<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Understanding tactical responses to social problems through the lens of regulatory scope</title>
        <author>Brown</author>
        <author>Craig</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Understanding tactical responses to social problems through the lens of regulatory scope</title>
          <date>2023</date>
          <publisher>Nature Reviews Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/s44159-023-00184-x</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Brown2023-understanding-tactical-responses-to-social-p</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Brown2023-understanding-tactical-responses-to-social-p.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">9c390121a9f563e7ee925848d3a969049c2aea00</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>prediction</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>choice between cause-focused and consequence-focused responses to social problems</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Features of a social problem contract or expand regulatory scope, and the width of scope then determines whether the solution pursued targets consequences or causes</term>
        <note>status: the paper&#x27;s own words: We propose that</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Where an emotion is aimed (at affected individuals versus at the system) narrows or widens scope, which in turn channels action towards relief or towards structural change</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proposed model as a whole has not been empirically tested; only some of its paths have prior support.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The intergroup studies cited as support did not actually measure expanded scope as the mediating mechanism.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Regulatory scope is only one of several possible mechanisms driving social action.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The five features analysed are illustrative rather than an exhaustive set of scope-modulating features.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The feasibility-versus-desirability prediction is offered as plausible reasoning that still requires empirical test.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The framework sorts the same actions by a different principle from the frameworks it replaces.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any comparison between this framework&#x27;s categories and earlier ones: existing frameworks categorise the actions themselves while this one categorises by the aims of the action, so the two sort the same behaviour differently</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Two adjacent constructs are distinguished in one sentence, and the theory depends on keeping them apart.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim here about scope: the authors distinguish it from psychological distance, which is the distance between a person and a mental object, whereas scope is the span and breadth of possibilities considered</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The paper is a Perspective that draws two existing theories together rather than reporting a study.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the status of the account given here: it is a Perspective drawing on regulatory scope theory and construal level theory</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>regulatory scope</label>
        <term>regulatory scope</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>construal level</label>
        <term>construal level</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>psychological distance</label>
        <term>psychological distance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper">
        <label>social action</label>
        <term>social action</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>scope</label>
        <term>scope</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>scope versus psychological distance - TWO CONSTRUCTS ROUTINELY CONFLATED, SEPARATED HERE IN ONE SENTENCE: distance is how far a mental object is from the person, scope is how wide a range of possibilities they are considering, and the theory&#x27;s predictions turn on the second not the first</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the framework - CARVED BY AIMS RATHER THAN BY ACTIONS: prior schemes classify what people do, this one classifies what they are trying to achieve, so a given act of protest or donation can land in different categories under the two schemes</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>construal level - AS THE INSTRUMENT FOR MOVING SCOPE: described as the most studied tool for modulating scope, with the abstract expanding it and the concrete contracting it, so a study that manipulates construal is manipulating scope only through that link</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → construal level theory and regulatory scope theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>psychological distance —distinct-from→ scope</label>
        <term>psychological distance</term>
        <term>scope</term>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHAT EACH CONSTRUCT IS A DISTANCE OR SPAN OF, AND BOTH DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN. &#x27;whereas psychological distance refers to the distance between a person and a mental object, Quotation withheld.&#x27; A paper distinguishing two of its own constructs by defining each - the cleanest form this field takes, and rare. · strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>construal level —part-of→ regulatory scope</label>
        <term>construal level</term>
        <term>regulatory scope</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but regulatory scope theory EXPANDS ON construal level theory; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper&#x27;s central proposal is that a proximal or lower-level focus pushes people towards solutions that relieve suffering, while a distal or higher-level focus pushes them towards solutions that attack the problem&#x27;s causes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The framework names five specific features of a social problem that are proposed to expand or contract scope and thereby steer which kind of solution is chosen.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The relation between construal features and chosen solutions is claimed to run in both directions: acting on consequences itself pulls attention to the present, while acting on causes pulls attention to the future.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors flag the emotion-target pathway as an untested, novel prediction generated by their framework rather than an established result.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors suggest that if people mostly pursue consequence-focused actions, for feasibility or short-term reward, the root cause remains and the problem may persist.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>social problem</label>
        <term>social problem</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>social action</label>
        <term>social action</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>collective action</label>
        <term>collective action</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>psychological distance</label>
        <term>psychological distance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>level of construal</label>
        <term>level of construal</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regulatory scope theory</label>
        <term>regulatory scope theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>feasibility and desirability</label>
        <term>feasibility and desirability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>group efficacy</label>
        <term>group efficacy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hope</label>
        <term>hope</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[12]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Affirmation actions</label>
        <term>Affirmation actions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[13]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>informed actions</label>
        <term>informed actions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[14]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>benevolence actions</label>
        <term>benevolence actions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[15]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>activism actions</label>
        <term>activism actions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[16]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>consequence-focused solutions</label>
        <term>consequence-focused solutions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[17]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cause-focused solutions</label>
        <term>cause-focused solutions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>90 per cent / 10 per cent — Share of surveyed anti-poverty NGO supporters reporting consequence-focused actions (donating, fair-trade purchases) versus cause-focused actions (signing petitions), cited in support of the framework</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00184-x.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
