standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 1 relation here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | long-range connectivity of the mouse posterior parietal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | observation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: observation | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The PPC is small and its anatomical borders are weakly agreed on in mouse, so injection targeting could be imprecise. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every result reported for mouse PPC, and every join on that label: THE PPC IS A RELATIVELY SMALL BRAIN REGION WITH A WEAK CONSENSUS ON ANATOMICAL BORDERS IN THE MOUSE BRAIN | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Few injections were available per structure in the atlas dataset, giving incomplete regional coverage. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the regional coverage of the atlas: A RELATIVELY LIMITED NUMBER OF INJECTIONS FOR EACH STRUCTURE ... CAN RESULT IN INCOMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE BRAIN REGIONS, WHICH MAY DISPLAY A HIGH LEVEL OF INTRAREGIONAL VARIABILITY | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The quantified signal is axonal, not synaptic, so laminar projection patterns must be read cautiously. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any synaptic reading of the projection patterns: THE DETECTED SIGNAL IS PRIMARILY BASED ON AXONAL STRUCTURE INSTEAD OF SYNAPTIC INPUTS PER SE | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The LD and LP injections did not fill those nuclei, so the apparent mouse-rat thalamic difference is not yet established. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the apparent mouse-rat thalamic difference: AS LD AND LP INJECTIONS ... DID NOT FILL THE ENTIRE LD OR LP, THE COMPLETE REGIONAL INJECTIONS OR ADDITIONAL NONOVERLAPPING SUBREGIONAL TARGETING ... ARE REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE A TRUE SPECIES DIFFERENCE | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Two ways of delineating the same region are reported not to match. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any boundary assigned to mouse PPC: even with functional retinotopic mapping using intrinsic optical imaging, voltage-sensitive dyes or Ca2+ responses, the boundaries of VISa and VISrl were not clearly defined or mismatched with the architectonic definition | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Injection quality varies by structure because selection falls back through three tiers. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison of projection strengths between structures here: injections occupying over 90% of the primary structure were preferred, with fallback to 75-90% and then 50-75% where none passed | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | A printed result is withdrawn as an artefact on evidence the paper does not show. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the CA3 projection signal reported here: the authors state it appears to have resulted from a false positive quantification from the path through the ventral internal capsule | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The threshold for showing a connection differs between structure classes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any connection matrix read from this paper: only connections above threshold are shown, and the threshold is not the same for cortical and thalamic structures | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | injections that fill the entire LD or LP, or non-overlapping subregional targeting - NOT achieved, and the paper says the comparison cannot be made without them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: an apparent mouse-versus-primate species difference in thalamic connectivity that is really a difference in where the tracer landed · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): absent-declared-unreported | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | functional retinotopic mapping Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: functional retinotopic mapping | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | architectonic definition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: architectonic definition | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | primary injection structure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: primary injection structure | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | false positive quantification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: false positive quantification | concepts[3] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | strong connections above threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: strong connections above threshold | concepts[4] | the paper's words | |
| senses | the PPC's borders - TWO DELINEATIONS THAT DISAGREE: there is a weak consensus on anatomical borders, and the paper reports that functional retinotopic mapping did not clearly define the boundaries or mismatched the architectonic definition, so the region has two methods of fixing it and they do not agree Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a selected injection - ONE OF THREE TIERS: preference is for injections occupying over 90% of the primary structure, falling back to 75-90% and then 50-75% where nothing passed, so the phrase 'representative injection' covers three grades of evidence and the result does not say which Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a false-positive attribution - A CORRECTION WITHOUT ITS EVIDENCE: a printed projection signal is attributed to quantification of a fibre path rather than a terminal field, and the reader is asked to discount the result on that basis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Oh et al. 2014; Harris et al. 2019 (brain-wide quantitative projection analyses) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Zingg et al. 2017 (AAV1 transsynaptic anterograde tracing) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → the rat connectivity record in BAMS (Brain Architecture Management System) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → prior rat reports of a zona incerta (ZI) projection to VISrl Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | functional retinotopic mapping —contrasted-with→ architectonic definition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: where each places the boundary: the functional maps were not clearly defined or did not match the architectonic one · strength of the relation: 1 | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mean | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The mouse posterior parietal cortex sends its heaviest cortical output to secondary motor cortex, primary visual cortex and the barrel field of primary somatosensory cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | PPC output to the thalamus is concentrated in three associative nuclei, LP, PO and LD. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The heaviest inputs to the PPC come from ipsilateral secondary motor, auditory and visual cortex plus primary somatosensory cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Within the hypothalamus, moderate PPC projections appeared almost exclusively in the zona incerta. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | What separates PPC from neighbouring visual cortex is that it gets more multimodal spatial input and less primary visual input. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The strongest reciprocal cortical partners of PPC are MOs, SSp-bfd, VISal, VISam and VISpm. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The strongest reciprocal thalamic partners of PPC are LP, PO, LD and PF. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Neuromodulatory input to PPC is dominated by cholinergic fibres, with weaker serotonergic and histaminergic input. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The posterior thalamic nucleus projects topographically, its dorsomedial neurons reaching VISa and its lateral neurons reaching VISrl. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Compared with rats, mice have lighter LD and LP projections to PPC, while ventrobasal (VPL, VPM) and LGd input appears lightly but clearly in mice. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The greatest mouse-rat difference in PPC projection was in the infralimbic area. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Top-down cortical inputs from ILA and ACAd and higher-order thalamic input from VAL and PO terminate mainly in layer 1 of PPC. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Overall the mouse PPC connectome closely resembles the rat's, with a minority of clear species differences. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | normalized projection volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: normalized projection volume | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | injection volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: injection volume | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | robustness of labeling (R) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: robustness of labeling (R) | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | inclusiveness of projection targets (I) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | representative score (S) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: representative score (S) | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | reciprocality Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reciprocality | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | bilaterality Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: bilaterality | content_tags.definitions[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | virtual retrograde map Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: virtual retrograde map | content_tags.definitions[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | injection coordinates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: injection coordinates | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | projection strength Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: projection strength | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | injection volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: injection volume | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | N = 2556 — number of published atlas injection experiments that passed the standard-labelling screen and entered the analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 214 — unique primary injection sites, one per brain structure, from which afferents to PPC were inferred Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 173 — representative injections selected for the noncortical (subcortical) structures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.97 ± 0.03 — Pearson correlation of the top 25 projection targets between the chosen VISp representative injection and 13 alternative injections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.1 for cortical and 0.05 for thalamic — normalized-projection-volume thresholds a connection had to exceed to be shown in the reciprocality analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.