<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories</title>
        <author>Eichenbaum</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories</title>
          <date>2014</date>
          <publisher>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/nrn3827</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Eichenbaum2014-time-cells-in-the-hippocampus-a-new-dimensio</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Eichenbaum2014-time-cells-in-the-hippocampus-a-new-dimensio.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">4fe50e96d5765783e01322690f189dd9232f5937</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether hippocampal neurons code elapsed time as a dimension in its own right, and how that coding relates to spatial coding</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>the firing properties of time cells parallel those of place cells point for point, so time is an additional dimension integrated with spatial mapping rather than a separate system</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>hippocampal time cells</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Slowly evolving cortical temporal-context signals select among preconfigured intra-hippocampal firing chains, so that a given chain comes to represent a particular temporally organised memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Cortical areas of the &#x27;where&#x27; stream deliver temporal-context signals to the hippocampus, which then parses that continuous context into discrete time fields</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Repeated sequential activation strengthens connections so each place cell is driven by an earlier-firing cell, producing the backward expansion of place fields</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>temporal information generated in the cerebral cortex and other brain areas may provide signals to time cells, or the phenomenon may arise from firing chains generated locally within the hippocampal circuitry</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>the chaining account is supported by place fields expanding backwards from their centre with repeated runs, as if each cell were driven by an earlier-firing one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>the proposed resolution is a slowly evolving temporal context selecting among preconfigured firing chains, rather than either alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>prefrontal and parietal areas of the where stream turn out to be involved in the perception of time and project strongly to the hippocampus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The origin of hippocampal timing signals - external input versus internally generated firing chains - is left unresolved.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any mechanistic reading of time cells: IT REMAINS A CENTRAL QUESTION WHETHER TEMPORAL INFORMATION ... ORIGINATES FROM ITS INPUTS OR IS GENERATED INTERNALLY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The evidence reviewed is almost entirely restricted to hippocampal area CA1.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the anatomical reach of the whole review: STUDIES OF TIME CELLS HAVE FOCUSED ON HIPPOCAMPAL AREA CA1 BECAUSE THIS AREA SEEMS TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FOR TEMPORAL ORGANIZATION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The temporal/spatial distinction may be superficial if both reduce to association by proximity.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the time/space distinction the review is built on: IT REMAINS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT THE COMMON THREAD IN BOTH DIMENSIONS IS &#x27;ASSOCIATION BY PROXIMITY&#x27; IN SPACE OR TIME</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>whether the temporal signal comes from the inputs, is generated internally, or both, is left as the central open question</label>
        <note>duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - inputs, internal generation, or a combination, all still open</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>one study reports new temporal patterns emerging with learning rather than existing chains being co-opted, against the preconfigured account</label>
        <note>what this limits: the co-opted-chains account specifically: one study Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the human recordings show slowly changing patterns rather than the punctate time-cell activations seen in rodents, so the cross-species claim rests on a phenomenon of different form</label>
        <note>what this limits: the human-to-rodent join: the human patterns MORE CLOSELY RESEMBLE THE GRADUALLY EVOLVING TIME SIGNAL ... THAN THE SEQUENCES OF PUNCTATE TIME-CELL ACTIVATIONS in rodents, and are still read as the same phenomenon</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>studies of time cells have focused on hippocampal area CA1, with some evidence for CA2 but not CA3</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1], with what is known outside CA1: THERE IS SOME EVIDENCE THAT AREA CA2 (BUT NOT CA3) COULD ALSO BE IMPORTANT FOR TEMPORAL PROCESSING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the author&#x27;s closing possibility is that time cells and place cells are both reflections of association by proximity, which would dissolve the distinction the review is built on</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2], with the consequence spelled out: PLACE CELLS AND TIME CELLS ARE SIMPLY REFLECTIONS OF A BASIC FUNCTION OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the cue-and-structure vocabulary carried over term by term: temporal cues answering to spatial cues, temporal structure to spatial structure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>scalar timing, imported as the criterion a neural code must satisfy to count as a code for time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>time cell and place cell are two names for ONE population - the same neurons, distinguished by which dimension the experiment lets you measure, not by which cells they are</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the parallel is term for term, not loose analogy: temporal cues answer to spatial cues, temporal structure to spatial structure, re-timing to re-mapping, time fields to place fields</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the name &#x27;time cell&#x27; is a coinage of one particular study, made on the strength of an analogy to place cells - because they fire at moments as place cells fire at locations - rather than on a mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>scalar coding - later cells firing for longer - is not decoration but the property that adjudicates between the two mechanisms, since uniform-duration chains cannot produce it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>temporal coding in humans means gradually changing population patterns, while in rodents it means punctate successive activations; the review says so while treating both as the same finding</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>judging an interval and remembering temporal organisation are separated, with the hippocampus central only to the second - so &#x27;timing&#x27; names two roles with different anatomy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: existence</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: hippocampal neurons firing at successive specific moments within a temporally structured period, filling it out</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: hippocampal time cells — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the view that the fundamental function of the hippocampus is spatial mapping and navigation (the paper&#x27;s reference 75)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the scalar temporal context model (the paper&#x27;s reference 69)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>contradicts → the view that the fundamental function of the hippocampus is spatial mapping and navigation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → the strict chaining model in which time cells are a single fixed sequence of cell activations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>builds-on → the temporal context model of hippocampal coding, in its scalar variant</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → the original reports of hippocampal temporal coding, criticised as confounded by location and distance travelled</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS A SPATIAL CONFOUND. The original temporal-coding reports &#x27;were initially criticized as being Quotation withheld across time and of distance travelled over time, so that the apparent temporal coding could reflect spatial rathe[r than temporal] coding&#x27;. The finding is not denied - an alternative explanation for it is offered, on one named variable.