<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation</title>
        <author>Hanks</author>
        <author>Kopec</author>
        <author>Brunton</author>
        <author>Duan</author>
        <author>Erlich</author>
        <author>Brody</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>Nature</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/nature14066</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Hanks2015-distinct-relationships-of-parietal-and-prefr</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Hanks2015-distinct-relationships-of-parietal-and-prefr.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">50f862799dc0192850f9d98b445db8d09136ada8</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether parietal and frontal cortex relate to accumulating evidence in the same way, tested by asking what each region&#x27;s firing rate says about the value of the accumulator at each moment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether frontal premotor activity participates in the graded accumulation of evidence or only in converting it into a discrete choice</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>parietal cortex encodes the accumulator as a graded value while frontal cortex encodes the sign of it, and silencing frontal cortex changes behaviour only at the end of the stimulus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>evidence accumulation in perceptual decision-making</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>electrophysiology</label>
        <term>electrophysiology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the FOF does not integrate evidence; it reads out the sign of an accumulator computed upstream and converts it into a discrete motor plan at the moment the go signal could arrive, which is why perturbing it matters only at the end of the stimulus</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>unilateral FOF silencing biases behavior by flipping already-categorized contralateral choices into ipsilateral ones, rather than by corrupting the accumulation itself</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>parietal firing answers what the value of the accumulated evidence is, through a graded map that is stable across time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>frontal firing answers which choice the evidence so far favours, clustering into a positive and a negative group</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>the shorter click latency in frontal cortex suggests sensory information reaches it through circuits that bypass parietal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the inactivation effect is modelled as converting a fraction of already-categorised contralateral choices into ipsilateral ones, which is a step after accumulation rather than during it</label>
        <note>duplicate of: mechanisms[1]</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>There is no primate frontal eye field dataset against which the click-triggered-average result can be compared.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the click-triggered-average result: NO EQUIVALENT EXPERIMENT FROM PRIMATE FEF EXISTS AS YET FOR COMPARISON</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Data collection and analysis were not blinded to experimental group.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every group comparison in the paper: INVESTIGATORS WERE NOT BLINDED TO EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS DURING DATA COLLECTION OR ANALYSIS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The 500 ms and 250 ms optogenetic groups were run sequentially, so group assignment was not randomised.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the comparison between the two optogenetic durations: THE ASSIGNMENT OF GROUP WAS NOT RANDOMIZED - the groups were run sequentially</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Two rats were dropped from the fine-timing optogenetic analyses on the basis of their full-trial effects.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the fine-timing optogenetic results: TWO RATS WERE NOT INCLUDED ... BECAUSE THEY DID NOT EXHIBIT SIGNIFICANT FULL-TRIAL EFFECTS - the exclusion criterion is the effect being measured</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>investigators were not blinded to experimental groups during data collection or analysis</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - unblinded collection and analysis</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>two rats were dropped from the finer-timing experiments because they had not shown a significant full-trial effect, and the two timing groups were run sequentially so group assignment was not randomized</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[3] - selection on the outcome</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the accumulator value used to build the tuning curves is estimated partly from the choice the animal went on to make</label>
        <note>what this limits: every accumulator tuning curve: A BETTER ESTIMATE OF THE ACCUMULATED EVIDENCE CAN BE OBTAINED BY ALSO TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CHOICE MADE AT THE END OF THE TRIAL - the regressor is informed by the outcome it is used to explain</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the encoding difference does not survive the end of the decision, since the parietal map becomes categorical during motor preparation</label>
        <note>what this limits: the scope of the PPC/FOF encoding difference in time: THE DIFFERENCE IN ENCODING BETWEEN PPC AND FOF WAS NOT MAINTAINED AFTER THE END OF THE DECISION PROCESS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>no comparable click-triggered measurement exists in the primate frontal eye fields for comparison</label>
        <note>what this limits: the cross-species comparison: no comparable click-triggered measurement exists in the primate frontal eye fields, so the analogy is not tested against one</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>preferred sides are mixed rather than uniformly contralateral, at about 59 percent in both areas</label>
        <note>what this limits: any contralateral-preference claim: THE PREFERRED SIDE WAS CONTRALATERAL FOR 59.1% OF THE PPC NEURONS AND 59.4% OF THE FOF NEURONS - mixed selectivity, not a uniform map</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a fitted trial-by-trial accumulator, used as the independent variable that neural responses are plotted against</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the click-triggered average, isolating one stimulus quantum&#x27;s effect by subtracting the expected response for that Poisson rate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>halorhodopsin silencing on a random quarter of trials, used to convert an encoding claim into a timing prediction</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>single-parameter variants of one behavioural model compared by bootstrapped likelihood ratio</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>MODEL-FREE analyses run alongside the model-based ones</label>
