<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior</title>
        <author>Heckman</author>
        <author>Stixrud</author>
        <author>Urzua</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior</title>
          <date>2006</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Labor Economics</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1086/504455</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Heckman2006-the-effects-of-cognitive-and-noncognitive-ab</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Heckman2006-the-effects-of-cognitive-and-noncognitive-ab.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">623db8115d4ebeb7630dd3c1d06e4f2ebd5ceebc</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>economics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>cognitive and noncognitive skills as determinants of labour-market and behavioural outcomes</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>observational-study</label>
        <term>observational-study</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A single low-dimensional pair of latent abilities acts as the common cause generating the observed clustering of risky adolescent behaviors together with schooling and wage outcomes.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Noncognitive skills raise wages along two routes: directly by raising productivity, and indirectly by raising schooling attainment and accumulated work experience.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The GED wage penalty arises because GED holders&#x27; deficit in noncognitive skill lowers employment and work-experience accumulation and removes a trait the market pays for.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper does not estimate the separate channels (preferences, discount rate, human-capital productivity, market productivity) through which the abilities operate.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any mechanistic reading of the results: WE DO NOT ESTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS FOR EACH OF THE CHANNELS THROUGH WHICH COGNITIVE AND NONCOGNITIVE ABILITIES MIGHT OPERATE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Collapsing noncognitive skill into a single latent factor is unlikely to capture all its aspects.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every claim stated in terms of noncognitive skill: THERE ARE MANY ASPECTS ... SELF CONTROL, TIME PREFERENCE, SOCIABILITY ... IT IS LESS LIKELY THAT ONE TRAIT CAPTURES ALL ASPECTS - the construct is collapsed to one latent factor</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Support conditions for semiparametric identification are not met, so results rest on the parametric structure of the model.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every estimate in the paper: THE EMPIRICAL RESULTS THAT WE GENERATE ARE IDENTIFIED FROM THE PARAMETRIC STRUCTURE OF THE MODEL - the support conditions for semiparametric identification are not met, so the answers come from the assumed form</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The underlying theoretical model is static and ignores the timing of decisions.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any conclusion about sequencing or timing: OUR THEORETICAL MODEL IS STATIC AND DOES NOT CONSIDER THE TIMING OF DECISIONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The corroborating CNLSY79 data lack adult outcomes and have small samples.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the CNLSY79 corroboration only: MANY OF THE CHILDREN ARE STILL YOUNG AND WE LACK INFORMATION ON THEIR WAGES, OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND EMPLOYMENT AT AGE 30</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The noncognitive measures used (Rotter, Rosenberg) are narrower than would be ideal and are not linked to economic preference parameters.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the interpretation of the noncognitive measures: IT WOULD BE BETTER TO USE A WIDER ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS AND ... TO CONNECT THEM WITH MORE CONVENTIONAL MEASURES OF PREFERENCE PARAMETERS IN ECONOMICS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The scale of the two latent abilities is not measured but set: two normalizations are stated to be required for identification, and they fix the scale of the factors.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the magnitude of a factor score as a quantity of ability: the paper states two normalizations are required for identification and that they set the scale of the factors</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The direction of the bias in the conventional estimates is stated to be unknown, because the problems push in different directions.</label>
        <note>what this limits: treating an OLS estimate as a bound on the effect: the paper states the biases run in different directions so the sign of the difference from its own model cannot be predicted</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The measures used are declared imperfect: the attitude scales proxying noncognitive ability are affected by family background and are called at best imperfect measures of true ability.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any test score read as the ability itself: the paper states these scores are affected by family background and are at best imperfect measures of an individual&#x27;s true abilities</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>What the construct covers is bounded by the instrument available in the survey, and the authors say a wider array of psychological measurement would have been better.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the noncognitive factor as the full space of noncognitive ability: the authors state a wider array of psychological measurements would ideally have been used</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The channels through which the abilities act are not separately estimated; the model is a linear-in-the-parameters approximation.</label>
