<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Prefrontal Contributions to Metacognition in Perceptual Decision Making</title>
        <author>Fleming</author>
        <author>Huijgen</author>
        <author>Dolan</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Prefrontal Contributions to Metacognition in Perceptual Decision Making</title>
          <date>2012</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Neuroscience</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1523/jneurosci.6489-11.2012</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Fleming2012-prefrontal-contributions-to-metacognition-in</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Fleming2012-prefrontal-contributions-to-metacognition-in.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">1404160f10df0702f9a4c34f0cfe7df5beb28f28</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>the neural basis of metacognitive awareness of one&#x27;s own perceptual decisions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>which brain region supports metacognitive report, as opposed to the decision itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>identifies right rostrolateral PFC by three pre-stated criteria, and proposes it re-represents object-level uncertainty in a form usable for report</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>metacognition of perceptual decisions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>fmri</label>
        <term>fmri</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>rostrolateral PFC re-represents object-level decision uncertainty at the meta level, which is what makes an explicit confidence report possible</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>object-level uncertainty signals computed within the decision circuitry are re-coded for use in report, rather than confidence being read off the decision itself</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>metacognitive accuracy arises from trial-by-trial access to internal decision uncertainty, not from monitoring one&#x27;s own reaction time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a staircase equates objective performance across individuals, so metacognitive ability is not confounded by task performance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the Follow condition is yoked to the Report condition, matching the motor act of moving the cursor without any confidence judgment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the starting cursor position is jittered to prevent motor preparation from carrying the confidence signal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>no feedback is given, so confidence cannot be updated from knowledge of accuracy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the proposal: object-level uncertainty represented elsewhere is re-represented in rlPFC in a form suitable for explicit report</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability is measured as area under the type 2 ROC, distinct from type 1 sensitivity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The region-wise correlations linking confidence-related activity to metacognitive accuracy were not corrected for multiple comparisons.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the region-wise correlation results only: TESTING FOR REGIONAL CORRELATIONS WAS CARRIED OUT WITHOUT CORRECTION FOR MULTIPLE COMPARISONS, AND THUS A POSITIVE RESULT HERE SHOULD BE TEMPERED BY THIS CAVEAT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The study cannot separate the respective contributions of rostrolateral (BA10) and dorsolateral (BA46) prefrontal cortex to metacognitive ability.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any attribution to a specific prefrontal subregion: THE RESPECTIVE ROLE OF RLPFC (BA10) AND DLPFC (BA46) IN METACOGNITIVE ABILITY IS NOT YET CLEAR</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Whether the rlPFC account generalises beyond perceptual decisions to mnemonic metacognition is not settled by these data.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the domain-generality claim: FURTHER COMPARISON OF PERCEPTUAL AND MNEMONIC TASKS IS REQUIRED to separate domain-specific from domain-general substrates</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the regional correlations were tested without correction for multiple comparisons, and the authors say the positive result should be tempered by it</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - the uncorrected regional correlations</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>some connectivity activations did not survive correction and are reported uncorrected</label>
        <note>what this limits: the visual-cortex activations: ADDITIONAL ACTIVATIONS WERE OBSERVED IN PRIMARY AND EXTRASTRIATE VISUAL CORTEX THAT DID NOT SURVIVE CORRECTION FOR MULTIPLE COMPARISONS (p &lt; 0.001, UNCORRECTED)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the respective roles of rlPFC and dlPFC in metacognitive ability are stated to be unclear</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - the respective roles of rlPFC and dlPFC in metacognitive ability cannot be separated here</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>whether the region serves metacognition outside perceptual decisions is an open question</label>
        <note>what this limits: the domain of the rlPFC finding: WHETHER rlPFC ACTIVITY PLAYS A ROLE IN METACOGNITION IN DOMAINS OUTSIDE OF EVALUATION OF PERCEPTUAL DECISION MAKING IS AN OPEN QUESTION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a localiser scan was collected and then dropped because the main analysis found no visual cortex effects</label>
        <note>what this limits: the visual-cortex question specifically, which was closed by the main analysis rather than by the data collected for it: AS OUR INITIAL WHOLE-BRAIN ANALYSES DID NOT FIND EFFECTS IN VISUAL CORTEX, WE DO NOT ANALYZE THESE DATA FURTHER HERE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>three subjects excluded for performance, one more from the intelligence analysis</label>
