<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>A category-free neural population supports evolving demands during decision-making</title>
        <author>Raposo</author>
        <author>Kaufman</author>
        <author>Churchland</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>A category-free neural population supports evolving demands during decision-making</title>
          <date>2014</date>
          <publisher>Nature Neuroscience</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/nn.3865</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Raposo2014-a-category-free-neural-population-supports-e</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Raposo2014-a-category-free-neural-population-supports-e.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">be86e5ab19e9c25856578cc33b3e4cfd795ade67</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether multiple behaviors rely on distinct categories of neurons specialized to represent particular variables, or on a single population that is leveraged in different ways</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether neural populations are category-free - whether response features are distributed randomly across neurons rather than clustering into types</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>task parameters and temporal response features were distributed randomly across neurons, without evidence of categories, and the network explored different dimensions during decision and movement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>population coding in posterior parietal cortex during multisensory decision-making</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>electrophysiology</label>
        <term>electrophysiology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>because single neurons are jointly (and randomly) modulated by choice and modality, downstream readouts can weight the same population differently to recover whichever variable is currently needed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>random distribution of parameters across neurons lets an arbitrary subset be linearly combined to estimate a needed parameter, removing the need for pre-patterned connections to downstream targets</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>moving population activity into different dimensions at different moments lets PPC gate which signals reach which downstream areas</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>PPC inactivation impairs visual choices by lowering the signal-to-noise of the incoming visual evidence, not by changing the animal&#x27;s decision strategy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>when parameters are distributed randomly across neurons, an arbitrary group of them can be linearly combined to estimate the parameter needed at a given moment, which obviates the need for precisely pre-patterned connections and means all information is transmitted</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the average angle between the choice decoder and the modality decoder was 86.5 degrees, ONLY SLIGHTLY LESS THAN A PERFECTLY ORTHOGONAL 90</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the neurons retained their choice preference whether the stimulus was auditory, visual or multisensory, which the paper calls tolerance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Categories defined by cell type or connectivity rather than response features were not tested</label>
        <note>what this limits: the category-free claim, which is relative to the features tested: NEURAL CATEGORIES DEFINED BY OTHER PROPERTIES, SUCH AS CELL TYPE OR CONNECTIVITY, MIGHT REVEAL SPECIALIZATION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>No clustering test can cover every conceivable way the data might cluster</label>
        <note>what this limits: the strength of the clustering null: IT IS PROBABLY NOT POSSIBLE TO DETECT ALL CONCEIVABLE WAYS IN WHICH THE DATA MIGHT CLUSTER, though the test is described as reasonably general</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The choice/modality test leaves categories defined by other features unexamined</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0]: THIS LEAVES OPEN THE POSSIBILITY THAT THERE ARE CATEGORIES DEFINED BY OTHER FEATURES OF THE DATA</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Decoding was from a small sample of neurons in a noise-limited task</label>
        <note>what this limits: the decoding accuracy: DECODING WAS PERFORMED ON A SAMPLE OF TENS OF NEURONS OUT OF MANY THOUSANDS, ON A TASK WHERE THE ANIMAL&#x27;S PERFORMANCE IS LIKELY NOISE LIMITED</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Residual visual performance means the inactivation may have been incomplete or other structures may contribute</label>
        <note>what this limits: the inactivation result: ANIMALS RETAINED SOME ABILITY TO MAKE VISUAL JUDGMENTS DESPITE THE INACTIVATION, SUGGESTING EITHER THAT INACTIVATION WAS INCOMPLETE, OR THAT STRUCTURES IN ADDITION TO PPC SUPPORT THE TASK</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>neural categories defined by other properties, such as cell type or connectivity, might reveal specialization</label>
        <note>what this limits: categories defined by selectivity to task parameters or by time dependent response features, which is what this test covers</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>PAIRS is not only a test for clustering but more generally for non-uniformity of the distribution of tuning, and it is probably not possible to detect all conceivable ways in which the data might cluster</label>
