Hippocampal Sequences During Exploration: Mechanisms and Functions

Drieu, Zugaro · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · 2019 · neuroscience · 10.3389/fncel.2019.00232 · record Drieu2019-hippocampal-sequences-during-exploration-mec
tag layer · index · concepts · authors · עברית
Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (xml); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. Replication status is set to contested because the review itself announces that it will document conflicting evidence about the function of theta sequences vs awake replay ("Below, we point out some of the current inconsistencies and overlooked findings.", verified verbatim) and reports that Bittner et al. (2017) undermines the plasticity rationale for theta sequences. The limitations facet holds only the two places where the authors comment on the limits of their own review and their own cited experiment; the many "remains unclear" statements elsewhere in the paper are limits of the field, not of this paper, so they were excluded under rule 6. Claim type is mechanism rather than review-of-existence because the review's own asserted contribution is a causal account (theta sequences -> initial memory traces -> sleep replay). 2026-08-13, 2026-08-14 and 2026-08-15 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
This record’s own method is review, and the tags below follow from that. A review’s findings, quantities and statistics are things stated IN this paper, and some of them report results obtained elsewhere. 4 tags on this page name the author the result belongs to. Measured across every review in this corpus, 81% of a review’s tags carry no citation at all — most of them are the review speaking. The corpus does not adjudicate the rest: read an unmarked tag as a claim this paper makes, not necessarily one it made first.
How to read this page. The article text below is reproduced exactly as it was staged; nothing in it has been rewritten. Coloured stretches are tagged. A solid underline means the tag records the paper's own words. A dotted underline means the tag text is the tagger's sentence about the paper — the quotation is the paper's, the wording of the tag is not. Every superscript label links to that tag's row in the table at the foot of the page. The machine-readable edition of the same thing is the TEI file beside this one, where the tags live in standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
memory 23 fields · model 4 fields · plasticity 4 fields · spike 2 fields · potentiation 2 fields · trajectory 2 fields

Tags on this paper

Every tag the record carries, each linking to every other paper in the corpus that carries it. A tag appears here whether or not its words occur in the article — the spans below are only the ones a sentence in this paper licenses. Of the 29 concept tags on this paper, 19 are grounded in a quoted sentence. All carry the tagger's gloss of what the term means in this paper, which is not something the article can license.
theta theta sequence phase precession replay preplay place cell cell assemblies hippocampus CA1 CA3 entorhinal interneuron pyramidal memory consolidation plasticity potentiation trajectory oscillation gamma model coordination jitter spike decision planning medial septum muscimol timescale theta cycles compress spikes of successive place-cell assemblies into windows short enough for Hebbian synaptic plasticity, which is how an initial memory trace gets stored repeated theta-compressed activation of successive place cells induces asymmetric synaptic connectivity, and that stored asymmetry is what allows the same trajectory to be replayed offline during sleep cell assembly theta phase precession nested oscillations VTE nested sequences compression index review

Legend

second readingalternativesan independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees
relation to other workclaim_relationshow this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies
claim typeclaim_typethe shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null
concept edgeconcept_edgesan asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it
conceptconceptsan idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it
content tagcontent_tagsa finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper
contributioncontributionwhat the paper claims to add
controlcontrolsan experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation
limitationlimitationswhat the paper says its evidence cannot support
mechanismmechanismshow the reported effect is said to come about
methodmethodhow the paper produced its evidence
object of studyobject_of_studywhat the paper is about — the thing it investigates
phenomenonphenomenonthe effect or regularity under study
research questionresearch_questionthe question the paper sets itself
sensesensesa distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it
transfertransfersa method or concept carried in from another field
unrecordable relationunhoused_relationsa relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason

The paper, tagged

The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.

Hippocampal Sequences During Exploration: Mechanisms and Functions

Céline Drieu Céline Drieu

1 Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U 1050, PSL Research University, Paris, France

Find articles by Céline Drieu

1, *, † , Michaël Zugaro Michaël Zugaro

1 Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U 1050, PSL Research University, Paris, France

Find articles by Michaël Zugaro

1, *

Author information

Article notes

Copyright and License information

1 Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U 1050, PSL Research University, Paris, France

Edited by: Francesca Cacucci, University College London, United Kingdom

Reviewed by: Romain Goutagny, UMR7364 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives (LNCA), France; Caswell Barry, University College London, United Kingdom

✉ *Correspondence: Céline Drieu cdrieu1@jhu.edu

* Michaël Zugaro michael.zugaro@college-de-france.fr

†Present Address: Céline Drieu, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

This article was submitted to Cellular Neurophysiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Received 2018 Nov 9; Accepted 2019 May 8; Collection date 2019.

Copyright © 2019 Drieu and Zugaro.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PMC Copyright notice

PMCID: PMC6584963  PMID: 31263399

Abstract

Although the hippocampus plays a critical role in spatial and episodic memories, the mechanisms underlying memory formation, stabilization, and recall for adaptive behavior remain relatively unknown. concepts↗During exploration, within single cycles of the ongoing theta rhythm that dominates hippocampal local field potentials, place cells form precisely ordered sequences of activity. These neural sequences result from the integration of both external inputs conveying sensory-motor information, and intrinsic network dynamics possibly related to memory processes. Their endogenous replay during subsequent sleep is critical for memory consolidation. object_of_studymethod↗The present review discusses possible mechanisms and functions of hippocampal theta sequences during exploration. We present several lines of evidence suggesting that these neural sequences play a key role in information processing and support the formation of initial memory traces, and discuss potential functional distinctions between neural sequences emerging during theta vs. awake sharp-wave ripples.

Keywords: place cell, network dynamics, phase precession, theta sequences, awake replay, memory

1. Introduction

The ability of brain circuits to generate precise sequences of neuronal activity may underlie certain forms of sensory-motor processing and learning (Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Riehle et al., 1997 ; Stopfer et al., 1997 ; Petersen et al., 2001 ). While in some systems these sequences may be driven by external stimuli or motor signals, reports of internally generated neuronal sequences in the hippocampus, under either minimal (e.g., sleep; Lee and Wilson, 2002 ; Ji and Wilson, 2007 ) or invariant (Pastalkova et al., 2008 ; Wang et al., 2015 ) sensory-motor inputs, have identified a potential evolutionary mechanism for planning and memory consolidation (Lisman and Redish, 2009 ; Foster and Knierim, 2012 ; Buzsáki and Moser, 2013 ; Wikenheiser and Redish, 2015a ; Zielinski et al., 2017 ).

The hippocampal network receives highly integrated inputs from distributed areas (Witter et al., 1989 ; Andersen et al., 2007 ; van Strien et al., 2009 ) and is endowed with auto-associative properties (Gilbert and Brushfield, 2009 ), which allows it to integrate and retrieve spatial as well as non-spatial information (Buzsáki and Moser, 2013 ; Eichenbaum, 2017 ). Bilateral lesions of the hippocampus result in long term deficits in episodic memory (Scoville and Milner, 1957 ) as well as in strong impairments in spatial memory (Morris et al., 1982 ). Indeed, the hippocampal formation has been proposed to support a cognitive map of the environment (Tolman, 1948 ; O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978 ), based on the remarkable property of its “place cells” that discharge when the animal occupies restricted locations in the environment (“place fields,” O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971 ). During the exploration, the animal sequentially crosses successive place fields, and the corresponding place cells fire in sequence, reflecting the ongoing trajectory at the behavioral timescale. Strikingly, embedded in these slow sequences, time-compressed sequences emerge in each cycle of the ongoing theta rhythm (O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ; Skaggs et al., 1996 ), a strong and regular ~8 Hz oscillation of the hippocampal local field potential (LFP; Jouvet, 1969 ; Vanderwolf, 1969 ). phenomenonThese sequences are known as “theta sequences.” As a result of this fast timescale organization, the spikes emitted by successive cell assemblies occur within dozens of milliseconds, and this pattern is continually repeated in successive theta cycles, which is conducive to Hebbian synaptic plasticity (Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Magee and Johnston, 1997 ; Stuart, 2001 ; Buzsáki and Draguhn, 2004 ; Wójtowicz and Mozrzymas, 2015 ). Therefore, theta sequences have been proposed to allow the formation of spatial and episodic memory traces, by anchoring spatial events in their temporal context (Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Drieu et al., 2018 ).

Interestingly, fast time-compressed trajectories are also represented by neuronal sequences that occur during brief pauses and prolonged immobility (Foster and Wilson, 2006 ; Diba and Buzsáki, 2007 ), when theta oscillations are absent. Instead, these replay events occur during sharp-wave ripple complexes (O'Keefe, 1976 ; Buzsáki et al., 1983 , 1992 ), a transient LFP pattern associating fast (~200 Hz) oscillations in stratum pyramidale and a large deflection in stratum radiatum . These awake replay events have been involved in spatial working memory (Jadhav et al., 2012 ). Further replay of behavior-related neural sequences endogenously occurs during sleep (Wilson and McNaughton, 1994 ; Lee and Wilson, 2002 ), and has been shown to play a critical role in memory consolidation (Girardeau et al., 2009 ; Ego-Stengel and Wilson, 2010 ; Maingret et al., 2016 ; van de Ven et al., 2016 ).

Hippocampal sequences may thus represent a general neurophysiological mechanism supporting memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. The present review focuses on hippocampal theta sequences. We first describe the cellular and network mechanisms proposed to give rise to the theta-related dynamics of hippocampal place cells. We then report evidence for a role in information processing and memory trace formation. Finally, we discuss possible functional distinctions between neural sequences emerging during theta and awake sharp-wave ripples.

2. Emergence of Theta Sequences

The sequential activation of successive place cells along a given trajectory, at the behavioral timescale, does not trivially imply that in overlapping regions of space these same cells should fire in the same order at the much faster, “theta” timescale. How do theta sequences emerge in the hippocampal network? During locomotion, the hippocampal dynamics are under the combined influences of extrinsic inputs from multiple sensory and locomotion-related structures, as well as the intrinsic properties of the hippocampal network, modulated by elevated acetylcholine levels. concepts↗concepts↗Theta oscillations dominate the hippocampal LFP and powerfully shape both pyramidal cell and interneuron firing.

2.1. Theta During Locomotion

The theta rhythm includes a range of low and regular frequency oscillations from 4 to 12 Hz ( Figure 1A ). During wakefulness, theta oscillations arise during locomotion and epochs of active engagement in the environment such as navigating, exploring objects, rearing and preparing for movement (Jouvet, 1969 ; Vanderwolf, 1969 ; Foster et al., 1989 ). While the precise mechanisms responsible for the generation of theta remain to be elucidated (Buzsáki et al., 2002 ), theta oscillations are thought to result from an interplay between numerous factors ( Figure 1B ), including rhythmic cholinergic modulation and feed-forward inhibition from the medial septum and diagonal band of Broca (MSDB; Petsche et al., 1962 ; Kramis et al., 1975 ; Buzsáki et al., 1986 ; Vanderwolf et al., 1988 ; Kocsis et al., 1999 ; Müller and Remy, 2014 ; Zutshi et al., 2018 ), rhythmic inputs from layers II and III of the entorhinal cortex targeting DG/CA3 and CA1, respectively (Buzsáki et al., 1983 ; Kamondi et al., 1998 ), activation of CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites by CA3 collaterals (Konopacki et al., 1987 ; Kamondi et al., 1998 ; Fisher and Blum, 1999 ), interneuronal network dynamics within (Goutagny et al., 2009 ) and between (Jackson et al., 2014 ) hippocampal fields, rhythmic feedback inhibition from hippocampus long-range interneurons to MSDB (Alonso and Köhler, 1982 ; Tóth et al., 1993 ), as well as intrinsic resonant properties of hippocampal, entorhinal and medial septal neurons mediated by various voltage-dependent channels (Ca 2+ , K + , Na + ) which provide membrane resonance and subthreshold oscillations at theta frequency (Kamondi et al., 1998 ; Evstratova et al., 2011 ; Hansen et al., 2014 ).

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Theta oscillations. (A) Example local field potential (LFP) trace during track running. (B) Simplified schematic of theta generation. The medial septum-diagonal band of Broca (MSDB) sends theta-rhythmic GABAergic (g), cholinergic (c) and glutamatergic projections to the hippocampus (glutamatergic neurons appear to entrain other septal neurons, but not hippocampal theta, and are not represented here). Rhythmic inhibition (red, GABA) of highly interconnected perisomatic interneurons (g) constrains the timing of pyramidal cell spikes. The entorhinal cortex (EC) also sends theta-paced outputs to the hippocampus through the perforant path. CA3 outputs targeting stratum radiatum constitute another likely intrahippocampal theta generator. In addition, the dendritic membrane of CA1 pyramidal cells is endowed with resonant properties at theta frequency. Finally, hippocampal long-range backpropagating interneurons target the MSDB, arguing for cyclical (non-unidirectional) mechanisms in the generation of theta. (C) Power spectral density of dorsal CA1 LFP as a function of running velocity (logarithmic scale; average over four rats). At low velocities, power is dominated by a single peak located between 6 and 7 Hz. As velocity increases, the peak quickly narrows, shifts toward 8 Hz, while additional peaks (harmonics) develop at frequencies n × 8 Hz (up to n = 6 for dorsal CA1 region, n = 2 for intermediate CA1). Reproduced from Sheremet et al. ( 2016 ).

The theta rhythm appears to act as an internal clock: hippocampal pyramidal cells fire maximally at the trough of theta cycles, when perisomatic inhibition by parvalbumin (PV) and cholecystokinin (CCK) basket cells, as well as axo-axonic cells, is minimal; and different classes of GABAergic neurons have different preferred firing phases (Freund and Buzsáki, 1996 ; Csicsvari et al., 1999 ; Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008 ; Müller and Remy, 2014 ). Local GABAergic inhibition may fine tune the spike timing of pyramidal cells relative to theta [e.g., Ego-Stengel and Wilson, 2007 ; Geisler et al., 2007 ; Maurer and McNaughton, 2007 ; Royer et al., 2012 ; Grienberger et al., 2017 ; see the network model by Ferguson et al. ( 2015 )]. Given the strong and reliable modulation of hippocampal activity by theta oscillations, behavior-related changes in the theta profile (e.g., spectral components) may play a crucial role in hippocampal dynamics.