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>extends → the place-cell account of hippocampal function, by adding a temporal dimension carried by the same cells</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>time cells —same-as→ place cells</label>
        <term>time cells</term>
        <term>place cells</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE STRONGEST SAME-AS IN THE CORPUS: not two populations but one, given two names by two literatures. No lexical join could find this</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>scalar coding —operationalised-as→ time-fields</label>
        <term>scalar coding</term>
        <term>time-fields</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: scalar time is read off the width of the field, not off any clock
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but larger time-fields later in the delay is scalar coding; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>firing chains —contrasted-with→ temporal context</label>
        <term>firing chains</term>
        <term>temporal context</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: CRITERION: uniform-duration chains cannot produce later cells that fire longer, and scalar firing is what the temporal context model predicts</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>temporal context —contrasted-with→ chaining model</label>
        <term>temporal context</term>
        <term>chaining model</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: external source against internal generation - the two candidate origins the review is organised around</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>temporal context —causes→ firing chains</label>
        <term>temporal context</term>
        <term>firing chains</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: the proposed resolution: context SELECTS among chains rather than either mechanism acting alone. A proposal, hedged as &#x27;perhaps the most likely&#x27; - weighted accordingly
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but &#x27;perhaps the most likely&#x27; mechanism involves temporal context selecting firing chains; causes is hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>elapsed time —distinct-from→ distance travelled</label>
        <term>elapsed time</term>
        <term>distance travelled</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: DECOUPLED BY DESIGN: treadmill speed varied randomly per trial so the two could be separated at all</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>distance travelled —contrasted-with→ elapsed time</label>
        <term>distance travelled</term>
        <term>elapsed time</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: AND THE CONFOUND SURVIVED: most cells encoded BOTH, to differing degrees - decoupling vindicated the variable without eliminating the rival
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but most neurons encoded BOTH time and distance; contrasted-with is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>grid cells —part-of→ entorhinal cortex</label>
        <term>grid cells</term>
        <term>entorhinal cortex</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and they too fire at particular moments, so the same dual coding appears one synapse upstream</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>CA1 —contrasted-with→ CA2</label>
        <term>CA1</term>
        <term>CA2</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: SCOPE: nearly all the evidence is CA1; CA2 has some support and CA3 explicitly none
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but CA1 is where time cells were studied and CA2 &#x27;could also be important&#x27;; contrasted-with is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>trace eye-blink conditioning —distinct-from→ firing chains</label>
        <term>trace eye-blink conditioning</term>
        <term>firing chains</term>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER LEARNING CREATES THE PATTERN OR RECRUITS ONE. &#x27;one study examining trace eye-blink conditioning Quotation withheld.&#x27; Both accounts predict temporally structured firing after learning and differ only on where the structure came from - which is invisible in the trained animal and visible only across learning. · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: the dissenting paradigm: new patterns EMERGED with learning rather than existing chains being co-opted
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but trace eye-blink conditioning produced NEW temporal patterns rather than co-opting firing chains; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Hippocampal CA1 principal cells encode the temporal structure of remembered experience independently of the animal&#x27;s location and movement.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Time cells and place cells are not distinct populations — the same hippocampal neurons carry both codes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Time-cell firing sequences emerge with learning, are specific to particular memories, and predict whether a subsequent memory judgement will be correct.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Several findings suggest a strict chaining model is unlikely to be the mechanism for time cells.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>This challenges the view that spatial mapping and navigation is the hippocampus&#x27;s fundamental function.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the original temporal-coding reports were criticised as confounded by the animal&#x27;s changing location and by distance travelled over time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>later studies addressed this by tightly controlling the animal&#x27;s location and movement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>FIRST RUNG: cells with reliable place fields were simply excluded from the analysis</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>SECOND RUNG: a general linear model separated location, speed and head direction from elapsed time, leaving an independent contribution of time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THIRD RUNG, THE DECOUPLING: treadmill speed was randomised per trial so that elapsed time and distance travelled could be disentangled</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>over 80 percent of active neurons were modulated by elapsed time, position mattered little, but distance was also strongly encoded and most cells carried both</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>FOURTH RUNG: head-fixed preparations removed location and movement altogether</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the conclusion the ladder licenses: CA1 principal cells encode temporal structure independently of location and movement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AN EARLY DISSOCIATION: spatial representations differed across trials too, but equally on correct and error trials, so they did not predict memory accuracy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the firing patterns of many neurons re-timed when the delay was increased, even though the behaviour and locations of the animal during the initial period did not change</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>cells firing later in the delay were active for longer, a scalar coding of time paralleling human and animal time judgements</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: the authors 18 observed - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author&#x27;s rather than this record&#x27;s. