Tonotopic Organization in the Depth of Human Inferior Colliculus

Ress, Chandrasekaran · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2013 · neuroscience · 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00586 · record Ress2013-tonotopic-organization-in-the-depth-of-human
tag layer · index · concepts · authors · עברית
Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (xml); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. The paper stands in two relations to the same prior studies at once: it reproduces their depth-tonotopy result at a lower field strength while explicitly disagreeing with them about the spatial character (patchy vs continuous), which is why replication status is 'contested' and why both a 'replicates' and a 'contradicts' relation are recorded. Note the source's spaced citation punctuation ('Baumann et al. ( 2011 )', '(Schreiner and Langner, 1997 )') is preserved verbatim in the evidence strings. Claim type is 'existence' rather than 'method' even though the surface-based virtual-penetration analysis is a methodological advance, because the abstract's headline is that the gradients are there and significant. The left/right asymmetry of the gradients and the inverted-U tuning-width result are not captured by any facet. 2026-08-13 and 2026-08-15 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
How to read this page. The article text below is reproduced exactly as it was staged; nothing in it has been rewritten. Coloured stretches are tagged. A solid underline means the tag records the paper's own words. A dotted underline means the tag text is the tagger's sentence about the paper — the quotation is the paper's, the wording of the tag is not. Every superscript label links to that tag's row in the table at the foot of the page. The machine-readable edition of the same thing is the TEI file beside this one, where the tags live in standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
bootstrap 2 fields · confidence interval 2 fields · bootstrapping 2 fields · fmri 2 fields · linear regression 2 fields

Tags on this paper

Every tag the record carries, each linking to every other paper in the corpus that carries it. A tag appears here whether or not its words occur in the article — the spans below are only the ones a sentence in this paper licenses. Of the 12 concept tags on this paper, 1 are grounded in a quoted sentence. All carry the tagger's gloss of what the term means in this paper, which is not something the article can license.
tonotopy inferior colliculus central nucleus external cortex centroid frequency depth gradient virtual sparse-sampling spatial smoothing BOLD patchy bootstrapping Because BOLD reports synaptic input and local-circuit activity more than output spiking, the measured map tracks the interdigitated tonotopy of cochlear-nucleus afferents rather than the smooth map of IC neurons, producing patches. At 3 T half the BOLD signal is intravascular, so tissue near large draining veins yields strong contrast and tissue away from them yields little, imposing a vascular patch pattern on the frequency map. Attentive auditory tasks bias processing to the left hemisphere, and largely ipsilateral corticocollicular feedback carries that bias down to the colliculus, yielding stronger left-IC gradients. Each voxel averages millions of neurons of mixed frequency preference, so within-voxel heterogeneity broadens the apparent tuning and compresses the measured gradient range. surface-based octaves/mm midbrain laminar spiral frequency-discrimination high-resolution smoothing cochlear nucleus sparse-sampling design virtual penetration reference frame dorsal cortex center frequency BOLD response amplitude difference depth along the virtual penetration tuning width bootstrap confidence interval p-value an estimate of the p value for the gradient linear regression fit the result with a straight line; the slope of the fitted line weighted mean weighted average bootstrapping instead of spatial blurring linear fit of centroid frequency against depth bootstrapped confidence intervals on centroid frequency fmri

Legend

second readingalternativesan independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees
relation to other workclaim_relationshow this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies
claim typeclaim_typethe shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null
concept edgeconcept_edgesan asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it
conceptconceptsan idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it
content tagcontent_tagsa finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper
contributioncontributionwhat the paper claims to add
controlcontrolsan experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation
limitationlimitationswhat the paper says its evidence cannot support
mechanismmechanismshow the reported effect is said to come about
methodmethodhow the paper produced its evidence
object of studyobject_of_studywhat the paper is about — the thing it investigates
phenomenonphenomenonthe effect or regularity under study
research questionresearch_questionthe question the paper sets itself
sensesensesa distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it
transfertransfersa method or concept carried in from another field

The paper, tagged

The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.

Tonotopic Organization in the Depth of Human Inferior Colliculus

David Ress David Ress

1 Neuroscience Department, Center for Perceptual Systems, Imaging Research Center, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, USA

Find articles by David Ress

1, * , Bharath Chandrasekaran Bharath Chandrasekaran

2 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Find articles by Bharath Chandrasekaran

2

Author information

Article notes

Copyright and License information

1 Neuroscience Department, Center for Perceptual Systems, Imaging Research Center, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, USA

2 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Edited by: Florian Beissner, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, USA

Reviewed by: Elia Formisano, Maastricht University, Netherlands; Marc Schönwiesner, University of Montreal, Canada

✉ *Correspondence: David Ress, Neuroscience Department, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, S104N MS BCM240, Houston, TX 77030, USA e-mail: ress@bcm.edu

This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Received 2013 May 1; Accepted 2013 Aug 30; Collection date 2013.

Copyright © 2013 Ress and Chandrasekaran.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PMC Copyright notice

PMCID: PMC3776955  PMID: 24065909

Abstract

Experiments in animal models indicate that inferior colliculus (IC), the primary auditory midbrain structure, represents sound frequency in a particular spatial organization, a tonotopy , that proceeds from dorsal and superficial to ventral and deeper tissue. alternativesalternativesExperiments are presented that use high-resolution, sparse-sampling functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3 T to determine if tonotopic gradients can be reliably measured in human IC using high-resolution fMRI. Stimuli were sequences of bandpass-filtered noise with different center frequencies, presented sequentially while fMRI data were collected. Four subjects performed an adaptive frequency-discrimination task throughout the experiment. claim_typeResults show statistically significant tonotopic gradients within both ICs of all subjects. Frequency gradients as a function of depth were measured using surface-based analysis methods that make virtual penetrations into the IC tissue. This organization was evident over substantial portions of the IC, at locations that are consistent with the expected location of the central nucleus of IC. contributionThe results confirm a laminar tonotopy in the human IC at 3 T, but with a heterogeneous, patchy character. transfersThe success of these surface-based analysis methods will enable more detailed non-invasive explorations of the functional architecture of other subcortical human auditory structures that have complex, laminar organization.

