<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Neural correlates of learning and working memory in the primate posterior parietal cortex</title>
        <author>Rawley</author>
        <author>Constantinidis</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Neural correlates of learning and working memory in the primate posterior parietal cortex</title>
          <date>2009</date>
          <publisher>Neurobiology of learning and memory</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.nlm.2008.12.006</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Rawley2009-neural-correlates-of-learning-and-working-me</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Rawley2009-neural-correlates-of-learning-and-working-me.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">8359344b40ffd53aa6c7d82edca85c12e3d690a8</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>what the primate posterior parietal cortex contributes to working memory and to learning, against a tradition that assigned both to prefrontal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether parietal activity during memory and after training is a distinct contribution or a copy of the prefrontal signal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>collects the evidence that parietal neurons hold stimuli after they vanish and are reshaped by training, and identifies distractor resistance as the property that separates parietal from prefrontal memory activity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>working memory and learning in posterior parietal cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Delay-period activity is sustained because reciprocally connected pyramidal neurons re-excite each other, so discharges keep reverberating around the recurrent circuit after the stimulus is gone.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Slow postsynaptic receptors (NMDA) keep the postsynaptic cell excited long enough for sparse presynaptic inputs to accumulate, which is what allows low-firing-rate cortical neurons to sustain reverberation.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Damage to spatial working memory nodes destroys the record of which locations have already been searched, and that failure of book-keeping in the good hemifield compounds the failure to attend to the contralesional one.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Parietal episodic-memory deficits arise because bottom-up processes no longer capture attention toward internally stored memories, so unprompted recall misses details that a top-down cue can still retrieve.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>sustained activity is modelled as reverberation in recurrent excitatory loops that keeps firing after the stimulus is gone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the slow NMDA receptor is proposed as the element that lets sparse pyramidal firing sustain itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>such networks settle into attractor states, with or without oscillation depending on the instantiation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>spiking may not be the only carrier - intracellular and synaptic mechanisms are left open</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>training changes what parietal neurons are selective for: colour selectivity appears when colour becomes task-relevant</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review&#x27;s physiological coverage is restricted to areas LIP and 7a rather than the whole of posterior parietal cortex.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The evidence base lacks direct multi-area comparisons in monkeys, so functional differences between parietal areas are not firmly established.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The monkey-to-human mapping of parietal subdivisions that the review relies on is unresolved.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the correspondence between monkey and human parietal areas remains unclear, because few studies compare several areas directly</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>competing naming schemes and areas present in one species&#x27; atlas but not the other have impeded functional correspondence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the boundary of the region itself is defined loosely, by sulci</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the psychological subsystems of working memory are functional units and should not be read as brain regions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Baddeley&#x27;s four-subsystem model of working memory, imported as the framework for describing what is held and manipulated</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>attractor dynamics, used to describe how a recurrent network holds a state</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the neglect syndrome, the signature deficit after parietal damage and the original evidence for parietal function</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>neglect</label>
        <term>neglect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>set shifting</label>
        <term>set shifting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>working memory and short-term memory name the SAME system; the newer term marks an emphasis on manipulation rather than storage, not a different referent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>posterior parietal cortex has no single delineation: Brodmann, von Economo-Koskinas and von Bonin-Bailey each name the same tissue differently, and areas 39 and 40 exist in the human scheme but not the monkey one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>central executive, visual-spatial sketchpad and phonological loop are FUNCTIONAL units of a psychological model, explicitly not anatomical ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>egocentric and allocentric are two frames of reference, the second phylogenetically recent and late-developing in humans</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>this record is a REVIEW - every finding in it is another paper&#x27;s, and the quotes are the reviewers&#x27; summary rather than a primary report</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: existence</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: narrative review of monkey single-unit recording, human imaging, lesion and stimulation studies; no new data</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: review — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: sustained neuronal discharge representing a stimulus that is no longer present</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: working memory and learning in posterior parietal cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → the tradition assigning working memory to prefrontal cortex alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → attempts to map Baddeley&#x27;s working memory subsystems onto brain regions</label>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS FUNCTIONAL VERSUS ANATOMICAL INDIVIDUATION. &#x27;these working memory subsystems refer to functional rather than anatomical units ... For example, the prefrontal cortex seems a logical functional neural analogue to the central executive. However, physiological evidence indicates that prefrontal neurons in area 46 represent spatial and ob[ject information].&#x27; The mapping from a model component to a brain region is denied as an identity while kept as an analogy.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → the cross-species area nomenclature inherited from the pioneering anatomists</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>supports → reverberatory recurrent-network accounts of sustained delay activity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>reconciles → prefrontal and parietal accounts of delay activity, by assigning them different roles in one network</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>posterior parietal cortex —distinct-from→ prefrontal cortex</label>
