<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show Increased Helping Following Priming with Affiliation</title>
        <author>Over</author>
        <author>Carpenter</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show Increased Helping Following Priming with Affiliation</title>
          <date>2009</date>
          <publisher>Psychological Science</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02419.x</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Over2009-eighteen-month-old-infants-show-increased-he</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Over2009-eighteen-month-old-infants-show-increased-he.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">945e6cd6937b9f0f2269d2d1cd888c4672f4e933</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>social priming of prosocial helping in infants</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The affiliation photographs activate a general prosocial orientation, which is then expressed in an unrelated helping act, rather than being copied from what was depicted</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>An implicit, non-conscious link between affiliation to the group and helping is engaged by the prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Baseline helping rates were lower than in an earlier helping study, leaving open the alternative reading that the affiliation condition is the true baseline and the other three conditions suppressed helping.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Procedural choices (a single helping opportunity, and a different experimenter interacting with the infant beforehand) probably lowered helping in every condition, so rates are not comparable across studies.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>attentiveness and mood were measured and compared across conditions</label>
        <note>eliminates: that infants in the together condition simply paid more attention or were in a better mood, and helped more for that reason rather than because of the affiliation prime · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an INDIVIDUALITY prime condition run alongside the affiliation prime and the baseline</label>
        <note>eliminates: that any social prime raises helping - the individuality prime shares the format and the social content and should produce the effect if format is what matters · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>affiliation</label>
        <term>affiliation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>individuality</label>
        <term>individuality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>helping</label>
        <term>helping</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>helping behavior</label>
        <term>helping behavior</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>prosocial behavior</label>
        <term>prosocial behavior</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>prosocial orientation</label>
        <term>prosocial orientation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>affiliative stance</label>
        <term>affiliative stance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>back-to-back</label>
        <term>back-to-back</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>baseline</label>
        <term>baseline</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>mood</label>
        <term>mood</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>prime - a BACKGROUND element of a photograph whose foreground is an ordinary household object, and the assistant naming the photograph aloud never refers to it. The construct is delivered by what is deliberately not mentioned</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>spontaneous helping - the main dependent measure, and it is defined by a CLOCK rather than by a judgement: within the first 10 s, before the experimenter has spoken to the infant or reached for the sticks herself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>affiliation - as delivered here, an arrangement of two dolls in the background of a photograph, not a word list or a scenario. The whole construct rests on which way two small wooden figures are turned</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the back-to-back condition - the question it exists to answer, in the authors&#x27; own words: whether the effect belongs to the DOLLS or to their RELATION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>baseline - a condition included not to test the hypothesis but to DISAMBIGUATE THE DIRECTION of the effect: did the affiliation primes raise helping, or the individuality primes lower it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Warneken &amp; Tomasello (2006)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>affiliation —causes→ helping behavior</label>
        <term>affiliation</term>
        <term>helping behavior</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE DIRECTION IS READ OFF A NAMED COMPARISON, not from the two-group result: the non-social baseline is what distinguishes &#x27;affiliation raised helping&#x27; from &#x27;individuality lowered it&#x27;, and the authors say which in the same sentence.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>individuality —causes→ helping behavior</label>
        <term>individuality</term>
        <term>helping behavior</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: no-change · strength of the relation: 0.1 — the record marks this weak · note: The negative half of the same sentence, kept as its own edge because it is the half a reader would otherwise have to assume. Shares its span with the edge above, declared.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>affiliative stance —causes→ helping</label>
        <term>affiliative stance</term>
        <term>helping</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The back-to-back control holds the number of dolls and the visible proportion of their faces constant, so this edge is about WHICH FEATURE of the prime carries the effect.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>prosocial orientation —causes→ helping</label>
        <term>prosocial orientation</term>
        <term>helping</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: SHARED SPAN, DECLARED: also stands under mechanisms[0]. The sentence is the paper&#x27;s argument against imitation - the primes depict no helping at all - and it is the only place the intervening state is named.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>affiliation —causes→ prosocial orientation</label>
        <term>affiliation</term>
        <term>prosocial orientation</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: The theoretical premise, and weighted as one: the sentence says &#x27;we may expect&#x27;, so this is the expectation the study was designed around rather than something it establishes.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says direct connections &#x27;may be expected&#x27;; causes states an expectation.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mood —causes→ helping</label>
        <term>mood</term>
        <term>helping</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: no-change · strength of the relation: 0.05 — the record marks this weak · note: A RULED-OUT CONFOUND IS EDGE-SHAPED. Mood was rated by parents and looking time was coded for a third of the infants; neither differed across conditions. Recorded so a later reader does not assume the check was never run.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-squared test</label>
        <term>chi-squared test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA (F-test)</label>
        <term>ANOVA (F-test)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cohen&#x27;s kappa (interrater reliability)</label>
        <term>Cohen&#x27;s kappa (interrater reliability)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-rep (probability of replication)</label>
        <term>p-rep (probability of replication)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Eighteen-month-old infants who saw photographs with an affiliation prime (two dolls facing each other) helped an adult in need more often and more spontaneously than infants primed with individuality (a single doll).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Spontaneous helping was three times as frequent after the affiliation prime as in each of the alone, baseline and back-to-back control conditions.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Comparison with the non-social baseline shows the direction of the effect: the affiliation prime raised helping rather than the individuality prime lowering it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>What drove the increase was the affiliative stance of the two dolls toward each other, not the mere presence of two dolls, since the back-to-back condition contained the same two dolls but did not raise helping.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Differences in attentiveness or mood cannot explain the infants&#x27; increased helping in the together condition.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Helping itself was never depicted in the primes - the dolls only stood beside one another.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>general measure of helping</label>
        <term>general measure of helping</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>prosocial behavior</label>
        <term>prosocial behavior</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>together condition</label>
        <term>together condition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>back-to-back condition</label>
        <term>back-to-back condition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>infants’ mood</label>
        <term>infants’ mood</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sixty — number of 18-month-old infants in the study</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Fifteen — infants per condition (four conditions)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>7 — additional infants tested but excluded from analysis, for parental interference, crying, experimenter error and refusal to look</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Three times — ratio of infants helping spontaneously in the together condition to each control condition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>w2(1, N 5 60) 5 8.57, two-tailed p 5 .003 — chi-square test of spontaneous helping, together versus pooled controls</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>w2(1, N 5 60) 5 6.43, two-tailed p 5 .011 — chi-square test of overall helping (including after prompting), together versus pooled controls</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cohen’s k 5 1.00 — interrater agreement on both helping measures for the 20% of tapes double-coded</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>102.2 / 92.8 / 89.6 / 101.4 — mean seconds spent looking at the photographs in the together, alone, baseline and back-to-back conditions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02419.x.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
