Quotation withheld` The comparison runs on survivors - the isolates who got far enough to be measured - so the null holds on a sample the manipulation has already filtered. The authors put that in the abstract rather than leaving it to a reader, which is the shape this corpus wants from a limitation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>PRIMING AS AN INSTRUMENT, DECLARED IN THE FIRST SENTENCE: negative visuospatial priming `represents a quantifiable measure of inhibitory information processing that is disrupted in several neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia`. The clinical claim attaches to the PROCESS, not to the priming effect - priming is the dial, inhibition is the quantity, and the disorder is a property of the quantity. Second Amitai record where priming is a measuring device rather than a phenomenon</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>THE TITLE&#x27;S FINDING, AND IT IS A NULL INSIDE A NULL: `Quotation withheld` The drug disrupts negative priming in socially reared animals and does not in isolates - so the rearing that failed to disrupt the measure directly nonetheless changed how the measure responds to a drug. The discussion offers reduced prefrontal dopamine responsivity as the reason, hedged twice: `suggest that` and `might account for`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: null-result — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>method: behavioural-experiment</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: behavioural-experiment — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>phenomenon: negative visuospatial priming as a measure of inhibitory information processing, and its resistance to amphetamine in isolation-reared rats</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: negative visuospatial priming — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Amitai et al., 2013 (the rat negative-priming task and its disruption by amphetamine)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Amitai et al., 2013</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>isolation rearing —causes→ negative visuospatial priming</label>
        <term>isolation rearing</term>
        <term>negative visuospatial priming</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: no-change · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: A NULL RECORDED AS A DIRECTION, and this one is safe to record that way - unlike Takarada2018, the authors state the null as their finding and contrast it with their own hypothesis rather than hedging it later. The &#x27;despite inducing PPI deficits&#x27; clause is inside the quote because without it the null is uninterpretable.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-squared</label>
        <term>chi-squared</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons</label>
        <term>Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Fewer isolation-reared rats learned the task, but those that did showed negative priming no different from socially reared rats.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>D-amphetamine impaired negative priming and raised motor impulsivity in socially reared rats.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>D-amphetamine left negative priming and motor impulsivity unaffected in isolation-reared rats.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Significantly fewer isolation-reared than socially reared rats reached criterion performance in Experiment 1, showing a learning deficit for this complex task.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Amphetamine abolished negative priming by selectively lowering accuracy on baseline trials rather than by changing accuracy on negative trials.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Because the same isolates showed prepulse-inhibition deficits but intact negative priming, the two inhibitory-processing measures are dissociable.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>negative priming</label>
        <term>negative priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>inhibitory information processing</label>
        <term>inhibitory information processing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accuracy priming value</label>
        <term>accuracy priming value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>negative trials</label>
        <term>negative trials</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>baseline trials</label>
        <term>baseline trials</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>drug treatment</label>
        <term>drug treatment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>trial type</label>
        <term>trial type</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>prime stimulus duration</label>
        <term>prime stimulus duration</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accuracy priming value</label>
        <term>accuracy priming value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>premature responses</label>
        <term>premature responses</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ISI responses</label>
        <term>ISI responses</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>n = 23 socials and n = 14 isolates — Final animal numbers analysed in Experiment 1 after exclusions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>n = 19 socials and n = 18 isolates — Final animal numbers analysed in the amphetamine experiment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.25 mg/kg — Subcutaneous D-amphetamine dose used in the drug challenge</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Fifty-five — Total number of male Long-Evans rats weaned into the study</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>33.3 % — Chance accuracy level in the three-aperture task, which drugged animals still exceeded</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F (1, 35) = 24.4, p &lt; 0.001 — Main effect of amphetamine on the number of premature responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0369-0.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
