<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Chapter 12 - Neuroeconomics of Emotion and Decision Making</title>
        <author>Lempert</author>
        <author>Phelps</author>
        <author>Glimcher</author>
        <author>Fehr</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Chapter 12 - Neuroeconomics of Emotion and Decision Making</title>
          <date>2014</date>
          <publisher>Neuroeconomics (Second Edition)</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-416008-8.00012-7</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Lempert2014-chapter-12-neuroeconomics-of-emotion-and-dec</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Lempert2014-chapter-12-neuroeconomics-of-emotion-and-dec.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">fb6f0f2fb77456cf4fe16e961c6fd59502d1412e</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroeconomics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>emotional influence on value-based decision making</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>induced moods set appraisal tendencies - a sad or disgusted state makes the person appraise unrelated options in a mood-congruent way, which shifts the subjective value assigned to them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>stress impairs prefrontal function and enhances striatal/dopaminergic habit circuits, so the decision process falls back on automatic or habitual responding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>amygdala input to the striatum is proposed as the circuit that folds an emotional reaction into the subjective-value computation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>a mismatch between behaviour and attitude produces negative affect, and preference is revised after the fact to become consonant with the behaviour so that the negative affect is removed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A CATEGORY FALSIFIED BY ONE OF ITS OWN MEMBERS: `the hippocampus, a key component of the limbic system in MacLean&#x27;s formulation, was shown to be critical for memory, a basic cognitive function, rather than for emotion.` And the reverse also failed - `phylogenetically newer regions of the neocortex ... were found to be important in emotion`. The category leaked in both directions at once.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE FIRST REPAIR WAS TO CHANGE THE MEMBERSHIP, NOT THE DEFINITION: `Quotation withheld`. The name and its organising distinction were held fixed while the extension was edited to fit - a repair mode nothing else in this corpus records. (The sentence opens `In response to such findings, some researchers tried` on the previous page; the span starts after the page break because the staged text wedges a DOI, a page number, a copyright line and a running header into the middle of it.)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE REPAIR FAILED BECAUSE THE DISTINCTION ITSELF DISSOLVED: `there is no clean dividing line in the brain between regions underlying emotion and cognition, and there is NO EVIDENCE FOR A SINGLE UNIFIED SYSTEM that drives emotion.` Once the boundary the category was drawn to mark is denied, no membership list can save the name.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>AND WHAT REPLACES IT IS NOT ANOTHER CATEGORY BUT A FINER GRAIN: `Quotation withheld.` The successor to a failed umbrella term is a refusal to have an umbrella term.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The stress-to-habit account reviewed lacks direct neural evidence in humans.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the stress-to-habit account: AS OF YET, THERE IS NO DIRECT NEUROSCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF DIMINISHED PFC INVOLVEMENT IN THESE TASKS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The stress and decision-making literature reviewed is not yet conclusive.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the stress and decision-making literature as a whole: IT PRESENTS INTRIGUING IDEAS, BUT LEAVES MANY OPEN QUESTIONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The choice-blindness studies reviewed cannot separate preference change from preference revelation because preferences were not rated before and after.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the choice-blindness interpretation: PARTICIPANTS DID NOT SYSTEMATICALLY RATE THEIR PREFERENCES FOR OBJECTS BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER - so preference change cannot be separated from preference revelation</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The inference from brain activation to a psychological construct is named and reported as questioned, especially for regions with multiple functions.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim that an activation demonstrates an emotional process: the chapter names this reverse inference and reports its success as questioned, especially for multi-function regions</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The review deliberately excludes an entire class of evidence: findings that rest only on reverse inference are not reviewed at all.</label>
        <note>what this limits: this chapter as a survey of the emotion-and-decision literature: statements deriving exclusively from reverse inference were excluded from it by design</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The chapter describes the earlier practice it is correcting as assuming its conclusion a priori.</label>
        <note>what this limits: earlier neuroeconomic findings linking irrational choice to emotion: the chapter states the link was often assumed a priori and taken as verified by activation in regions previously linked to emotion</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>reverse inference</label>
        <term>reverse inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>incidental affect</label>
        <term>incidental affect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>affective state</label>
        <term>affective state</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>limbic system</label>
        <term>limbic system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>hippocampus</label>
        <term>hippocampus</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>reverse inference - the named move from an observed activation to the presence of a psychological construct, whose success the chapter reports as questioned</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>incidental affect - a stipulated sense: a baseline affective state unrelated to the decision that can nevertheless shift choices</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`limbic system` - THE ORIGINAL SENSE: `the emotional center of the brain, with the phylogenetically newer portions of the neocortex underlying cognitive functions, such as reason`. The category exists to carry one distinction: emotion here, reason there.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`limbic system` - THE TERMINAL SENSE: `obsolete and should be abandoned`, argued by `affective neuroscientists` with four citations behind it. Not withdrawn by a committee and not renamed - talked out of use by the practitioners of the field.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → MacLean&#x27;s limbic system concept</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the Risk-As-Feelings Hypothesis (Loewenstein et al., 2001)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>incidental affect —is-a→ affective state</label>
        <term>incidental affect</term>
        <term>affective state</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The emotion/cognition division inherited from the limbic system concept fails anatomically: no boundary separates emotional from cognitive brain regions, and no single unified system drives emotion.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A second main route by which emotion influences decisions is by entering the emotional reaction to options or outcomes into the value calculation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The studies suggest that emotion modulates the value computation, thereby changing the choice.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>There does not seem to be a single mechanism by which incidental affect influences choices.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Reappraising an unfair ultimatum offer changes decisions, whereas merely suppressing the outward expression of emotion does not - so it is the reinterpretation, not the display, that carries the effect.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>That cognitive reappraisal of a choice option&#x27;s emotional significance changes decisions is treated as strong evidence that emotion enters the subjective-value calculation itself.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Merely believing they had chosen an item increased participants&#x27; preference for it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The chapter discusses only findings that measure and/or manipulate affective processes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>incidental affect</label>
        <term>incidental affect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reverse inference</label>
        <term>reverse inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mood</label>
        <term>mood</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>stress</label>
        <term>stress</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>physiological arousal</label>
        <term>physiological arousal</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>skin conductance response (SCR)</label>
        <term>skin conductance response (SCR)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>temporal discounting</label>
        <term>temporal discounting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>future anhedonia</label>
        <term>future anhedonia</term>
        <note>about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:1). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reconsolidation</label>
        <term>reconsolidation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Somatic Marker Hypothesis</label>
        <term>Somatic Marker Hypothesis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>construal level theory</label>
        <term>construal level theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>risk taking</label>
        <term>risk taking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>gender</label>
        <term>gender</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Less than 30% — proportion of participants who noticed that the face they had chosen had been covertly swapped, in the choice-blindness study the chapter reports</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416008-8.00012-7.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