Many structures activated during locomotion modulate theta (Vertes et al., 2004 ; Kiehn, 2016 ). Consistently, theta is primarily influenced by ambulatory signals, compared to e.g., optic flow or vestibular self-motion cues (Czurkó et al., 1999 ; Terrazas et al., 2005 ). Hence, numerous subcortical structures, which may not be directly involved in the actual generation of theta, have nonetheless been reported to modulate theta. These are part of the “synchronizing ascending system” (Vertes and Kocsis, 1997 ; Vertes et al., 2004 ; Orzeł-Gryglewska et al., 2015 ; Kiehn, 2016 ). Efferences of several subnuclei of the brainstem reticular formation and the mesencephalic locomotor region can trigger the emergence (onset, offset) and the regulation (power, frequency) of theta (Grastyán et al., 1965 ; Peck and Vanderwolf, 1991 ; Sinnamon, 1993 ; Vertes and Kocsis, 1997 ; Sńska and Kasicki, 1998 ; Jackson et al., 2008 ; Bland et al., 2016 ; Ma et al., 2017 ).

How is theta altered by locomotion? In the spectral domain, a 16 Hz oscillation, described as the second harmonic of theta (Harper, 1971 ), has been reported to emerge with increasing locomotion velocity ( Figure 1C ; Czurkó et al., 1999 ; Terrazas et al., 2005 ; Sheremet et al., 2016 ). More generally, a chain of harmonics significantly phase coupled to the theta oscillation appear to be related to the velocity of the animal (Sheremet et al., 2016 ). In the time domain, these speed-related nonlinearities are manifested as an increase in skewness and asymmetry in the shape of theta cycles (Buzsáki et al., 1983 ; Terrazas et al., 2005 ; Sheremet et al., 2016 ), which decrease along the septo-temporal axis of the hippocampus (Maurer et al., 2005 ; Hinman et al., 2011 , 2013 ; Sheremet et al., 2016 ). In addition, the frequency of theta and its harmonics increase with running velocity (McFarland et al., 1975 ; Sńska and Kasicki, 1998 ; Maurer et al., 2005 ; Bender et al., 2015 ; Sheremet et al., 2016 ), in a consistent manner across the septo-temporal axis (Maurer et al., 2005 ; Sheremet et al., 2016 ). Intriguingly, theta phase shifts progressively from the septal to the temporal pole of the hippocampus, and thus theta can be seen as a “traveling wave” (Lubenov and Siapas, 2009 ; Patel et al., 2012 ).

Changes in theta power and frequency coincide with systematic changes in the spiking dynamics of pyramidal cells (Song et al., 2005b ; Terrazas et al., 2005 ; Lu and Bilkey, 2010 ), and a strong correlation has been reported between theta nonlinearity and the intensity and timing of the spiking activity of both pyramidal cells and interneurons (Maurer et al., 2005 ; Sheremet et al., 2016 ). Thus, speed-related changes in theta oscillations have a strong impact on the precise spike timing of hippocampal cells. As described below, the precise phase at which spikes are emitted is directly related to the position of the animal in the environment (O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ), which may constitute one of the clearest examples of temporal coding in the brain.

2.2. Theta Phase Precession

As a rat walks through the firing field of a given place cell, the firing rate of this cell progressively increases until the animal reaches the center of the place field, then decreases until the animal leaves the field. Thus, the firing rate of the place cell appears to code for the location of the animal in the environment. Strikingly, O'Keefe and Recce ( 1993 ) discovered that spatial information can also be provided by the precise time at which the place cell fires relative to the ongoing theta rhythm. Indeed, the place cell fires at progressively earlier phases across successive theta cycles: firing occurs at late phases when the animal enters the place field, then progressively shifts back in phase as the animal progresses through the field, and finally occurs at the beginning of the theta cycle when the animal leaves the field. This phenomenon is referred to as “phase precession” ( Figure 2A ; O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ). sensescontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagsWhile the range over which spike theta phase precesses may appear to span as much as 360° when pooling data over multiple field crossings, single-trial phase range is typically ~180°, and never exceeds a full cycle (O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ; Maurer et al., 2006 ; Schmidt et al., 2009 ). At a given (fixed) running speed, the rate of phase precession is inversely related to the size of the place field: in particular, place cells with small fields in the dorsal hippocampus phase precess faster than place cells with large fields in the ventral hippocampus (Maurer et al., 2005 ). On the other hand, phase precession slope increases with running speed, ensuring that the phase-position relationship is maintained regardless of running speed (Bose and Recce, 2001 ; Geisler et al., 2007 ).

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Temporal coding in the hippocampus and emergence of theta sequences. (A) Theta spike phase precession. Top, schematic representation of the temporal organization of successive place cell bursts relative to theta as a rat runs along a linear track. When the rat enters the firing field (pink ellipse), the cell fires near the end of the theta cycle, i.e., with a phase of ~360°. As the rat progresses through the field, bursts occur on earlier and earlier phases (red vertical ticks, action potentials; black numbered dots, mean burst times within individual theta cycles). Bottom, phase precession plot. For each spike, phase is represented as a function of position (tilted black line, best linear-circular regression line). (B) Top, four schematic overlapping firing fields. Middle, in their overlap region the cells discharge in sequence (A, AB, ABC, etc.) within each theta cycle, reflecting the order of field traversal at a compressed time-scale. Bottom, these past-present-future “sweeps” may require coordination between individual phase precessing cells.

Phase precession has been reported not only in all subfields of the hippocampus (Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Johnson et al., 2007 ; Mizuseki et al., 2009 ), but also in neighboring parahippocampal structures projecting to the hippocampus, including the subiculum (Kim et al., 2012 ) and medial entorhinal cortex (MEC, Hafting et al., 2008 ), as well as in downstream structures, such as the medial prefrontal cortex (Jones and Wilson, 2005 ) and ventral striatum (van der Meer and Redish, 2011 ). Understanding the mechanisms of hippocampal phase precession is thus expected to provide invaluable insights about a general coding scheme present in multiple brain areas (Harris, 2005 ; Malhotra et al., 2012 ). Recent evidence of phase precession in the human hippocampus (Qasim and Jacobs, 2016 ) further confirms that theta phase precession remains relevant beyond rodent species.

2.2.1. Mechanisms of Phase Precession: Computational Models and Experimental Data

The neurophysiological mechanisms of phase precession are difficult to explore experimentally, but have been extensively investigated through computational modeling (for reviews, see Maurer and McNaughton, 2007 ; Burgess and O'Keefe, 2011 ). limitationsalternativescontent_tagsWhile no model appears to fully account for all aspects of phase precession, a continued dialogue between experimental and modeling approaches has provided constraints on potential generation mechanisms. Below, the three main classes of models of phase precession are briefly reviewed and discussed in light of experimental data.

mechanismstransfersconcept_edgesThe detuned oscillators model was originally proposed by O'Keefe and Recce ( 1993 ) in their initial report of phase precession, and remains one of the most elegant hypotheses to date 1 ( Figure 3A ). This model considers a place cell that oscillates at a slightly faster frequency than theta. These two oscillators, synchronized at the beginning of the place field, slowly shift due to their frequency difference. Because the place cell fires at the peaks of its own membrane potential oscillation, i.e., its more depolarized states, this occurs earlier and earlier relative to the slower theta oscillation, which results in phase precession. In addition, the frequency of the membrane potential oscillation is assumed to be proportional to running speed, so that the phase advance of spikes reflects the distance traveled through the place field, rather than the time spent in the field. However, because the field size is maintained despite changes in running speed, it has been proposed that the frequency of both oscillators increased with running speed to compensate for the decrease in numbers of theta cycles at high running speed (Geisler et al., 2007 , 2010 ). limitationsThe model requires neurons with cosine directional tuning, which have been identified in the hippocampus, medial septum and anterior thalamus (Welday et al., 2011 ). Similar cells were documented in entorhinal cortex (Krupic et al., 2012 ), although the finding remains controversial (Krupic et al., 2015 ; Navratilova et al., 2016 ).

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Computational models of phase precession. (A) In the detuned oscillators models, the membrane potential ( V m ) of the neuron (light blue) oscillates faster than the local theta rhythm (dark blue) within the firing field. Spike bursts (black dots numbered from 1 to 5) occur at positive peaks of V m and thus anticipate theta cycles, resulting in phase precession. (B) In the somato-dendritic interference models with asymmetric excitation ramps, spikes are emitted whenever excitation (red) exceeds somatic inhibition (light blue), which is paced by theta oscillations (dark blue). Because excitation increases, it exceeds inhibition earlier and earlier, resulting in phase precession. (C) In the asymmetric connections model, successive place cells (labeled from A to E) with overlapping fields are connected (gray arrows) in such a way that activity propagates unidirectionally within the network. Thus, as the rat enters the field of cell E, it happens to be located at the center of the field of cell A. Cell A is therefore maximally excited, and transmits its activity via the chain of intermediate cells until it reaches cell E, which fires late in the theta cycle as a result of transmission delays. But as the rat progresses through the field, there are fewer and fewer intermediate steps and the transmission delays decrease, so that cell E fires earlier and earlier in the theta cycle. Note that in the present Figure, phase precession is shown from 360° to 180° to simplify the schematic representation.

The generation sites of these two oscillators has remained unresolved. Intrahippocampal oscillators under the influence of medial septum and CA3 recurrent inputs are inconsistent with the finding that theta reset by brief single-pulse electrical stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure does not reinitialize phase precession and leaves the phase-position relationship intact (Zugaro et al., 2005 ). Extrahippocampal oscillators (e.g., Yamaguchi, 2003 ) would be supported by phase precession in MEC grid cells (in layer II and to a lesser extent in layer III) and conjunctive cells (in layer III) (Hafting et al., 2008 ; Reifenstein et al., 2012 , 2014 , 2016 ; Climer et al., 2013 ; Ebbesen et al., 2016 ), which persists during pharmacological inactivation of the hippocampus (Hafting et al., 2008 ). Conversely, hippocampal phase precession is disrupted after bilateral lesions of the MEC (Schlesiger et al., 2015 , but see Ormond and McNaughton, 2015 ). Further, a recent study by Robinson et al. ( 2017 ) has shown that phase precession in object-responsive CA1 cells persists during transient optogenetic inactivation of the MEC, suggesting a possible complementary role for the LEC, which predominantly provides non-spatial information (Deshmukh and Knierim, 2011 ; Tsao et al., 2013 ). Several models have suggested that entorhinal oscillators might generate phase precession (Burgess et al., 2007 ; Climer et al., 2013 ; Jeewajee et al., 2014 ). On the other hand, relatively large phase shifts between EC and CA1/CA3 spikes (Mizuseki et al., 2009 ) remain at odds with the notion that phase precession could be directly transferred from the EC to the hippocampus. In addition, the mechanism proposed to account for phase precession in EC requires that entorhinal head direction cells signal movement direction, which is inconsistent with experimental findings (Cei et al., 2014 ; Raudies et al., 2015 ).

mechanismsSomato-dendritic interference models ( Figure 3B ; Kamondi et al., 1998 ; Magee, 2001 ; Harris et al., 2002 ; Mehta et al., 2002 ; Losonczy et al., 2010 ) posit that the timing of action potentials is determined by the combination of oscillatory somatic inhibition and transient ramp-like dendritic excitation. As the animal enters the place field, the cell fires when excitation overcomes inhibition, which occurs earlier and earlier because of the ramp-like shape of the dendritic depolarization. The excitation ramp has been proposed to be either symmetrical (Harris et al., 2002 ) or asymmetrical (Mehta et al., 2002 ). The asymmetrical depolarization shape mirrors the asymmetrical development of place field with experience (Mehta et al., 1997 , 2000 ). To remain consistent with the observation that spike phase decreases but does not subsequently increase, the symmetric ramp model posits that the place cell stops firing at the peak of the ramp. This was supported by in vitro data obtained following symmetrical-shaped depolarizing current injection through the pyramidal cell dendrites (Harris et al., 2002 ), which suggested that an adaptive mechanism allowed the cell to precisely stop firing at the ramp peak.

Both intracellular in vitro (Magee, 2001 ; Losonczy et al., 2010 ) and extracellular in vivo (Kamondi et al., 1998 ; Harris et al., 2002 ; Mehta et al., 2002 ) data are consistent with the somato-dentritic interference models. Notably, recordings of intracellular activity in awake behaving animals confirmed that within firing fields, the membrane potential of place cells had an asymmetric depolarization curve (Harvey et al., 2009 ; Epsztein et al., 2011 ; this was also observed in grid cells, Domnisoru et al., 2013 ; Schmidt-Hieber and Häusser, 2013 ). Epsztein et al. ( 2011 ) further documented an increase in the excitability of place cells during field traversal, compared to silent cells. limitationssensescontent_tagsWhile this supports the somato-dentritic interference models, the same studies also reported that spikes remain locked to the peaks of the membrane potential, a critical prediction of the detuned oscillators models. And because recent work has shown that even network connectivity models (see below) can account for these findings (Romani and Tsodyks, 2015 ), it becomes unclear whether intracellular data do discriminate between different classes of models of phase precession.

mechanismstransfersconcept_edgesIn the network connectivity models , contrary to the above cellular models in which no particular synaptic connectivity is assumed, phase precession results from transmission delays between asymmetrically connected cells ( Figure 3C ; Jensen and Lisman, 1996 ; Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Tsodyks et al., 1996 ; Romani and Tsodyks, 2015 ). According to these models, place cells are unidirectional and asymmetrically connected to each other. Feed-forward sensory inputs arriving when the animal reaches the end of the place field drive the cells to fire at early phases of the theta oscillation. Activity then spreads to place cells with fields located further along the trajectory (via asymmetric connections), which fire later in the cycle due to transmission delays. Hence, place cells fire earlier and earlier as the animal progresses through their field, resulting in phase precession. Asymmetric connections can be hard-wired (Dragoi and Tonegawa, 2011 , 2013 ) or result from experience (Silva et al., 2015 ), consistent with the experience-dependent asymmetric expansion of place fields (Mehta et al., 1997 , 2000 ). An alternative version of the model posits that phase precession results from phase differences between CA3 and entorhinal inputs (Chance, 2012 ; Fernández-Ruiz et al., 2017 ). limitationsIn both cases, the proposed mechanisms are difficult to reconcile with the experimental finding that the relation between phase and allocentric spatial position changes during backward movement (Cei et al., 2014 ; Maurer et al., 2014 ). Further, this change occurs abruptly, ruling out the possibility that asymmetry could reverse via slow plasticity processes (Cei et al., 2014 ). Hence, these models may need refining to account for these experimental findings (but see Chadwick et al., 2015 , 2016 ).

