<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Monkeys show recognition without priming in a classification task</title>
        <author>Basile</author>
        <author>Hampton</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Monkeys show recognition without priming in a classification task</title>
          <date>2013</date>
          <publisher>Behavioural processes</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.beproc.2012.08.005</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Basile2013-monkeys-show-recognition-without-priming-in</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Basile2013-monkeys-show-recognition-without-priming-in.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">88f317d1fa26e7a6951b4035c07c8c37b65b3d68</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>null-result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>perceptual (repetition) priming in monkeys</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The visual processing that supports recognition is encapsulated from the processing that supports classification, so remembering an image cannot feed forward to help classify a degraded version of it.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Pigeons and monkeys classify by different routes — local features versus global shape — which is offered as the explanation for why priming appeared in pigeons but not here.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The study may simply have failed to identify the conditions under which priming would appear in monkeys.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Despite exploring many manipulations, the critical conditions for producing a memory effect on classification may have been missed.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The one significant priming effect obtained (Experiment 5, blur mask) is treated by the authors as unreliable and possibly a Type I error.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the human occluded-picture-naming priming paradigm is converted into a classification task so it can be run on monkeys</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the S+ category counterbalanced across monkeys - cats were S+ for three monkeys and S- for the other three</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the result is a pre-existing preference for one stimulus category rather than learning of the assigned contingency · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>perceptual priming</label>
        <term>perceptual priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming</label>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>explicit memory</label>
        <term>explicit memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>recognition</label>
        <term>recognition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>classification</label>
        <term>classification</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>repetition suppression</label>
        <term>repetition suppression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>search image</label>
        <term>search image</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming as IMPLICIT - named by the paper as the critical feature of the theories it is testing, and stated as a double requirement: subjects identify primed material better AND cannot explicitly remember it. The effect is defined partly by a FAILURE that has to accompany it, which is why a study finding memory for the primes is testing something the definition cares about</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming defined by a PROPERTY LIST rather than by a mechanism - automatic, effortless, unconscious, neuroanatomically separate from sophisticated forms of memory such as episodic memory. Every item is a contrast with something else, and it is precisely this shape of definition that licenses the leap to evolutionary age: a capacity that needs none of the expensive machinery is assumed to have come first</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the PHYLOGENETIC ASSUMPTION, named as an assumption in the abstract: priming is `commonly thought, with little evidence, to be widely distributed phylogenetically`. The paper&#x27;s target is not a finding but a belief its field holds without having tested it - and the only prior nonhuman evidence it can find is one study in pigeons</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>search image versus perceptual priming - a neighbouring concept separated by two stated measurements rather than by definition: the search image is SHORT LIVED and is DIMINISHED BY DIVIDED ATTENTION, so it is classed as short-term ATTENTIONAL priming rather than the long-term PERCEPTUAL priming seen in humans. Two literatures using one word, told apart by duration and by whether attention matters</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`priming` and `perceptual priming` are used at DIFFERENT GRAIN in different parts of the argument, and the split is systematic rather than casual: where the paper reasons about memory SYSTEMS - dissociation from explicit memory, survival in amnesia, evolutionary age - it writes bare `priming`; where it describes the visual effect it measures, and where it fences that effect off from the search image, it writes `perceptual priming`. The general term carries the theory and the specific term carries the experiment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a null defended rather than reported - the paper argues its own absence of evidence is not absence of power, on three separate grounds: priming is routinely seen in SINGLE human subjects, the pigeon result that motivated the study used FEWER subjects than this one, and the same animals demonstrably remembered the primes. The last is the one that matters, because it rules out the animals not having encoded the images at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Brodbeck (1997)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Brodbeck (1997)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Mcmahon &amp; Olson (2007)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>perceptual priming —distinct-from→ search image</label>
        <term>perceptual priming</term>
        <term>search image</term>