        <note>what this limits: attributing an effect to a particular channel: the paper states it does not estimate the relationships for each channel separately and that its model approximates the general one</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>An interchangeability the paper asserts in principle is explicitly deferred rather than shown.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that test scores and behaviours are interchangeable proxies: the paper states this in principle and leaves the task for future work</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The disputed word in this literature is &#x27;importance&#x27;, and the paper&#x27;s claim holds under one sense of it and reverses under another that the paper states in the same sentence: cognitive skills explain much more of the variance of log wages, while the skill gradients of the two abilities are similar. The paper marks its choice (&#x27;for the sense of importance adopted in this paper&#x27;) rather than leaving it implied, which is what makes the reversal checkable at all.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors take the latent-variable measurement models built in psychometrics and extend them so that a choice variable (schooling) and background variables can enter the measurement equations of an economic model.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>two psychology instruments - the Rotter Locus of Control Scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - are imported into labour economics to stand for noncognitive skill</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>cognitive skill is measured with five subtests of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, an instrument built for military selection and re-used as an economic variable</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>holding cognitive ability constant when comparing GED recipients with high school dropouts</label>
        <note>eliminates: cognitive ability as the explanation of any wage difference attributed to the credential - and with it removed, the difference reverses rather than shrinking · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>noncognitive skills</label>
        <term>noncognitive skills</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>cognitive skills</label>
        <term>cognitive skills</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>normalizations</label>
        <term>normalizations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper">
        <label>measurement error</label>
        <term>measurement error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>ASVAB</label>
        <term>ASVAB</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Rotter Locus of Control Scale</label>
        <term>Rotter Locus of Control Scale</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>coding speed</label>
        <term>coding speed</term>
        <note>about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:48). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>AFQT</label>
        <term>AFQT</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>schooling</label>
        <term>schooling</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ability → schooling</label>
        <note>THE TWO CANNOT BE SEPARATED IN THIS STUDY - the DESIGN form / It bounds what the paper&#x27;s own results can mean, and it lives in a methods paragraph where nothing downstream will find it. The confound is between the paper&#x27;s own explanatory variables, so it bounds every coefficient in the table it is attached to.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>noncognitive skills - AS MEASURED: scores on attitude scales, which the paper calls at best imperfect measures of the individual&#x27;s true ability</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>noncognitive skills - AS MODELLED: a latent factor whose scale is fixed by normalization rather than by measurement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Bayesian methods - used here for computation only, with the identification argument stated to be strictly classical and the priors asymptotically irrelevant</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>test score - a quantity that depends on schooling completed AT THE TIME OF THE TEST, so the measurement is not independent of the outcome being explained</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>importance - IN THE SENSE THIS PAPER ADOPTS: the size of the skill gradient, how much an outcome moves when a person is moved across the distribution of one ability. ON THE RIVAL MEASURE THE RANKING REVERSES AND THE PAPER SAYS SO IN THE SAME SENTENCE: cognitive skills &#x27;explain much more of the variance of (log) wages&#x27;, while by skill gradients the two are similar</label>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the text of footnote 33 and a page number, between &#x27;their effects on (log)&#x27; and &#x27;wages (as measured&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>importance - A THIRD SENSE THE PAPER NAMES AND EXPLICITLY DOES NOT CLAIM: equal strength in its own sense &#x27;does not translate into equal cost of changing these skills&#x27;, so the finding is silent on which ability is cheaper to change</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the &quot;g&quot; theory of Herrnstein and Murray (1994) and Jensen (1998)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Hansen, Heckman, and Mullen (2004)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the LISREL model of Jöreskog (1977) and the MIMIC model of Jöreskog and Goldberger (1975)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Neal and Johnson (1996); Hansen, Heckman, and Mullen (2004); Heckman, Larenas, and Urzua (2004)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Herrnstein and Murray (1994) and Herrnstein and Wilson (1985) on cognitive ability and crime</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the single-skill signalling model of Arrow (1973) and Spence (1973)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>cognitive skills —operationalised-as→ ASVAB</label>
        <term>cognitive skills</term>
        <term>ASVAB</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Five subtests of a battery built to decide military eligibility - the paper says elsewhere that the AFQT composite &#x27;is a general measure of trainability and a primary…&#x27;. An instrument designed for a selection decision is here the measure of the construct.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>noncognitive skills —operationalised-as→ Rotter Locus of Control Scale</label>
        <term>noncognitive skills</term>
        <term>Rotter Locus of Control Scale</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE PAPER STATES ITS REASON FOR CHOOSING THEM AND IT IS NOT FITNESS: &#x27;…these measures because of their availability in the NLSY…&#x27; The construct carrying the paper&#x27;s headline claim against Herrnstein and Murray is measured by a four-item abbreviated locus-of-control scale and a self-esteem scale, picked for what the survey happened to contain.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;noncognitive measures&#x27;, not &#x27;noncognitive skills&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>cognitive skills —operationalised-as→ coding speed</label>
        <term>cognitive skills</term>