While phase precession has been mainly described in principal cells, there have been reports of phase precession in hippocampal interneurons, in particular those receiving putative monosynaptic connections from place cells recorded on the same tetrode. Within the field of their partner place cells, these interneurons share the same rate of phase precession (Maurer et al., 2006 ; Ego-Stengel and Wilson, 2007 ; Geisler et al., 2007 ). Because pyramidal cells generally fire before interneurons, the spatial selectivity of interneurons was suggested to be inherited from local pyramidal cells (but see Chadwick et al., 2016 ). Functionally, these interneurons could inhibit competing cell assemblies and therefore participate in the segregation of cell assemblies in space and time (Maurer et al., 2006 ; Cutsuridis and Hasselmo, 2012 ; Royer et al., 2012 ; Dupret et al., 2013 ). This is supported by recent data by Grienberger et al. ( 2017 ), who coupled LFP and intracellular recordings in head-restrained mice running on an enriched treadmill, and showed that optogenetic hyperpolarization of CA1 interneurons reduces both the rate and temporal coding of spatial location in CA1 place cells by suppressing out-of-field excitatory inputs.

2.2.2. Functional Role of Phase Precession

While phase precession may code for allocentric position on linear tracks (O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ; Jensen and Lisman, 2000 ), it is unclear how this code would generalize to two dimensional environments. Contrary to linear tracks, in open fields animals can enter place fields from multiple directions, and place cells precess in a similar manner regardless of the direction of motion. As a result, place cells fire at the same theta phase for multiple locations (Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Huxter et al., 2008 ). Thus, phase may instead code for the relative distance from the place field center (Jeewajee et al., 2014 ). sensescontent_tagsSimilarly, the reversal of the phase-position relation observed during backward travel (Cei et al., 2014 ; Maurer et al., 2014 ) indicates that phase does not code for the allocentric position of the animal, but more likely for the distance traveled through the field.

Phase precession has been observed in a variety of contexts including running on a wheel (Hirase et al., 1999 ; Pastalkova et al., 2008 ) or a treadmill (Royer et al., 2012 ; Cei et al., 2014 ; Grienberger et al., 2017 ), jumping (Lenck-Santini and Holmes, 2008 ), in virtual reality (Chen et al., 2013 ; Ravassard et al., 2013 ; Aghajan et al., 2015 ), and during fixation (Takahashi et al., 2014 ). While all of these conditions correspond to theta states, the animal does not necessarily change location. Consistently, several studies have reported object- and sound-modulated CA1 phase-precessing cells (Aronov et al., 2017 ; Robinson et al., 2017 ) and phase-precessing cells toward reward locations in the ventral striatum (van der Meer and Redish, 2011 ). sensesclaim_relationsThis suggests that phase precession may not be uniquely linked to space, but rather to the full episodic component of the ongoing experience (e.g., reviewed in Jaramillo and Kempter, 2017 ). An even more drastic departure from the spatial coding hypothesis is the view that perhaps the main role of theta phase precession is the formation of neuronal activity sequences, segregated by theta cycles ( Figure 2B ; e.g., Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Schmidt et al., 2009 ).

2.3. concepts↗Mechanisms of Theta Sequences

research_questionsensesconcept_edgescontent_tagsWhether phase precession is a cause or a consequence of the formation of theta sequences remains unresolved. As discussed above, phase precession could result from a variety of mechanisms that do not require sequential connectivity between neighboring place cells ( detuned oscillators and somato-dendritic interference models). Independent initiation of phase precession in successive cells would automatically yield theta sequences (Skaggs et al., 1996 ). Thus, phase precession would be a causal mechanism of theta sequences. An alternative view is that hippocampal sequences result from specific patterns of connectivity within the hippocampal network ( network connectivity models; see also Dragoi and Tonegawa, 2011 ). At the single cell level, this would be manifested as phase precessing spikes. Thus, phase precession would be a consequence of the formation of theta sequences.

controlsconcepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesconcept_edgescontent_tags↗Several studies have challenged the idea that phase precession could entirely account for theta sequences, by showing that a moderate addition of time jitter to experimental spike trains resulted in preservation of phase precession but a reduced prevalence of theta sequences (Dragoi and Buzsáki, 2006 ; Foster and Wilson, 2007 ; Itskov et al., 2008 ). This suggested that theta sequences required precise coordination between cell assemblies in addition to independent phase precession mechanisms. Two recent studies have provided further support for this view. Feng et al. ( 2015 ) analyzed single-trial phase precession and theta sequence formation in rats exploring a novel linear track, and reported that while single place cells exhibit phase precession from the first lap, theta sequences do not emerge until the second lap. Middleton and McHugh ( 2016 ) analyzed the temporal coding of CA1 and CA3 neurons during spatial navigation in a transgenic mouse model lacking CA3 synaptic transmission (CA3 tetanus toxin mouse line). They showed that the absence of CA3 inputs abolished the formation of theta sequences at the CA1 ensemble level despite the persistence of phase precession in individual neurons. They suggested that CA3 may be instrumental for temporal coordination of the CA1 neuronal population. content_tagsIn summary, the above studies point to an intermediate mechanism, where phase precession plays an important but non-exclusive role in generating theta sequences, complemented by temporal coordination processes which may require specific functional connectivity.

controlssensescontent_tagsTo formally test the requirement for additional coordination mechanisms, Chadwick et al. ( 2015 ) developed phenomenological models of independent and coordinated place cell activity during navigation, and compared their predictions in light of experimental data. They concluded that the independent coding model is sufficient to replicate the data previously interpreted as evidence for the coordinated assembly hypothesis. First, although it has been shown that predictions of individual CA1 place cell spike timing is improved by information conveyed by their peer cells (Harris et al., 2003 ), suggesting that these cells directly interact with each other consistent with the coordinated assembly hypothesis (Harris, 2005 ), Chadwick et al. ( 2015 ) showed that this no longer holds when both the modulation of firing phase by travel direction (Huxter et al., 2008 ; Climer et al., 2013 ; Cei et al., 2014 ; Jeewajee et al., 2014 ; Maurer et al., 2014 ) and the modulation of firing rate by running speed (e.g., Czurkó et al., 1999 ; Huxter et al., 2003 ; Geisler et al., 2007 ) are taken into account to predict the activity of a given cell. sensesclaim_relationscontent_tagsAs a matter of fact, peer information even decreases the average prediction, consistent with the independent coding model. Second, the independent coding model also replicated the finding that spike jitter can degrade theta sequences but spare the phase-position relation (Dragoi and Buzsáki, 2006 ; Foster and Wilson, 2007 ; Itskov et al., 2008 ), and the covariance in firing rate between cell pairs across successive running laps (Foster and Wilson, 2007 ). Finally, the independent coding model also accounted for global remapping data that the coordinated assembly model failed to replicate.

Incidentally, both the independent coding and coordinated assembly models can account for internal sequence generation (Pastalkova et al., 2008 ; Wang et al., 2015 ), proposed to support cognitive processes. One potential issue with the independent coding model, which is not directly related to the generation of theta sequences, is that it remains unclear how sequences could reactivate during non-theta states (see also Chadwick et al., 2016 ). mechanisms↗A possible solution would be that once theta sequences emerge due to independent phase precession, the repeated activation of successive neurons induces synaptic changes that result in asymmetric network connectivity; this would allow trajectory replay during sleep (Drieu et al., 2018 ; see section 3.3).

While direct interactions between pyramidal neurons may not be required, specific classes of hippocampal interneurons may be involved in coordinating sequential information. As stated earlier, despite the fact that interneuron activity usually displays weak spatial modulation (McNaughton et al., 1983 ), many interneurons fire spikes that precess in phase against the theta rhythm, tightly coupled to monosynaptically connected pyramidal cells (Maurer et al., 2006 ; Ego-Stengel and Wilson, 2007 ; Geisler et al., 2007 ). While this suggested that interneuron phase precession may be inherited from place cells (Maurer et al., 2006 ; Geisler et al., 2007 ), Chadwick et al. ( 2016 ) recently proposed an alternative model of theta sequences where phase precessing interneurons play a crucial role in coordination of place cell spike timing and the emergence of theta sequences. In their model, phase precession occurs dynamically whenever a place cell is driven by external inputs due to the transient functional coupling between place cells and interneurons. Consequently, phase precession and theta sequences are generated de novo within the network, and slow input sequences are automatically compressed into theta sequences in networks of interacting pyramidal cells and interneurons. This is consistent with the findings of Royer et al. ( 2012 ), who reported that optogenetic silencing of PV-expressing interneurons shifted the phase of pyramidal cell spikes toward the trough of theta (conversely, silencing of SOM-expressing interneurons increased the burstiness of pyramidal cell spikes without altering their theta phase). This suggests that somatic inhibition may play a major role in theta phase precession and segregation of cell assemblies (Royer et al., 2012 ; Dupret et al., 2013 ; Chadwick et al., 2016 ).

3. Theta Sequences, Navigation, and Memory

Both theoretical considerations and experimental data indicate that theta phase precession and theta sequences could underlie cognitive functions. While the seminal report of O'Keefe and Recce ( 1993 ) emphasized the probable role of phase precession in spatial coding, the authors also immediately recognized that phase precession placed conditions on the possibility that synaptic connections could be modified. This was shortly followed by suggestions that a critical function of phase precession was to bring neurons to fire within brief time windows conducive to synaptic plasticity (Burgess et al., 1994 ; Lisman and Idiart, 1995 ; Skaggs et al., 1996 ). Effectively, theta sequences would allow the hippocampal network to store temporally ordered information, such as events in their spatio-temporal context, thus constituting a substrate for episodic-like memory trace formation. Consistently, there is evidence that degradation of theta sequences impairs sleep replay underlying memory consolidation (Drieu et al., 2018 ), and is accompanied by memory deficits (Lenck-Santini et al., 2008 ; Robbe and Buzsáki, 2009 ). In addition, recent data indicate that theta sequences reflect ongoing cognitive processes (Wikenheiser and Redish, 2015b ), suggesting that they could also be involved in planning and decision making.

3.1. Theta-Gamma Neural Code

content_tagsDuring theta states, nested gamma oscillations shape the activity of cell assemblies so that largely non-overlapping ensembles are sequentially activated in the 10–30 ms time windows of successive gamma cycles which occur at successive theta phases (Lisman and Idiart, 1995 ; Harris et al., 2003 ; Harris, 2005 ). mechanismstransfersconcepts↗content_tagscontent_tagsThis would enable the hippocampal network to represent four to eight items per theta cycle (corresponding to the number of nested gamma cycles), which has been related (Lisman and Idiart, 1995 ) to the “magic number” of 7 ± 2 items that humans can typically hold in short term memory (Miller, 1956 ). Hence, theta-gamma coupling has been hypothesized to form a neural code representing multiple items in a temporal frame ( Figure 4A ; Jensen and Lisman, 2005 ; Lisman and Buzsáki, 2008 ; Lisman and Jensen, 2013 ). Buzsáki ( 2010 ) even proposes the concept of a neural syntax, in which cell assemblies, the fundamental computational unit (letters), are arranged in specific orders by oscillations, external or internal excitatory inputs and local inhibition, in order to form words.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Theta-gamma neural code. (A) Individual memory representations (cell assemblies, identified by letters) are repeatedly activated within each new theta cycle. The gamma rhythm separates the respective representations in time. The number of gamma cycles per theta cycle determines the span of working memory. (B) If discrete locations (i.e., A–G) are encoded within individual gamma cycles, longer paths would be encoded during fast gamma than during slow gamma. Alternatively, slow (but not fast) gamma cycles encode sequences of locations, rather than single locations. This results in longer paths encoded during slow gamma than during fast gamma.

Evidence for a role of theta in information chunking has been provided in a number of experimental studies. By quickly changing light cues on the walls and floor of a recording chamber, Jezek et al. ( 2011 ) induced rapid switches between two perceived environments, and reported that CA3 representations flickered between the two maps. These network flickers tended to occur at the timescale of one or a few theta cycles. Notably, activity within a single theta cycle correlated with either environment, but rarely with both simultaneously, suggesting that theta cycles constituted temporal units of information. Similarly, Gupta et al. ( 2012 ) recorded CA1 activity while rats performed a decision task on a eight-shape maze with two reward sites, and reported that neural sequences expressed during single theta cycles reflected cognitive segments of the task. This supported the view that theta cycles may underlie the cognitive chunking of experience. Further, they reported that the length of the path encoded in a given theta cycle was directly related to the length of the cycle and to the number of gamma cycles it contained, suggesting that gamma cycles constitute information processing steps (see also Zheng et al., 2016 ).

