<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Cortical Membrane Potential Signature of Optimal States for Sensory Signal Detection</title>
        <author>McGinley</author>
        <author>David</author>
        <author>McCormick</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Cortical Membrane Potential Signature of Optimal States for Sensory Signal Detection</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>Neuron</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.038</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">McGinley2015-cortical-membrane-potential-signature-of-opt</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">McGinley2015-cortical-membrane-potential-signature-of-opt.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">8aeb7f81b54b76b6e90cf938e3530fbdc0e4530c</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>what the cortex is doing at the moment an animal is best at detecting a faint sound, and how that state can be measured continuously from outside</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what the synaptic and circuit basis is of the classical inverted-U between arousal and detection performance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>arousal read continuously from the pupil predicts membrane potential, sensory response and behaviour, and all three are optimal at an intermediate level where the cortex is stably hyperpolarised</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>arousal-dependent auditory signal detection</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>electrophysiology</label>
        <term>electrophysiology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>rising arousal suppresses low-frequency cortical rhythms, letting cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical circuits interact more reliably and so producing larger, more precise sensory responses</term>
        <note>status: the paper&#x27;s own words: We hypothesize that</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>at hyper-arousal the depolarization is carried by task-unrelated synaptic activity that raises membrane variance and thereby disrupts sensory-evoked neuronal interactions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the opposing arousal-driven changes in thalamic gain and cortical depolarization combine to generate the U and inverted-U curves relating arousal to neural and behavioural performance</term>
        <note>status: the paper&#x27;s own words: We propose that</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the lag between cortical depolarization and pupil dilation arises because pupillary and eyelid muscles respond slowly to sympathetic and parasympathetic drive</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>membrane potential and its variance trace a U-shaped relationship against arousal level as indexed by normalized pupil diameter</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>so the signal-to-noise ratio of an evoked response is high at that state, from both suppressed background and larger responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>at high arousal the cortex depolarises, which may raise single-neuron responsiveness while degrading the interactions that carry a sensory response</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and thalamic responses fall with arousal and fall further with walking, so part of the cortical decline is inherited</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proposed thalamo-cortical account of the U-shaped relationship has not been tested across behavioural contexts.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the thalamo-cortical account of the U-shaped relationship: FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THIS HYPOTHESIS, PARTICULARLY THE INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL CONTEXT, REMAINS TO BE DONE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper cannot resolve why locomotion enhances visual but suppresses auditory cortical responses.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the visual-versus-auditory locomotion discrepancy: IT IS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR WHETHER THESE APPARENTLY OPPOSING RESULTS REFLECT VARIATIONS BETWEEN SENSORY SYSTEMS IN CORTICAL OR SUBCORTICAL INFLUENCES OF LOCOMOTION AND/OR AROUSAL</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The neuromodulatory pathway linking pupil-indexed arousal to the cortical inhibitory circuitry was not established.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the neuromodulatory account: THE INFLUENCE OF NOREPINEPHRINE, WHICH IS THOUGHT TO CONTROL PUPIL DIAMETER, ON CORTICAL INHIBITORY CIRCUITS REMAINS TO BE DETERMINED</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>whether the opposing visual and auditory results reflect sensory systems, subcortical influences or the arousal level during stillness is stated to be unclear</label>
        <note>what this limits: the generalisation across cortical areas: in visual cortex LOCOMOTION IS ASSOCIATED WITH ENHANCED SENSORY-EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSES, while in auditory cortex the effect runs the other way</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>laminar position and cell type are named as a second possible source of between-study variation, with their layer 5 cells behaving unlike layer 2/3 visual cells</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[3], with a second candidate source: ANOTHER POSSIBLE SOURCE OF VARIATION BETWEEN STUDIES ... IS THE LAMINAR POSITION AND CELL TYPE OF THE RECORDED NEURONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the influence of behavioural context on the proposed account remains to be done</label>
        <note>what this limits: the proposed U-shaped account: FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THIS HYPOTHESIS, PART[icularly under behavioural context], remains to be done</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the peak of one measure out of thirteen, behavioural discriminability, sits at a significantly smaller pupil diameter than the rest</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that the measures share an optimal arousal level: WE DID NOT FIND STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 12 OF THE 13 BEHAVIORAL OR PHYSIOLOGICAL measures - so one of thirteen peaks elsewhere, and it is the behavioural one</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>pupillometry as a continuous index of autonomic state, imported to index cortical membrane potential rather than emotion</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>sharp-wave ripple rate as an independent state variable, used to validate the pupil rather than as the object of study</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>response latency on hit trials plotted against pupil diameter, showing short latency licks and a large decrease in variability of lick latency at intermediate diameters</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>responses sorted by state against responses averaged over all states, where no effect would be a diagonal of slope one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>eyelid opening measured IN DARKNESS, alongside the pupil recording</label>
        <note>eliminates: illumination change as the cause of the pupil dilations - an eye movement changes how much light reaches the pupil, so a dilation time-locked to behaviour could be an optical consequence of looking elsewhere · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>pupil</label>
        <term>pupil</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper">