        <note>what this limits: the category-free conclusion, whose test is broader than its name: PAIRS IS NOT ONLY A TEST FOR CLUSTERING, BUT ALSO MORE GENERALLY FOR NON-UNIFORMITY OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF TUNING ACROSS NEURONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>animals retained some ability to make visual judgments despite the inactivation, suggesting either that inactivation was incomplete, or that structures in addition to PPC support the task</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[4], with the effect size: SHALLOWER PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTIONS ON INACTIVATION DAYS (sigma_saline = 2.64 +/- 0.39; sigma_muscimol = 4.67 +/- 0.67)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>relatively close neuron pairs were occasionally observed and differed from chance in 1 of 5 cases, so a small fraction of neurons do have pairs in feature space</label>
        <note>what this limits: the no-clustering claim, per animal: PAIRS INDEX FOR RATS 1-5: -0.011, 0.108, -0.038, 0.011, -0.007; p-values 0.621, 0.001, 0.209, 0.491, 0.857 - one of five deviates</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>auditory responses in PPC, though apparently not necessary for this task, may be invoked by other decision tasks</label>
        <note>what this limits: the negative inactivation result for audition: AUDITORY RESPONSES IN PPC, THOUGH APPARENTLY NOT NECESSARY FOR THIS TASK, MAY BE INVOKED BY OTHER DECISION TASKS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>a linear Support Vector Machine, explicitly labelled a standard machine-learning technique, is imported as the decoder for single-trial neural population activity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>tolerance, and the reading that a linear decoder working under many conditions shows a representation has been untangled</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a linear support vector machine used as the decoder, and bootstrap aggregation to combine a thousand trained classifiers</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the prediction that random mixtures let arbitrary groups of neurons be linearly combined, imported as the hypothesis to be tested rather than assumed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>nearest-neighbor angles compared against randomly oriented vectors, turned into a clustering test for neural response profiles</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>synthetic categories introduced into the population, with noise derived from the real neural data</label>
        <note>eliminates: the lack of categories being a failure of the analysis to see structure - with faux neurons carrying exactly the same amount of noise as their originals, a strikingly different PAIRS distribution was evident · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the distribution of decoder weights compared with random weightings</label>
        <note>eliminates: the decode resting on rare neurons with pure selectivity - the weights were nonzero for all neurons and did not differ from what would be expected by chance · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>auditory decisions measured alongside the impaired visual ones</label>
        <note>eliminates: reduced motivation or confusion about the stimulus-response contingency, since the sparing of auditory decisions rules both out · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a second inactivation method that permits visualization of the agent to determine its spread</label>
        <note>eliminates: the impairment coming from spread into neighboring visual areas - and the rat with more expression posterior to PPC had WEAKER visual impairment · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="controls" ana="#controls[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the Variance Alignment analysis repeated on visual against multisensory trials within the decision epoch</label>
        <note>eliminates: noise making two aligned state spaces look misaligned - this positive control gave strong alignment, which is the reassurance that the decision-movement misalignment is real · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="controls" ana="#controls[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>modulation during the stimulus compared against modulation during movement, neuron by neuron</label>
        <note>eliminates: the misalignment being two separate groups of active neurons - the two were strongly correlated, so it is a population-level phenomenon · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="controls" ana="#controls[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the excess rate analysis over sliding windows of the stimulus</label>
        <note>eliminates: snap judgments or evidence leak as the explanation for the impairment - the analysis indicates inactivation reduced the signal-to-noise of incoming evidence instead · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE TARGET IS THE CATEGORY ASSUMPTION ITSELF: individual neurons are OFTEN SEEN AS MEMBERS OF HIGHLY SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES, and THE ASSUMPTION OF NEURAL CATEGORIES IS REFLECTED IN MANY EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS AND ANALYSIS METHODS, even far downstream of early sensory areas</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AND THE DEVICES THAT CARRY IT ARE NAMED. In sampling: neurons MUST MEET CERTAIN RESPONSE CRITERIA TO BE INCLUDED FOR STUDY, and IMPLICIT IN THIS APPROACH IS THE IDEA THAT THE CELL&#x27;S RESPONSE DURING ONE STIMULUS IDENTIFIES IT AS A MEMBER OF THE CATEGORY BEING EXAMINED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>in analysis: PIE