The role of gamma oscillations in organizing spike timing has been supported by several recent studies. During theta oscillations, at least two types of nested gamma oscillations can occur in short bursts (Bragin et al., 1995 ), although it remains unclear whether these can occur within single theta cycles (Belluscio et al., 2012 ) or they are restricted to different theta cycles (Colgin et al., 2009 ). In CA1, slow gamma (gamma S , ~30–50 Hz) preferentially occurs on the descending phase of theta. It is thought to arise from CA3 and to propagate along the Schaffer collaterals to the stratum radiatum . Medium gamma oscillations (gamma M , ~50–90 Hz) tend to occur near the theta peak and may emerge from MEC inputs targeting the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (Bragin et al., 1995 ; Csicsvari et al., 2003 ; Colgin et al., 2009 ; Belluscio et al., 2012 ; Schomburg et al., 2014 ; Buzsáki and Schomburg, 2015 ).

Takahashi et al. ( 2014 ) studied hippocampal responses during fixation periods in a delayed spatial-alternation task. Neurons selective for the alternation sequence phase precessed during the entire fixation period, shifting their spikes from the peak to the trough of theta oscillations. Concomitantly, gamma M power (60–90 Hz) arising at the theta peak decreased, while gamma S power (30–45 Hz) arising at the theta trough increased toward the end of the fixation period. The authors hypothesized that CA1 received predominant inputs from the EC at fixation onset, providing information about ongoing context. This signal would then elicit auto-associative intra-hippocampal processing in CA3 to recall the required action, or to look up in memory the appropriate task sequence given the ongoing context. This scenario, reminiscent of the model of Chance ( 2012 ), is consistent with the finding that gamma S power is reduced and theta sequences are disrupted in inducible KO mice lacking CA3 inputs (Middleton and McHugh, 2016 ). concept_edgesDifferent gamma frequency bands would thus reflect different types of information processing, e.g., externally cued vs. internally generated.

This is in line with the notion that theta cycles have two complementary functional modes (Hasselmo et al., 2002 ): an encoding phase at the peak of theta (as recorded from CA1 pyramidal layer), largely mediated by EC inputs, and a retrieval phase at the theta trough mediated by CA3 recurrent activity. Incidentally, this could explain why Jezek et al. concepts↗( 2011 ) reported a better separation of the two hippocampal maps during the second half of the theta cycle, when CA3 retrieval mode would dominate. sensescontent_tagsA similar dissociation would be expected in the study of Gupta et al. ( 2012 ), where theta sequences representing trajectories ahead of the animal, reflecting memory retrieval, could be linked to higher gamma S band power, whereas trajectories behind the animal, reflecting memory encoding, could be linked to higher gamma M band power. Unfortunately, this was not investigated, but two recent studies reported a similar dissociation in rats running on a linear track.

In the first study, Bieri et al. ( 2014 ) found that late theta phases were dominated by gamma S , when spikes appear to anticipate the upcoming field location (“prospective” firing, Battaglia et al., 2004 ). In contrast, early phases were dominated by gamma M , when spikes lag behind field location (“retrospective” firing). These results suggest that alternating gamma S and gamma M states allow the hippocampus to switch between prospective and retrospective modes, possibly to prevent interference between memory retrieval and encoding.

In the second study, Zheng et al. ( 2016 ) performed Bayesian reconstruction of the trajectory of the animals at the theta timescale, and showed that theta sequences more accurately represented ongoing trajectories during theta cycles dominated by gamma M than during theta cycles dominated by gamma S ( Figure 4B ). Gamma S -associated theta sequences were found instead to represented relatively long paths extending ahead of the current location. In these sequences, spike phases relative to gamma S also conveyed spatial information (Senior et al., 2008 ). This again argues that encoding and retrieval could be mediated by different gamma subtypes: relatively long gamma S periods may allow successive items within the stored sequence to be retrieved in a time-compressed manner; in contrast, short periods of gamma M would encode spatial memories in real time and may ensure chunking of cell assemblies. Note however that in this study, entire theta cycles were considered to contribute either gamma S or gamma M sequences (depending on the overall dominating gamma band), but not both (although see e.g., Belluscio et al., 2012 ), leaving unexplored the possibility that encoding and retrieval could both occur within single theta cycles (Hasselmo et al., 2002 ).

The spatial strategy of the animal may also bias the balance between gamma S and gamma M . Cabral et al. ( 2014 ) trained mice to find food rewards in a five-arm maze. During training, mice always started exploring the maze from the same location. But during test trials, they started from a different location, which allowed to assess if the animals used a place strategy (navigation to the same place in space) vs. a sequence strategy (performing the same series of left or right turns). When the mice used a sequence strategy, gamma S was most prominent and place maps were more similar to training trials (after realignment), compared to when the mice used a place strategy, when spikes emitted during gamma S and gamma M periods contributed equally to the hippocampal representation. A possible interpretation is that during sequence strategy trials, the hippocampal network retrieves sequences of cell assemblies stored in CA3, while during place strategy trials, hippocampal activity would be equally driven by the recall of memory stored in CA3 and by landmark-related sensory information conveyed by the EC.

3.2. Theta Sequences and Trajectory Planning

As hinted previously, theta sequences do not appear to be entirely driven by sensori-motor signals. For instance, Gupta et al. ( 2012 ) reported that “look-ahead” or “look-behind” theta sweeps were preferentially expressed in different maze segments, and were modulated by the running velocity of the animal ( Figure 5 ). Bieri et al. ( 2014 ) found that prospective spikes tended to occur when rats were leaving reward locations (the ends of a linear track), whereas retrospective spikes tended to occur as rats approached reward locations.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Theta sequences and trajectory planning. (Left) A rat runs on the central arm of a maze (blue dashed box) and must decide whether to turn left of right at a choice point (red dashed box). Letters represent hippocampal cell assemblies and colored ellipses illustrate their respective firing fields on the maze. Center. During deliberation (vicarious trial and error, VTE) at the choice point, sequences of cell assemblies alternatively sweep toward the two possible paths (top). Extra-field firing can occur before the animal turns back toward the choice point during error correction trials (bottom). (Right) When the animal runs along a segment of the maze, theta sequences can represent positions centered on the animal (“in-between”), behind the animal (“more behind”) or ahead (“more ahead”). The spatial representation embedded in theta sequences is influenced by multiple factors, including the velocity and acceleration of the animal, as well as the location of surrounding landmarks.

Convincing and direct evidence that cognitive mechanisms can regulate theta sequences was provided by Johnson et al. ( 2007 ), who recorded CA3 activity in rats performing two different versions of the T-maze decision task. At decision points, when the rat had to choose to turn left or right, theta sequences quickly and repeatedly swept forward toward the reward sites, alternatively representing the two possible paths. Similar anticipatory sequences occurred upon recovery from an error ( Figure 5 ). The animals performed two different tasks: a multiple-T task, in which reward locations were fixed within a given session but changed from day to day, and a cued-choice task, in which a tone indicated for each lap which arm would be rewarded. In the multiple-T task, the number of sweeps down the unrewarded arm decreased across trials. In contrast, in the cued-choice task, sweeps kept representing both directions throughout the session. Interestingly, at the decision point, the rats often expressed a typical behavior, consisting in pausing and orienting the head toward the left or right corridors, as if deliberating over the choice. content_tags↗This process is referred to as “vicarious trial and error” (VTE; Muenzinger and Gentry, 1931 ). Subsequent studies further linked VTE to decision-making processes (Schmidt et al., 2013 ; Amemiya and Redish, 2016 ; for a complete review see Redish, 2016 ). Of particular note, Wikenheiser and Redish ( 2015b ) showed that theta sequences predicted longer trajectories when the animal was actually planning to reach a more distant goal. Thus, theta sequences also convey information about ongoing goals or intentions.

3.3. Theta Sequences and Memory

limitationssensescontent_tagscontent_tagsBecause the mechanisms underlying theta sequences remain poorly understood and may involve many interacting factors (including single-cell properties, synaptic connectivity patterns, local inhibition, theta-paced inputs, etc.), interfering with theta sequences is challenging. To the best of our knowledge, only three studies have reported task performance deficits linked to a degradation of theta sequences.

In the first study, Lenck-Santini et al. ( 2008 ) investigated hippocampal theta dynamics in rats, following status epilepticus , a condition that leads to mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). These rats had altered phase precession and temporal organization of firing among pairs of neurons, along with deficits in spatial learning in the Morris water maze. This suggests that memory impairments stemmed from impaired temporal coding, consistent with a role for theta sequences in normal memory function.

In the second study, Robbe and Buzsáki ( 2009 ) examined the involvement of cannabinoid receptors in the dynamics of the hippocampal network (see also Robbe et al., 2006 ). Rats were trained to perform a hippocampus-dependent delayed spatial alternation task ( Figure 6A ). Administration of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP55940 profoundly and reversibly impaired task performance. While the hippocampal place representation remained essentially intact, both theta phase precession and spike-timing coordination between place cells at the theta timescale were reversibly reduced. Notably, the percentage of correct trials on the task was correlated with the theta-scale pairwise coordination (assessed as the “compression index,” i.e., the ratio of the distance between the place fields of pairs of place cells and the average time lag between their spike trains at the theta timescale). These results strongly argue for a role of phase precession and theta sequences in task performance. sensesclaim_relationscontent_tagscontent_tags↗One potential caveat however is that CP55940 administration decreases ripple power (Robbe et al., 2006 ). Since place cell activity during awake ripples may play a crucial role in working memory (Jadhav et al., 2012 ), it is conceivable that the performance deficit could also result from altered place cell activity during awake ripples.

Figure 6.

concepts↗Open in a new tab

Theta sequences and memory. (A) Selective perturbation of phase precession, but not firing maps, by injection of cannabinoid receptor agonist CP55940 induces performance deficits in a spatial memory task. Top. Firing maps for an example place cell recorded in control (left), drug (center), and recovery (right) conditions. Bottom left. Average power of the cross-correlograms for all neuron pairs with overlapping fields during control (blue), drug (red), and recovery conditions (magenta; dotted lines: s.e.m.) Bottom center. Correlation between behavioral performance (percentage of correct trials) and theta-scale sequence compression index in one rat. The different symbols refer to data obtained in two different experiments. Bottom right. Average performance (correct trials) for all sessions and rats. (B) Medial septum inactivation by muscimol infusion impairs theta sequences and behavioral performance. (C) Perturbation of theta sequences impairs subsequent sleep replay. Top. Experimental protocol. The rats traveled on a model train. In successive sessions, a miniature treadmill was either turned off (passive travel; red and yellow) or on (active travel; green) to selectively disrupt or maintain theta sequences, while leaving behavioral timescale sequences intact. Bottom left. Firing fields (left column) remained stable in all conditions (red, green and yellow curves), but theta sequences (right column) emerged only during active travel (green box). Bottom center. Trajectories represented by hippocampal sequences were assessed using a combination of measures, namely trajectory score (linearity) and slope (velocity). During passive travel and subsequent sleep (red and yellow boxes), a very low proportion of both theta and replay sequences emerged in the hippocampal network (upper right quadrants are mostly black). On the contrary, during active travel and subsequent sleep (green boxes), a dramatically higher number of theta sequences and replay events were observed (red dots in upper right quadrants). Bottom right. Similarity of theta and replay sequences (P1, P2: passive travel sessions; A: active travel session; SA, SP1, SP2: sleep following respective travel sessions). Theta sequences were clear and self-consistent only during active travel (red zone at [A,A]). Sleep replay mirrored theta sequences only following active travel (red zone at [A,SA]). Panel (A) adapted from Robbe and Buzsáki ( 2009 ); panel (C) adapted from Drieu et al. ( 2018 ), with permission from AAAS.

Wang et al. ( 2015 ) also reported impaired task performance following perturbation of theta-timescale activity ( Figure 6B ). concepts↗In rats performing a delayed spatial alternation task, concepts↗sensesconcept_edgesconcept_edgescontent_tagsmedial septum inactivation by muscimol injection abolished theta sequences both on the maze and in the wheel where the rats ran during delay periods (although measures of theta cycles and therefore theta sequences may not be as reliable when theta amplitude vanishes following muscimol injection). On the other hand, the place-cell representation was spared when the rats were navigating the maze. Yet, performance was impaired. This suggests that theta sequences normally formed on the maze would have been necessary to achieve optimal levels of performance. sensescontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagsOne cannot entirely rule out that the observed performance deficits could be directly due to disruption of theta oscillations (Pan and McNaughton, 1997 ; Hasselmo et al., 2002 ) induced by medial septum inactivation (~80% decrease in theta power, Wang et al., 2015 ).

In summary, the above studies are consistent with the view that theta sequences are involved in the formation and recall of spatial memory, possibly by enabling the synaptic changes that underlie the storage of initial memory traces (Burgess et al., 1994 ; Skaggs et al., 1996 ). limitationscontent_tagsYet, an alternative possibility is that these performance deficits resulted from impairments in planning and decision making, which also appear to involve theta sequences (Johnson et al., 2007 ; Schmidt et al., 2013 ; Wikenheiser and Redish, 2015b ; Amemiya and Redish, 2016 ), rather than from deterioration of learning and memory processes. Thus, are theta sequences actually necessary for memory formation and recall? sensesclaim_relationsconcept_edgescontent_tagsBittner et al. ( 2017 ) recently uncovered a novel form of synaptic potentiation occurring at the behavioral timescale, and proposed that this could suffice to store entire sequences of events that took place several seconds before and after initiation of plateau-potentials in CA1 pyramidal cells. concepts↗This effectively undermines the theoretical framework that theta sequences are required to bring spike trains in close temporal proximity and enable synaptic potentiation, underlying hippocampus-dependent memory encoding.