        <note>eliminates: the accumulation model itself as the source of the conclusion - if only the fitted model showed gradual accumulation, the finding could be a property of the model rather than of the rats · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE STANDARD ANALYSIS SAYS THE TWO AREAS ARE THE SAME AND A DIFFERENT ANALYSIS ON THE SAME DATA SAYS THEY ARE NOT: trial-averaged ramping looks alike in both, and the tuning curve assay separates a graded code from a categorical one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the same firing rate is read as the answer to two different questions - what is the value of the accumulated evidence, against which choice should I make if the signal came now</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE RIVAL ACCOUNTS ARE SORTED BY WHEN THEY ACT: two of the four modelled biases must operate throughout accumulation and two only at its end, which is exactly what the timed silencing can separate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>so the model comparison and the causal experiment are testing the same distinction in two ways rather than checking each other</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE STIMULUS IS DESIGNED SO THAT THE ANALYSIS IS VALID: because clicks come from a Poisson process, one click&#x27;s timing says nothing about another&#x27;s, which is what licenses the click-triggered average at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE LATENT VARIABLE IS INFERRED PARTLY FROM THE OUTCOME: the better estimate of accumulated evidence uses the choice the animal went on to make, and the frontal claim is about encoding that same choice</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>ENCODING IS NOT NECESSITY: parietal cortex carries a veridical graded code for the accumulator, and the same laboratory reports that its activity is not needed for the behaviour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the sample is declared unselected and then selected: every isolatable neuron was recorded regardless of response properties, and the analysis keeps the side-selective ones for a stated reason</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and both disclosures are made - the recording area was assigned randomly, the timing groups were not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: tuning curves relating firing rate to a trial-by-trial estimate of the accumulator from a fitted behavioural model, compared between areas, and unilateral optogenetic silencing in four separate time windows</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: gradual accumulation of sensory evidence toward a binary choice, and its neural correlates in more than one cortical area</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: evidence accumulation in perceptual decision-making — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the prevailing view that prefrontal cortex is part of the neural circuit for evidence accumulation (refs 3, 5, 7, 8)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the previously developed &quot;Poisson Clicks&quot; accumulation task (ref. 10)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → previous findings of pre-movement side selectivity in rat PPC (refs 14, 15) and FOF (ref. 13)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>contradicts → the prevailing view that prefrontal cortex is part of the circuit that accumulates evidence</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHEN IN THE TRIAL THE PERTURBATION MATTERS. &#x27;Unilateral FOF perturbations Quotation withheld, when the provisional choice must be converted into a motor act.&#x27; The prevailing view is not denied a role for prefrontal cortex - it is denied the ACCUMULATION role, on the evidence of WHEN the effect appears.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>supports → primate work reporting ramping correlates of accumulation in parietal and frontal eye field neurons</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>extends → the graded parietal encoding seen in monkeys, which was measured in a task that did not require temporal accumulation</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE TASK REQUIRED TEMPORAL ACCUMULATION AT ALL. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; The earlier finding is granted in full and its task is named as lacking the thing this paper is about - so a &#x27;similar encoding&#x27; across species is a similarity of signal, not of computation, and only the task says which.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → the idea of a single distributed decision process shared across parietal and frontal areas</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>builds-on → the authors&#x27; own trial-by-trial behavioural model of the clicks task, which supplies the accumulator estimate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>tuning curve —operationalised-as→ firing rate</label>
        <term>tuning curve</term>
        <term>firing rate</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE NEW ASSAY: a fitted behavioural model supplies a moment-by-moment estimate of the accumulator, and firing rate is plotted against it at each timepoint</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>graded —distinct-from→ categorical</label>
        <term>graded</term>
        <term>categorical</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE STANDARD ANALYSIS SAYS THE AREAS ARE ALIKE AND THE NEW ONE SAYS THEY ARE NOT - same neurons, same trials, opposite conclusions</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>graded —operationalised-as→ firing rate</label>
        <term>graded</term>
        <term>firing rate</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: the parietal rate answers what the value of the mentally accumulated evidence is, through a map that is stable across time
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but graded encoding was read from firing rates; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>categorical —operationalised-as→ firing rate</label>
        <term>categorical</term>
        <term>firing rate</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the frontal rate answers a different question about the same quantity - which choice to make if the go signal came now
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but categorical encoding was read from firing rates; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>steepness —operationalised-as→ tuning curve</label>
        <term>steepness</term>
        <term>tuning curve</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and it holds per neuron as a distribution shift, with the two populations overlapping
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but steepness was computed per tuning curve; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>click-triggered average —operationalised-as→ firing rate</label>
        <term>click-triggered average</term>
        <term>firing rate</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: one click has a sustained effect in both areas, decaying only in frontal cortex, and no primate frontal comparison exists</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>latency —operationalised-as→ click-triggered average</label>
        <term>latency</term>
        <term>click-triggered average</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the 200 against 100 ms difference is read as a bypassing route rather than as a processing delay