CHARTS, A COMMON WAY OF SUMMARIZING POPULATION DATA, EXPLICITLY ASSIGN NEURONS TO CATEGORIES - and AVERAGING OVER MANY NEURONS LIKEWISE REFLECTS THE ASSUMPTION THAT EACH NEURON IS AN EXEMPLAR OF A CATEGORY, DIFFERENT FROM OTHER CATEGORY MEMBERS MAINLY BECAUSE OF NOISE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with the alternative stated as a hypothesis about DISTRIBUTION rather than about types: neurons REFLECT RANDOM COMBINATIONS OF PARAMETERS, leading to populations in which NEURONS&#x27; RESPONSES DEFY CATEGORIZATION - and the advantage is that an ARBITRARY GROUP OF THEM CAN BE LINEARLY COMBINED to estimate the parameter needed at a given moment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the earlier test is described by what it could not cover: Quotation withheld A MORE GENERAL TEST IS THUS REQUIRED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A NEW STATISTIC NAMED, DEFINED, AND BOUNDED BY ITS OWN AUTHORS: PAIRS, PROJECTION ANGLE INDEX OF RESPONSE SIMILARITY - 1 IF ALL NEURONS HAVE AT LEAST K IDENTICAL PARTNERS, AND 0 IF CLUSTERING IS ONLY AS STRONG AS EXPECTED BY CHANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and its limits stated in the same paragraph that introduces it: PAIRS IS NOT ONLY A TEST FOR CLUSTERING, BUT ALSO MORE GENERALLY FOR NON-UNIFORMITY of the distribution of tuning, and IT IS PROBABLY NOT POSSIBLE TO DETECT ALL CONCEIVABLE WAYS IN WHICH THE DATA MIGHT CLUSTER</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A SIGNIFICANT P-VALUE READ AS SUPPORTING THE NULL: no evidence for clear categories in any animal, with p-values 0.236, 0.253, 0.399, 0.004 - and THE ONE SIGNIFICANT P-VALUE INDICATED LESS CLUSTERING THAN EXPECTED BY CHANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE NULL VALIDATED BY MANUFACTURING WHAT WAS ABSENT: the lack of categories WAS NOT SIMPLY BECAUSE NEURAL VARIABILITY CAUSED OUR ANALYSIS TO MISS STRUCTURE - when SYNTHETIC CATEGORIES were introduced with noise derived from the real data, A STRIKINGLY DIFFERENT PAIRS DISTRIBUTION WAS EVIDENT</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="senses" ana="#senses[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the manufacture is exact rather than approximate - the faux partners were made by RESAMPLING TRIALS WITH REPLACEMENT from real neurons, so THESE FAUX NEURONS HAD EXACTLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF NOISE AS THEIR ORIGINATING NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="senses" ana="#senses[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with the exceptions counted rather than dismissed: relatively close neuron pairs were occasionally observed but DIFFERED FROM CHANCE IN ONLY 1 OF 5 CASES, and THE VAST MAJORITY OF NEURONS EACH REFLECT A UNIQUE COMBINATION OF RESPONSE FEATURES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="senses" ana="#senses[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE SCOPE OF THE NULL, STATED BY THE AUTHORS: neural categories defined by OTHER PROPERTIES, SUCH AS CELL TYPE OR CONNECTIVITY, MIGHT REVEAL SPECIALIZATION - so `PPC is category-free` holds for categories defined by task-parameter selectivity and by time-dependent response features, and for nothing else</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="senses" ana="#senses[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the recommendation that follows is procedural, not factual: FUTURE STUDIES CAN TEST DIRECTLY FOR THE EXISTENCE OF CATEGORIES, AND DESIGN APPROPRIATE ANALYSES IF NEURONS ARE SHOWN TO REFLECT RANDOM COMBINATIONS of task parameters</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="senses" ana="#senses[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE SAMPLING CHOICE IS ITSELF THE ARGUMENT: WE RECORDED FROM ALL ENCOUNTERED NEURONS AND USED IDENTICAL STIMULI FOR EACH - the traditional approach of selection criteria and customized stimuli IS SUCCESSFUL IN IDENTIFYING NEURONS WITH STRONG CHOICE SIGNALS, BUT MAY LEAVE UNEXAMINED NEURONS WITH SUBTLER CHOICE SIGNALS THAT NONETHELESS SHAPE THE EVOLVING DECISION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="senses" ana="#senses[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>stated again as a difference from the primate literature - the stimulus WAS NOT OPTIMIZED FOR EACH NEURON&#x27;S PREFERENCE and neurons WERE NOT SELECTED BASED ON TUNING PROPERTIES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="senses" ana="#senses[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>MIXED SELECTIVITY MAKES TWO CONDITIONS INDISTINGUISHABLE IN ONE CELL: rare neurons had PURE choice or PURE modality selectivity, but for the majority THE MIXING SOMETIMES RESULTED IN IDENTICAL FIRING RATES FOR DIFFERENT CONDITIONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="senses" ana="#senses[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the absence of correlation is explicitly refused as proof: LACK OF CORRELATION DOES NOT CONCLUSIVELY RULE OUT THE EXISTENCE OF FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES - selectivity for task features could still define categories, if the points formed an X or clusters symmetric about the origin</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="senses" ana="#senses[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with every member of the population contributing: the neural weights WERE NONZERO FOR ALL NEURONS, and the distribution of weights DID NOT DIFFER FROM THOSE THAT WOULD BE EXPECTED BY CHANCE if neurons reflected random weightings</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="senses" ana="#senses[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AN INACTIVATION WHOSE SPARED CONDITION IS THE CONTROL: impairment was