<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Attention and Implicit Memory: Priming-Induced Benefits and Costs Have Distinct Attentional Requirements</title>
        <author>Keane</author>
        <author>Cruz</author>
        <author>Verfaellie</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Attention and Implicit Memory: Priming-Induced Benefits and Costs Have Distinct Attentional Requirements</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>Memory &amp; cognition</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3758/s13421-014-0464-4</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Keane2015-attention-and-implicit-memory-priming-induce</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Keane2015-attention-and-implicit-memory-priming-induce.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">276b15da9bd736dca04454973d5ce2983d1a0e7e</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>priming-induced performance costs and benefits in picture naming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A lure picture activates the perceptually similar studied item as a competing incorrect response alongside the correct one, so naming requires selection among alternatives.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Because only the cost involves response competition at test, only the cost depends on attention at encoding, in line with the identification-production account.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The small amnesic sample forced a within-subject design in Experiment 2, unlike the between-subjects design of Experiment 1.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Amnesic participants&#x27; longer and more variable RTs complicate the between-group comparison, requiring z-score transformation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>three FILLER PICTURES resembling none of the critical stimuli placed at the beginning and end of the study list</label>
        <note>eliminates: that memory for the critical items is inflated or depressed by primacy and recency · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>items counterbalanced across participants so each pair appeared equally often in the old, lure and new conditions</label>
        <note>eliminates: that a condition effect is an item effect - that the old, lure and new sets simply contain different pictures · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>which member of each pair became the target and which the mate was decided at random</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the target items are systematically more memorable than their mates · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>costs</label>
        <term>costs</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>benefits</label>
        <term>benefits</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>divided attention</label>
        <term>divided attention</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>response competition</label>
        <term>response competition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>implicit memory</label>
        <term>implicit memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>PRIMING WITH THE SIGN REVERSED, and a field-level gap named in the abstract: the literature has focused EXCLUSIVELY on priming effects that are beneficial and has OVERLOOKED those that are costly, `wherein performance is harmed by prior exposure to task stimuli`. Nearly every other priming record in this corpus reports a facilitation. If `priming` is defined as an influence of prior exposure rather than as a benefit, then half the phenomenon has gone unstudied because of what the word suggests</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>cost and benefit as a SYMMETRIC PAIR of operationalisations - both are response times against the same NEW baseline, in the same task, from the same study phase: benefit = faster to OLD than to new, cost = slower to LURE than to new. Because the two share a baseline and differ only in the relation between studied and test item (identical versus merely similar), a dissociation between them cannot be explained by task or by measure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the amnesia control, and it is chosen for the ALTERNATIVE IT KILLS. Dividing attention damages explicit memory as well, so eliminating the cost that way leaves open that the cost was explicit all along. Amnesic participants have no explicit memory to lose and the costs are INTACT - so the Experiment 1 result cannot be an artifact of reduced explicit memory. A population used as a control condition rather than as a subject of study</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>attention required WHERE A SELECTION MUST BE MADE - the paper&#x27;s account of why one effect needs attention and the other does not is not about strength or depth but about whether the test cue leaves a CHOICE. The lure activates a wrong response alongside the right one; the old item points at a single correct response. Offered as a suggestion (`We suggest`, `may be linked`), and weighted here as one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → unitary-source accounts of priming costs and benefits (Rouder, Ratcliff &amp; McKoon, 2000; Marsolek, 2008)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Gabrieli et al. (1999) on divided attention not reducing the picture-naming priming benefit</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Cave &amp; Squire (1992) and Verfaellie et al. (1996) on normal picture-naming priming benefits in amnesia</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>costs —distinct-from→ benefits</label>
        <term>costs</term>
        <term>benefits</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER ATTENTION AT ENCODING IS REQUIRED - dividing attention eliminates the cost and leaves the benefit intact. Same task, same study phase, same participants, so the difference cannot be attributed to materials or measure · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE RESULT. Two effects that a corpus would file under one word, separated by an experimental manipulation rather than by definition. Confidence 0.95 - this is the paper&#x27;s own headline, stated in its abstract, not my reading of a discussion.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>divided attention —causes→ costs</label>
        <term>divided attention</term>
        <term>costs</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: eliminates · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: &#x27;eliminated&#x27;, not reduced - the paper&#x27;s own word, and the vocabulary has the exact term for it. Experiment 2 is what licenses reading this as a fact about the cost rather than about explicit memory.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>response competition —causes→ costs</label>
        <term>response competition</term>
        <term>costs</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: Weight 0.7, the lowest here, and the paper&#x27;s hedges are the reason: &#x27;We suggest&#x27;, &#x27;may be linked&#x27;, &#x27;it is likely that&#x27;. The mechanism is an interpretation offered after the result, not something the experiments manipulated.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the authors &#x27;SUGGEST&#x27; the role of attention is linked to response competition; causes is hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>power analysis</label>
        <term>power analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>effect size</label>
        <term>effect size</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>partial eta squared</label>
        <term>partial eta squared</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard deviation</label>
        <term>standard deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>z-score standardization</label>
        <term>z-score standardization</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Dividing attention at encoding wiped out the priming-induced cost in speeded picture naming while leaving the priming-induced benefit untouched.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Amnesic patients showed a normal performance cost despite explicit memory impairment comparable to that produced by divided attention.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Costs and benefits in this task therefore arise from at least two separable implicit-memory mechanisms with different attentional requirements.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The dissociation is a problem for existing unitary-source models of priming costs and benefits (decision-node weighting and superimpositional representation accounts).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming</label>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming-induced performance cost</label>
        <term>priming-induced performance cost</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>performance benefit</label>
        <term>performance benefit</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>identification-production distinction</label>
        <term>identification-production distinction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>attention at encoding (full vs. divided)</label>
        <term>attention at encoding (full vs. divided)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>study condition</label>
        <term>study condition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean RT</label>
        <term>mean RT</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>corrected recognition</label>
        <term>corrected recognition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>age</label>
        <term>age</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>education</label>
        <term>education</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>WAIS-III Verbal IQ</label>
        <term>WAIS-III Verbal IQ</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F (1, 106) = 82.44, p &lt; .001 — overall priming benefit (old vs. new pictures) in Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t (53) = 2.12, p = .02, d = .24 — the priming-induced cost, significant only under full attention (p = .12 under divided attention)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F (1, 106) = 5.68, p = .019 — attention x study condition interaction showing the cost differed between full and divided attention</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>132 msec / 89 msec — size of the priming benefit under divided versus full attention (numerically larger under divided attention)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t (22) = 5.09, p &lt; .001, d = 2.16 — impairment of corrected recognition in the amnesic group relative to controls in Experiment 2</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F (1, 24) = 4.22, p = .051 — the performance cost in Experiment 2, which did not differ between amnesic and control groups</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>54 — participants per attention group in the Experiment 1 implicit memory task</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>11 — amnesic participants tested in Experiment 2</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0464-4.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