        <label>hyperpolarized</label>
        <term>hyperpolarized</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper">
        <label>evoked</label>
        <term>evoked</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[25]" resp="#paper">
        <label>hit</label>
        <term>hit</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>pupil derivative → pupil diameter</label>
        <note>THE INDEXING / PROXY RELATION - &#x27;from&#x27; STANDS IN FOR &#x27;to&#x27;. We have no type for it: &#x27;causes&#x27; asserts production, and &#x27;operationalised-as&#x27; says the authors CHOSE a measure, whereas a proxy claim says THIS STANDS IN FOR WHAT WE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT AND WE KNOW IT IS NOT THE SAME THING. Measured at 8% of papers. A PROXY FOR ITSELF, DISPLACED IN TIME: &#x27;the explanatory power of the pupil derivative occurs because it serves as a proxy for the pupil diameter approximately 1 second later&#x27;. The two endpoints are the same measurement at different lags, which is a substitution no vocabulary of concepts would catch.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A LITERATURE&#x27;S CONTRADICTIONS ATTRIBUTED TO A VARIABLE NOBODY MEASURED: state fluctuates continuously and in seconds, which produces variability between studies and between moments inside one study, and has not been accounted for</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and one earlier report is named as having recorded across un-anaesthetised states without quantifying the arousal of the animals at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A BINARY CATEGORY IS DISSOLVED INTO A CONTINUUM: the same pupil measure had been used to sort trials into aroused and unaroused, and is used here as a graded quantity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AND A WHOLE LITERATURE&#x27;S INDEPENDENT VARIABLE IS RE-IDENTIFIED: the often reported effects of movement may not result from movement per se but from arousal, with one exception named and kept</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE SHAPE OF THE EFFECT BREAKS THE SUMMARY STATISTIC: because the relation is U-shaped the correlation is positive over one half of the range and negative over the other, which forced a sliding window rather than one coefficient</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A RIVAL MEASURE IS TESTED AND THEN EXPLAINED AWAY: the derivative of the pupil predicts less than the diameter, and correlates with the diameter a second later, so its explanatory power may be entirely borrowed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE MEASURE IS VALIDATED THROUGH A CHANNEL WHERE THE CONFOUND CANNOT OPERATE: pupil dilation could be a response to light, so eyelid opening was measured in darkness, where dilation is saturated, and moved the same way</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the recording artefact is ruled out by timing rather than by argument - the depolarisation begins before the behavioural event and returns after it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THIRTEEN MEASURES ARE ASKED WHETHER THEY PEAK IN THE SAME PLACE: twelve are statistically indistinguishable and the thirteenth is not, with an interpretation offered for the one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="senses" ana="#senses[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the state measure is normalised within session because its maximum drifts between days and animals, so every number here is a fraction of that animal&#x27;s own range</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: pupil diameter as a continuous state measure, validated against hippocampal ripple rate and against eyelid opening in darkness, related to membrane potential, evoked responses and trial outcome</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: the inverted-U between arousal and performance, and its cortical signature</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: arousal-dependent auditory signal detection — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Reimer et al. (2014)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Reimer et al. (2014)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Williamson et al. (2014)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>explains-away → the rate of change of pupil diameter as the better index of cortical state, which is shown to be a lagged proxy for the diameter itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>reconciles → the divergent reports of cortical membrane potential in waking animals, by supplying the continuously varying state variable none of them measured</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → studies of the effects of walking and whisking on sensory responses, which most likely involved large uncontrolled changes in arousal</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS AROUSAL AS AN UNCONTROLLED VARIABLE. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; A whole literature&#x27;s independent variable is shown to have carried a second one with it - established by THIS paper&#x27;s own pupil measurement, which is why nobody could have controlled for it earlier.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>supports → the classical Yerkes-Dodson inverted-U between arousal and performance, by giving it a cellular and network basis</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → the opposing visual and auditory locomotion results, which are left explicitly unresolved</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS THE CORTICAL AREA, AND THE SIGN REVERSES ACROSS IT. &#x27;Quotation withheld (over non-locomotion), while in auditory cortex locomot[ion suppresses them].&#x27; The paper poses the question, gives the opposite findings, and LEAVES IT UNRESOLVED - so &#x27;locomotion modulates sensory responses&#x27; is true with two opposite signs and the area is not optional.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>state —operationalised-as→ arousal</label>
        <term>state</term>
        <term>arousal</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: A LITERATURE&#x27;S CONTRADICTIONS ATTRIBUTED TO A VARIABLE NOBODY MEASURED: it fluctuates continuously and rapidly, producing variability between studies and between moments within one, and has not been accounted for
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;state (arousal)&#x27;; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>pupil —operationalised-as→ state</label>
        <term>pupil</term>
        <term>state</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: chosen for being non-invasive and continuous, and for tracking state changes whether or not they come with overt movement</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>EIS —operationalised-as→ eyelid</label>
        <term>EIS</term>
        <term>eyelid</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and a cheaper proxy is then derived from the light reflected off the eye, so the measure can travel
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but reflected infrared light is a proxy for lid opening; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>pupil —contrasted-with→ derivative</label>
        <term>pupil</term>
        <term>derivative</term>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHICH PREDICTOR ADDS ANYTHING, AND THE ANSWER IS THAT ONE DOES NOT. &#x27;Factoring in both the pupil diameter and its derivative explained 40+/-6% of the variance of power in the 2-10 Hz band, which was statistically larger than the amount explained by pupil derivative (p&lt;0.0005), but not pupil diameter alone (p=0.36).&#x27; Adding the derivative to diameter does not improve on diameter alone - a null reported in the same sentence as the significant comparison, and the pair is only distinguishable because both tests are given. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: A RIVAL MEASURE TESTED HEAD TO HEAD: the diameter explains 34 percent of the variance in low-frequency power, the derivative about half that, and both together add nothing over the diameter alone