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but latency was measured on the click-triggered average; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>side-selective —operationalised-as→ pre-movement period</label>
        <term>side-selective</term>
        <term>pre-movement period</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: 23 percent of parietal and 32 percent of frontal neurons qualify, kept because they are the ones most likely to matter for the decision</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>side-selective —operationalised-as→ firing rate</label>
        <term>side-selective</term>
        <term>firing rate</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and in both areas those neurons ramp with a slope proportional to stimulus strength, which is the correlate the classical analysis finds
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but side-selective neurons showed ramping FIRING RATES; the side-selectivity itself is defined by a firing-rate difference, so operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>inactivation —causes→ bias</label>
        <term>inactivation</term>
        <term>bias</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: full-trial silencing gives a 10.3 percent ipsilateral bias</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>post-categorization —operationalised-as→ bias</label>
        <term>post-categorization</term>
        <term>bias</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: defined as flipping a fraction of already-categorised contralateral choices, with that fraction the only free parameter
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span defines the post-categorization bias; operationalised-as &#x27;bias&#x27; is circular.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>input gain —distinct-from→ input noise</label>
        <term>input gain</term>
        <term>input noise</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>graded —distinct-from→ choice</label>
        <term>graded</term>
        <term>choice</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: ENCODING IS NOT NECESSITY: parietal cortex carries a veridical graded code and is reported elsewhere not to be needed for the behaviour
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says PPC is not necessary for choice; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[28]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accumulator shift —contrasted-with→ input gain</label>
        <term>accumulator shift</term>
        <term>input gain</term>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHEN IN THE ACCUMULATION THE MECHANISM ACTS. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; Four candidate mechanisms fall into two groups by timing, and the grouping is what an experiment could test. Replaces the retracted within-group edge. · strength of the relation: 0.8</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ROC analysis</label>
        <term>ROC analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mann-Whitney U test</label>
        <term>Mann-Whitney U test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>nonlinear curve fitting</label>
        <term>nonlinear curve fitting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>log-likelihood model comparison</label>
        <term>log-likelihood model comparison</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>likelihood ratio</label>
        <term>likelihood ratio</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Fano factor</label>
        <term>Fano factor</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence interval</label>
        <term>confidence interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard error of the mean</label>
        <term>standard error of the mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>smoothing / kernel estimation</label>
        <term>smoothing / kernel estimation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Receiver operating characteristic</label>
        <term>Receiver operating characteristic</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>nonparametric resampling bootstrap</label>
        <term>nonparametric resampling bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>95% CI</label>
        <term>95% CI</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>SEM</label>
        <term>SEM</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Posterior parietal cortex encodes the running value of the accumulated evidence as a graded quantity, through a map that does not change over the course of the trial.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The frontal orienting fields instead encode mainly the sign of the accumulator, splitting activity into two clusters corresponding to the two available choices.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The FOF tuning curve was significantly steeper at the zero-crossing than the PPC tuning curve, quantifying the graded-versus-categorical distinction.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Clicks influenced FOF firing about 100 ms earlier than PPC firing, suggesting sensory input reaches FOF by a route that does not pass through PPC.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Silencing FOF across the whole trial produced a significant bias toward choices on the same side as the inactivation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Of the four inactivation windows, only peri-choice inactivation produced a significant ipsilateral bias (10.6%).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>With 250-ms windows only the peri-choice perturbation affected behaviour; perturbation 250 ms earlier had a smaller, non-significant effect.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Model comparison favored a bias applied after categorization over biases acting on the accumulation process itself.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The inactivation-induced bias was uncorrelated with how many clicks were played or how long the stimulus lasted, as expected if FOF is not part of the accumulator.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors conclude that evidence accumulation happens upstream of the FOF, challenging the view that prefrontal cortex implements accumulation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE CLASSICAL ANALYSIS MAKES THE TWO AREAS LOOK ALIKE and the tuning curve assay separates them</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>side-selective neurons in both PPC and FOF ramped upwards for preferred-direction stimuli with a slope proportional to the stimulus strength, and downwards for anti-preferred ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>parietal cortex encodes the accumulator as a graded value through a map stable across time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>frontal cortex clusters by the sign of the accumulator, which is the choice currently favoured</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the whole distinction reduces to the slope at the zero crossing, 0.058 against 0.158</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and it holds per neuron as a distribution shift, with the populations overlapping</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the