Toward an integrated classification of neuronal cell types: morphoelectric and transcriptomic characterization of individual GABAergic cortical neurons

Gouwens, Sorensen, Baftizadeh, Budzillo, Lee, Jarsky, Alfiler, Arkhipov · bioRxiv · 2020 · neuroscience · 10.1101/2020.02.03.932244 · record Gouwens2020-toward-an-integrated-classification-of-neuro
tag layer · index · concepts · authors · עברית

Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (pdftext); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. The method is Patch-seq, i.e. whole-cell recording combined with single-cell RNA-sequencing and biocytin morphological reconstruction; the controlled method vocabulary has no combined term, so 'electrophysiology' records the core measurement and the transcriptomic and morphological arms are not captured by that facet. Claim type is 'existence' because the headline claim is that at least 20 cross-modal met-types are present; the paper simultaneously reports a partial null (t-types are not reliably predictable from morpho-electric features, classifier accuracy 57%), which the single claim type field cannot hold. This is a bioRxiv preprint that had not been certified by peer review at the time of posting. 2026-08-14, 2026-08-16 and 2026-08-25 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.

Some quotes on this page contain (cid:NN). The PDF this text was extracted from encodes 5 characters in a way that names no letter, so the extractor could not say what they were. The quotes keep them because a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing — the marks are the source’s, not the tagging’s.

How to read this page. The article itself is not reproduced here — this paper is not cleared for redistribution, so what follows is the tag layer alone. The evidence sentences are withheld with the article. The table at the foot lists every tag the record carries; each row names the facet it belongs to, and the whose words column says whether the tag records the paper's own wording or the tagger's sentence about the paper. Every tag links to each other paper in the corpus carrying it. The machine-readable edition of the same thing is the TEI file beside this one, where the tags live in standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.

Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
principal component analysis 5 fields · cross-validation 3 fields · bootstrap 2 fields · statistical-significance 2 fields · morphological features 2 fields

Tags on this paper

Every tag the record carries, each linking to every other paper in the corpus that carries it. A tag appears here whether or not its words occur in the article — the spans below are only the ones a sentence in this paper licenses. Of the 7 concept tags on this paper, all 7 are grounded in a quoted sentence.

t-types me-types Martinotti cell met-types co-clusters consensus number t-type classifier the noisy modality is not clustered on its own but MAPPED onto a reference taxonomy built from the clean one, and the stated purpose is to minimise the contribution of contamination from non-neuronal cells and nearby excitatory neurons the mapping is bootstrapped rather than computed once - a hundred iterations, each using only seventy per cent of the available genes and of the reference cells - so that a cell's assigned type carries a confidence instead of being a bare label AMBIGUITY THAT BELONGS TO THE TAXONOMY IS SEPARATED FROM AMBIGUITY THAT BELONGS TO THE MEASUREMENT: a reference matrix records how often each type is confused with each other type in the clean data, and a cell's observed confusion is scored against that expectation rather than against zero two numerical cut-offs then decide which cells are set aside - a divergence above two, and, among the survivors, a correlation below one half between the cell's expression and the average expression of the types the per-type analyses are then run only on the subset with the highest-confidence mapping, and the stated reason is to limit the effect of mapping ambiguities due to technical issues the mapping is checked four separate ways rather than asserted: against a method that does not use the tree's hierarchy at all, against cells from transgenic lines labelling known types, against marker-gene expression levels, and against the layer distribution the dissociated cells show whether two named types are electrophysiologically distinct is made TESTABLE rather than assumed: a two-component model, one component per type, is fitted against a single-component model of the two merged, and how much better the split describes the data is then measured as a log-likelihood ratio between the two models correspondence between the two classifications is found by spectral co-clustering of the two type sets, with agreement given a stated threshold - at least two thirds of a type's cells falling inside its co-cluster THE FINAL TYPES ARE EDITED CO-CLUSTERS, NOT CO-CLUSTERS: the poorly-agreeing types are removed first, and the remaining co-clusters are split further wherever the transcriptomic differences inside one are large - so the twenty met-types are the output of a procedure with two further editing steps applied AFTER the clustering, not of the clustering itself met-type t-type “inconsistent” cells Patch-seq recording technique transcriptomic type intrinsic electrophysiological features morphological features soma location sparse principal component analysis principal component analysis principal components analysis (PCA) likelihood ratio test log-likelihood ratio (LLR) bootstrap parametric boostrap statistical-significance random forest classifier cross-validation cross-validated discriminant analysis discriminability index (effect size) d′ statistic correlation the correlation between an individual cell’s axon histogram and the t-type average Kullback-Leibler divergence Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence Jensen-Shannon divergence Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence standard error of the mean mean (lines) ± SEM resampling / subsampling for cluster stability electrophysiology

