<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Toward a theory of media priming</title>
        <author>Hoewe</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Toward a theory of media priming</title>
          <date>2020</date>
          <publisher>Annals of the International Communication Association</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1080/23808985.2020.1815232</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Hoewe2020-toward-a-theory-of-media-priming</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Hoewe2020-toward-a-theory-of-media-priming.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">12659e3219cfcc71e832738eb044604e8b7f3654</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>media-and-communication-studies</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>media priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A prime spreads activation through an associative memory network, and because only a few activated nodes reach conscious awareness the resulting judgment cannot be traced back to its source.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Media priming works by activating nodes or networks of nodes in associative memory outside the media consumer&#x27;s immediate awareness.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Awareness cancels the effect: once people notice the prime or deliberate about the source of their decision they correct for it, which is why the effect requires unawareness.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A gap between desired and actual confidence in a political judgment motivates a switch from System 1 to System 2, which is why evaluations of political actors can be made within awareness.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper sets aside the argument that System 1 / System 2 dichotomisation is itself inadequate, treating it as out of scope.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper imports the dual-process account of cognition wholesale and uses it as the machinery for distinguishing media priming from political priming in communication research.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Chooses Kahneman&#x27;s and Stanovich and West&#x27;s System 1 / System 2 vocabulary, in preference to the communication field&#x27;s own ELM and HSM, as the framework for the new theory.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>media priming</label>
        <term>media priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>political priming</label>
        <term>political priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>System 1</label>
        <term>System 1</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>System 2</label>
        <term>System 2</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>agenda setting</label>
        <term>agenda setting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>prime</label>
        <term>prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>awareness</label>
        <term>awareness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>learning</label>
        <term>learning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming, at its most basic - the presentation of a stimulus and the effects it causes, with the PRIME separated out as the portion of the stimulus responsible. The paper starts from the least contested version and then shows it does not survive contact with the field</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming per Bargh 2016, quoted at length as the best available clarification - PASSIVE, UNINTENDED, and not accurately reportable. The definition works by exclusion: an explicit instruction is not priming because the person intends it, and presenting new information is LEARNING rather than passive activation of what is already in the head</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>media priming, the paper&#x27;s own sense - restricted to System 1 and defined by the consumer&#x27;s INABILITY TO TRACE the influence. A sense drawn as a limit on an existing word rather than a new mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>political priming, the sense inherited from agenda setting - media coverage makes an issue salient and the consumer then weighs it when judging a politician. The paper&#x27;s point is that this can be a CONSCIOUS application, which is what puts it outside media priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>awareness, as the paper narrows it - NOT awareness of the stimulus but awareness of the INFLUENCE of the prime within it. The narrowing is what makes the boundary testable, because a consumer can watch an advertisement knowingly and still be primed by it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the operational test for the boundary, which is the part most definitional papers omit: ask whether the participant can identify the prime, and if they can, the study is not studying media priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Bargh (2016)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Kahneman (2011)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Roskos-Ewoldsen et al. (2007, 2009)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Lenz (2009)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>media priming —part-of→ System 1</label>
        <term>media priming</term>
        <term>System 1</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: The core proposal, and it is stated as a restriction - &#x27;can only occur within System 1&#x27; - so the edge is a containment rather than a cause.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>political priming —part-of→ System 2</label>
        <term>political priming</term>
        <term>System 2</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.6 — the record marks this weak · note: WEIGHTED FOR ITS OWN HEDGING. The paper says &#x27;entirely plausible&#x27;, not demonstrated, and immediately concedes System 1 remains possible. What it does assert is the consequence: only one of the two routes fits the theory.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but political priming &#x27;COULD occur&#x27; through System 2; part-of is hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>political priming —distinct-from→ media priming</label>
        <term>political priming</term>
        <term>media priming</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER THE PROCESSING HAPPENS INSIDE THE CONSUMER&#x27;S AWARENESS - both may run on accessibility, and that shared mechanism is exactly why the two have been treated as one thing · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The paper&#x27;s central separation, and it grants the similarity before drawing the line: same accessibility mechanism, different awareness.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>political priming —part-of→ agenda setting</label>
        <term>political priming</term>
        <term>agenda setting</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: Attributed to a long list of media-effects scholars rather than argued here, and hedged with &#x27;can act as&#x27; - hence 0.7. It is the genealogy that explains why one field has two incompatible senses of one word.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>learning —distinct-from→ political priming</label>
        <term>learning</term>
        <term>political priming</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: Lenz&#x27;s charge, reported by this paper: the political-priming findings were consumers LEARNING which issues the media covered. If that is right the effect leaves the priming category altogether rather than moving to the other side of this paper&#x27;s boundary - a third option the System 1 / System 2 split does not provide for.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper proposes that media priming, properly defined, occurs only within System 1 processing, when a media stimulus produces a reaction whose source the consumer cannot trace.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Media priming and political priming are separated by awareness rather than by accessibility: the first works outside awareness, the second may work inside it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Political priming could occur through System 1, but it could just as plausibly occur through System 2 processing.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review identifies two divergent research camps using the same word &#x27;priming&#x27; with different operationalizations and different effect patterns.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>If the consumer can identify the prime that influenced their response, the effect is not counted as media priming.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Applying the criterion to an existing study of terrorism news framing shows it does not qualify as media priming because participants demonstrably noticed the manipulated phrase.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>media priming</label>
        <term>media priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming</label>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>prime</label>
        <term>prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>political priming</label>
        <term>political priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>System 1</label>
        <term>System 1</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>System 2</label>
        <term>System 2</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>law of least effort</label>
        <term>law of least effort</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sufficiency principle</label>
        <term>sufficiency principle</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1815232.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