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE IDENTITY CLAIM: time cells are the same neurons as place cells, and in freely moving animals fire only when the animal is in a particular location</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the same cells that fired at particular moments on the treadmill fired at particular places on the maze outside it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the reorganisation of time cells when a temporal cue changes parallels the reorganisation of place cells when spatial cues change</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>temporal cues and structure control time cells just as spatial cues and structure control place cells</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the proposal that follows is to treat hippocampal principal neurons as multidimensional rather than as either kind of cell</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>temporal coding is tied to memory three ways: it develops with learning, it is memory-specific, and it predicts judgement accuracy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A DOUBLE GRADIENT IN MONKEYS: time coding falls and object-identity coding rises going from entorhinal to perirhinal to inferotemporal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>QUALIFICATION ON THE CROSS-SPECIES CLAIM: the human patterns are slowly changing rather than punctate, closer to an earlier rat result than to the rodent time cells</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[24]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>place-cell sequences replay in compressed form during sleep and quiet wakefulness, so spatial coding is recapitulated temporally</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>when spatial and sequence strategies compete, the firing sequences follow whichever strategy the animal expressed on that probe trial</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[26]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>FOUR ARGUMENTS AGAINST STRICT CHAINING, first: the cells changed their firing patterns even during the initial part of the delay, rather than simply adding cell activations during the extended segment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[27]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>second: strict chains cannot split to encode overlapping memories that share identical events</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[28]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>third: scalar firing is inconsistent with uniform-duration chain activations and consistent with the scalar temporal context model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[29]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>fourth: compressed replay would need a mechanism that can decompress back to the original intervals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[30]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>on the other side, firing chains appear to be preconfigured and then co-opted to organise events</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[31]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>DISSENT PRESERVED: one trace eye-blink study found new temporal patterns emerging with learning rather than existing chains being used</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: one study examining trace eye-blink conditioning reported - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author&#x27;s rather than this record&#x27;s. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[32]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the proposed synthesis is temporal context dynamics selecting specific firing chains</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[33]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>grid cells in medial entorhinal cortex also fire at particular moments during treadmill running</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[34]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>judging intervals and remembering temporal organisation are separated, with the hippocampus secondary to the first and central to the second</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[35]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the review&#x27;s headline consequence: this challenges spatial mapping and navigation as the fundamental function of the hippocampus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[36]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE AUTHOR&#x27;S CLOSING DEFLATION: it remains entirely possible that both dimensions reduce to association by proximity, making time cells and place cells reflections of one associative function</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>time cells</label>
        <term>time cells</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>place cells</label>
        <term>place cells</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>re-timing</label>
        <term>re-timing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>temporal context model</label>
        <term>temporal context model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chaining model</label>
        <term>chaining model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>place cells</label>
        <term>place cells</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>time cells</label>
        <term>time cells</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>scalar coding</label>
        <term>scalar coding</term>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: the authors 18 observed - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author&#x27;s rather than this record&#x27;s. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>replay</label>
        <term>replay</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>chaining model</label>
        <term>chaining model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>over 80% — proportion of neurons active during treadmill running whose activity was modulated by elapsed time, in a study that dissociated time from distance travelled</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>approximately 30% — proportion of hippocampal cells coding successive moments of the delay in head-fixed rats doing a delayed matching-to-sample task</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>about 100 ms — the compressed duration within which seconds-long place-cell sequences are replayed during quiet periods</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>over 80% — neurons active during treadmill running whose activity was modulated by elapsed time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>general linear model</label>
        <term>general linear model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>elapsed time</label>
        <term>elapsed time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>distance travelled</label>
        <term>distance travelled</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3827.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