difference survived scaling the integration time constant and the sticky bound, varying response latencies, and fitting the behavioural model per rat or in aggregate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>but it does not survive the end of the decision - during motor preparation the parietal code becomes categorical too</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>single clicks have a sustained effect on firing in both areas, slowly decaying only in frontal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the click latency is about 200 ms in parietal against 100 ms in frontal, read as a route that bypasses parietal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE STIMULUS IS DESIGNED SO THE ANALYSIS IS VALID: Poisson clicks are independent in time, which is what lets the residual isolate one click&#x27;s effect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE ENCODING CLAIM IS TURNED INTO A TIMING PREDICTION: if frontal cortex only converts evidence into a choice, silencing it should matter only at the end</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>full-trial silencing produced a 10.3 percent ipsilateral choice bias</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>of four 500 ms windows only the peri-choice one biased behaviour, and the early accumulation window was not different from zero</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[24]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>at 250 ms resolution the same held, with a window ending 250 ms earlier having no significant effect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the peri-choice bias fully accounted for the full-trial bias, at ratios of 1.17 and 0.93 in the two groups</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[26]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a post-categorization bias fitted the silencing data better than biases acting on the accumulation itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[27]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE FOUR RIVAL BIASES ARE SORTED BY WHEN THEY ACT - two throughout accumulation, two only at its end</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[28]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>each rival is a single added parameter on a model whose original bias term was one decision borderline</label>
        <note>about this quote: THE QUOTE ENDS ON A COLON: the paper goes on with the four sources of side bias it compared, each described in its own paragraph, too long to quote here; what this row states is in that list, not in the quoted words.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t104" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[29]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with control trials fitted first and each variant then fitted to the inactivation trials from that starting point</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t105" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[30]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the comparison made over 200 bootstrap resamples rather than once</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t106" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[31]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>no correlation was found between the induced bias and click counts or stimulus duration</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t107" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[32]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>ENCODING IS NOT NECESSITY: parietal cortex carries the graded code and is reported elsewhere not to be needed for the behaviour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t108" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[33]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the conclusion is that accumulation happens upstream of frontal cortex, against the prevailing view</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t109" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[34]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>394 neurons were recorded in PPC of 4 rats and 397 in FOF of 6 rats, and all isolatable neurons encountered were recorded regardless of response properties</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t110" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[35]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and 93 neurons in PPC (23%) and 128 in FOF (32%) differed significantly in pre-movement firing rate by the choice that followed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t111" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[36]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with an explicit rate floor and significance test as the criteria</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t112" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[37]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>preferred sides were mixed rather than uniformly contralateral, near 59 percent in both areas</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t113" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[38]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE ACCUMULATOR ESTIMATE USES THE CHOICE THE ANIMAL WENT ON TO MAKE, by backward propagation from the end of the trial</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t114" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[39]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>neurons were combined by weighting each by the inverse variance of its conditional distribution, so less noisy representations count for more</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t115" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[40]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the model was fitted separately to each rat, and the analysis repeated with one aggregate fit</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t116" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[41]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the two parameters probed are the ones measuring how far accumulation departs from optimality</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t117" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[42]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and response lag was varied for both areas jointly, as a matrix rather than a single choice</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t118" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[43]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>graded and categorical encoding schemes were simulated with matched lags to predict what each would look like</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t119" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[44]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>model-based and model-free analyses were both used to confirm the rats were accumulating throughout the stimulus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t120" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[45]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>INVESTIGATORS WERE NOT BLINDED to experimental groups during collection or analysis, stated outright</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t121" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[46]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>recording area was assigned randomly per rat and confirmed by histology</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t122" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[47]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AND THE OTHER HALF OF THE DISCLOSURE: two rats were dropped for showing no full-trial effect, and the timing groups were not randomized</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t123" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[48]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>laser illumination occurred on a random quarter of trials interleaved with controls</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t124" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Poisson Clicks task</label>
