<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The neural roots of mathematical expertise</title>
        <author>Ansari</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The neural roots of mathematical expertise</title>
          <date>2016</date>
          <publisher>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1604758113</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Ansari2016-the-neural-roots-of-mathematical-expertise</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Ansari2016-the-neural-roots-of-mathematical-expertise.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">f2da0d117b6c5eb5816b30e8e16221fd5daa8ab5</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>Amalric and Dehaene&#x27;s fMRI comparison of expert mathematicians with non-mathematicians, read for what it settles about the relation between mathematics and language in the brain.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>mathematical expertise</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Acquiring mathematical expertise drives plastic change in ventral visual cortex for formulas and digits, which in turn reorganises responses to other visual categories such as faces</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Expertise redirects attention toward domain-relevant information, which could by itself produce the frontoparietal activation differences</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The commentary&#x27;s own Neurosynth analysis supports the dissociation independently: regions reported alongside the term numerical are largely separate from those reported alongside language</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The overlap between advanced mathematical reflection and simple calculation is read as evidence that expertise is built on elementary symbolic number circuits rather than separate from them</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Expertise may reorganise the ventral visual stream, with gains for formulas and digits accompanied by reduced response to faces</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The commentary&#x27;s own alternative account: expertise may change where attention goes rather than which systems are recruited, and the design cannot separate the two</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A test is proposed that would separate them - compare mathematicians on mathematics with experts in another field on their own domain</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The commentary bounds its own conclusion: language may still matter for the acquisition of expertise, or via connectivity rather than direct recruitment.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the commentary&#x27;s own reading of the language result: LANGUAGE MAY HAVE PLAYED A ROLE IN THE INITIAL ACQUISITION OF MATHEMATICAL EXPERTISE OR ... AT THE LEVEL OF FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY WITH LANGUAGE AREAS ... RATHER THAN THROUGH THEIR DIRECT RECRUITMENT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The evidence discussed is correlational and cannot establish that expertise causes the reported plastic changes.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any causal reading of the expertise-related differences: SUCH CORRELATIONAL DATA CANNOT BE USED TO INFER CAUSALITY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The commentary&#x27;s own caution, echoing the original authors: the expertise-related brain differences are correlational and cannot establish causality</label>
        <note>duplicate of: limitations[1] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1], and it is an amplification rather than a new objection: AS AMALRIC AND DEHAENE ACKNOWLEDGE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Genetic differences between the groups are as compatible with the data as expertise-driven plasticity</label>
        <note>what this limits: the plasticity interpretation specifically: IT IS EQUALLY PLAUSIBLE THAT GENETIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EXPERT MATHEMATICIANS AND NONMATHEMATICIANS AFFECT THE ORGANIZATION OF THE VENTRAL VISUAL STREAM</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The refutation of the language hypothesis is qualified in two ways the data cannot reach</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - the refutation of the language hypothesis is qualified in two ways these data cannot reach</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Whether the link to elementary number extends to nonsymbolic representations is untested and not implied</label>
        <note>what this limits: the extension to nonsymbolic number: A CONNECTION BETWEEN SYMBOLIC NUMBERS AND MATHEMATICAL EXPERTISE IN THE BRAIN DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE FOR NONSYMBOLIC NUMBER PROCESSING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Whether the reorganisation has behavioural consequences is left as an open question</label>
        <note>what this limits: the functional significance of the reorganisation: DOES A REDUCED RESPONSE TO FACES TRANSLATE INTO POORER FACE-PROCESSING SKILLS AMONG EXPERT MATHEMATICIANS?</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>number processing - symbolic: numerals and written formulas, which the commented study ties to advanced mathematics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>number processing - nonsymbolic: quantity as in dot arrays, shared with other species, and explicitly NOT covered by the result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>expertise effect - domain-general: attention, working memory and difficulty, which the frontoparietal network also serves</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>expertise effect - domain-specific: information processing particular to the domain, which is the reading the commented paper needs and the design cannot yet secure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the language claim - Hurford&#x27;s strong form: numeracy is impossible without language</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the language claim - the surviving weak forms: language may matter for ACQUIRING expertise, or through connectivity rather than recruitment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: mathematical expertise</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mathematical expertise — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Amalric &amp; Dehaene, &quot;Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians&quot; (PNAS 2016) - the companion article this piece comments on</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Hurford (ref. 7, p. 305), &quot;without language, no numeracy&quot;</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>critiques → Hurford&#x27;s claim that there is no numeracy without language</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>supports → Amalric and Dehaene (2016), the commented paper</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>supports → Dehaene and Cohen&#x27;s prediction of a visual number form area</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>critiques → the early structural studies of Einstein&#x27;s brain</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · mathematical expertise —distinct-from→ language</label>