        <term>coding speed</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: THE UNIT OF THE LATENT ABILITY IS SET BY WHICHEVER INDICATOR WAS GIVEN THE 1. The cognitive factor&#x27;s loading is normalised to 1 on CODING SPEED (ASVAB 5) and the noncognitive factor&#x27;s on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, both &#x27;for individuals in grades 9 to 11 at the time of the test&#x27; - so the scale is fixed by an indicator choice AND a schooling subgroup. The record already carries the existence of the normalisation; this names what the units are. NOTE THE HEADLINE COMPARISON DOES NOT DEPEND ON IT: the paper compares the two abilities by moving people between DECILES of each factor&#x27;s own distribution, which is invariant to the scale.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>schooling —causes→ AFQT</label>
        <term>schooling</term>
        <term>AFQT</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE PROXY IS CAUSED BY THE OUTCOME IT IS USED TO EXPLAIN: each additional year of schooling raises measured AFQT by 2 to 4 percentage points on average, and &#x27;…THIS CREATES A REVERSE CAUSALITY…&#x27; problem. The paper says flatly in its conclusion that schooling &#x27;…raises measured cognitive…&#x27; and noncognitive ability. Naming this is the reason the paper builds a latent-factor model instead of regressing on test scores.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ordinary least squares regression</label>
        <term>ordinary least squares regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>probit / multinomial discrete choice models</label>
        <term>probit / multinomial discrete choice models</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation</label>
        <term>Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-squared test</label>
        <term>chi-squared test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>goodness-of-fit test</label>
        <term>goodness-of-fit test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>factor analysis</label>
        <term>factor analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard error</label>
        <term>standard error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A low-dimensional vector of cognitive and noncognitive skills explains a variety of labor-market and behavioral outcomes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For many dimensions of social performance, cognitive and noncognitive skills are equally important.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Noncognitive skills shape schooling choices and additionally raise wages conditional on schooling.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Schooling raises measured test scores.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Male GED holders have a worse noncognitive ability distribution than dropouts.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Noncognitive rather than cognitive ability is what mainly explains differences in criminal participation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The two latent skills carry different hedonic prices in the labor markets of different schooling levels.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Estimated returns to ability shrink when test scores are corrected for the schooling attained at test date, showing that endogenous test scores bias conventional OLS estimates upward.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>GED</label>
        <term>GED</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>AFQT</label>
        <term>AFQT</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>illegal activities</label>
        <term>illegal activities</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Rotter Internal-External Locus of Control Scale</label>
        <term>Rotter Internal-External Locus of Control Scale</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>risky behaviors</label>
        <term>risky behaviors</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cognitive skills</label>
        <term>cognitive skills</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>schooling level at the time of the test</label>
        <term>schooling level at the time of the test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>gender</label>
        <term>gender</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ethnicity dummies</label>
        <term>ethnicity dummies</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cohort dummies</label>
        <term>cohort dummies</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>local labor market conditions</label>
        <term>local labor market conditions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>region of residence dummies</label>
        <term>region of residence dummies</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>work experience</label>
        <term>work experience</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[12]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>choice of occupation</label>
        <term>choice of occupation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[13]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>employment</label>
        <term>employment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[14]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>schooling</label>
        <term>schooling</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>9% — share of the variance of log wages explained by the cognitive ability measure when schooling is not controlled for</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.9% — share of the variance of log wages explained by the noncognitive measure for men</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>77% — proportion of the trace of the male cognitive test-score correlation matrix explained by a single factor</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>31% — proportion of the trace of the noncognitive correlation matrix explained by a single factor, much lower than for cognitive scores</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>2 to 4 percentage points — increase in measured AFQT score produced by each additional year of schooling</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>66% — share of the Perry Preschool treatment group graduating from high school by age 18</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>431.65 with 150 degrees of freedom — chi-squared statistic rejecting the null that schooling does not affect measured cognitive tests for males</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>116.53 with 40 degrees of freedom — chi-squared statistic rejecting the null that schooling does not affect the noncognitive measurement equations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1086/504455.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
