<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>From reaction (‘priming’) to motivated selection: changing conceptualizations of accessibility</title>
        <author>Eitam</author>
        <author>Tory Higgins</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>From reaction (‘priming’) to motivated selection: changing conceptualizations of accessibility</title>
          <date>2016</date>
          <publisher>Current Opinion in Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.017</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Eitam2016-from-reaction-priming-to-motivated-selection</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Eitam2016-from-reaction-priming-to-motivated-selection.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">d959c7bbd9a824bcda8160ed3ff654c0af6e0265</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>mental accessibility</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Motivational relevance gates the activation of semantic knowledge, so a stimulus that is not relevant to truth, control or value fails to make its corresponding knowledge functionally available</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Feedback that a shared reality failed retroactively lowers the truth relevance of the tuned message, which lowers its accessibility and hence its influence on recall</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper deliberately restricts itself to how accessibility has been conceptualised and does not assess whether the hypotheses it reviews are empirically supported.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors characterise their own mechanistic model of accessibility as crude.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the priming method and the surrounding cluster of concepts (availability, accessibility, activation, applicability) were imported into social psychology, where their nature was altered to fit social-cognitive phenomena</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>accessibility</label>
        <term>accessibility</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>applicability</label>
        <term>applicability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance</label>
        <term>relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>goals</label>
        <term>goals</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming</label>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>mental representations</label>
        <term>mental representations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>accessibility, FIRST GENERATION - a tendency to be activated, fixed by the frequency and recency of exposure and nothing else. Every stage from stimulus to activation is passive and depends only on exposure history, which is exactly why a selective stage had to be added next</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>applicability - introduced to solve an OVER-PREDICTION: if accessibility were the whole story every accessible construct would be used, and they are not. Defined as the match between selected features of the stimulus and of the activated concept, and named by these authors as the precursor to their own principle of relevance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>accessibility, IN ROAR - redefined from a property fixed by exposure history into one proportional to MOTIVATIONAL RELEVANCE: knowledge is `functionally available` to cognitive processes to the degree that it matters to the organism&#x27;s current concerns. The same word, with the causal direction reversed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the paper&#x27;s own methodological stance, stated once and worth the layer: the CHANGING UNDERSTANDING of a concept is treated as a SEPARATE ISSUE from whether the hypotheses that carried it were empirically verified. That separation is what lets a history of a term be written at all while its results are under dispute</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Higgins&#x27; parsing of motivation (reference [24])</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance —causes→ accessibility</label>
        <term>relevance</term>
        <term>accessibility</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE REVERSAL THE WHOLE PAPER IS ABOUT. Accessibility stops being a property fixed by how often and how recently something was met, and becomes one proportional to how much it matters to the organism now. Same word, opposite causal direction, thirty years apart.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says a relevance framework can accommodate diverse results; the sign is not stated.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>goals —is-a→ mental representations</label>
        <term>goals</term>
        <term>mental representations</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The third generation&#x27;s move: goals are folded INTO the representational machinery rather than added beside it, so everything already true of concept activation becomes true of goal activation without further argument.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Merely designating one of two locations as task-relevant produces a blindness to information at the other location, as ROAR predicts.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Participants &#x27;blind&#x27; to irrelevant Kanizsa inducers still showed the illusion, judging the illusory shape&#x27;s orientation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The biased memory effect disappears when participants learn just before recall that their reality was not shared by the audience.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The memory bias does not occur when participants tune merely to be polite or to ingratiate, though tuning is at least as great.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ROAR</label>
        <term>ROAR</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>applicability</label>
        <term>applicability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>irrelevance induced blindness</label>
        <term>irrelevance induced blindness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sources of motivational relevance</label>
        <term>sources of motivational relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>up to 25% — share of participants who could not report the colour of the task-irrelevant inner circle</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>500 ms — unmasked presentation duration of the irrelevant concentric circle that participants still failed to report</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.017.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
