<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The emotional valence and features of subliminal priming images impact conscious perception of face expressions</title>
        <author>Huang</author>
        <author>Rana</author>
        <author>Vaina</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The emotional valence and features of subliminal priming images impact conscious perception of face expressions</title>
          <date>2018</date>
          <publisher>bioRxiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1101/255489</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Huang2018-the-emotional-valence-and-features-of-sublim</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Huang2018-the-emotional-valence-and-features-of-sublim.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">363444f6833b237ff88c28cde2020afc1551855a</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>subliminal affective priming of facial expression perception</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>faces in the prime are processed preferentially, and the perceived prime face then competes with and interferes with perception of the target face</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>a face in the prime sets up an expectation of an emotionally charged target, which speeds and biases the response toward &#x27;angry&#x27;</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>an egocentric vantage-point recruits action-preparation processes, which lower the priority given to affect processing and so degrade angry-face recognition</term>
        <note>status: the paper&#x27;s own words: we suggest that</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The design cannot separate the emotion of the depicted scene from the emotion of the facial expression within the prime; the authors state they will add further prime dimensions to do so.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>prime and mask both subtending 12.5 by 12.5 degrees and presented at the same central location</label>
        <note>eliminates: a size or position difference between prime and mask, which would make the masking incomplete in a way that varies with the stimulus · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>subliminal priming</label>
        <term>subliminal priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>affective primacy</label>
        <term>affective primacy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>centricity</label>
        <term>centricity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>egocentric</label>
        <term>egocentric</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A NAMED HYPOTHESIS GIVEN A BOUNDARY CONDITION RATHER THAN A VERDICT: `the affective primacy hypothesis which predicts that affective information can be accessed automatically, preceding conscious cognition, holds true in subliminal priming only when the priming image contains a face.` Not confirmed, not refuted - restricted. And the condition is a property of the STIMULUS, where the ambiguity condition is a property of the outcome situation and Holcomb2005&#x27;s is a property of the observer. Three different places a priming effect can be conditional, and a corpus that records only `X primes Y` loses all three</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE PRIME MAKES THE TASK HARDER, WHICH IS THE CASE THE STANDARD DEFINITION EXCLUDES. `subliminally priming with a face-containing image significantly impairs the subjects&#x27; ability to perceive the emotional expression of the target-face.` Minton2017 quotes McNamara defining priming as `an IMPROVEMENT in performance` and then strikes the word out, because `priming can also involve a change in performance that is neutral or results in POORER performance`. This record is the counterexample that correction needed - a real interference effect, in a different literature, from a paper that never mentions the definitional dispute</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>IT CONTRADICTS A NAMED STUDY AND SAYS SO PLAINLY: `Quotation withheld.` And it offers the reconciling detail rather than leaving the disagreement bare - `the emotional expression of a face in a prime can be processed, at least partially, during a 16 ms exposure`. A null and a positive on the same manipulation, with an exposure duration between them</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE CONGRUENCY EFFECT IS ITSELF CONDITIONAL, WHICH IS THE SECOND `only when` IN ONE PAPER: `we found that specifically the incongruency of the pleasant prime and the angry expression of the target-face lead to worse performance ... Quotation withheld.` So the paper reports an affective congruency effect, agrees it is the known one, and then restricts it - twice qualifying a borrowed finding rather than claiming a new one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Vaina, Rana, Cotos Cheng, Huang, &amp; Podea (2014) preliminary study of affective subliminal priming in schizophrenic subjects</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Andrews, Lipp, Malan, &amp; Könjg (2011)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Kemps, Erauw, and Vandierendock (1996)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>egocentric —causes→ subliminal priming</label>
        <term>egocentric</term>
        <term>subliminal priming</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: NO effect direction. Vantage-point is a two-level CATEGORY (egocentric or allocentric), not a quantity, so &#x27;increases&#x27; and &#x27;reduces&#x27; are both meaningless - what the paper reports is that the two levels DIFFER, and in which direction for which target. And what this edge cannot carry is the sharpest part: the centricity effect holds &#x27;REGARDLESS of whether…&#x27;, which makes it the one route here that does NOT need the affective content. That sentence never says &#x27;subliminal priming&#x27;, so it is on the &#x27;centricity&#x27; concept row instead.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says vantage point impacts the priming effect; &#x27;egocentric causes subliminal priming&#x27; drops the effect.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>generalized linear mixed model</label>
        <term>generalized linear mixed model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Wilcoxon signed-rank test</label>
        <term>Wilcoxon signed-rank test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>false discovery rate correction</label>
        <term>false discovery rate correction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>power analysis</label>
        <term>power analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F-test</label>
        <term>F-test</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard error</label>
        <term>standard error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Priming images that contained a face impaired subsequent identification of the target face&#x27;s expression relative to primes without a face.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Pleasant primes containing a face selectively damaged recognition of angry target-face expressions.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>After an egocentric prime, neutral target expressions were recognised significantly better than angry ones.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Among face-containing primes, neutral ones produced better target-face performance than either aggressive or pleasant ones.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors conclude that the affective primacy hypothesis survives in subliminal priming only in the special case where the prime image contains a face.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The face-versus-non-face prime difference reached significance only for aggressive prime content.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>congruency effect</label>
        <term>congruency effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>affective primacy hypothesis</label>
        <term>affective primacy hypothesis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>SAFFIMAP test</label>
        <term>SAFFIMAP test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>centricity</label>
        <term>centricity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>presence or absence of a face in the priming image</label>
        <term>presence or absence of a face in the priming image</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>centricity</label>
        <term>centricity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>percent correct</label>
        <term>percent correct</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>subject variability</label>
        <term>subject variability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>16 ms — exposure duration of the subliminal prime image, followed by a 100 ms mask</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Thirty-three subjects — number of participants, with their sex split and mean age</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>120 trials — total number of trials in the SAFFIMAP test</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>74.20% vs 78.00% — mean accuracy on target-face evaluation after face primes versus non-face primes</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>73.4% vs 81.0% — mean accuracy after aggressive primes with a face versus aggressive primes without a face</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>81.64% vs 77.31% — mean accuracy on neutral target faces after egocentric versus allocentric primes</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1101/255489.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
