<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Consciousness and cognitive control</title>
        <author>Kunde</author>
        <author>Reuss</author>
        <author>Kiesel</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Consciousness and cognitive control</title>
          <date>2012</date>
          <publisher>Advances in Cognitive Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.2478/v10053-008-0097-x</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Kunde2012-consciousness-and-cognitive-control</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Kunde2012-consciousness-and-cognitive-control.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">dc515097d4c41e0df63ee2508bd0d2d5d1079d91</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>The claim that cognitive control requires awareness, and the inconsistent evidence about whether unconscious events can trigger it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>cognitive control triggered by unconscious events</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>implicit control cues must leave a memory trace that survives across trials, and only consciously represented events are strong enough to bridge that interval, so unconscious implicit cues never reach the control system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>adapting to a statistical property such as conflict frequency requires accumulating information across many separate episodes over a long period, an accumulation that unconscious representations cannot support</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>control is executed by if-then plans; explicit cues let participants specify both sides of the plan in advance, whereas implicit events leave the if-side and then-side vague, so the plan itself has to be revised and it is this revision that demands awareness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proposed resolution: control cued by a single explicit signal can be triggered without awareness, while control that has to be inferred from a pattern of events cannot</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>An implicit cue is one where the environment never signals the need for control - it merely suggests it, so the actor must infer it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Unconscious stimuli are processed only where the system was prepared in advance to process them, so preparation rather than awareness does the work</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Conflict adaptation works by reallocating attention toward the relevant stimulus aspects after conflict is frequent or recent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>An indirect route could fake unconscious control: the prime stays unconscious while its behavioural consequences do not, and the actor adjusts to those</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review&#x27;s own headline result is that the literature it surveys does not settle the question.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The evidence base the review rests on may be distorted by selective publication of positive findings.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors name publication bias in their own literature: positive evidence for control without awareness is publishable and negative evidence is not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The effects at issue are small, so studies claiming them need power that is not always present</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The central claim is stated with an epistemic hedge: awareness seems essential, or else the evidence is merely not consistent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The failures of implicit control might be failures of the manipulation rather than of the capacity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The key term is admitted to be poorly defined</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>control cue - EXPLICIT: a single stimulus that directly signals what to do, such as a task cue or stop signal - and this kind works without awareness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>control cue - IMPLICIT: no signal at all, only a pattern in the environment from which the need for control must be inferred - and this kind appears to need awareness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the claim - as a positive necessity: awareness is essential for implicitly cued control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the claim - as an absence of evidence: the effect has simply not been found consistently, which is a weaker statement the authors deliberately keep in reserve</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>unconscious effect - genuinely unconscious: the masked event itself drives the adjustment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>unconscious effect - indirectly conscious: the event stays unconscious but its behavioural consequences are noticed, and the actor adjusts to those</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Crump et al. (2006) and Crump, Vaquero, &amp; Milliken (2008) on context-specific proportion congruency effects</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>critiques → Dehaene and Naccache&#x27;s workspace model, which reserves cognitive control for consciousness</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHICH PROCESSES NEED CONSCIOUSNESS. &#x27;DEHAENE AND NACCACHE (2001) suggest in their workspace model that routine actions are possible without consciousness, while consciousness is required for cognitive control.&#x27; The model is stated precisely enough to be tested and the critique targets exactly the line it draws - so the disagreement is about WHERE the boundary falls, not whether there is one.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>critiques → Jack and Shallice&#x27;s separation of conscious from automatic action</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → preparation accounts of subliminal processing, on which unconscious stimuli work only where the system is set up for them</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS AN ASSUMED PRECONDITION. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; Unconscious processing is granted only where the system was set up for it, so a null in an unprepared condition is not evidence against unconscious processing - it is outside the claim.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>conflict frequency —causes→ cognitive control</label>
        <term>conflict frequency</term>
        <term>cognitive control</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;response-conflict is generally frequent&#x27; and &#x27;more attention is devoted&#x27;, not &#x27;conflict frequency&#x27; / &#x27;cognitive control&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>RETRACTED (THE DIRECTION IS INVERTED AND THE CLAIM IS ATTRIBUTED) · task switching —part-of→ cognitive control</label>
        <term>task switching</term>
        <term>cognitive control</term>
        <note>RETRACTED: THE DIRECTION IS INVERTED AND THE CLAIM IS ATTRIBUTED. The edge is &#x27;task switching --part-of--&gt; cognitive control&#x27;. The span: &#x27;…thus cognitive control is believed to be heavily involved…&#x27;. The sentence says CONTROL IS INVOLVED IN SWITCHING - the paradigm engages the faculty. The edge says the paradigm is a component of the faculty, which is the other way round; and &#x27;is believed&#x27; marks it as the field&#x27;s view rather than this paper&#x27;s finding. — strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but cognitive control is &#x27;believed to be heavily INVOLVED IN&#x27; task switching; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>post-error slowing —part-of→ cognitive control</label>
        <term>post-error slowing</term>
        <term>cognitive control</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>subliminal priming —distinct-from→ consciousness</label>
        <term>subliminal priming</term>
        <term>consciousness</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says stimulus awareness is not necessary for processing; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>When the need for control is signalled by a single explicit cue, that cue does not have to be consciously perceived for control to be recruited.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>When the need for control is only implied by recent or frequent response conflict, awareness of that event appears to be necessary, and unconscious induction of control is not reliably obtained.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Exactly three control functions have so far been shown to be triggerable by subliminal explicit cues: task preparation, response inhibition, and orienting of attention.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>There is little doubt that masked stimuli can induce task sets.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Strategic adaptation to how often conflict occurs is obtained only when the conflicting irrelevant information is consciously seen.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Conflict adaptation requires that the prime in the preceding trial was visible, yet the control settings so established still act on masked primes in the current trial - so awareness is needed to invoke control, not to execute it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In contrast to Experiment 1, the congruency effect here was not affected by context information.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Taken as a whole the literature is inconsistent: some experiments show control prompted by unnoticed events and others show it fails.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors conjecture that cognitive control does not require meta-knowledge of when and how to apply it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>control cued by a single explicit signal appears to work without awareness; control that must be inferred from a pattern does not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>masked primes speed and improve responses when mapped to the same response or category as the target</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the literature on unconscious control is inconsistent, and the authors treat that inconsistency as the thing to be explained</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the field may be shaped by publication bias favouring positive evidence for unconscious control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cognitive control</label>
        <term>cognitive control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>explicit events</label>
        <term>explicit events</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>implicit events</label>
        <term>implicit events</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>prime stimulus</label>
        <term>prime stimulus</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Gratton effect</label>
        <term>Gratton effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>interference tasks</label>
        <term>interference tasks</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cognitive control</label>
        <term>cognitive control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>subliminal priming</label>
        <term>subliminal priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>54 ms ... 32 ms — size of the congruency effect with visible primes in the low-interference versus high-interference context, showing context-specific adaptation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>80% — proportion of congruent trials in the low-interference colour context and of incongruent trials in the high-interference colour context</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>80% ... 20% — proportions of congruent trials in the two conditions across which masked priming effects declined</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0097-x.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