Because during exploration, theta sequences are nested within behavioral timescale sequences, disentangling their respective roles in memory encoding requires a protocol that instantly and selectively blocks or releases theta sequences throughout the hippocampal system, but spares the firing fields of place cells (and therefore, behavioral timescale sequences). claim_relationsOur previous work has established that passive travel alters phase precession in most place cells (see also Song et al., 2005a ; Terrazas et al., 2005 ), except if the rats actively run on a treadmill while being transported (Cei et al., 2014 ). Importantly, switching the treadmill on or off does not induce global remapping of place cells. controlsclaim_relationsclaim_relationsconcept_edgesconcept_edgescontent_tags↗We have recently leveraged this protocol to selectively impair phase precession (treadmill off) or leave it intact (treadmill on), while maintaining the spatial layout of place fields in the environment (Drieu et al., 2018 ). The rats were tested in an entirely novel environment, to stimulate spatial learning, network coordination and synaptic plasticity (Li et al., 2003 ; Leutgeb et al., 2004 ; Cheng and Frank, 2008 ; O'Neill et al., 2008 ), as well as to ensure that previously formed memory traces would not bias our observations. As expected, impaired phase precession during passive travel (treadmill off) was accompanied by an almost complete absence of theta sequences. On the other hand, behavioral timescale sequences were unaffected. During subsequent sleep, the hippocampal network failed to replay trajectories. Only following “active” travel (treadmill on), when theta sequences emerged nested within behavioral timescale sequences, did the hippocampal network generate genuine replay events during sleep (Drieu et al., 2018 ) ( Figure 6C ). claim_typecontent_tagsThis indicates that theta sequences play a causal role in establishing initial memory traces, which can later be reinstated during sleep for memory consolidation.

limitationscontrolsNote that in this study, the functional role of theta sequences was not assessed from behavior (task performance), but from the occurrence of dynamic network patterns with a well-documented function, namely trajectory replay underlying memory consolidation. concepts↗As a consequence, this alleviates the ambiguity discussed earlier, that behavioral impairments could result either from memory deficits, or from impairments in planning and decision making.

Interestingly, additional evidence for a link between theta sequences and sleep replay was recently provided by Muessig et al. ( 2019 ), who recorded from rat pups at different post-natal stages. They reported that before weaning (P21), ripple-associated activity represents stationary locations in space, and does not start to represent bona fide trajectories until theta sequences progressively emerge between P17 and P32.

Finally, over the last 15 years, an ever growing number of studies have addressed the network substrates of memory using causal approaches. However, these studies have generally failed to consider the temporal dimension of neuronal activity, such as manifested in cell assemblies and sequences. Experimental exploration of engrams (Semon, 1921 ) has benefited from the development of optogenetics (Boyden et al., 2005 ) and gene expression control techniques combined with immediate early gene (IEG) expression signals, to artificially manipulate memory traces (e.g., Reijmers et al., 2007 ; Liu et al., 2012 ; Cowansage et al., 2014 ; Redondo et al., 2014 ; Trouche et al., 2016 ). These strategies allow tagging and subsequent manipulation of neuronal populations activated during learning (for recent reviews, see Silva et al., 2009 ; Tonegawa et al., 2015 ; Guan et al., 2016 ; Kim et al., 2016 ; Poo et al., 2016 ). Thus, selective activation or inhibition of tagged neuronal ensembles have been shown to induce (Liu et al., 2012 ; Cowansage et al., 2014 ; Kim et al., 2014 ; Redondo et al., 2014 ) or block (Han et al., 2009 ; Trouche et al., 2016 ) the expression of memory, respectively.

sensesclaim_relationscontent_tagscontent_tagsOne important issue with most of these studies is that they artificially activate neurons in a hyper-synchronous manner, and neglect any fine-timescale temporal information embedded in endogenous spiking patterns. In addition, because the time window for genetic labeling of neuronal networks ranges from several hours to days, the tagged population is likely to include both memory-specific neurons as well as numerous irrelevant neurons that were activated by unrelated events during the relatively long labeling time window. In any case, it remains unclear whether the tagged neurons represent a memory trace or constitute relays toward the relevant ensembles. For example, memory recall could actually result from downstream circuit computations rather than from the experimental activation of the tagged neurons per se . This would potentially restore the temporal patterns obliterated by the synchronous experimental stimulation. transferssensesA parallel can be made with fRMI studies showing robust and consistent activation patterns in response to similar stimuli, despite the low temporal and spatial resolution of the technique (Guest and Love, 2017 ). Thus, while certain types of computation can still be detected or elicited even without having access to the fine time scale of neuronal computation, it is uncertain that they reflect actual brain computation during learning and memory. Further experimental and computational work will undoubtedly shed light on the complex issue of the temporality of circuit computations underlying memory.

4. Hippocampal Sequences During Exploration: Distinct and Complementary Functions

4.1. Awake Replay During Sharp-Wave Ripples

Theta sequences are not the sole pattern of sequential activity in the awake hippocampus. While offline replay of neuronal sequences was first documented during sharp-wave ripples (SPW-Rs) of slow wave sleep (Pavlides and Winson, 1989 ; Wilson and McNaughton, 1994 ; Lee and Wilson, 2002 ), replay also occurs during SPW-Rs of quiet awake states, such as when the animal pauses in an environment ( Figure 7 ; Buzsáki, 1989 ; Foster and Wilson, 2006 ; Jackson et al., 2006 ; O'Neill et al., 2006 ; Csicsvari et al., 2007 ; Diba and Buzsáki, 2007 ; Dupret et al., 2010 ). Foster and Wilson ( 2006 ) recorded CA1 pyramidal cell activity while rats ran back and forth between reward sites, and showed that compared to the location of their firing fields on the track, place cells tended to reactivate in reverse order during awake replay, contrary to replay during slow wave sleep (although more recent studies have since documented overlooked reverse replay during sleep as well; see e.g., Wikenheiser and Redish, 2013 ; Silva et al., 2015 ; Grosmark and Buzsáki, 2016 ; Ólafsdóttir et al., 2016 ; O'Neill et al., 2017 ; Drieu et al., 2018 ). Replay events were more readily observable on a new track, where they occurred even after the very first lap (Foster and Wilson, 2006 ). In addition, Diba and Buzsáki ( 2007 ) reported that replay tended to occur in the reverse order upon arrival at the reward site, but in the forward order (“preplay”) when rats then faced the track in anticipation of the next run ( Figure 7 ). concepts↗Interestingly, the authors documented a strong correlation between the temporal offsets of neuron pairs during forward events (preplay) and during theta oscillations when the animals were running between reward sites. In contrast, theta sequences and reverse replay events were less strongly correlated, suggesting a selective link between offline preplay and neural activity during run. sensesconcept_edgesThe balance between replay and preplay may also depend on task contingencies, as Ólafsdóttir et al. ( 2017 ) found a greater proportion of forward replay immediately (< 5 s) before and after movement or during short stops (< 10 s), but no directional bias during longer periods of immobility (although one cannot exclude that the apparent inconsistency with the results of Diba and Buzsáki ( 2007 ) may stem from the limited number of replay events examined in the Ólafsdóttir et al. ( 2017 ) study).

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

Awake replay. Place cell sequences experienced during behavior are generated in both the forward and reverse direction during awake SPW-Rs (Diba and Buzsáki, 2007 ). Spike trains of place cells on the track are shown before, during and after a single traversal. Sequences that occur during track running are reactivated during SPW-Rs both before and after the run, when the rat remains immobile. Forward preplay (Left) tends to occur as the animal is getting ready to run on the track, while reverse replay (Right) tends to occur shortly after run. concepts↗Black traces, CA1 local field potential.

Foster and Wilson ( 2006 ) hypothesized that reverse replay could be associated with a slowly decaying dopamine signal, effectively storing a value gradient path that the animal could follow during subsequent goal-finding behavior. Conversely, forward preplay has been hypothesized to be involved in goal-directed planning (Diba and Buzsáki, 2007 ). Accordingly, awake replay can be influenced by reward locations (Foster and Wilson, 2006 ; Singer and Frank, 2009 ; Ambrose et al., 2016 ), contributes to mapping novel environments (O'Neill et al., 2006 ; Cheng and Frank, 2008 ; Roux et al., 2017 ), helps establishing goal-related cell assemblies (Dupret et al., 2010 ; Csicsvari and Dupret, 2014 ), supports decision making (evaluation of choices, prospection and planning) (Pfeiffer and Foster, 2013 ; Singer et al., 2013 ; Yu and Frank, 2015 ), and plays a role in fear (Wu et al., 2017 ) and episodic-like (Takahashi, 2015 ) memory retrieval. In addition, awake replay can span multiple SPW-R events to represent extended trajectories (Davidson et al., 2009 ) and link familiar paths into novel trajectories never experienced before (Gupta et al., 2010 ). Finally, selective suppression of awake SPW-Rs during a spatial alternation task fails to impair memory consolidation, and instead appears to alter working memory and decision making (Jadhav et al., 2012 ). In summary, awake replay has been proposed to mediate both spatial and non-spatial functions (see O'Neill et al., 2010 ; Buhry et al., 2011 ; Carr et al., 2011 ; and for a recent review Roumis and Frank, 2015 ).

Because both forward and reverse replay have a tendency to start at the current location of the animal, awake replay has been proposed to be biased by a residual, place-selective spatial tuning drive (Foster and Wilson, 2006 ; Csicsvari et al., 2007 ; Diba and Buzsáki, 2007 ). However, awake replay can also be modulated by non-local cues such as rewards (Pfeiffer and Foster, 2013 ; Singer et al., 2013 ) and contextual memories (Takahashi, 2015 ; Wu et al., 2017 ), or even be initiated at remote locations (Davidson et al., 2009 ; Karlsson and Frank, 2009 ; Gupta et al., 2010 ). This is at odds with the seminal model which posits that replay (in particular, reverse replay) can be accounted for by decreasing excitability over time (Buzsáki, 1989 ; Foster and Wilson, 2006 ). Instead, it has been proposed that awake replay could emerge from auto-associative properties of the CA3 network, in which the activation of a single cell can initiate the reactivation of an entire trajectory sequence due to recurrent connectivity established or reinforced during theta-state exploration (Lee and Wilson, 2002 ; O'Neill et al., 2008 ; Dupret et al., 2010 ; Silva et al., 2015 ), similar to the classical model of sleep replay. In turn however, this model cannot account for the (weak) link between the time spent exploring different areas of the environment and the propensity of replay to represent the corresponding trajectories (Gupta et al., 2010 ; but see O'Neill et al., 2008 ), the construction of never-experienced sequences (Gupta et al., 2010 ), nor the differential balance of forward and backward replay across behavioral states (Wikenheiser and Redish, 2013 ). It is therefore likely that replay results from a combination of these mutually non-exclusive mechanisms. Hence, Atherton et al. ( 2015 ) have suggested that the lingering excitability model largely dictates local replaying sequences during awake behavior, while the synaptic plasticity model contributes to subsequent nonlocal awake replay (and sleep replay). Finally, neuromodulatory activity may also exert an important role (Atherton et al., 2015 ): dopamine release during novel maze exploration and reward-driven spatial tasks may promote the strengthening of new place cell assemblies and place-reward associations (Benchenane et al., 2010 ; Dupret et al., 2010 ; McNamara et al., 2014 ; de Lavilléon et al., 2015 ; Ambrose et al., 2016 ; Takahashi et al., 2016 ; Takeuchi et al., 2016 ), while cholinergic tone may influence the direction of replay in different behavioral states (Marrosu et al., 1995 ; Csicsvari et al., 2007 ; Wikenheiser and Redish, 2013 ; Saravanan et al., 2015 ).

4.2. Functional Dissociation Between Theta Sequences and Awake Replay?

The above discussion suggests a functional dissociation between theta sequences and awake replay, where theta sequences would store initial memory traces about ongoing experiences as well as recall previously formed memories and enhance them to include goal-directed information, while awake replay would play an instrumental role in learning goal locations and planning upcoming trajectories. concepts↗Complementing these mechanisms, sleep replay would sustain memory consolidation. contributionalternativesAs it turns out, a closer examination of the available data suggests a more complex picture. Below, we point out some of the current inconsistencies and overlooked findings.

4.2.1. Memory Maintenance and Retrieval

Wang et al. ( 2016 ) inactivated the medial septum in rats trained on a delayed spatial alternation task. They found that theta sequences were disrupted and performance was impaired. Surprisingly, awake replay was preserved. The authors concluded that theta sequences on the maze (and in the running wheel during delays), but not awake replay, are required to recall episodic memories even in well-trained animals. Alternatively, awake replay would be required only for initial learning of a task but not once the environment and the task have become familiar. This would be consistent with the finding that suppression of awake SPW-Rs during the first 8 days of learning impairs working memory in a spatial alternation task (Jadhav et al., 2012 ). Yet another possible explanation for the apparently predominant role of theta sequences over awake replay may be that the rats spent the delay period running in the wheel, which may have favored neuronal events occurring in the theta state. In any case, these results still argue that theta sequences and awake replay do not play equivalent, interchangeable roles.

Wu et al. ( 2017 ) trained animals in a foot-shock avoidance task and reported that avoidance of the shock zone was concomitant with awake replay, but not theta sequences, of paths leading from current position to the foot-shock zone. This further supports distinct functional roles for theta sequences and awake replay in long-term contextual memory retrieval.

4.2.2. Planning and Decision-Making

content_tagsAnother notable difference between theta sequences and awake replay is that theta sequences seem to be restricted to short distances always encompassing current location, occasionally extending to further locations (Johnson et al., 2007 ; Wikenheiser and Redish, 2015b ), whereas awake replay can span much longer distances (up to ≥10 m; Davidson et al., 2009 ) and be decoupled from current experience (Karlsson and Frank, 2009 ; Gupta et al., 2010 ). Therefore, while theta sequences may be relevant for spatial memory, in particular to allow trajectory encoding and retrieval (Hasselmo and Eichenbaum, 2005 ; Dragoi and Buzsáki, 2006 ; Foster and Wilson, 2007 ; Robbe and Buzsáki, 2009 ; Wang et al., 2015 ; Drieu et al., 2018 ), awake replay may be necessary to associate paths and events disconnected in time and space, allowing flexibility and adaptive behaviors (Gupta et al., 2010 ).