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span compares pupil diameter with its derivative as indicators; contrasted-with is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>microdilation —causes→ membrane potential</label>
        <term>microdilation</term>
        <term>membrane potential</term>
        <note>status: ASSOCIATIONAL AND TIME-LOCKED, WHICH IS NOT THE SAME AS CAUSAL: microdilations &#x27;were reliably associated with 5-20 mV time-locked depolarization&#x27;. Tight temporal coupling in 16 neurons; nothing was manipulated to establish which leads. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: 5 to 20 mV depolarisations time-locked to them, and leading the pupil by about a second
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says microdilations were ASSOCIATED with depolarization; causes overstates it.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>MG —contrasted-with→ ACtx</label>
        <term>MG</term>
        <term>ACtx</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: thalamic responses fall steadily with arousal and fall further during walking, so part of the cortical decline is inherited and part is not</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>walking —is-a→ movement</label>
        <term>walking</term>
        <term>movement</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: since walking only ever happened at large pupil diameters, previous studies of movement effects most likely involved large changes in arousal</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>whisking —distinct-from→ arousal</label>
        <term>whisking</term>
        <term>arousal</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span argues effects may come from arousal rather than movement; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[29]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>hit —contrasted-with→ false alarm</label>
        <term>hit</term>
        <term>false alarm</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: with hit and miss trials resampled to equal target level distributions, so loudness cannot be what separates them</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[32]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>arousal —causes→ detection</label>
        <term>arousal</term>
        <term>detection</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: the optimum is 40 to 60 percent of full dilation, for the neurons and for the behaviour alike
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says intermediate arousal is optimal for detection; causes is loose and unsigned.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[35]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>evoked —distinct-from→ spontaneous</label>
        <term>evoked</term>
        <term>spontaneous</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the optimum is a ratio: background suppressed AND response enhanced, not either alone
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span attributes high SNR to suppression of spontaneous activity; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[36]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>depolarization —causes→ reliability</label>
        <term>depolarization</term>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: the proposed cost of the depolarised state - single neurons more responsive, their interactions less so
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span discusses possible detrimental effects of depolarization; causes is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>coherence</label>
        <term>coherence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard deviation</label>
        <term>standard deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard error of the mean</label>
        <term>standard error of the mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap confidence interval</label>
        <term>bootstrap confidence interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>resampling with replacement</label>
        <term>resampling with replacement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>signal detection theory measures (d-prime and criterion)</label>
        <term>signal detection theory measures (d-prime and criterion)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F-test</label>
        <term>F-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>explained variance</label>
        <term>explained variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cross-correlation</label>
        <term>cross-correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>coherence</label>
        <term>coherence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>cross correlation</label>
        <term>cross correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>explained variance</label>
        <term>explained variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>resampled</label>
        <term>resampled</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Pupil diameter showed a strong inverse relationship to the rate of fast ripples, with a peak coherence of about 0.78 at low frequencies.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Auditory cortical membrane potential and its variance follow a U-shaped function of arousal, being most hyperpolarized and least variable at intermediate pupil diameter.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Brief spontaneous pupil microdilations in still animals are locked to 5-20 mV depolarizations of cortical neurons.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The cortical depolarization leads the pupil dilation by roughly one second, so the membrane potential change comes first.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Sound-evoked synaptic responses in auditory cortex are largest at intermediate pupil diameter and shrink with either constriction or further dilation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Behavioural hit rate on the tone-in-noise detection task follows an inverted-U in pupil diameter at every tone intensity.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Just before correct detections the membrane potential was more hyperpolarized and less variable than before false alarms.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Pupil diameter predicts trial-to-trial cortical response variability at least as well as walking status and absorbs walking&#x27;s predictive power.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The optimal arousal band, for both neural coding and behaviour, corresponds to pupils dilated to 40-60% of maximum.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Thalamic (medial geniculate) sound responses decline steadily as pupil diameter increases and are suppressed further during walking.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Raw pupil diameter explains about twice as much of the low-frequency membrane-potential power as the rate of change of pupil diameter does.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mice only walked when their pupils were large, so locomotion in this preparation is always accompanied by high arousal.