SPECIFIC TO VISUAL TRIALS with NO CONSISTENT EFFECT ON AUDITORY DECISIONS, and THE SPARING OF AUDITORY DECISIONS REVEALS THAT INACTIVATION DID NOT REDUCE THE ANIMAL&#x27;S MOTIVATION, OR INTRODUCE CONFUSION about the stimulus-response contingency</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="senses" ana="#senses[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and a confound answered by the wrong direction of its own effect: THE MORE POSTERIOR EXPRESSION WAS APPARENTLY NOT THE SOURCE OF THE IMPAIRMENT BECAUSE THE RAT WITH MORE EXPRESSION POSTERIOR TO PPC HAD WEAKER VISUAL IMPAIRMENT</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="senses" ana="#senses[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>with the surprise stated rather than smoothed: our inactivation results WERE SURPRISING IN THAT AUDITORY DECISIONS WERE SPARED DESPITE A CLEAR SIGNATURE OF THE DEVELOPING CHOICE IN PPC NEURONS - a signal that is present, reliable, and not necessary</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="senses" ana="#senses[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE NETWORK EXPLORES DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS AT DIFFERENT MOMENTS: dimensions that CAPTURED CONSIDERABLE VARIANCE DURING THE MOVEMENT CAPTURED FAR LESS VARIANCE DURING DECISION FORMATION, arguing AGAINST ALIGNED STATE SPACES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="senses" ana="#senses[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the null is protected by a POSITIVE CONTROL - the same analysis on visual against multisensory trials revealed STRONG ALIGNMENT, which PROVIDES REASSURANCE THAT THE MISALIGNMENT of decision and movement INDICATES A REAL DIFFERENCE IN NEURAL COVARIANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="senses" ana="#senses[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and it is not two groups of cells taking turns: modulation during the stimulus was STRONGLY CORRELATED with modulation during movement, so THE MISALIGNMENT IS A POPULATION-LEVEL PHENOMENON, NOT DUE TO HAVING SEPARATE GROUPS OF NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="senses" ana="#senses[24]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>visible in single cells as a reversal - one neuron has an ELEVATED response before a leftwards choice and is THEN SUPPRESSED DURING THE LEFTWARDS MOVEMENT used to report that same choice</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="senses" ana="#senses[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A CONTROL ANIMAL BORROWED FROM ANOTHER STUDY, WITH ITS OWN NULL RECORDED: one animal had stimulating fibers implanted and laser stimulation on half its trials - THE ANIMAL EXPRESSED NO LIGHT-ACTIVATED ION CHANNELS IN ITS BRAIN, AND LASER STIMULATION HAD NO EFFECT ON NEURAL ACTIVITY OR BEHAVIOR</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="senses" ana="#senses[26]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the structure that survives the randomness is named TOLERANCE - although individual neurons reflected RANDOM COMBINATIONS of task components, THE OBSERVED RESPONSES WERE NONETHELESS STRUCTURED, retaining their choice preference across modalities</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: null-result</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: a statistic on the angles between neurons&#x27; response vectors and their nearest neighbours, compared against randomly oriented vectors - PAIRS, Projection Angle Index of Response Similarity</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: mixed selectivity - individual neurons modulated by more than one task parameter at once, so that different conditions can give identical firing rates</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: population coding in posterior parietal cortex during multisensory decision-making — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the widespread assumption of functionally specialised neural categories (refs 1, 5-11, 32)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → prior work testing for categories defined by response timing (ref 19)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → theoretical work on random mixed representations (refs 12-14)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the established rat multisensory rate-discrimination task (refs 20, 21)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → the assumption of neural categories, which is built into how neurons are sampled and into how populations are summarized</label>
        <note>differs in: pie charts and averaging, which assign neurons to categories and treat each neuron as an exemplar differing from others mainly because of noise</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>extends → earlier work that argued against categories but tested only for categories defined by response sequence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>supports → theoretical work predicting that randomly distributed parameters let an arbitrary group of neurons be linearly combined for whatever estimate is needed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>distinguishes-from → the primate approach of selecting neurons by tuning and optimising the stimulus per neuron, which finds strong choice signals and leaves subtler ones unexamined</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS HOW THE NEURONS AND STIMULI WERE CHOSEN. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; The older method is granted its successes and denied its denominator - it finds what it selects for, so a literature built on it cannot report what fraction of the population is involved.