Legend

relation to other work	`claim_relations`	how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies
claim type	`claim_type`	the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null
concept edge	`concept_edges`	an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it
concept	`concepts`	an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it
content tag	`content_tags`	a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper
control	`controls`	an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation
limitation	`limitations`	what the paper says its evidence cannot support
mechanism	`mechanisms`	how the reported effect is said to come about
method	`method`	how the paper produced its evidence
phenomenon	`phenomenon`	the effect or regularity under study
sense	`senses`	a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it

The paper

The full text is not reproduced here. This article is not cleared for redistribution, so the page carries the tag layer only. Its evidence sentences are withheld; the grounding status remains with each tag, and the article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.03.932244. The reading view exists for the papers whose licence permits it.

Every tag on this page

claim_relations 2 · claim_type 1 · concept_edges 2 · concepts 7 · content_tags 38 · controls 1 · limitations 8 · mechanisms 9 · method 1 · phenomenon 1 · senses 3

Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.

facet	tag	field	conf.	whose words
claim_type	existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_type`		the paper's words
phenomenon	cortical GABAergic interneuron cell types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`phenomenon`		the paper's words
method	electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology	`method`		the paper's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the noisy modality is not clustered on its own but MAPPED onto a reference taxonomy built from the clean one, and the stated purpose is to minimise the contribution of contamination from non-neuronal cells and nearby excitatory neurons	`mechanisms[0]`	0.85	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the mapping is bootstrapped rather than computed once - a hundred iterations, each using only seventy per cent of the available genes and of the reference cells - so that a cell's assigned type carries a confidence instead of being a bare label	`mechanisms[1]`	0.95	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: AMBIGUITY THAT BELONGS TO THE TAXONOMY IS SEPARATED FROM AMBIGUITY THAT BELONGS TO THE MEASUREMENT: a reference matrix records how often each type is confused with each other type in the clean data, and a cell's observed confusion is scored against that expectation rather than against zero	`mechanisms[2]`	0.95	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: two numerical cut-offs then decide which cells are set aside - a divergence above two, and, among the survivors, a correlation below one half between the cell's expression and the average expression of the types	`mechanisms[3]`	0.95	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the per-type analyses are then run only on the subset with the highest-confidence mapping, and the stated reason is to limit the effect of mapping ambiguities due to technical issues	`mechanisms[4]`	0.85	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the mapping is checked four separate ways rather than asserted: against a method that does not use the tree's hierarchy at all, against cells from transgenic lines labelling known types, against marker-gene expression levels, and against the layer distribution the dissociated cells show	`mechanisms[5]`	0.95	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: whether two named types are electrophysiologically distinct is made TESTABLE rather than assumed: a two-component model, one component per type, is fitted against a single-component model of the two merged, and how much better the split describes the data is then measured as a log-likelihood ratio between the two models	`mechanisms[6]`	0.85	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correspondence between the two classifications is found by spectral co-clustering of the two type sets, with agreement given a stated threshold - at least two thirds of a type's cells falling inside its co-cluster	`mechanisms[7]`	0.95	the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: THE FINAL TYPES ARE EDITED CO-CLUSTERS, NOT CO-CLUSTERS: the poorly-agreeing types are removed first, and the remaining co-clusters are split further wherever the transcriptomic differences inside one are large - so the twenty met-types are the output of a procedure with two further editing steps applied AFTER the clustering, not of the clustering itself	`mechanisms[8]`	0.85	the tagger's words
limitations	Too few morphological reconstructions exist for the Vip, Lamp5 and Sncg subclasses, so the number of met-types may change. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the met-type count for three named subclasses: WE DO NOT YET HAVE A SUFFICIENTLY LARGE NUMBER OF MORPHOLOGY RECONSTRUCTIONS FOR THE Vip, Lamp5 AND Sncg SUBCLASSES	`limitations[0]`		the tagger's words
limitations	Brain-slice preparation artifacts cannot be ruled out as a source of the observed morphological differences. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the morphological differences the classification rests on: WE CANNOT RULE OUT THE POSSIBILITY THAT ARTIFACTS OF THE BRAIN SLICE PREPARATION CONTRIBUTE TO OR EXPLAIN OBSERVED MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES	`limitations[1]`		the tagger's words
limitations	Restricting analysis to highly consistent mappings may impose discrete types on what is really continuous variation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the discreteness of the types themselves: SOME OF THE AMBIGUITY IN TYPES COULD BE BIOLOGICAL RATHER THAN TECHNICAL, SUCH THAT FOCUSING OUR ANALYSIS THIS WAY MAY OVERLY-DISCRETIZE A LANDSCAPE WITH MORE CONTINUOUS VARIATION BETWEEN CELLS AND CELL TYPES	`limitations[2]`		the tagger's words