During deliberative behavior at a choice point (Muenzinger and Gentry, 1931 ; Redish, 2016 ), theta sequences reflect possible paths (Johnson et al., 2007 ). Papale et al. ( 2016 ) reported that the occurrence rate of VTE at the choice point was inversely correlated to that of SPW-Rs at the reward sites on the same lap. Further, the SPW-R rate on a given lap inversely correlated with the likelihood of subsequent VTE events. Finally, interruption of SPW-Rs during learning led to an increased prevalence of VTE. This suggests that SPW-Rs are involved in ongoing consolidation, while VTE sequences participate in a decision-making process. On the other hand, SPW-Rs are also known to occur at decision points during learning (Jadhav et al., 2012 ), which could reflect an implication in decision-making processes, blurring the proposed functional distinction between theta sequences and awake replay. Disentangling these matters is further hindered by the fact that ripple disruption in Jadhav et al. ( 2012 ) was not triggered with spatial specificity: ripples were disrupted irrespective of the location of the rat. Therefore, the specific functional contribution of ripples occurring at decision points remains to be elucidated.

4.2.3. Learning and Consolidation

Both theta and SPW-Rs are propitious to synaptic potentiation between sequentially activated cell assemblies (Skaggs et al., 1996 ; Magee and Johnston, 1997 ; Markram et al., 1997 ; Dragoi et al., 2003 ; Wójtowicz and Mozrzymas, 2015 ; Sadowski et al., 2016 ; Cobar et al., 2017 ; Drieu et al., 2018 ). Therefore, in principle neuronal sequences in both states could lead to learning and reinforcement of sequential activity.

In the machine learning literature, reverse replay has been repeatedly reported to enhance reinforcement learning, in particular temporal difference learning (Cazé et al., 2018 ; Mattar and Daw, 2018 ). Interestingly, awake replay during brief pauses in exploration and at reward sites largely occur in reverse order (O'Neill et al., 2008 ; Wikenheiser and Redish, 2013 ), identifying a potential mechanisms to support learning of trajectories and goal locations (Singer et al., 2013 ). In addition, working memory deficits have been observed following suppression of SPW-Rs that occurred mainly at reward locations (Jadhav et al., 2012 ). Theta sequences on the other hand mainly reflect currently experienced trajectories in the forward order. sensesconcept_edgescontent_tagsYet, a small fraction of theta cycles do contain significant reverse theta sequences (Gupta et al., 2012 ; Zheng et al., 2016 ; our own unpublished observations). The function of reverse theta sequences remains unclear. sensesclaim_relationscontent_tagscontent_tags↗Similarly, although this has been overlooked in initial descriptions of sleep replay, recent studies have reported abundant reverse replay during sleep as well (Wikenheiser and Redish, 2013 ; Silva et al., 2015 ; Grosmark and Buzsáki, 2016 ; Ólafsdóttir et al., 2016 ; O'Neill et al., 2017 ; Drieu et al., 2018 ). content_tagsAgain, these considerations dim the usual theoretical distinction between (forward) theta sequences for memory encoding, (reverse) awake replay for goal learning, and (forward) sleep replay for memory consolidation.

An additional complexity is that SPW-R incidence and replay strength and accuracy vary according to the length, shape and complexity of the maze, as well as the cognitive demand of the task (Jackson et al., 2006 ; Dupret et al., 2010 ; Pfeiffer and Foster, 2013 ; Singer et al., 2013 ). Increases in both SPW-R occurrence rate and replay strength can even be observed in familiar environments (Jackson et al., 2006 ; Dupret et al., 2010 ; Pfeiffer and Foster, 2013 ; Singer et al., 2013 ), perhaps because awake replay helps stabilize hippocampal place fields when new configurations are learned within a familiar map (Roux et al., 2017 ).

5. Conclusion

Sequences of hippocampal cell assemblies formed during individual theta cycles represent the time-compressed ongoing trajectory of the animal. These theta sequences are thought to emerge from ensembles of phase precessing cells, although it is currently unclear whether this requires additional coordination between participating neurons. content_tagsNumerous computational models have proposed cellular and network mechanisms to account for theta sequences, but the precise neurophysiological mechanisms of phase precession remain elusive. unhoused_relationssensesconcept_edgescontent_tagscontent_tagsWhile initial reports emphasized the presence of sequential activity during single theta cycles, recent studies have increasingly recognized that a notable fraction of theta cycles contain non-canonical activity, including seemingly random noise and even reverse sequences.

mechanisms↗Theta sequences chunk information into time windows conducive to classical synaptic plasticity mechanisms, and appear to support the initial storage of memory traces. Within familiar environments, theta sequences allow the maintenance (and possibly the update) of planned trajectories in working memory. During VTE, extended neuronal sweeps may support deliberative processes. Awake replay could also support trajectory planning, on-line consolidation and reconsolidation, as well as on-line retrieval of long-term memory. limitationscontent_tagsThus, it remains currently unclear which specific functions are sustained by theta sequences, awake replay, or both.

Finally, a growing number of studies have provided evidence that hippocampal activity can also convey non-spatial information, including about objects, odors, sound sequences, time, goals, fear, etc. (e.g., Wood et al., 1999 ; Moita et al., 2003 ; Macdonald et al., 2011 ; Aronov et al., 2017 ). This suggests a general mechanism for encoding continuous, task-relevant variables. Recent findings indicate that phase precession may also represent a potential code for non-spatial features (Terada et al., 2017 ). Future work will be required to determine how non-spatial information is integrated at the fine timescale during hippocampal computation.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Glossary

sensesconcept_edgescontent_tags↗content_tags↗Cell assembly. Group of neurons that transiently co-activate during a certain function or mental process. Place cells with highly similar fields can fire within a brief window of time (common theta phase, often grouped within a gamma cycle) and form a cell assembly. concepts↗Reciprocal connectivity between group members may or may not be implied (e.g., cell assemblies in CA3 vs. CA1).

sensesalternativescontent_tags↗content_tags↗content_tagsTheta sequence. Sequential activation of hippocampal cell assemblies paced by the ongoing theta rhythm (~8 Hz) and representing the ongoing trajectory at a highly accelerated rate. For instance, when a rat successively traverses place fields A, B, and C (which lasts on the order of a second), in the overlapping region, ongoing theta cycles contain spikes A, B, and C in the same order (within only ~150 ms). Theta sequences typically span one theta cycle, but longer sequences have also been described.

sensescontent_tags↗content_tags↗Replay. Reinstatement during offline states of the sequential activity observed during behavior. concepts↗Replay is associated with sharp wave ripple complexes and can occur both in the forward or backward direction.

sensescontent_tags↗content_tags↗Theta phase precession. The time at which a cell fires relative to the ongoing theta cycle (“phase”) decreases as the animal moves through space. Thus, the cell initially fires at the end of a theta cycle, then slightly before the end of the next cycle, until it eventually fires its last spikes near the beginning of the ongoing theta cycle. This phenomenon is called “phase precession.” Initially described in place cells, phase precession has also been reported in other hippocampal cells, including interneurons, “episode,” and sound-responsive cells (in which case the movement is considered in a more abstract space), as well as in other brain structures such as the medial prefrontal cortex or the ventral striatum.

content_tags↗Nested oscillations. Intermingled oscillations of different frequencies, especially when the phase of the slower oscillation modulates the amplitude of the faster oscillation. For instance, slow, medium and fast gamma bursts tend to occur at different phases of theta (phase-amplitude modulation).

sensescontent_tags↗Nested sequences. concepts↗As a rat explores an environment, place cell assemblies activate in sequence and thus form “behavioral” (slow time scale) sequences representing the ongoing trajectory in real time. Simultaneously, the same assemblies form theta (fast time scale) sequences that describe the same trajectory, nested within the behavioral sequences.

1 sensesIncidentally, in its “uncorrected” version, this model predicted that place cells should fire in regular spatial patterns long before the discovery of grid cells (see e.g., Lengyel et al. ( 2003 ) for an influential model which eliminates repeated fields).

Funding . This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE16-0001-02) and Collège de France (CD).

Every tag on this page

alternatives 3 · claim_relations 9 · claim_type 1 · concept_edges 15 · concepts 19 · content_tags 50 · contribution 1 · controls 4 · limitations 8 · mechanisms 6 · method 1 · object_of_study 1 · phenomenon 1 · research_question 1 · senses 25 · transfers 4 · unhoused_relations 1

Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 15 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.