        <term>posterior parietal cortex</term>
        <term>prefrontal cortex</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: CRITERION: parietal memory activity is overwritten by an intervening distractor and prefrontal activity is not. The two are indistinguishable on the usual measure - see the identical-percentages finding - and separated by this one manipulation
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;parietal cortex&#x27; / &#x27;frontal cortical neurons&#x27;, not the two full names.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>working memory —same-as→ short-term memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <term>short-term memory</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: SAME REFERENT, different emphasis - the paper says outright that the newer term does not name a different system. Neither synonymy by fiat nor a renaming across fields: a reframing</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.6">
        <label>visual-spatial sketchpad —operationalised-as→ posterior parietal cortex</label>
        <term>visual-spatial sketchpad</term>
        <term>posterior parietal cortex</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.4 — the record marks this weak · note: OFFERED IN THE CONCLUSION AND HEDGED (&#x27;could provide&#x27;). The body of the same paper denies this mapping at the level of the region pair - see the mapping-declined limitation. Weight kept low deliberately
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but PPC activity &#x27;COULD PROVIDE a physiological correlate&#x27; to the sketchpad; operationalised-as is hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>RETRACTED (NEITHER ENDPOINT IS ATTESTED AS WRITTEN) · area 7a —part-of→ posterior parietal cortex</label>
        <term>area 7a</term>
        <term>posterior parietal cortex</term>
        <note>RETRACTED: NEITHER ENDPOINT IS ATTESTED AS WRITTEN. The edge is &#x27;area 7a --part-of--&gt; posterior parietal cortex&#x27;. The span: &#x27;PARIETAL AREAS 7A…&#x27; The paper writes &#x27;parietal areas 7a and LIP&#x27;; the edge writes &#x27;area 7a&#x27; and &#x27;posterior…&#x27;. THE CONTAINMENT IS TRUE OF THE FIELD - 7a is a posterior parietal area - AND THE SPAN NEVER SAYS IT, which is the commonest fault in this corpus and one this edge shares with the 66 expanded-endpoint rows measured this hour. Predates the endpoint check and would be refused today. Found by the neighbour query. — strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;parietal areas 7a and LIP&#x27;, not &#x27;posterior parietal cortex&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · LIP —part-of→ posterior parietal cortex</label>
        <term>LIP</term>
        <term>posterior parietal cortex</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span compared prefrontal and parietal neurons without naming LIP&#x27;s container. This sentence names both: working memory activity &#x27;in the posterior parietal…&#x27; described as &#x27;discharges in monkey AREA LIP&#x27;. — strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>spectral power —operationalised-as→ selective attention</label>
        <term>spectral power</term>
        <term>selective attention</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: a decrease at 5-10 Hz distinguishes attending from remembering, in trained animals
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attention and maintenance were CHARACTERIZED BY decreased 5-10 Hz power; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Parietal memory-related activity is disrupted by intervening distractors and represents whichever stimulus appeared most recently, relevant or not.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proportion of neurons showing working-memory activity is essentially the same in parietal areas 7a and LIP as in prefrontal areas 46 and FEF.</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: LIP and prefrontal areas 46 and FEF ( Chafee &amp; Goldman-Rakic, 1998 ). - THE RESULT IS THE CITED WORK&#x27;S AND THE CITATION TRAILS THE SENTENCE. A plain noun phrase is the subject of the result verb and the attribution is a bracket at the end - &#x27;Neurons within the dorsal temporal pole demonstrated match suppression ... ( Ng et al., 2014 )&#x27;. Neither of my two cues could see this shape, so THESE WERE READ RATHER THAN SWEPT: 36 candidates of the shape, 20 read, 11 marked, 9 refused. THE REFUSALS ARE WHY IT IS NOT A CUE: &#x27;Aru2012 findings[16]&#x27; is the paper&#x27;s OWN result with a citation supporting the localisation, &#x27;Natan2015 findings[3]&#x27; ends &#x27;consistent with previous findings ( Szymanski et al., 2009 )&#x27; where the main clause is the paper&#x27;s, and &#x27;Drieu2019&#x27; x3 are &#x27;One cannot entirely rule out...&#x27; - a limitation, not an attribution. About 55% precise, which is a list to read and not a sweep to run.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Area 7a neurons hold the remembered location of a visual stimulus even when no motor response to it is planned, so the signal is mnemonic rather than motor-preparatory.</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: studies in area 7a demonstrated - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. &#x27;Previous studies reported&#x27;, &#x27;studies in guinea pig showed&#x27;, &#x27;recent studies have reported&#x27; - somebody else&#x27;s work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE&#x27;S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject (&#x27;Sperling (1960) demonstrated&#x27;) and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on &#x27;Plakke2016&#x27; by hand showed four the cue could not see - &#x27;A study examining recognition found&#x27;, &#x27;studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated&#x27;, &#x27;A follow up study found&#x27; - so the named cue&#x27;s 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE&#x27;S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record&#x27;s whole layer.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Attending to and holding a stimulus in working memory was marked by distinct firing patterns, notably lower spectral power at 5-10 Hz.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Colour selectivity in posterior parietal neurons, normally low, increases once colour becomes the cue that signifies which eye movement to make.