limitations	The field is stated to have no consensus number, or even definition, of neuronal cell types. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any count of neuronal cell types taken as settled: the authors state the field has not readily converged on a consensus number, or even definition, of neuronal cell types, and that efforts to determine one have been limited by well-documented challenges	`limitations[3]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	Two modalities counting the same area's interneuron types differ by more than a factor of two. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any number of GABAergic cell types quoted for mouse VISp: the transcriptomic estimate is 60 t-types and the morpho-electric estimate 26 me-types, and the authors state such discrepancies are not unique to VISp	`limitations[4]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	A classical cell-type name has no absolute definition, and by the loose reading every met-type would qualify. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any classification of a neuron as a Martinotti cell: the authors state they are not aware of an absolute definition in terms of total amount of axon in L1, that it is generally described as significant, and that all the Sst met-types contain at least one cell that could be considered one	`limitations[5]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	The combined classifier's stated improvement is over the morphology arm, not the electrophysiology arm. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim that combining modalities improved t-type prediction here: electrophysiology alone gave 57%, morphology alone 41%, and the combination 57%	`limitations[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	Type frequencies differ between the two preparations despite the same transgenic driver lines. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison of t-type proportions between Patch-seq and dissociated-cell data: the difference persisted despite using the same, relatively specific transgenic driver lines, and the authors state it may reflect gene expression differences in slice versus dissociated cell preparations	`limitations[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
controls	the reference cells split into an 80 per cent training set and a 20 per cent test set before the classifier was fitted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a cell-type accuracy earned on the cells the classifier was fitted to - the held-out fifth is the only part of the data that can report performance · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held	`controls[0]`	0.85	the tagger's words
concepts	t-types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-types	`concepts[0]`		the paper's words
concepts	me-types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: me-types	`concepts[1]`		the paper's words
concepts	Martinotti cell Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Martinotti cell	`concepts[2]`		the paper's words
concepts	met-types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: met-types	`concepts[3]`		the paper's words
concepts	co-clusters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: co-clusters	`concepts[4]`		the paper's words
concepts	consensus number Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: consensus number	`concepts[5]`		the paper's words
concepts	t-type classifier Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-type classifier	`concepts[6]`		the paper's words
senses	a Martinotti cell - A NAMED TYPE WHOSE DEFINING QUANTITY HAS NO THRESHOLD: the quantity is total amount of axon in L1, the criterion on it is the word significant, the authors state they are not aware of an absolute definition, and all the Sst met-types contain at least one cell that could therefore be considered one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[0]`	1.0	the tagger's words
senses	a met-type - A CO-CLUSTER THAT WAS THEN EDITED: spectral co-clusters of t-types and me-types were the starting point, t-types with poorer agreement were removed, and co-clusters were split further where transcriptomic differences were large, so the twenty is the output of a procedure with two judgement steps rather than a count of found groups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[1]`	1.0	the tagger's words
senses	the counted number of GABAergic cell types - MODALITY-RELATIVE: for one cortical area of one species it is 60 by transcriptomics and 26 by morpho-electric features, a difference of more than a factor of two, and the authors state other areas have likewise arrived at varying numbers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[2]`	1.0	the tagger's words
claim_relations	extends → Tasic et al. (2018/2016) transcriptomic taxonomy and Gouwens et al. (2019) morpho-electric types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[0]`		the tagger's words
claim_relations	builds-on → Tasic et al. (2018) dissociated-cell transcriptomic reference dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[1]`		the tagger's words
concept_edges	t-types —contrasted-with→ me-types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: how many kinds each yields for one cortical area of one species: 60 against 26 · strength of the relation: 1 also in: t-types · me-types	`concept_edges[0]`		the tagger's words
concept_edges	met-types —operationalised-as→ co-clusters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. holds when: after t-types with poorer agreement were removed and co-clusters were split further where transcriptomic differences were large · strength of the relation: 1 also in: met-types · co-clusters	`concept_edges[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	sparse principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sparse principal component analysis	`content_tags.statistics[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis	`content_tags.statistics[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	likelihood ratio test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: likelihood ratio test	`content_tags.statistics[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	bootstrap Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: bootstrap	`content_tags.statistics[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	statistical-significance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: statistical-significance	`content_tags.statistics[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	random forest classifier Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: random forest classifier	`content_tags.statistics[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	cross-validation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-validation	`content_tags.statistics[6]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	discriminability index (effect size) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:48). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. also in: discriminability index (effect size)	`content_tags.statistics[7]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation	`content_tags.statistics[8]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Kullback-Leibler divergence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Kullback-Leibler divergence	`content_tags.statistics[9]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Jensen-Shannon divergence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Jensen-Shannon divergence	`content_tags.statistics[10]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	standard error of the mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard error of the mean	`content_tags.statistics[11]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	resampling / subsampling for cluster stability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: resampling / subsampling for cluster stability	`content_tags.statistics[12]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	The combined data support at least twenty GABAergic interneuron met-types whose transcriptomic, electrophysiological and morphological properties agree. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Nine met-types were resolved within the Sst subclass. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Sst neurons respect laminar boundaries, and their dominant laminar target may distinguish them more reliably than the presence of axon in layer 1. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Most transcriptomic types differ systematically from one another in their electrophysiological properties. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Adding morphological to electrophysiological features raised t-type classifier accuracy to 57%. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	A neuron's specific t-type is frequently hard to predict from its morphological and/or physiological features. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Somata of many GABAergic t-types occupy specific laminar or sublaminar positions, giving an anatomical correlate to purely transcriptomic groupings. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[6]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Individual cells' axon depth histograms correlate positively with their t-type average, indicating consistent innervation patterns within a type. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[7]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	met-type Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: met-type	`content_tags.definitions[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	t-type Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-type	`content_tags.definitions[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	“inconsistent” cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: “inconsistent” cells	`content_tags.definitions[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Patch-seq recording technique Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Patch-seq recording technique	`content_tags.definitions[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	transcriptomic type Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: transcriptomic type	`content_tags.variables[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	intrinsic electrophysiological features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: intrinsic electrophysiological features	`content_tags.variables[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	morphological features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: morphological features	`content_tags.variables[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	soma location Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: soma location	`content_tags.variables[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	3,708 — cortical GABAergic interneurons whose transcriptomic and electrophysiological data passed quality control; 350 of them were morphologically reconstructed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	3,417 of the 3,708 — cells mapped to one or more reference transcriptomic types with better than 70% confidence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	>90% — accuracy of the random forest classifier predicting transcriptomic subclass from electrophysiological features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	57% — accuracy of the classifier predicting individual t-type from electrophysiological features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	41% — accuracy of the classifier predicting t-type from morphological features alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	57% — accuracy of the classifier when electrophysiological and morphological features were combined - no better than electrophysiology alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	83% — share of the authors' Patch-seq recordings made in primary visual cortex, the remainder in surrounding higher visual areas Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[6]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	(60) and (26) — previously estimated numbers of VISp GABAergic transcriptomic types versus morpho-electric types, the discrepancy this study set out to resolve Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[7]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	twenty — met-types produced by the co-clustering plus transcriptomic-splitting procedure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[8]`		the tagger's words

Interpretive choices

Tags that could not be placed in the text:

none — every tag was located in the text

What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.