<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The influence of intention on masked priming: A study with semantic classification of words</title>
        <author>Eckstein</author>
        <author>Perrig</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The influence of intention on masked priming: A study with semantic classification of words</title>
          <date>2007</date>
          <publisher>Cognition</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.005</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Eckstein2007-the-influence-of-intention-on-masked-priming</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Eckstein2007-the-influence-of-intention-on-masked-priming.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">693ada6388e02109c6c7bfd8602b04b52590f5c8</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>masked semantic priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>An intention instantiates a task-set that pre-tunes the automatic perceptual-classification-response chain, so masked primes are run through the same task-defined categorization as targets and interfere at the response stage</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Above-chance prime discrimination arises because forced-choice responding under uncertainty recruits the very same practised automatic classification processes, not because the primes were consciously seen</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The results do not settle whether the priming effects rest on conscious or nonconscious prime perception.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Experiment 4&#x27;s masked-vs-unmasked comparison was underpowered for small differences.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Semantic processing of primes in this paradigm is bounded by what was practised beforehand, limiting claims about semantic depth.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>participants were randomly assigned to the evaluative-decision or the animacy-decision task</label>
        <note>eliminates: that a difference between the two decision tasks is a difference between the people doing them · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>unconscious perception</label>
        <term>unconscious perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>intentional control</label>
        <term>intentional control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>automatic</label>
        <term>automatic</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>masked priming</label>
        <term>masked priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>IT ARGUES IN 2007 WHAT hesselmann2016 OFFERS IN 2016 AS SPECULATION: `Quotation withheld. We challenge this view by arguing that some automatic processes may indeed be under intentional control.` hesselmann2016 closes with `SPECULATIVELY, the category task might have DESENSITIZED perceptual pathways ... the shape task SENSITIZED` them, citing Kiefer 2012. This paper made it the thesis of three experiments nine years earlier, and the 2016 paper does not cite it. Two records, one claim, nine years, no link - the corpus can show that without asserting anyone should have known</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE AWARENESS RESULT CUTS ACROSS Finkbeiner2011 FROM THE OTHER SIDE: `Quotation withheld.` The same primes are above chance under one awareness test and at chance under another. Finkbeiner2011 argues the prime-classification task UNDERESTIMATES awareness because it is harder; this shows the answer depends on WHICH TASK, not only how hard. Every subliminal claim in this corpus rests on a single such test</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND ONE SENTENCE MAKES THE WHOLE FRAMING AWKWARD: `priming was as pronounced when the primes were visible as when they were invisible.` If visibility does not change the effect, awareness was never the variable. Schmidt2010 reaches the same place from a different paradigm - a qualitative dissociation with the stimuli in plain view - and this is the second record today to arrive there. Two papers, two methods, one conclusion the masked-priming literature is organised against</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE MECHANISM IS THE TASK, NOT THE STIMULUS: `Quotation withheld.` Same words, same masks, same subjects - only the instruction changed, and the priming changed with it. That is a manipulation of the observer rather than of the stimulus, which is rare in this corpus and is why the result bears on what `automatic` can mean</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Klinger et al. (2000); Draine &amp; Greenwald, 1998; Greenwald et al., 1995</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Klinger et al. (2000), Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Logan, 1988; Pashler &amp; Baylis, 1991; Singley &amp; Anderson, 1989</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Hommel, 2000; Monsell, 1996; Neumann, 1990</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>automatic —distinct-from→ intentional control</label>
        <term>automatic</term>
        <term>intentional control</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE ENTAILMENT THE PAPER BREAKS, AND IT IS THE CLEANEST THING IN THE RECORD. The field treats &#x27;automatic&#x27; as implying &#x27;not under intentional control&#x27;; Eckstein and Perrig argue &#x27;some automatic…&#x27;. So the two properties come apart, and &#x27;distinct-from&#x27; says exactly that. Weight 0.95: both terms are in the quote and the separation is the article&#x27;s whole contribution.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>signal detection sensitivity index</label>
        <term>signal detection sensitivity index</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>planned contrast</label>
        <term>planned contrast</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>power analysis</label>
        <term>power analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>alpha level</label>
        <term>alpha level</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard deviation</label>
        <term>standard deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>With one and the same word set, masked priming appeared only on the dimension the current task required: valence congruency affected only the valence task and animacy congruency only the animacy task.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A brand-new, never-practised classification (a disjunction/conjunction of the two practised categories) produced larger task-relevant priming than the simple single-dimension tasks did.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Prime discrimination in the direct test was clearly above chance in both groups (accuracy 0.66 and 0.74).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Participants could not discriminate masked word from nonword primes in a lexical decision task.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Unmasking the primes did not cancel priming.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Amount of priming was unrelated to how well an individual could discriminate the primes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The main effect of test half was not significant.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming</label>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>short-lived priming</label>
        <term>short-lived priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming effect</label>
        <term>priming effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>affect priming</label>
        <term>affect priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>combined priming</label>
        <term>combined priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>task-set</label>
        <term>task-set</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>test task</label>
        <term>test task</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>prime masking</label>
        <term>prime masking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accuracy of target classification responses</label>
        <term>accuracy of target classification responses</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>prime discrimination</label>
        <term>prime discrimination</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>stimulus set</label>
        <term>stimulus set</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F(1, 22) = 29.85, p &lt; .001 — the task x type-of-priming interaction in Experiment 1, showing priming was confined to the task-relevant dimension</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F(1, 14) = 20.95, p &lt; .001 — the same interaction in Experiment 3, where the task was switched within subjects every 16 trials</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>da = 0.42 — prime discrimination in Experiment 3, above chance despite the shortened 42 ms prime</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t(7) = 3.51, p = .01 vs t(6) = 1.67, p = .15 — lexical-decision prime discrimination was above zero only for unmasked primes, not for masked ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.91 — post-hoc statistical power to detect a borderline-conscious discrimination effect (da = 0.3) in the masked group</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>482 ms — the deadline within which classification responses had to be produced under the response-window procedure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>56 ms — prime presentation duration in Experiments 1 and 2, between a 156 ms premask and a 14 ms postmask</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>60% — share of inaccurate responses on incongruent trials even when primes were fully visible</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>26 — number of participants recruited for Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.005.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