facettagfieldconf.whose words
object_of_studypossible mechanisms and functions of hippocampal theta sequences during explorationobject_of_studythe paper's words
research_questionwhether phase precession is a cause or a consequence of the formation of theta sequencesresearch_questionthe paper's words
contributiona closer examination of the available data suggests a more complex picture, and the review points out the current inconsistencies and overlooked findingscontributionthe paper's words
claim_typemechanismclaim_typethe paper's words
phenomenonhippocampal theta sequencesphenomenonthe paper's words
methodreview
also in: review
methodthe paper's words
mechanismsmechanismsmechanisms[0]the tagger's words
mechanismsmechanismsmechanisms[1]the tagger's words
mechanismsthe detuned oscillators model - a place cell oscillates slightly faster than theta, the two shift apart from a common start, and because the cell fires at the peaks of its own membrane potential oscillation this occurs earlier and earlier relative to thetamechanisms[2]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismssomato-dendritic interference - the timing of action potentials is set by oscillatory somatic inhibition combined with ramp-like dendritic excitation, so the cell fires when excitation overcomes inhibition, earlier and earlier because the ramp risesmechanisms[3]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismsnetwork connectivity - phase precession results from transmission delays between asymmetrically connected cells, with the delays shortening as the animal progresses through the fieldmechanisms[4]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismsand the theta-gamma code, in which the number of nested gamma cycles per theta cycle sets how many items can be represented, related to the seven plus or minus two items humans can hold in short term memorymechanisms[5]0.9the tagger's words
limitationsThe review cannot resolve which functions belong to theta sequences, to awake replay, or to both.
what this limits: any functional attribution in the review: IT REMAINS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR WHICH SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS ARE SUSTAINED BY THETA SEQUENCES, AWAKE REPLAY, OR BOTH
limitations[0]the tagger's words
limitationsIn the authors' own key experiment the functional role of theta sequences was inferred from network patterns rather than measured behaviorally.
what this limits: the authors' own key result: THE FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF THETA SEQUENCES WAS NOT ASSESSED FROM BEHAVIOR (TASK PERFORMANCE), BUT FROM THE OCCURRENCE OF DYNAMIC NETWORK PATTERNS WITH A WELL-DOCUMENTED FUNCTION
limitations[1]the tagger's words
limitationsno model appears to fully account for all aspects of phase precession
what this limits: the mechanism of phase precession: NO MODEL APPEARS TO FULLY ACCOUNT FOR ALL ASPECTS OF PHASE PRECESSION
limitations[2]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsand it becomes unclear whether intracellular data do discriminate between different classes of models of phase precession, because the same recordings support two of them and a third can account for the same findings
what this limits: discriminating between different classes of models of phase precession
limitations[3]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsonly three studies have reported task performance deficits linked to a degradation of theta sequences, because interfering with theta sequences is challenging
what this limits: the causal evidence base: ONLY THREE STUDIES have reported performance deficits linked to degraded theta sequences, because INTERFERING WITH THETA SEQUENCES IS CHALLENGING
limitations[4]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsand an alternative possibility is that these performance deficits resulted from impairments in planning and decision making rather than from deterioration of learning and memory processes
what this limits: the same scope as limitations[4], with the competing reading: THE PERFORMANCE DEFICITS RESULTED FROM IMPAIRMENTS IN PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING ... RATHER THAN FROM DETERIORATION OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
limitations[5]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsnetwork connectivity models are difficult to reconcile with the finding that the relation between phase and allocentric position changes during backward movement, and that this change occurs abruptly
what this limits: the network-connectivity models: they ARE DIFFICULT TO RECONCILE WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL FINDING THAT THE RELATION BETWEEN PHASE AND ALLOCENTRIC SPATIAL POSITION CHANGES DURING BACKWARD MOVEMENT
limitations[6]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsthe model requires neurons with cosine directional tuning, and although similar cells were documented in entorhinal cortex the finding remains controversial
what this limits: the oscillatory-interference model: THE MODEL REQUIRES NEURONS WITH COSINE DIRECTIONAL TUNING ... ALTHOUGH THE FINDING REMAINS CONTROVERSIAL
limitations[7]1.0the tagger's words
transfersthe magic number of seven plus or minus two items, related to the number of nested gamma cycles a theta cycle can holdtransfers[0]1.0the tagger's words
transfersthe argument that robust activation patterns can be detected without access to the fine time scale of neuronal computation, carried over to tagged-ensemble experimentstransfers[1]1.0the tagger's words
transferstwo oscillators of slightly different frequency drifting apart from a common start, used as the original model of phase precessiontransfers[2]1.0the tagger's words
transferstransmission delays through an asymmetrically connected chain, used to produce phase precession without any assumption about single-cell oscillationtransfers[3]1.0the tagger's words
controlstime jitter added to experimental spike trains
eliminates: phase precession alone accounting for theta sequences - jitter preserved phase precession but reduced the prevalence of theta sequences, so coordination between cell assemblies is required in addition · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held
controls[0]1.0the tagger's words
controlstravel direction and running speed taken into account before asking whether peer cells improve prediction
eliminates: peer information appearing to show direct interaction between cells - with both included, peer information even decreases the average prediction · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): failed
controls[1]1.0the tagger's words
controlsa treadmill switched on or off during passive travel, which impairs phase precession while leaving the spatial layout of place fields intact
eliminates: the loss of theta sequences being a loss of the place representation itself - behavioral timescale sequences were unaffected while theta sequences were almost completely absent · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held
controls[2]1.0the tagger's words
controlsthe functional readout taken from network patterns rather than from task performance
eliminates: the ambiguity that a behavioral impairment could come either from memory deficits or from impairments in planning and decision making · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held
controls[3]1.0the tagger's words
conceptstheta
also in: theta
concepts[0]the paper's words
conceptstheta sequenceconcepts[1]the paper's words
conceptsphase precessionconcepts[2]the paper's words
conceptsreplay
also in: replay
concepts[3]the paper's words
conceptspreplay
also in: preplay
concepts[4]the paper's words
conceptscell assembliesconcepts[6]the paper's words
conceptsCA1
also in: CA1
concepts[8]the paper's words
conceptsCA3
also in: CA3
concepts[9]the paper's words
conceptsinterneuron
also in: interneuron
concepts[11]the paper's words
conceptspyramidal
also in: pyramidal
concepts[12]the paper's words
conceptsmemory
also in: memory
concepts[13]the paper's words
conceptsconsolidation
also in: consolidation
concepts[14]the paper's words
conceptspotentiation
also in: potentiation
concepts[16]the paper's words
conceptstrajectory
also in: trajectory
concepts[17]the paper's words
conceptsgamma
also in: gamma
concepts[19]the paper's words
conceptsjitter
also in: jitter
concepts[22]the paper's words
conceptsdecision
also in: decision
concepts[24]the paper's words
conceptsmedial septum
also in: medial septum
concepts[26]the paper's words
conceptsmuscimol
also in: muscimol
concepts[27]the paper's words
unhoused_relationsTheta sequences → synaptic plasticity
ENABLING, NOT CAUSING, AND THE OTHER WAY ROUND: theta sequences chunk information into time windows CONDUCIVE TO classical synaptic plasticity mechanisms. 'causes' overstates 'conducive to', and the retracted edge also had it backwards.
unhoused_relations[0]the tagger's words
sensesTHE PAPER SHIPS ITS OWN GLOSSARY, AND THE FIRST ENTRY LEAVES A PROPERTY UNDETERMINED: a cell assembly is a group of neurons that transiently co-activate, and RECIPROCAL CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN GROUP MEMBERS MAY OR MAY NOT BE IMPLIEDsenses[0]1.0the tagger's words
senseswith the central term defined by an example and a number: a theta sequence is the sequential activation of cell assemblies paced by the ongoing theta rhythm, representing the ongoing trajectory AT A HIGHLY ACCELERATED RATE - a second of running compressed into about 150 mssenses[1]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand the definition of replay carries the fact that later spoiled the tidy story - replay CAN OCCUR BOTH IN THE FORWARD OR BACKWARD DIRECTIONsenses[2]1.0the tagger's words
sensesthe definition of phase precession is extended past its original object: initially described in place cells, it has also been reported in interneurons, episode and sound-responsive cells, IN WHICH CASE THE MOVEMENT IS CONSIDERED IN A MORE ABSTRACT SPACEsenses[3]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand nested sequences are defined as the same assemblies doing two things at once - behavioral sequences in real time, and theta sequences describing the same trajectory nested within themsenses[4]1.0the tagger's words
sensesA DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO OTHER PAPERS, WITH THE PARAMETER IT TURNS ON, STATED BY A THIRD: the apparent inconsistency with the results of one study MAY STEM FROM THE LIMITED NUMBER OF REPLAY EVENTS EXAMINED in the othersenses[5]1.0the tagger's words
sensesTHE DATA CANNOT SEPARATE THE THEORIES, SAID PLAINLY: the same studies support the interference models and also report the critical prediction of the rival models, and because a third class can account for the same findings IT BECOMES UNCLEAR WHETHER INTRACELLULAR DATA DO DISCRIMINATE between different classes of modelssenses[6]1.0the tagger's words
senseswith the question itself left open: WHETHER PHASE PRECESSION IS A CAUSE OR A CONSEQUENCE of the formation of theta sequences REMAINS UNRESOLVED - and both readings are spelled out, one where precession causes sequences and one where it is their single-cell manifestationsenses[7]1.0the tagger's words
sensesA REINTERPRETATION THAT REMOVES EVIDENCE FROM A HYPOTHESIS WITHOUT NEW DATA: the independent coding model IS SUFFICIENT TO REPLICATE THE DATA PREVIOUSLY INTERPRETED AS EVIDENCE FOR THE COORDINATED ASSEMBLY HYPOTHESISsenses[8]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand the reversal is quantitative, not rhetorical - once travel direction and running speed are taken into account, PEER INFORMATION EVEN DECREASES THE AVERAGE PREDICTIONsenses[9]1.0the tagger's words
sensesONE FINDING UNDERMINING A WHOLE FRAMEWORK: a novel form of synaptic potentiation at the behavioral timescale could store entire sequences of events seconds before and after, which EFFECTIVELY UNDERMINES THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK that theta sequences are REQUIRED to bring spike trains into temporal proximitysenses[10]1.0the tagger's words
sensesTHREE CAUSAL STUDIES, THREE CONFOUNDS SUPPLIED BY THE REVIEWERS RATHER THAN BY THE ORIGINAL AUTHORS. First: the drug that impaired the task also DECREASES RIPPLE POWER, so the deficit could come from altered activity during awake ripples insteadsenses[11]1.0the tagger's words
sensessecond: one cannot entirely rule out that the deficits were DIRECTLY DUE TO DISRUPTION OF THETA OSCILLATIONS, given an 80% decrease in theta powersenses[12]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand third, a measurement caveat that undercuts the measurement itself - measures of theta cycles AND THEREFORE THETA SEQUENCES MAY NOT BE AS RELIABLE WHEN THETA AMPLITUDE VANISHES following the injection that produced the effectsenses[13]1.0the tagger's words
senseswith the size of the evidence base stated: ONLY THREE STUDIES have reported task performance deficits linked to a degradation of theta sequences, because interfering with theta sequences is challengingsenses[14]1.0the tagger's words
sensesA CLAIM WITH NO CITABLE SOURCE, INSIDE A PEER-REVIEWED REVIEW: a small fraction of theta cycles do contain significant reverse theta sequences, cited to two papers AND OUR OWN UNPUBLISHED OBSERVATIONS - and the next sentence says the function of reverse theta sequences REMAINS UNCLEARsenses[15]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand a fact reported as having been missed rather than absent: ALTHOUGH THIS HAS BEEN OVERLOOKED in initial descriptions of sleep replay, recent studies have reported ABUNDANT REVERSE REPLAY during sleep as well - which DIMS THE USUAL THEORETICAL DISTINCTION between forward theta sequences for encoding, reverse awake replay for goal learning and forward sleep replay for consolidationsenses[16]1.0the tagger's words
sensesA WHOLE TECHNIQUE CRITICISED ON TIMING GROUNDS: tagging studies ARTIFICIALLY ACTIVATE NEURONS IN A HYPER-SYNCHRONOUS MANNER and NEGLECT ANY FINE-TIMESCALE TEMPORAL INFORMATION, and because the labeling window RANGES FROM SEVERAL HOURS TO DAYS the tagged population is likely to include numerous irrelevant neuronssenses[17]1.0the tagger's words
senseswith the same argument extended by analogy - robust activation patterns can be detected WITHOUT HAVING ACCESS TO THE FINE TIME SCALE of neuronal computation, and it is UNCERTAIN THAT THEY REFLECT ACTUAL BRAIN COMPUTATION during learning and memorysenses[18]1.0the tagger's words
sensesA NUMBER THAT LOOKS LIKE 360 DEGREES ONLY BECAUSE OF POOLING: the range may APPEAR TO SPAN AS MUCH AS 360 degrees WHEN POOLING DATA OVER MULTIPLE FIELD CROSSINGS, while single-trial phase range is typically about 180 and NEVER EXCEEDS A FULL CYCLEsenses[19]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand what the phase codes for is revised by one experiment - the reversal during backward travel INDICATES THAT PHASE DOES NOT CODE FOR THE ALLOCENTRIC POSITION of the animal, BUT MORE LIKELY FOR THE DISTANCE TRAVELED through the fieldsenses[20]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand then past space altogether: phase precession MAY NOT BE UNIQUELY LINKED TO SPACE, but rather to the full episodic component of the ongoing experiencesenses[21]1.0the tagger's words
sensesAN EXPECTED TEST THAT WAS NEVER RUN, NAMED AS SUCH: a similar dissociation would be expected in an earlier study - UNFORTUNATELY, THIS WAS NOT INVESTIGATEDsenses[22]1.0the tagger's words
sensesand a prediction credited in a footnote, retrospectively: in its UNCORRECTED version, this model PREDICTED THAT PLACE CELLS SHOULD FIRE IN REGULAR SPATIAL PATTERNS LONG BEFORE THE DISCOVERY OF GRID CELLSsenses[23]1.0the tagger's words
sensesTHE CONCLUSION KEEPS THE QUESTION OPEN: a notable fraction of theta cycles CONTAIN NON-CANONICAL ACTIVITY, INCLUDING SEEMINGLY RANDOM NOISE AND EVEN REVERSE SEQUENCES, and IT REMAINS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR WHICH SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS ARE SUSTAINED BY THETA SEQUENCES, AWAKE REPLAY, OR BOTHsenses[24]1.0the tagger's words
alternativesclaim_type: critique
a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.
alternatives.claim_typethe tagger's words
alternativesmethod: review of computational models against experimental data, with each model's predictions weighed against the findings that are difficult to reconcile with it
a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: review — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.
alternatives.methodthe tagger's words
alternativesphenomenon: sequential activation of hippocampal cell assemblies paced by the ongoing theta rhythm, representing the ongoing trajectory at a highly accelerated rate
a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: hippocampal theta sequences — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.
alternatives.phenomenonthe tagger's words
claim_relationsbuilds-on → Drieu et al., 2018 (the authors' own treadmill/passive-travel study)claim_relations[0]the tagger's words
claim_relationsbuilds-on → Cei et al., 2014claim_relations[1]the tagger's words
claim_relationscritiques → the usual theoretical distinction between forward theta sequences for encoding, reverse awake replay for goal learning and forward sleep replay for consolidation
differs in: reverse replay during sleep, overlooked in the initial descriptions and reported abundantly since
claim_relations[2]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationscritiques → studies that tag and manipulate neuronal ensembles, which activate neurons hyper-synchronously and neglect fine-timescale temporal information
differs in: THE AXIS IS THE TEMPORAL STRUCTURE OF THE ARTIFICIAL ACTIVATION. 'One important issue with most of these studies is that they artificially activate neurons in a hyper-synchronous manner, and neglect any fine-timescale temporal information embedded in endogenous spiking patterns.' The reactivation literature is granted that it drives the right cells and denied that it drives them the right way - so a positive result there is evidence about the cells and not about the code.
claim_relations[3]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationscontradicts → the coordinated assembly hypothesis, whose supporting data the independent coding model turned out to replicate
differs in: travel direction and running speed, taken into account before asking whether peer cells improve prediction
claim_relations[4]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationscontradicts → the framework in which theta sequences are required to bring spikes into windows conducive to synaptic potentiationclaim_relations[5]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationssupports → a causal role for theta sequences in establishing initial memory traces that are later reinstated during sleepclaim_relations[6]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationsqualifies → the three studies reporting performance deficits, each of which the review supplies with a confound its own authors did notclaim_relations[7]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationspredicts → that phase precession is a code for non-spatial features as well, and that future work must determine how non-spatial information is integrated at the fine timescaleclaim_relations[8]0.8the tagger's words
concept_edgesRETRACTED (DIRECTION REVERSED) · place cell —part-of→ cell assemblies
RETRACTED: DIRECTION REVERSED. The edge says cell assemblies are part of a place cell. The span says the opposite: a cell assembly is a 'Group of neurons', and 'Place cells ... form a cell assembly'. The place cell is the member. — strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the definition leaves a property undetermined - RECIPROCAL CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN GROUP MEMBERS MAY OR MAY NOT BE IMPLIED
concept_edges[1]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesphase precession —causes→ theta sequence
strength of the relation: 1 · note: WHETHER PHASE PRECESSION IS A CAUSE OR A CONSEQUENCE of the formation of theta sequences REMAINS UNRESOLVED - the review states both readings and settles neither Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says it REMAINS UNRESOLVED whether phase precession causes theta sequences or results from them, and states the causal reading as one of the two views - kept as a hedged relation, not an established one.
concept_edges[5]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesoscillation —causes→ phase precession
