<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness</title>
        <author>Reingold</author>
        <author>Merikle</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness</title>
          <date>1988</date>
          <publisher>Perception &amp; Psychophysics</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3758/bf03207490</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Reingold1988-using-direct-and-indirect-measures-to-study</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Reingold1988-using-direct-and-indirect-measures-to-study.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">4decf96467cb16b7b7b8b69db9ae6edc40cf0936</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>perception without awareness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Instructing an observer to respond on a given stimulus dimension makes them exploit whatever conscious information about that dimension exists, which is why a direct task can never be beaten by an indirect one on conscious information.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Apparent direct/indirect dissociations can be manufactured by measuring the two indexes on different stimulus states and displays, so the gap reflects unequal discrimination difficulty rather than unconscious perception.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The empirical conclusion may not generalise beyond the specific display and stimulus parameters used.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Because the indirect measure was the less sensitive one, the experiments themselves settle nothing about unconscious perception.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper cannot explain why its familiarity/duration correlation runs opposite to Avant&#x27;s, and leaves that to future work.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The field&#x27;s results are stated to be inconclusive because it has no agreed measure of its central term, not because the experiments are poor.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the accumulated literature on perception without awareness: the paper states definitive results have been elusive in the absence of consensus on what constitutes an adequate measure of awareness</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Whether the available measures are even comparable to one another is stated to be unknowable without a framework that does not exist.</label>
        <note>what this limits: comparing results across studies that used different awareness measures: the paper states it is impossible to know whether those measures are adequate or comparable</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The opposing position is rejected on the ground that the thing it depends on cannot be observed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim that a direct discrimination reflects intentional responding: the paper states an observer&#x27;s intentions cannot be directly observed or measured</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The paper&#x27;s own diagnosis is that decades of experimental work could not settle the question because the field had no agreed measure of the thing being denied. An empirical programme is stalled by a definitional gap, and the remedy offered is not a better definition but a weaker assumption - an ordering between two sensitivities rather than a claim that either instrument is complete.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>presentation order and word length completely counterbalanced within each block of 24 trials</label>
        <note>eliminates: order effects and word-length effects, either of which could produce a difference between the direct and indirect measures the paper is comparing · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>dissociation paradigm</label>
        <term>dissociation paradigm</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>measure of awareness</label>
        <term>measure of awareness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>direct measures</label>
        <term>direct measures</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>exhaustiveness assumption</label>
        <term>exhaustiveness assumption</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>null sensitivity</label>
        <term>null sensitivity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>indirect measure</label>
        <term>indirect measure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>measure of perception - DIRECT: subjects are explicitly instructed to perform the discriminations of interest, which is what makes the measure direct</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>measure of perception - INDIRECT: one index assumed to indicate availability to awareness, the other assumed to indicate availability of the information regardless of awareness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>perception without awareness - A LITERATURE BLOCKED BY A DEFINITIONAL GAP RATHER THAN BY DATA: &#x27;definitive results have been elusive IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY GENERAL CONSENSUS AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE MEASURE OF AWARENESS.&#x27; The proposed fix does not settle the definition but MINIMISES what must be assumed - &#x27;THE ONLY ASSUMPTION required by the proposed approach is that the sensitivity of direct discriminations to relevant conscious information is greater than or equal to&#x27; that of comparable indirect ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Avant and Thieman (1985)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Avant &amp; Lyman (1975); Avant et al. (1975); Avant &amp; Thieman (1985)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → the filled-duration illusion (Allan, 1979; Craig, 1973; Goldfarb &amp; Goldstone, 1963)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>direct measures —operationalised-as→ measure of awareness</label>
        <term>direct measures</term>
        <term>measure of awareness</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER THE EXHAUSTIVENESS ASSUMPTION IS MADE. Reading a null on a direct measure as an absence of awareness &#x27;can be true ONLY IF it is also assumed that direct measures provide AN EXHAUSTIVE MEASURE of conscious perceptual experience. Quotation withheld, given conscious perceptual experience&#x27; · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: A NULL MEASUREMENT MEANS ABSENCE ONLY IF THE INSTRUMENT IS EXHAUSTIVE, and the assumption is usually implicit - the paper calls it &#x27;another IMPLICIT assumption underlying many recent…&#x27;. This is the 1988 psychology statement of the problem that a verifier cannot report absence.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span discusses the ASSUMPTION that direct measures are exhaustive measures of awareness; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>indirect measure —distinct-from→ direct measures</label>
        <term>indirect measure</term>
        <term>direct measures</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER THE TWO ARE MEASURED UNDER COMPARABLE CONDITIONS. Avant and Thieman (1985) claimed an indirect measure was MORE sensitive than a direct one; &#x27;CONTRARY TO THIS CLAIM, WHEN DIRECT AND INDIRECT INDEXES ARE MEASURED UNDER COMPARABLE CONDITIONS&#x27;, the indirect measure is LESS sensitive. The ordering of the two instruments reverses on the comparability of the conditions, not on the instruments · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE PUBLISHED CLAIM AND ITS REVERSAL USE THE SAME TWO MEASURES. What changed is that they were put on comparable footing - the same lesson as measuring candidates within one run rather than across runs.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper&#x27;s central deduction is that unconscious perception is established as soon as an indirect measure is absolutely more sensitive to a stimulus dimension than a comparable direct measure.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>To demonstrate unconscious perception it suffices that the indirect measure be more sensitive than a comparable direct one, even when the direct measure&#x27;s sensitivity is above zero.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Experiment 1 replicated the filled-duration illusion: displays containing a word or a nonword were judged longer than blank displays of identical physical duration.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Words were in general judged longer than nonwords, a positive relation between familiarity and perceived duration.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The duration-judgment measure is blind to lexical status at 33 ms exposure, showing no word/nonword difference at all.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Lengthening exposure only strengthens the positive familiarity effect rather than reversing its direction.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Performance on the direct lexical decision task was significantly better than on the indirect duration judgment task.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Detection in Experiment 4 gave the same ordering: a direct measure indexed perception more sensitively than a comparable indirect duration measure.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>indirect measure of perception</label>
        <term>indirect measure of perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>dissociation paradigm</label>
        <term>dissociation paradigm</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exclusiveness assumption</label>
        <term>exclusiveness assumption</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exhaustiveness assumption</label>
        <term>exhaustiveness assumption</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>filled-duration illusion</label>
        <term>filled-duration illusion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exposure duration</label>
        <term>exposure duration</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>stimulus familiarity (word vs. nonword)</label>
        <term>stimulus familiarity (word vs. nonword)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>proportion of &quot;longer&quot; responses</label>
        <term>proportion of &quot;longer&quot; responses</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t(19) = 12.0, p &lt; .0001 — size of the filled-duration effect for word-blank pairs in Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F(l,38) = 5.10, P &lt; .05 — the Experiment 3 main effect of task showing lexical decision outperformed duration judgment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F(1,18) = 48.32, P &lt; .001 — the Experiment 4 main effect of task, detection versus duration judgment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t(39) = 3.23, p &lt; .01 — Experiment 3 direct lexical decision accuracy above chance at 33 ms exposure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>60% — accuracy of the indirect preference measure in Kunst-Wilson and Zajonc, against 48% for the direct recognition test</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Twenty — number of undergraduate subjects run in Experiment 1 (and again in Experiments 2 and 4)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207490.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