        <term>mathematical expertise</term>
        <term>language</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span named only the brain regions. This sentence names both and states the distinction AS THE FIELD&#x27;S OPEN DISAGREEMENT - some argue language is the basis, others that the abilities are nonverbal - which is a more honest ground for &#x27;distinct-from&#x27; than an assertion. — strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;expert mathematicians&#x27;, not &#x27;mathematical expertise&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>symbolic number processing —part-of→ mathematical expertise</label>
        <term>symbolic number processing</term>
        <term>mathematical expertise</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports a CONNECTION between the circuits for elementary number processing and higher mathematics; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>nonsymbolic —distinct-from→ symbolic number processing</label>
        <term>nonsymbolic</term>
        <term>symbolic number processing</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: &#x27;symbolic numbers&#x27; = symbolic number processing (previous sentence); the span says a connection &#x27;does not necessarily imply&#x27; the same for nonsymbolic processing; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>visual number form area —part-of→ ventral visual cortex</label>
        <term>visual number form area</term>
        <term>ventral visual cortex</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>visual number form area —operationalised-as→ inferior temporal gyri</label>
        <term>visual number form area</term>
        <term>inferior temporal gyri</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says regions in the bilateral inferior temporal gyri respond to numerals - a LOCATION for the VNFA; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>frontoparietal —part-of→ domain-general</label>
        <term>frontoparietal</term>
        <term>domain-general</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the frontoparietal regions are ASSOCIATED WITH processes not specific to mathematics; part-of &#x27;domain-general&#x27; is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Neurosynth —operationalised-as→ reverse-inference</label>
        <term>Neurosynth</term>
        <term>reverse-inference</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the reverse-inference meta-analysis was CONDUCTED USING Neurosynth; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mathematical expertise —distinct-from→ language</label>
        <term>mathematical expertise</term>
        <term>language</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports a DEBATE - some argue language is the basis, others that nonverbal processes are; distinct-from is not the paper&#x27;s own claim.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>meta-analysis</label>
        <term>meta-analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The analysis supports the finding that numerical processing is largely anatomically separate from the circuitry thought to support language.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The commentary concludes that the absence of language-area recruitment in expert mathematicians refutes the claim that high-level mathematical ability is grounded in language systems.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The commentary argues the overlap between advanced mathematical reflection and elementary number processing implies a deep continuity between rudimentary symbolic number skills and advanced mathematics.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The author qualifies the refutation: language may still matter for the initial acquisition of expertise or through functional connectivity rather than direct recruitment.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The author raises an alternative: the experts may have attended differently to mathematical statements because these are especially salient to them.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>As the original authors acknowledge, correlational data like these cannot be used to infer causality.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the author&#x27;s meta-analysis maps regions reported more often in articles whose abstracts mention &#x27;numerical&#x27; (89 studies) than in those that do not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the commentary reads the result as refuting the hypothesis that higher-level mathematical abilities are grounded in the brain&#x27;s language systems</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the commentary&#x27;s open question: how elementary number circuits are recruited into expertise is not addressed by the data</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>visual number form area (VNFA)</label>
        <term>visual number form area (VNFA)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>visual number form area</label>
        <term>visual number form area</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reverse-inference meta-analysis</label>
        <term>reverse-inference meta-analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>89 studies — Number of studies whose abstracts mention &quot;numerical&quot;, pooled in the author&#x27;s Neurosynth map</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>885 studies — Number of studies contributing to the &quot;language&quot; term map in the same meta-analysis</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>15 expert mathematicians and 15 nonmathematicians — Sample of the fMRI study the commentary evaluates</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>89 studies — abstracts mentioning &#x27;numerical&#x27; behind the commentary&#x27;s own meta-analytic map</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>885 studies — abstracts mentioning &#x27;language&#x27; in the same analysis - ten times the numerical set</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604758113.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