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>APPARENTLY DIVERGENT RESULTS ARE ATTRIBUTED TO A VARIABLE NOBODY ACCOUNTED FOR: state fluctuates continuously and rapidly, giving variability between studies and between moments within individual studies</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with the divergent reports themselves laid out first, across species and sensory systems</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: Steriade et al., 2001 ), but recent work in rodent sensory cortical areas has revealed - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author&#x27;s rather than this record&#x27;s. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and one earlier study named as having recorded across un-anaesthetised states without quantifying arousal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>walking increases visual cortical responses and decreases auditory ones, which is the contradiction in view</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A BINARY CATEGORY IS DISSOLVED INTO A CONTINUUM: the same pupil measure had been used to sort trials into aroused and unaroused</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>pupil diameter tracks hippocampal ripple rate inversely, supporting the view that it may be a useful indicator of brain state</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE LIGHT CONFOUND IS REMOVED BY CHANGING CHANNEL: eyelid opening measured in darkness, where dilation is saturated, moves the same way</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and a proxy is derived from infrared light reflected from the eye, termed eye-indexed state</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the pupil is normalised within session because its maximum drifts between days and animals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>brief dilations are time-locked to 5 to 20 mV depolarisations that lead them by about a second</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>membrane potential and its variance both trace a U against arousal, most hyperpolarised and least variable in the middle</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE SHAPE OF THE EFFECT BREAKS THE SUMMARY STATISTIC: the correlation is positive over one half of the range and negative over the other, forcing a sliding window</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[24]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and layer 5 multi-unit firing shows the same U, lowest at intermediate pupil</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t104" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE RECORDING ARTEFACT IS RULED OUT BY TIMING: the depolarisation starts before the behavioural event and returns after it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t105" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[26]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and spike threshold barely tracks the pupil, varying instead with the rate of rise into threshold</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t106" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[27]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A RIVAL MEASURE IS TESTED HEAD TO HEAD: raw pupil diameter and the rate of change of pupil diameter are both compared to membrane power at 2-10 Hz, and factoring in both is not statistically better than the diameter alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t107" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[28]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AND THEN EXPLAINED AWAY: the derivative correlates with the diameter 1.3 s later and not with it at the same moment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t108" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[29]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>evoked spikes and synaptic responses are largest at moderate pupil diameters and smaller in both directions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t109" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[30]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with evoked rate, reliability and gain all following the same inverse U</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t110" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[31]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the gain model is built so that no effect is a diagonal of slope one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t111" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[32]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>thalamic responses fall steadily as the pupil dilates and are suppressed further during walking</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t112" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[33]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE PUPIL SUBSUMES THE OLDER VARIABLE: walking status adds 20 percent explained variance, pupil adds 28, and both together (29) are not significantly more than pupil alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t113" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[34]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>lick latency is shortest and least variable at intermediate diameters, for hits and false alarms alike</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t114" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[35]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>membrane potentials are most hyperpolarised and least variable before hits, with the largest evoked responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t115" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[36]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and hit and miss trials are resampled to equivalent target tone level distributions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t116" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[37]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THIRTEEN MEASURES ARE ASKED WHETHER THEY PEAK IN THE SAME PLACE: twelve are indistinguishable and only behavioural discriminability sits lower</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t117" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[38]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the optimum is 40 to 60 percent of full dilation, for the neurons and the behaviour alike</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t118" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[39]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>which suggests a cellular and network basis for the classical inverted-U</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t119" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[40]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and at the best state the signal-to-noise ratio of evoked cortical responses is high, owing both to the suppression of spontaneous activities and the enhanced amplitude of sensory evoked responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t120" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[41]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A LITERATURE&#x27;S INDEPENDENT VARIABLE IS RE-IDENTIFIED: reported effects of movement may not result from movement per se but from arousal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t121" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[42]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with previous walking studies described as having most likely involved large uncontrolled changes in arousal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t122" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[43]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>and one arousal-independent walking