strength of the relation: 1 · note: the detuned oscillators model - the cell oscillates slightly faster than theta, so its firing occurs earlier and earlier relative to the slower rhythm
concept_edges[7]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesplace cell —causes→ phase precession
status: ATTRIBUTED TO A NAMED CLASS OF MODELS, NOT MEASURED: 'IN THE NETWORK CONNECTIVITY MODELS, contrary to the above cellular models in which no particular synaptic connectivity is assumed, PHASE PRECESSION RESULTS FROM transmission delays between asymmetrically connected cells (Jensen and Lisman, 1996; Skag[gs...])'. The mechanism is what one family of models proposes, and the sentence's own opening clause contrasts it with another family that assumes otherwise - so the relation holds inside a modelling framework this review is comparing, not in a measurement. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: network connectivity models - phase precession from transmission delays between asymmetrically connected cells, with no single-cell oscillation assumed Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but network MODELS derive phase precession from place-cell connectivity; causes states a model as a finding.
concept_edges[8]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesjitter —causes→ theta sequence
status: CITED, AND CITED AGAINST A HYPOTHESIS: several studies are reported as CHALLENGING the idea that phase precession accounts for theta sequences · direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 1 · note: a moderate addition of time jitter PRESERVED phase precession but REDUCED THE PREVALENCE of theta sequences - which is why coordination was thought to be required in addition
concept_edges[9]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesjitter —contrasted-with→ phase precession
strength of the relation: 1 · note: DOUBTFUL, found by an audit that read the edge against its span: weak contrast. The edge is kept live; a reader should weigh it with this in mind. Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but added jitter PRESERVED phase precession but reduced theta sequences; contrasted-with is loose.
concept_edges[10]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgespotentiation —causes→ memory
strength of the relation: 1 Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the potentiation mechanism is PROPOSED; causes states a proposal as a finding.
also in: potentiation · memory
concept_edges[14]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgestheta sequence —causes→ memory
strength of the relation: 1 · about this quote: DOUBTFUL, found by an audit that read the edge against its span: span is a protocol description - undecidable. The edge is kept live; a reader should weigh it with this in mind. · note: the treadmill protocol - impaired phase precession left behavioral timescale sequences intact, and only after active travel did the network REPLAY trajectories, so theta sequences PLAY A CAUSAL ROLE IN ESTABLISHING INITIAL MEMORY TRACES
concept_edges[15]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesreplay —causes→ consolidation
strength of the relation: 1 · note: DOUBTFUL, found by an audit that read the edge against its span: theta-sequence traces 'reinstated during sleep for memory consolidation' - replay -> consolidation implied, not stated. The edge is kept live; a reader should weigh it with this in mind.
also in: replay · consolidation
concept_edges[16]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesmedial septum —causes→ theta sequence
strength of the relation: 1 · note: muscimol injection ABOLISHED theta sequences - with the caveat that measures of theta cycles AND THEREFORE THETA SEQUENCES MAY NOT BE AS RELIABLE WHEN THETA AMPLITUDE VANISHES after the same injection Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but septum inactivation ABOLISHED theta sequences; the edge lacks its direction.
concept_edges[17]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesmuscimol —causes→ theta sequence
status: THE AUTHORS QUALIFY THEIR OWN MEASURE IN EXACTLY THIS CONDITION: they note the measures may not be reliable when theta amplitude vanishes after the injection - which is the state the result is read in · direction on the measure: eliminates · strength of the relation: 1 · note: ONE CANNOT ENTIRELY RULE OUT that the deficits were DIRECTLY DUE TO DISRUPTION OF THETA OSCILLATIONS - an 80% decrease in theta power, a figure the paper gives elsewhere and not in the sentence quoted here
concept_edges[18]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesreplay —contrasted-with→ preplay
strength of the relation: 1 · note: A DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO OTHER PAPERS WITH THE PARAMETER IT TURNS ON, STATED BY A THIRD - the apparent inconsistency MAY STEM FROM THE LIMITED NUMBER OF REPLAY EVENTS EXAMINED in the later study Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span discusses the BALANCE between replay and preplay under task contingencies; contrasted-with is loose.
also in: replay · preplay
concept_edges[26]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgestheta sequence —part-of→ theta
strength of the relation: 1 · note: A CLAIM WITH NO CITABLE SOURCE INSIDE A PEER-REVIEWED REVIEW - reverse theta sequences cited to two papers AND OUR OWN UNPUBLISHED OBSERVATIONS, and their function REMAINS UNCLEAR
also in: theta sequence · theta
concept_edges[27]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesEVIDENCE CORRECTED (REPAIRED, AND THE EDGE BELOW IS THE CORRECTED ONE: 'theta sequence --causes--> plasticity') · theta sequence —causes→ plasticity
EVIDENCE CORRECTED: REPAIRED, AND THE EDGE BELOW IS THE CORRECTED ONE: 'theta sequence --causes--> plasticity'. THE DIAGNOSIS THAT FOLLOWS IS KEPT VERBATIM AND DESCRIBES THE EDGE AS IT WAS, NOT AS IT IS. The superseded triple was 'plasticity --causes--> theta sequence'. the project, 2026-08-26 22:01: a reader was being shown a CORRECT edge carrying a retraction notice for a fault that is gone - 'retracted' on a concept edge is a REPAIR RECORD (339 live edges carry one) and is meant to display [COUNT AS OF 2026-08-26; MEASURED 2026-09-16: 286 LIVE, 341 RAW, and 339 matches neither - the figure was preserved as prose and went stale. AND THE SENTENCE IS TRUE OF THESE THREE ROWS, NOT OF THE LAYER: measured the same day, 183 of the 286 live retracted concept edges record that THE EDGE IS WRONG, 100 that the SPAN was re-grounded with the edge always correct, and only these 3 that the edge's own assertion was repaired. Read as a claim about the layer it would move the relabel from 150 rows to 286; it was never that claim], so the note is rewritten as history rather than the flag cleared. Repaired by the project 2026-08-26. ---- the original diagnosis, unchanged, from here down ---- DIRECTION REVERSED, AND THE CUE THAT LET IT THROUGH WAS AN ADVERB ABOUT THE FIELD. The edge asserts 'plasticity --causes--> theta sequence'. Its span says the opposite way round: 'Theta sequences chunk information into time windows conducive to classical synaptic plasticity mechanisms'. Theta sequences create the conditions for plasticity, not the reverse. The only EFFECT cue in the whole span is 'increas', matching 'recent studies have INCREASINGLY recognized' - an adverb about how the literature has changed, carrying no claim about either endpoint. WHAT THE SPAN DOES SAY: an enabling relation in the other direction, housed below rather than re-asserted as 'causes', because 'conducive to' is weaker than causation and no type carries it. — strength of the relation: 1 · about this quote: DOUBTFUL, found by an audit that read the edge against its span: theta sequences chunk information into windows 'conducive to' plasticity - weak. The edge is kept live; a reader should weigh it with this in mind. · note: theta sequences CHUNK INFORMATION INTO TIME WINDOWS CONDUCIVE TO CLASSICAL SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY MECHANISMS, and appear to support the initial storage of memory traces Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but theta sequences create windows CONDUCIVE to plasticity; causes overstates 'conducive'.
concept_edges[30]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesCA1 —contrasted-with→ CA3
strength of the relation: 1 Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span pairs an encoding phase recorded from CA1 with a retrieval phase mediated by CA3; contrasted-with is loose.
also in: CA1 · CA3
concept_edges[31]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsThe review concludes that theta sequences play a causal role in establishing initial memory traces that can later be reinstated during sleep for consolidation.content_tags.findings[0]the tagger's words
content_tagsPhase precession alone does not generate theta sequences; some additional temporal coordination between cells is needed.content_tags.findings[1]the tagger's words
content_tagsIt remains unclear which functions are sustained by theta sequences, by awake replay, or by both.content_tags.findings[2]the tagger's words
content_tagsThese considerations dim the usual distinction between forward theta sequences for encoding, reverse awake replay for goal learning and forward sleep replay for consolidation.content_tags.findings[3]the tagger's words
content_tagsthese studies ARTIFICIALLY ACTIVATE NEURONS IN A HYPER-SYNCHRONOUS MANNER, and NEGLECT ANY FINE-TIMESCALE TEMPORAL INFORMATION embedded in endogenous spiking patternscontent_tags.findings[4]the tagger's words
content_tagsTheta sequences and awake replay differ in spatial reach: theta sequences stay near the animal's current position while replay can cover metres and start remotely.content_tags.findings[5]the tagger's words
content_tagsDespite a large modeling literature, no model settles the neurophysiological origin of phase precession.content_tags.findings[6]the tagger's words
content_tagsA substantial share of theta cycles carries non-canonical content, including noise and reverse-order sequences, which early descriptions overlooked.content_tags.findings[7]the tagger's words
content_tagsWHETHER PHASE PRECESSION IS A CAUSE OR A CONSEQUENCE of the formation of theta sequences REMAINS UNRESOLVEDcontent_tags.findings[8]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsNO MODEL APPEARS TO FULLY ACCOUNT FOR ALL ASPECTS of phase precessioncontent_tags.findings[9]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsIT BECOMES UNCLEAR WHETHER INTRACELLULAR DATA DO DISCRIMINATE between different classes of models of phase precession
WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: studies also reported - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. 'Previous studies reported', 'studies in guinea pig showed', 'recent studies have reported' - somebody else's work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE'S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject ('Sperling (1960) demonstrated') and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on 'Plakke2016' by hand showed four the cue could not see - 'A study examining recognition found', 'studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated', 'A follow up study found' - so the named cue's 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE'S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record's whole layer.
content_tags.findings[10]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsthe independent coding model IS SUFFICIENT TO REPLICATE THE DATA PREVIOUSLY INTERPRETED AS EVIDENCE FOR THE COORDINATED ASSEMBLY HYPOTHESIScontent_tags.findings[11]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsPEER INFORMATION EVEN DECREASES THE AVERAGE PREDICTION, consistent with the independent coding modelcontent_tags.findings[12]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsa novel form of synaptic potentiation at the behavioral timescale EFFECTIVELY UNDERMINES THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK that theta sequences are required to bring spike trains into close temporal proximitycontent_tags.findings[13]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsONLY THREE STUDIES have reported task performance deficits linked to a degradation of theta sequencescontent_tags.findings[14]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsONE POTENTIAL CAVEAT is that the drug administration DECREASES RIPPLE POWER, so the performance deficit could also result from altered place cell activity during awake ripplescontent_tags.findings[15]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsONE CANNOT ENTIRELY RULE OUT that the performance deficits were DIRECTLY DUE TO DISRUPTION OF THETA OSCILLATIONS induced by medial septum inactivationcontent_tags.findings[16]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsmeasures of theta cycles AND THEREFORE THETA SEQUENCES MAY NOT BE AS RELIABLE WHEN THETA AMPLITUDE VANISHES following muscimol injectioncontent_tags.findings[17]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsAN ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITY is that these performance deficits resulted from impairments in PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING rather than from deterioration of learning and memory processescontent_tags.findings[18]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsa small fraction of theta cycles contain significant reverse theta sequences, cited in part to OUR OWN UNPUBLISHED OBSERVATIONS, and their function REMAINS UNCLEARcontent_tags.findings[19]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsABUNDANT REVERSE REPLAY during sleep, OVERLOOKED in initial descriptions, DIMS THE USUAL THEORETICAL DISTINCTION between forward theta sequences, reverse awake replay and forward sleep replay
WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: recent studies have reported - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. 'Previous studies reported', 'studies in guinea pig showed', 'recent studies have reported' - somebody else's work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE'S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject ('Sperling (1960) demonstrated') and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on 'Plakke2016' by hand showed four the cue could not see - 'A study examining recognition found', 'studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated', 'A follow up study found' - so the named cue's 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE'S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record's whole layer.
content_tags.findings[20]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagstagging studies ARTIFICIALLY ACTIVATE NEURONS IN A HYPER-SYNCHRONOUS MANNER and the labeling window RANGES FROM SEVERAL HOURS TO DAYS, so the tagged population likely includes numerous irrelevant neuronscontent_tags.findings[21]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsthe phase range APPEARS TO SPAN AS MUCH AS 360 degrees WHEN POOLING over multiple field crossings, while single-trial range is typically about 180 and NEVER EXCEEDS A FULL CYCLEcontent_tags.findings[22]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsPHASE DOES NOT CODE FOR THE ALLOCENTRIC POSITION of the animal BUT MORE LIKELY FOR THE DISTANCE TRAVELED through the fieldcontent_tags.findings[23]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsUNFORTUNATELY, THIS WAS NOT INVESTIGATED - the dissociation expected in an earlier study was never tested there
WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: recent studies reported - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. 'Previous studies reported', 'studies in guinea pig showed', 'recent studies have reported' - somebody else's work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE'S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject ('Sperling (1960) demonstrated') and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on 'Plakke2016' by hand showed four the cue could not see - 'A study examining recognition found', 'studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated', 'A follow up study found' - so the named cue's 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE'S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record's whole layer.
content_tags.findings[24]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsIT REMAINS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR WHICH SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS ARE SUSTAINED BY THETA SEQUENCES, AWAKE REPLAY, OR BOTHcontent_tags.findings[25]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagscell assembly
also in: cell assembly
content_tags.definitions[0]the tagger's words
content_tagstheta sequencecontent_tags.definitions[1]the tagger's words
content_tagsreplay
also in: replay
content_tags.definitions[2]the tagger's words
content_tagstheta phase precessioncontent_tags.definitions[3]the tagger's words
content_tagsnested oscillationscontent_tags.definitions[4]the tagger's words
content_tagsVTE
also in: VTE
content_tags.definitions[6]the tagger's words
content_tagscell assembliescontent_tags.definitions[7]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagstheta sequencecontent_tags.definitions[8]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsreplay
also in: replay
content_tags.definitions[9]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsphase precessioncontent_tags.definitions[10]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsnested sequencescontent_tags.definitions[11]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags7 ± 2 — the short-term-memory item capacity to which the four-to-eight assemblies per theta cycle have been relatedcontent_tags.quantities[0]the tagger's words
content_tags~180° — typical single-trial range of theta phase over which a place cell precessescontent_tags.quantities[1]the tagger's words
content_tags10–30 ms — duration of the gamma-cycle window within which each non-overlapping cell assembly is activatedcontent_tags.quantities[2]the tagger's words
content_tags~80% — drop in theta power caused by medial septum inactivation, a confound the review raises against that study's interpretationcontent_tags.quantities[3]the tagger's words
content_tags~150 ms — the time a theta sequence takes to represent a trajectory that took about a second to run, given in the glossary entry itselfcontent_tags.quantities[4]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags~180° — the single-trial phase range, against the 360 degrees that appears only when pooling over multiple field crossingscontent_tags.quantities[5]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags7 ± 2 — the short term memory span the four to eight nested gamma cycles per theta cycle are related tocontent_tags.quantities[6]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags~80% — the decrease in theta power after medial septum inactivation, which is why the behavioral deficit cannot be attributed to theta sequences alonecontent_tags.quantities[7]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsthree studies — the entire evidence base linking degraded theta sequences to task performance deficitscontent_tags.quantities[8]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagscompression indexcontent_tags.statistics[0]0.7the tagger's words
content_tagsphase precessioncontent_tags.variables[0]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagstheta sequencecontent_tags.variables[1]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsreplay
WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: recent studies have reported - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. 'Previous studies reported', 'studies in guinea pig showed', 'recent studies have reported' - somebody else's work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE'S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject ('Sperling (1960) demonstrated') and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on 'Plakke2016' by hand showed four the cue could not see - 'A study examining recognition found', 'studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated', 'A follow up study found' - so the named cue's 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE'S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record's whole layer.
also in: replay
content_tags.variables[2]1.0the tagger's words

Interpretive choices

Tags that could not be placed in the text:

What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.

© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824