        <term>Poisson Clicks task</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t125" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>tuning curves</label>
        <term>tuning curves</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t126" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>click-triggered average</label>
        <term>click-triggered average</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t127" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>post-categorization bias</label>
        <term>post-categorization bias</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t128" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accumulator shift</label>
        <term>accumulator shift</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t129" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>pre-movement period</label>
        <term>pre-movement period</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t130" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>tuning curve</label>
        <term>tuning curve</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t131" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>click-triggered average</label>
        <term>click-triggered average</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t132" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>post-categorization</label>
        <term>post-categorization</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t133" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>pre-movement period</label>
        <term>pre-movement period</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t134" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Easy trials</label>
        <term>Easy trials</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t135" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[12]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>difficult trials</label>
        <term>difficult trials</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t136" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>trial difficulty</label>
        <term>trial difficulty</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t137" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>brain region</label>
        <term>brain region</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t138" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ipsilateral choice bias</label>
        <term>ipsilateral choice bias</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t139" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>non-inactivation trials</label>
        <term>non-inactivation trials</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t140" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>total mean click rate held fixed at 40 Hz</label>
        <term>total mean click rate held fixed at 40 Hz</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t141" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>firing rate</label>
        <term>firing rate</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t142" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>accumulator</label>
        <term>accumulator</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t143" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>bias</label>
        <term>bias</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t144" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>latency</label>
        <term>latency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t145" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>steepness</label>
        <term>steepness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t146" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>394 ... 397 — neurons recorded in PPC (from 4 rats) and in FOF (from 6 rats)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t147" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>23% ... 32% — proportion of recorded neurons in PPC and in FOF that were side-selective before movement onset</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t148" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>PPC: 0.058 ± 0.003, FOF: 0.158 ± 0.015 — slope of the tuning curve at the zero-crossing in each region; the roughly threefold steeper FOF slope is the paper&#x27;s core quantitative contrast</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t149" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>10.3 ± 3.0% — ipsilateral choice bias caused by full-trial unilateral FOF silencing</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t150" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5.4 ± 0.8% — ipsilateral bias from silencing only the final 250 ms of the click train</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t151" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>59.1% ... 59.4% — share of side-selective neurons preferring the contralateral choice in PPC and FOF, i.e. only a mild contralateral bias in both regions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t152" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>0.058 ± 0.003, FOF: 0.158 ± 0.015 — slope at the zero crossing of the tuning curve - the single number the graded against categorical claim rests on</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t153" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>10.3 ± 3.0% — ipsilateral choice bias from silencing the whole trial</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t154" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>1.17 ± 0.45 and 0.93 ± 0.33 — peri-choice bias divided by full-trial bias in the two groups - the last window accounts for all of the effect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t155" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>394 neurons in PPC of 4 rats and 397 neurons in FOF of 6 rats — the recorded sample, taken without regard to response properties</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t156" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>~200 ms — click latency in parietal cortex against about 100 ms in frontal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t157" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>59.1% — share of parietal neurons preferring the contralateral side, against 59.4 percent in frontal cortex - selectivity is mixed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14066.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