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>TMS during the delay period slows responses whether applied over prefrontal or parietal cortex, but TMS during the decision period impairs performance only over prefrontal cortex.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Monkeys trained on a salience-detection task signal the target faster and with more discriminable activity than untrained monkeys, although the overall response pattern is unchanged.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Imaging meta-analysis places area 7 in every executive component of working memory tested - ordering, updating and manipulating items - as well as in spatial content.</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: studies involving working memory tasks revealed - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. &#x27;Previous studies reported&#x27;, &#x27;studies in guinea pig showed&#x27;, &#x27;recent studies have reported&#x27; - somebody else&#x27;s work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE&#x27;S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject (&#x27;Sperling (1960) demonstrated&#x27;) and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on &#x27;Plakke2016&#x27; by hand showed four the cue could not see - &#x27;A study examining recognition found&#x27;, &#x27;studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated&#x27;, &#x27;A follow up study found&#x27; - so the named cue&#x27;s 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE&#x27;S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record&#x27;s whole layer.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>parietal and prefrontal cortex show virtually identical proportions of neurons with working memory responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>parietal delay activity is overwritten by an intervening distractor; prefrontal activity is not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>TMS over prefrontal cortex disrupted the decision phase of a memory task while TMS over parietal cortex did not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>cooling either PPC or PFC profoundly affects the output of neurons in the other</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>parietal neurons acquire colour selectivity when colour becomes task-relevant, having had little before</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>trained animals&#x27; parietal neurons signalled the target faster and more discriminably than naive animals&#x27;</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: studies revealed - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. &#x27;Previous studies reported&#x27;, &#x27;studies in guinea pig showed&#x27;, &#x27;recent studies have reported&#x27; - somebody else&#x27;s work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE&#x27;S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject (&#x27;Sperling (1960) demonstrated&#x27;) and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on &#x27;Plakke2016&#x27; by hand showed four the cue could not see - &#x27;A study examining recognition found&#x27;, &#x27;studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated&#x27;, &#x27;A follow up study found&#x27; - so the named cue&#x27;s 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE&#x27;S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record&#x27;s whole layer.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>attention and memory maintenance were characterized by a fall in 5-10 Hz spectral power</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>two patients with frontal lesions and no neglect still failed spatial working memory, dissociating the two deficits</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the Corsi task was modified to put all items on the vertical midline, removing the attentional bias from the memory measure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>MAPPING DECLINED: the parietal-prefrontal specialisation does not correspond to Baddeley&#x27;s subsystems, since both regions do visual-spatial and executive work</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>MAPPING OFFERED, HEDGED: the conclusion nonetheless proposes parietal activity as a possible correlate of the visual-spatial sketchpad</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>alternative accounts of what sustained prefrontal activity represents are listed without adjudication</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>working memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chunking</label>
        <term>chunking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>set shifting</label>
        <term>set shifting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Balint&#x27;s syndrome</label>
        <term>Balint&#x27;s syndrome</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>memory simultanagnosia</label>
        <term>memory simultanagnosia</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sensorimotor transformations</label>
        <term>sensorimotor transformations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>selective attention</label>
        <term>selective attention</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>working memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>short-term memory</label>
        <term>short-term memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>chunking</label>
        <term>chunking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>set shifting</label>
        <term>set shifting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>neglect</label>
        <term>neglect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>attractor</label>
        <term>attractor</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5 cm — the distance from the face within which &quot;ultranear&quot; VIP neurons encode a visual stimulus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5–10 Hz — the frequency band in which spectral power of parietal spike trains drops during attention and working-memory maintenance after training</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>5-10 Hz — the band whose power falls during attention and memory maintenance after training</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>areas 5, 7, 40 and 39 — the human Brodmann areas making up posterior parietal cortex, two of which have no monkey counterpart</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>four — subsystems in the current Baddeley model, all functional rather than anatomical</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.6">
        <label>meta-analysis</label>
        <term>meta-analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>distracting stimuli</label>
        <term>distracting stimuli</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>delay period</label>
        <term>delay period</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>spectral power</label>
        <term>spectral power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2008.12.006.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