effect, on thalamic responses and decision bias, named and kept</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t123" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[44]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>laminar position and cell type are named as a second source of between-study variation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t124" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[45]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and whether the opposing visual and auditory results reflect systems, subcortical influence or arousal during stillness is left open</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t125" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[46]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the proposed cost is that depolarisation may raise single-neuron responsiveness while harming sensory-evoked neuronal interactions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t126" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[47]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the influence of behavioural context on the account remains to be done</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t127" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[48]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the classical Yerkes-Dodson curve predicts optimal performance at intermediate arousal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t128" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>microdilations</label>
        <term>microdilations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t129" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>eye-indexed state</label>
        <term>eye-indexed state</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t130" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Yerkes-Dodson curve</label>
        <term>Yerkes-Dodson curve</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t131" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>canonical wakeful state</label>
        <term>canonical wakeful state</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t132" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>EIS</label>
        <term>EIS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t133" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>microdilation</label>
        <term>microdilation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t134" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>gain</label>
        <term>gain</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t135" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>arousal</label>
        <term>arousal</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t136" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>target tone level</label>
        <term>target tone level</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t137" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>intracellular injection of current</label>
        <term>intracellular injection of current</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t138" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>spontaneous activity</label>
        <term>spontaneous activity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t139" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>behavioral performance</label>
        <term>behavioral performance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t140" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>pupil diameter</label>
        <term>pupil diameter</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t141" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>pupil</label>
        <term>pupil</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t142" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>membrane potential</label>
        <term>membrane potential</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t143" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>gain</label>
        <term>gain</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t144" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>latency</label>
        <term>latency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t145" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>reliability</label>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t146" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.78 ± 0.07 — peak coherence between pupil diameter and hippocampal fast-ripple rate at low frequencies</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t147" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>R=−0.94 +/− 0.03 — correlation between pupil diameter and hippocampal ripple rate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t148" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5–20 mV — amplitude of the membrane-potential depolarizations time-locked to pupil microdilations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t149" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>1.1 ± 0.1 s — lead time by which cortical depolarization precedes pupil dilation or eyelid opening</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t150" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>34±7% versus 18±4% — variance in 2-10 Hz membrane-potential power explained by pupil diameter versus by its temporal derivative</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t151" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>−74 ± 1.2 mV — average membrane potential corresponding to zero change on the arousal heatmap</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t152" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>37 ± 17%, 160 ± 120%, and 94 ± 55% — gain in explained variance for d-prime, bias and lick latency when pupil diameter is known in addition to tone intensity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t153" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>~0.15 mm to ~1.8 mm — range over which pupil diameter varied in waking mice under constant low light</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t154" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>40–60% — fraction of full dilation that marks the optimal arousal band for neural coding and behaviour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t155" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>40–60% — of full dilation - the optimum, and the same range for the neurons and for the behaviour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t156" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>34±7% — variance in low-frequency membrane power explained by pupil diameter, against about half that for its derivative</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t157" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>1.3 ± 0.7 seconds — the lag by which the pupil derivative leads the diameter - which is why it looked like a better predictor</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t158" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>1.1 ± 0.1 s — by how much the cortical depolarisation precedes the pupil dilation it is locked to</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t159" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>20 ± 8% — explained variance added by knowing walking status, against 28 percent for pupil diameter and nothing for both together</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t160" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>12 of the 13 — measures whose optimum could not be distinguished from one another</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.038.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