        <note>what this limits: the sample every effect rests on: WE EXCLUDED THREE SUBJECTS FROM FURTHER ANALYSIS DUE TO TYPE 1 d&#x27; SCORES &gt;2 SDs FROM THE GROUP MEAN. TWENTY-THREE SUBJECTS WERE INCLUDED</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability did not correlate with fluid intelligence, reported as a null</label>
        <note>what this limits: any account linking metacognition to general ability: METACOGNITIVE ABILITY DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY CORRELATE WITH FLUID INTELLIGENCE (g)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the type 1 versus type 2 distinction, which is what makes metacognition measurable separately from performance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the object-level versus meta-level model, imported as the framework for perceptual metacognition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a MATCHED control condition against which self-report activity was compared</label>
        <note>eliminates: that right rostrolateral prefrontal activity reflects the act of reporting, the button press or the task&#x27;s difficulty rather than metacognition · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>metacognition</label>
        <term>metacognition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability is defined so as to be independent of task performance - measured by type 2 ROC after a staircase equates type 1 sensitivity across people</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>object level and meta level are distinguished as monitoring and controlling versus being monitored, which is what makes the two separable in principle</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>confidence is instructed as RELATIVE rather than absolute, because the task is too hard for certainty</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the paper distinguishes object-level uncertainty, which other studies measure, from metacognitive report, and argues the earlier work cannot separate them without concurrent reports</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: existence</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: fMRI during a face/house discrimination with staircased difficulty and concurrent confidence ratings, against a yoked motor-matched control condition</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: fmri — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: metacognition of decision performance</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: metacognition of perceptual decisions — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Rounis et al. (2010); Fleming et al. (2010b); Yokoyama et al. (2010)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Song et al. (2011); Maniscalco and Lau (2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Fleming et al. (2010b); Kornbrot (2006)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>extends → structural and TMS evidence that anterior PFC supports metacognitive accuracy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → studies of decision confidence that manipulate difficulty without collecting concurrent confidence reports</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>distinguishes-from → left rlPFC, dACC and right PPC, which track confidence but do not predict metacognitive ability</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS TRACKING VERSUS PREDICTING. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; All these regions carry a confidence signal; only one predicts how good the metacognition is. Two different tests, and the regions separate on the second - so a study that only measured tracking would report them as equivalent.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>contradicts → the expectation that metacognitive ability tracks fluid intelligence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability —operationalised-as→ type 2</label>
        <term>metacognitive ability</term>
        <term>type 2</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>meta —distinct-from→ object</label>
        <term>meta</term>
        <term>object</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: the model that licenses treating them as separable at all</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability —distinct-from→ fluid intelligence</label>
        <term>metacognitive ability</term>
        <term>fluid intelligence</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: argued from a null, which the paper reports plainly
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but metacognitive ability did NOT CORRELATE with fluid intelligence; distinct-from rests on a null correlation.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>rlPFC —distinct-from→ dACC</label>
        <term>rlPFC</term>
        <term>dACC</term>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER CONFIDENCE-RELATED ACTIVITY PREDICTS METACOGNITIVE ABILITY. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; All these regions TRACK confidence; only one predicts how good the metacognition is. Tracking and predicting are different tests and the regions separate on the second, not the first. · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: both track confidence; only rlPFC predicts metacognitive ability, which is the paper&#x27;s third criterion doing the separating</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>signal detection theory</label>
        <term>signal detection theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>receiver operating characteristic / area under the curve</label>
        <term>receiver operating characteristic / area under the curve</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test (paired)</label>
        <term>t-test (paired)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test (one-sample)</label>
        <term>t-test (one-sample)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>partial correlation</label>
        <term>partial correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>general linear model</label>
        <term>general linear model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>random-effects group analysis</label>