        <note>differs in: DURATION AND ATTENTIONAL DEPENDENCE - the search image is short lived and is diminished by divided attention, which is why the paper files it as short-term attentional priming rather than long-term perceptual priming · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The paper&#x27;s own phrase is &#x27;similar to, but distinct from&#x27;, and it does not leave the distinction as an assertion: both differentiating properties are cited to experiments. This is the shape the corpus wants - a boundary drawn with measurements.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming —distinct-from→ explicit memory</label>
        <term>priming</term>
        <term>explicit memory</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER IT SURVIVES AMNESIA AND WHICH NEURAL SYSTEM CARRIES IT - the separation is the definition rather than a finding about it, which is what makes this record&#x27;s null result awkward for the theory · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Recorded because the dissociation is doing definitional work: priming is IDENTIFIED by being separable from explicit memory. A monkey that recognises the primes but shows no priming is a dissociation running the other way.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>repetition suppression —causes→ priming</label>
        <term>repetition suppression</term>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: Weight 0.7 - the LOWEST on this record, and deliberately. The paper reports this as a theorised mechanism it is about to find fault with: the neural signature is present in monkeys and the behavioural effect is not. Recorded as the literature&#x27;s claim, not as this paper&#x27;s.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but repetition suppression is &#x27;THEORIZED TO UNDERLIE&#x27; priming; causes is hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>recognition —distinct-from→ classification</label>
        <term>recognition</term>
        <term>classification</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER MEMORY FOR AN IMAGE REACHES THE PROCESS AT ALL - the same remembered image supports recognition and does nothing for classification, which the paper reads as cognitive encapsulation between the two · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE RESULT, stated as a relation between two tasks rather than as an effect size. The paper&#x27;s last word on it is &#x27;presents a puzzle&#x27;, and the weight says so.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>arcsine transformation</label>
        <term>arcsine transformation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>significance level (alpha), two-tailed testing</label>
        <term>significance level (alpha), two-tailed testing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>effect size (Cohen&#x27;s d)</label>
        <term>effect size (Cohen&#x27;s d)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>median</label>
        <term>median</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Type I error</label>
        <term>Type I error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Across eleven experiments rhesus monkeys showed no priming: previously seen images conferred no reliable advantage when degraded versions had to be classified.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The same monkeys did recognise the prime images, both masked and unmasked, at the same memory interval at which no priming appeared.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The single significant priming result (the blur-mask experiment) failed to replicate under stronger conditions and is interpreted as a Type I error.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Scrambling the masked images significantly lowered classification accuracy compared with intact masked images.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The classification was based on global form, exactly the kind of process that memory for the intact image should have facilitated.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A close methodological replication of the only positive nonhuman priming study (in pigeons) produced no priming in monkeys.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The combination of intact recognition with absent facilitation constitutes a dissociation between remembering an image and classifying it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>perceptual priming</label>
        <term>perceptual priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>specific searching image</label>
        <term>specific searching image</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>perceptual closure</label>
        <term>perceptual closure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accuracy</label>
        <term>accuracy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>latency</label>
        <term>latency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>classification accuracy</label>
        <term>classification accuracy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>latency</label>
        <term>latency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>image quality (color, grayscale, line drawings)</label>
        <term>image quality (color, grayscale, line drawings)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>category control images</label>
        <term>category control images</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>six — number of adult male rhesus monkeys tested throughout the study</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>288 / 288 — primed and unprimed trials collected per monkey in Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>3.1% — the absolute accuracy advantage for primed images in the one experiment that reached significance, later attributed to Type I error</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>80% / 81% — the occlusion level required in the pigeon-replication and the accuracy it produced</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>98% — the monkeys&#x27; accuracy on the cats-versus-cars discrimination by the final training session</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t (5) = 0.6, p = .6 — the null test of primed versus unprimed classification accuracy in Experiment 1, typical of the paper&#x27;s null results</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>d = 1.9 — effect size for recognition of unmasked primes, the effect that was present while priming was absent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.08.005.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
