<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Attentional Modulation of Unconscious ‘‘Automatic’’ Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm</title>
        <author>Kiefer</author>
        <author>Brendel</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Attentional Modulation of Unconscious ‘‘Automatic’’ Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm</title>
          <date></date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          
          
          <idno type="record">Kiefernd-attentional-modulation-of-unconscious-automa</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Kiefernd-attentional-modulation-of-unconscious-automa.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">b37926ac091b8cd7be0343a9c3c94bd68da10925</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>masked semantic priming (N400)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>electrophysiology</label>
        <term>electrophysiology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Temporal attention amplifies the activation of the masked prime&#x27;s stimulus representation, and this amplification is what allows an unconsciously perceived prime to trigger the automatic semantic process indexed by the N400</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Attentional amplification acts on conscious and unconscious stimuli alike, so attention and awareness are separable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A temporal window of attention opened around the predicted target boosts processing of primes falling close to it in time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The cueing manipulation may have been too weak to fully disengage temporal attention from the prime, which could explain why behavioural priming was unaffected.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Some backward priming from target to prime cannot be entirely ruled out in Experiment 2.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a CONTROL EXPERIMENT identical to Experiment 1 except that the cue stimulus was not task-relevant and did not direct attention</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the modulation follows from the cue&#x27;s physical presence rather than from the attention it directs · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>filler trials at an intermediate cue-prime interval were included</label>
        <note>eliminates: that subjects learn the trial-length structure and prepare differently for short and long intervals · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>automatic processes</label>
        <term>automatic processes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>temporal attention</label>
        <term>temporal attention</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>masked priming</label>
        <term>masked priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>N400</label>
        <term>N400</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE DEFINITIONAL CLAIM IS QUOTED HERE VERBATIM AND THEN CONTRADICTED BY THE SAME PAPER. `Quotation withheld (Posner &amp; Snyder, 1975).` If independence from attention is what makes a process automatic, and the process turns out not to be independent of attention, then either it is not automatic or the definition is wrong. The paper takes the second option and keeps the word - which is precisely the move this corpus exists to make visible, and it is made in an introduction without comment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE RESULT, AND `PREREQUISITE` IS A STRONGER WORD THAN `MODULATES`: `Quotation withheld` Not amplified, not enhanced - required. Without attention in the prime&#x27;s time window there is no masked N400 priming at all. neely1977 built a design to separate the automatic component from the attentional one; this says the separation does not hold at the boundary</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>AND THE CONTROL THAT MAKES IT INTERESTING IS ONE CLAUSE IN THE HYPOTHESIS: masked priming is amplified when attention is directed to the stimulus stream in the prime&#x27;s time window, `even in the absence of any prime awareness.` Attention moves; awareness stays at zero. Without that clause the result reads as `attending made the prime visible` - a different and far less interesting paper. Same manoeuvre as marcel1983&#x27;s second mask and eckstein2007&#x27;s awareness measures. Sixth record running where the instrument turns out to be part of the phenomenon, and the first where the thing being modulated is the definition itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Naccache, Blandin &amp; Dehaene (2002)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Schneider &amp; Shiffrin (1977); Posner &amp; Snyder (1975)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Deacon et al. (2000); Kiefer &amp; Spitzer (2000); Brown &amp; Hagoort (1993)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>temporal attention —causes→ N400</label>
        <term>temporal attention</term>
        <term>N400</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.95 · direction on the measure (stated by the tagger, no quotation): increases · note: &#x27;PREREQUISITE&#x27; IS WHY THIS IS 0.95 AND WHY &#x27;increases&#x27; UNDERSTATES IT. The enforced axis vocabulary offers increases / reduces / eliminates / no-change, and the claim here is stronger than any of them: without temporal attention the effect does not occur. The nearest available value is &#x27;increases&#x27; and it is recorded with that gap stated rather than papered over. A fifth value - &#x27;is-required-for&#x27; - would be the honest one, and that goes to Shir with the other schema items rather than being invented here. Both endpoints named as words, the sentence is a results statement, no hedge to preserve.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F-test / main effect</label>
        <term>F-test / main effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>post hoc multiple comparison test</label>
        <term>post hoc multiple comparison test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Huynh-Feldt correction for sphericity</label>
        <term>Huynh-Feldt correction for sphericity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>signal detection sensitivity (d-prime)</label>
        <term>signal detection sensitivity (d-prime)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>between-subjects factor in mixed ANOVA</label>
        <term>between-subjects factor in mixed ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The masked N400 priming effect was strongest when the cue interval and the SOAs were short.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Temporal attention to the prime is a prerequisite for masked N400 priming.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>With a task-irrelevant cue, N400 priming was considerably reduced and no longer modulated by the cue-prime interval.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Masked behavioural priming was significant but did not vary with the cue-prime interval.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Prime visibility was at chance for the analysed participants, supporting the claim that the primes were unconscious.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Regression found no significant correlation between priming effects and prime identification scores.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>semantic priming</label>
        <term>semantic priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>masked priming procedure</label>
        <term>masked priming procedure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>N400 priming effect</label>
        <term>N400 priming effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cue prime interval</label>
        <term>cue prime interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>stimulus onset asynchrony</label>
        <term>stimulus onset asynchrony</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>SOA</label>
        <term>SOA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cue relevance</label>
        <term>cue relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>N400 amplitude</label>
        <term>N400 amplitude</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>objective measure of prime identification</label>
        <term>objective measure of prime identification</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>RT</label>
        <term>RT</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ER</label>
        <term>ER</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F(1,15) = 31.064, MSE = 948, p &lt; .0001 — Main effect of semantic relatedness on lexical decision reaction time in Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F(1,15) = 34.405, MSE = 17.83, p &lt; .0001 — Main effect of semantic relatedness on N400 amplitude in the 400-599 msec window of Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>16 subjects, mean age 25.1 years — Analysed sample of Experiment 1 after excluding three participants whose prime identification exceeded chance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>49.45% and 49.38% — Masked prime identification accuracy in the short and long cue-prime interval conditions, both at the 50% chance level</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>67 msec or 200 msec — The two prime-target stimulus onset asynchronies used to track the time course of masked priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>33.5 msec — Duration of the masked prime word presentation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>800 trials — Total trials per participant, split into five blocks of 160</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.97% versus 1.79% — Lexical decision error rates for semantically related versus unrelated word pairs in Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at .</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