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → its own null, which covers categories defined by task-parameter selectivity and temporal response features and not those defined by cell type or connectivity</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHICH PROPERTY DEFINES THE CATEGORY. &#x27;Quotation withheld.&#x27; The paper&#x27;s headline null - no categories - is bounded by the definition of category it used, IN THE SENTENCE AFTER THE CLAIM. Its [4] criticises pie charts and averaging for assigning neurons to categories; here it says which categories its own null covers.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>supports → an analogy with inferotemporal cortex, where tolerance is read as evidence that representations have been untangled</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>predicts → that future studies test directly for the existence of categories and design their analyses accordingly</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>clustering —contrasted-with→ PAIRS</label>
        <term>clustering</term>
        <term>PAIRS</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: its limits stated where it is introduced - NOT ONLY A TEST FOR CLUSTERING BUT MORE GENERALLY FOR NON-UNIFORMITY, and IT IS PROBABLY NOT POSSIBLE TO DETECT ALL CONCEIVABLE WAYS IN WHICH THE DATA MIGHT CLUSTER
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says PAIRS also tests non-uniformity beyond clustering; contrasted-with is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>choice —distinct-from→ modality</label>
        <term>choice</term>
        <term>modality</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: MIXED SELECTIVITY MAKES TWO CONDITIONS INDISTINGUISHABLE IN ONE CELL - the mixing SOMETIMES RESULTED IN IDENTICAL FIRING RATES FOR DIFFERENT CONDITIONS
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says pure choice or modality selectivity is rare and most neurons mix both; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mann-Whitney U test</label>
        <term>Mann-Whitney U test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Monte Carlo simulation</label>
        <term>Monte Carlo simulation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ROC analysis / area under the curve</label>
        <term>ROC analysis / area under the curve</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>principal component analysis</label>
        <term>principal component analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>support vector machine classifier</label>
        <term>support vector machine classifier</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>generalized linear model regression</label>
        <term>generalized linear model regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sign test</label>
        <term>sign test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>kurtosis</label>
        <term>kurtosis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>maximum likelihood estimation (psychometric function fitting)</label>
        <term>maximum likelihood estimation (psychometric function fitting)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence interval</label>
        <term>confidence interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap aggregation (bagging)</label>
        <term>bootstrap aggregation (bagging)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>PAIRS</label>
        <term>PAIRS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>SVM</label>
        <term>SVM</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>p-values from Monte Carlo simulations</label>
        <term>p-values from Monte Carlo simulations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>PPC INACTIVATION RELIABLY IMPAIRED VISUAL DECISIONS, by Mann-Whitney U test at p &lt; 0.001 pooled across animals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Most PPC neurons carried joint information about both stimulus modality and the animal&#x27;s choice rather than either one alone.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The nearest-neighbor angle distribution of neurons&#x27; feature vectors was statistically indistinguishable from that of randomly oriented vectors.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A linear decoder read the animal&#x27;s choice from single-trial population responses significantly above chance in every rat.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The same choice decoder did not estimate stimulus modality better than chance.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The choice and modality decoder vectors were nearly orthogonal, meaning the two parameters occupy essentially independent dimensions of population activity.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Dimensions that captured most variance during movement captured little variance during decision formation, so the network occupies different covariance patterns in the two epochs.