        <term>random-effects group analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>multiple-comparison correction</label>
        <term>multiple-comparison correction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard deviation</label>
        <term>standard deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>type 1 signal detection theory</label>
        <term>type 1 signal detection theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>area under the type 2 ROC</label>
        <term>area under the type 2 ROC</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>psychophysiological interaction</label>
        <term>psychophysiological interaction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>orthogonalisation against reaction time</label>
        <term>orthogonalisation against reaction time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Right rostrolateral prefrontal cortex met all three of the paper&#x27;s criteria for a role in metacognition: greater activity during self-report, correlation with confidence, and prediction of metacognitive ability across people.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Confidence-related activity was exclusively negative: dACC, right posterior parietal cortex and bilateral rlPFC scaled inversely with reported confidence and no region scaled positively with it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Metacognitive ability was statistically independent of perceptual task performance, replicating an earlier dissociation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Simply moving the confidence cursor in the control (Follow) condition did not modulate activity in the confidence-sensitive regions, showing the effect is specific to genuine self-report.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Functional connectivity of right rlPFC with contralateral prefrontal cortex and occipital cortex rose during metacognitive report relative to the control condition.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The confidence effect in right rlPFC was not an artefact of reaction time, since it survived orthogonalizing confidence with respect to RT.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The individual-differences effect was lateralized: left rlPFC showed no relationship between confidence-related activity and metacognitive ability.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>right rlPFC activity was greater during confidence report than in the yoked control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the strength of the confidence-activity relation in right rlPFC predicted metacognitive ability across people, r = -0.47</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>no such correlation in left rlPFC, r = 0.024</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>confidence-related activity was absent in the Follow condition, so using the scale is not sufficient to produce it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>activity did not differentiate correct from incorrect trials, so it is not an error signal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the confidence effect survived orthogonalising against reaction time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>connectivity between right rlPFC and contralateral PFC and occipital cortex rose during report</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability did not correlate with fluid intelligence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A roc</label>
        <term>A roc</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>psychophysiological interaction (PPI)</label>
        <term>psychophysiological interaction (PPI)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>metacognitive ability</label>
        <term>metacognitive ability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>three criteria</label>
        <term>three criteria</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>decision confidence</label>
        <term>decision confidence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>fMRI time series</label>
        <term>fMRI time series</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>metacognitive ability</label>
        <term>metacognitive ability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>type 1 reaction time</label>
        <term>type 1 reaction time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>motion correction parameters</label>
        <term>motion correction parameters</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>reported confidence</label>
        <term>reported confidence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>n = 23 — number of participants retained for analysis after exclusions, with age range and mean age</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>70.6 ± 3.2 — mean percentage of correct face/house decisions held near threshold by the staircase during scanning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>r = −0.47, p = 0.025 — across-subject correlation between the right rlPFC confidence beta and metacognitive ability (A roc), the paper&#x27;s key individual-differences result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean R 2 = 0.98 — goodness of fit of the type 2 signal detection model to the confidence rating data</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>1087 ms vs 971 ms — mean reaction time on incorrect versus correct perceptual decisions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean r = −0.32 ± 0.09 — within-subject correlation between reaction time and reported confidence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>26 recruited, 3 excluded for performance, 23 analysed — the sample after exclusions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>r = -0.47, p = 0.025, partial r = -0.46 controlling for d prime — the third criterion in right rlPFC</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>r = 0.024, p = 0.91 — the same test in left rlPFC</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>t(22) = 2.35, p = 0.028 — the confidence effect after controlling for reaction time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.6489-11.2012.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
