<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Racialized Campaign Ads: The Emotional Content in Implicit Racial Appeals Primes White Racial Attitudes</title>
        <author>Banks</author>
        <author>Bell</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Racialized Campaign Ads: The Emotional Content in Implicit Racial Appeals Primes White Racial Attitudes</title>
          <date>2013</date>
          <publisher>Public Opinion Quarterly</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1093/poq/nft010</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Banks2013-racialized-campaign-ads-the-emotional-conten</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Banks2013-racialized-campaign-ads-the-emotional-conten.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">71412951ab9630da50be03587fad976d5fdfa796</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>racial priming by implicit racial appeals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>anger and symbolic racism are stored as tightly linked associations in memory, so arousing anger activates the racial belief system and makes it available for the subsequent policy judgement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>emotional (mood-congruent) priming: being returned to the emotional state in which an attitude was learned makes that attitude easier to recall</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>because contemporary racial discourse is dominated by blame attribution, and blame is the appraisal that produces anger, anger rather than fear is the emotion bonded to whites&#x27; racial predispositions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The sample was a non-representative convenience sample of undergraduates, over-weighted toward liberals.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>It is unknown whether an adult sample would show the same effect.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Generalisation beyond crime to other racialised issue domains is untested.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the paper takes Bower and Forgas&#x27;s theory of emotional priming — a psychological account of mood-congruent recall — and uses it as the explanatory engine for a political-communication effect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>a manipulation check on the campaign advertisements, coded from an open-ended &#x27;how did the advertisement make you feel&#x27; by two trained research assistants, double-coded</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the anger and fear advertisements produced the emotions they were built to produce, rather than undifferentiated negative affect · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>anger</label>
        <term>anger</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>fear</label>
        <term>fear</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial priming</label>
        <term>racial priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial attitudes</label>
        <term>racial attitudes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial conservatives</label>
        <term>racial conservatives</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial liberals</label>
        <term>racial liberals</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>negative emotion, as this paper refuses to use it - the charge is CONFLATION: most research on racial priming treats negative affect as one thing, and the paper&#x27;s contribution is to show that two negative emotions from the same advertisement do different work. A category being used where a distinction was needed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>anger, in this account - not a stronger version of negative feeling but a SPECIFIC ROUTE: it is argued to be tightly linked in memory to whites&#x27; negative racial attitudes, so it reaches them where another negative emotion may not. The claim is about association, not intensity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial conservative and racial liberal, as defined here by WHERE THEY LOCATE THE CAUSE: conservatives find fault in the moral character of blacks, liberals blame the racism and discrimination endured. The two are separated by an attribution rather than by a policy position, which is what lets one emotion move them in opposite directions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Bower and Forgas (2001)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Banks and Valentino (2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Banks and Valentino (2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>anger —distinct-from→ fear</label>
        <term>anger</term>
        <term>fear</term>
        <note>differs in: WHICH ONE IS BOUND TO RACIAL ATTITUDES IN MEMORY - the paper&#x27;s claim is that they are not interchangeable negatives, and that the difference is associative rather than a matter of degree · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE DISTINCTION THE PAPER EXISTS TO DRAW, and it is drawn against its own field: the charge is that research on racial priming conflates the two under &#x27;negative emotion&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial conservatives —contrasted-with→ racial liberals</label>
        <term>racial conservatives</term>
        <term>racial liberals</term>
        <note>differs in: WHERE EACH LOCATES THE CAUSE of black disadvantage - in moral character, or in racism and discrimination endured. An attributional difference, not a policy one · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Recorded because the paper&#x27;s headline result depends on it: the same anger, from the same advertisement, moves these two groups in OPPOSITE directions on the same policies.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>interaction term in linear regression</label>
        <term>interaction term in linear regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cronbach&#x27;s alpha (intercoder/scale reliability)</label>
        <term>Cronbach&#x27;s alpha (intercoder/scale reliability)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence interval</label>
        <term>confidence interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>An implicit racial appeal that arouses anger significantly amplifies the effect of symbolic racism on opposition to racial policies among whites.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>An implicit racial appeal that arouses fear does not boost the effect of symbolic racism on racial policy opinions.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Among whites low in symbolic racism, anger moved policy opinion in the opposite direction, making racial liberals more supportive of racial policies.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The marginal effect of anger on racial policy opinion grows monotonically with symbolic racism while the marginal effect of fear stays flat across the same range.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The emotion manipulation worked: open-ended responses in the anger ad condition showed significantly more intense anger than both the control and the fear conditions.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Overall, the experiment shows anger is the emotional channel through which an implicit racial appeal primes symbolic racism.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>implicit racial appeal</label>
        <term>implicit racial appeal</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>symbolic racism (SR)</label>
        <term>symbolic racism (SR)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>racial priming</label>
        <term>racial priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>appraisal theory of emotion</label>
        <term>appraisal theory of emotion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>anger</label>
        <term>anger</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>symbolic racism</label>
        <term>symbolic racism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>racial policy opinions</label>
        <term>racial policy opinions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>age</label>
        <term>age</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>113 — total number of experimental subjects in wave 2, of whom 85 were white</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>65 percent — share of the student sample who were liberals (a stated limitation of the convenience sample)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>59 percent — retention/response rate from wave 1 (190 subjects) to wave 2</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>β = .44; p ≥ .001 — intensity of expressed anger in the anger-ad condition relative to control, in the manipulation check</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>β = .57; p ≥ .001 — intensity of expressed fear in the fear-ad condition relative to control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft010.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