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>this analysis, BY CONTRAST, REVEALED STRONG ALIGNMENT - index 0.840 at p &lt; 10 to the minus 4, PRESENT IN ALL RATS TESTED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t104" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>80.1% of neurons, 218 of 272 units, HAD A MULTISENSORY RESPONSE THAT WAS BETTER PREDICTED BY THE AUDITORY AND VISUAL RESPONSES THAN BY THE MULTISENSORY MEAN, assessed on left-out data</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t105" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE ASSUMPTION OF NEURAL CATEGORIES IS REFLECTED IN MANY EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS AND ANALYSIS METHODS, even those focusing on structures far downstream of early sensory areas</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t106" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>neurons MUST MEET CERTAIN RESPONSE CRITERIA TO BE INCLUDED FOR STUDY, and IMPLICIT IN THIS APPROACH IS THE IDEA THAT THE CELL&#x27;S RESPONSE DURING ONE STIMULUS IDENTIFIES IT AS A MEMBER OF THE CATEGORY BEING EXAMINED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t107" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>PIE CHARTS, A COMMON WAY OF SUMMARIZING POPULATION DATA, EXPLICITLY ASSIGN NEURONS TO CATEGORIES, and AVERAGING OVER MANY NEURONS LIKEWISE REFLECTS THE ASSUMPTION THAT EACH NEURON IS AN EXEMPLAR OF A CATEGORY</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t108" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>earlier work ARGUED AGAINST CATEGORIES, BUT ONLY TESTED FOR CATEGORIES DEFINED BY RESPONSE SEQUENCE. A MORE GENERAL TEST IS THUS REQUIRED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t109" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>PAIRS is 1 IF ALL NEURONS HAVE AT LEAST K IDENTICAL PARTNERS, AND 0 IF CLUSTERING IS ONLY AS STRONG AS EXPECTED BY CHANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t110" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>PAIRS IS NOT ONLY A TEST FOR CLUSTERING, BUT ALSO MORE GENERALLY FOR NON-UNIFORMITY of the distribution of tuning, and IT IS PROBABLY NOT POSSIBLE TO DETECT ALL CONCEIVABLE WAYS IN WHICH THE DATA MIGHT CLUSTER</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t111" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>no evidence for clear categories was present in any animal, and THE ONE SIGNIFICANT P-VALUE INDICATED LESS CLUSTERING THAN EXPECTED BY CHANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t112" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the lack of categories WAS NOT SIMPLY BECAUSE NEURAL VARIABILITY CAUSED OUR ANALYSIS TO MISS STRUCTURE - with SYNTHETIC CATEGORIES introduced, A STRIKINGLY DIFFERENT PAIRS DISTRIBUTION WAS EVIDENT</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t113" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THESE FAUX NEURONS HAD EXACTLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF NOISE AS THEIR ORIGINATING NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t114" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>close neuron pairs DIFFERED FROM CHANCE IN ONLY 1 OF 5 CASES, and THE VAST MAJORITY OF NEURONS EACH REFLECT A UNIQUE COMBINATION OF RESPONSE FEATURES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t115" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>neural categories defined by OTHER PROPERTIES, SUCH AS CELL TYPE OR CONNECTIVITY, MIGHT REVEAL SPECIALIZATION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t116" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>WE RECORDED FROM ALL ENCOUNTERED NEURONS AND USED IDENTICAL STIMULI FOR EACH, where the traditional approach MAY LEAVE UNEXAMINED NEURONS WITH SUBTLER CHOICE SIGNALS THAT NONETHELESS SHAPE THE EVOLVING DECISION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t117" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[24]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the mixing SOMETIMES RESULTED IN IDENTICAL FIRING RATES FOR DIFFERENT CONDITIONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t118" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[25]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>LACK OF CORRELATION DOES NOT CONCLUSIVELY RULE OUT THE EXISTENCE OF FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t119" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[26]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the neural weights were NONZERO FOR ALL NEURONS and did not differ from those EXPECTED BY CHANCE if neurons reflected random weightings</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t120" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[27]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE SPARING OF AUDITORY DECISIONS REVEALS THAT INACTIVATION DID NOT REDUCE THE ANIMAL&#x27;S MOTIVATION, OR INTRODUCE CONFUSION about the stimulus-response contingency</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t121" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[28]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE RAT WITH MORE EXPRESSION POSTERIOR TO PPC HAD WEAKER VISUAL IMPAIRMENT compared to the other rat</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t122" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[29]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>dimensions that CAPTURED CONSIDERABLE VARIANCE DURING THE MOVEMENT CAPTURED FAR LESS VARIANCE DURING DECISION FORMATION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t123" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[30]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the positive control revealed STRONG ALIGNMENT, which PROVIDES REASSURANCE THAT THE MISALIGNMENT of decision and movement INDICATES A REAL DIFFERENCE IN NEURAL COVARIANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t124" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[31]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE MISALIGNMENT IS A POPULATION-LEVEL PHENOMENON, NOT DUE TO HAVING SEPARATE GROUPS OF NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t125" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[32]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE ANIMAL EXPRESSED NO LIGHT-ACTIVATED ION CHANNELS IN ITS BRAIN, AND LASER STIMULATION HAD NO EFFECT ON NEURAL ACTIVITY OR BEHAVIOR</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t126" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Projection Angle Index of Response Similarity</label>
        <term>Projection Angle Index of Response Similarity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t127" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Variance Alignment</label>
        <term>Variance Alignment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t128" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>choice divergence</label>
        <term>choice divergence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t129" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>choice preference</label>
        <term>choice preference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t130" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>excess rate</label>
        <term>excess rate</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t131" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mixed selectivity</label>
        <term>mixed selectivity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t132" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>decision formation</label>
        <term>decision formation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t133" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>DREADD (Designer Receptor Exclusively Activated by Designer Drug)</label>
        <term>DREADD (Designer Receptor Exclusively Activated by Designer Drug)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t134" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>impairment ratio</label>
        <term>impairment ratio</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t135" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>PAIRS</label>
        <term>PAIRS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t136" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>clustering</label>
        <term>clustering</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t137" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>tolerance</label>
        <term>tolerance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t138" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>categories</label>
        <term>categories</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t139" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>PPC inactivation</label>
        <term>PPC inactivation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t140" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>control sessions</label>
        <term>control sessions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t141" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>selectivity</label>
        <term>selectivity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t142" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>weights</label>
        <term>weights</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t143" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t144" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>80.1% (218 of 272 units) — neurons whose multisensory response was better predicted by a linear combination of auditory and visual responses than by the multisensory mean</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t145" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>68.2% — median share of multisensory response variance accounted for by a linear combination of the unisensory responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t146" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>33.8% — proportion of neurons with statistically significant modality preference</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t147" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>86.5° — average angle between the choice decoder and the modality decoder, near the orthogonal 90°</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t148" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>68.9%, 61.2%, 59.4%, 80.2%, 70.1% — choice-decoding accuracy in the five rats at 700-800 ms after stimulus onset, outside the training window</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t149" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>PAIRS index = −0.052; p = 0.632 — clustering statistic for the example rat&#x27;s feature vectors, indistinguishable from chance (no categories)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t150" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>index = 0.840, p &lt; 10 −4 — Variance Alignment index for visual versus multisensory decision-epoch activity, the aligned positive control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t151" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>r = 0.709, r = 0.655, r = 0.577, r = 0.666, r = 0.763 — per-rat correlation between each neuron&#x27;s stimulus-epoch and movement-epoch modulation depth</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t152" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>86.5° — the average angle between the choice decoder and the modality decoder, ONLY SLIGHTLY LESS THAN A PERFECTLY ORTHOGONAL 90</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t153" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>0.004 — the one significant PAIRS p-value, which INDICATED LESS CLUSTERING THAN EXPECTED BY CHANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t154" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>1 of 5 cases — the number of animals in which close neuron pairs differed from chance at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t155" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>3.3 — the signal-to-noise criterion a neuron had to exceed to be included - firing-rate range divided by maximal s.e.m.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3865.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