Keywords: audition, tonotopy, inferior colliculus, fMRI, midbrain

Introduction

content_tags↗Organization by frequency, tonotopy , is one of the central organizing principles of the auditory system. concepts↗The inferior colliculus (IC) is the primary auditory midbrain structure that forms a major convergence zone within the auditory system, receiving obligatory bottom-up connections from the brainstem auditory structures, and direct corticofugal feedback connections from auditory cortex. concept_edgescontent_tags↗content_tags↗content_tags↗The IC consists of three prominent and functionally distinct subdivisions: the tonotopically organized central nucleus, the multisensory external cortex, and the dorsal cortex, which receives corticocollicular connections, primarily from the auditory cortex. Invasive studies on animal models show that the CN of IC exhibits tonotopic organization along the dorsal-to-ventral direction, which roughly corresponds to the depth direction within this laminated tissue (Schreiner and Langner, 1997 ; Malmierca et al., 2008 ; Baumann et al., 2011 ; Cheung et al., 2012 ). Electrophysiological studies in animal models show finely tuned topographical mapping of frequency along the laminar axis of the IC (Schreiner and Langner, 1997 ; Baumann et al., 2010 ). sensesSimilarly, anterograde labeling studies from the cochlear nucleus also show evidence for laminar frequency selectivity, but these results suggest a more heterogeneous, patchy distribution of frequency selectivity for the bottom-up inputs to IC (Oliver and Morest, 1984 ; Hofstetter and Ehret, 1992 ; Loftus et al., 2008 ).

content_tagsIn humans, the small size of the IC (<9 mm), coupled with the limited resolution of conventional human neuroimaging studies, have precluded the non-invasive examination of frequency representation. Further, subcortical structures are harder to image because of their susceptibility to physiological noise (Guimaraes et al., 1998 ). content_tagsConventional functional neuroimaging studies employ 3–10 mm sampling and spatial blurring, making it impossible to resolve functional subdivisions within the IC. In addition, the IC has a complex organization that represents multiple auditory features, with tonotopic specificity shown to be largely resolved along the laminar axis (Zook et al., 1985 ; Malmierca et al., 1993 ; Schreiner and Langner, 1997 ). The complicated internal structure of the IC requires a more detailed examination using high-resolution imaging and depth-resolved analyses.

Two recent studies have examined tonotopic organization using a resolution (2-mm FWHM) that is higher than traditional neuroimaging studies. Baumann et al. ( 2011 ) examined tonotopic and rate-dependent gradients in rhesus monkeys using a 4.7 T MRI scanner and found an orthogonal relationship between frequency and rate representation in the IC. More recently, De Martino et al. ( 2013 ) examined tonotopic organization in the human IC using a 7 T MRI scanner. Both studies showed a dorsolateral-to-ventromedial tonotopic gradient in the IC preferentially responding to low-to-high frequencies, respectively. research_questionWhile these studies demonstrate the utility of very high-field strengths in resolving tonotopic gradients within the IC, it is unclear whether clear tonotopy is evident at smaller field strengths. Functional neuroimaging studies at 3 T have demonstrated tonotopy in the human auditory cortex, in a manner consistent with the organization found in other primates (Barton et al., 2012 ; Moerel et al., 2012 ), suggesting the possibility that tonotopy can also be evidenced at 3 T.

object_of_studyphenomenoncontent_tagsThe goal of this study is to examine frequency representation in the human IC using high-resolution (1.2 mm) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3 T, adapted for auditory stimulation. During fMRI, subjects listened to sequences of five sounds in the range of 0.25–8 kHz, while performing a frequency-discrimination task (Figure 1 ). Surface-based analyses were then used to systematically evaluate tonotopy within human IC.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Protocol, stimulus, and task . (A) Sequence of stimulus presentation and fMRI acquisition; sound frequency is color-coded. (B) Typical subject performance during a single fMRI run.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

limitationscontent_tagsSubjects were four male adults (age range 21–31), with normal hearing (air-conduction thresholds <20 dB nHL for octaves from 0.25 to 8 kHz). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Texas at Austin.

Stimulus and task

content_tags↗Auditory stimuli, presented through MRI compatible earphones, consisted of bandpass-filtered (0.6-octave bandwidth) white noise, presented with five different center frequencies, logarithmically spaced on 0.25–8 kHz (Figure 1 A). The sounds were followed by a sixth quiet-period with no sound presented to act as a reference. This sequence was repeated five times during each 6-min run.

controlsTo ensure that participants paid consistent attention to the stimuli, they performed a challenging two-interval forced-choice frequency-discrimination task. Sounds were presented in pairs, each lasting 2.85 s with a 0.3-s gap. The sound in one of the two periods, randomly chosen, had a slightly higher center frequency than the other, and subjects used a MRI compatible button box after each sound pair to indicate their judgment as to which interval had the higher frequency. No response was given during the final quiet-period of each sequence. mechanismsDuring stimulus periods, the frequency difference, typically 3–8%, between the two sounds was adjusted in real time using a pair of randomly interleaved two-up, one-down staircases. After each run, the subject’s current frequency-discrimination threshold value was estimated as the average frequency difference over the latter half of the trials in that run. Frequency difference for the next run was then initialized to a value 30% greater than this estimate. This creates a stable pattern of performance in which subjects perform very well on the task at the start of each run, and then steadily return to their threshold value (Figure 1 B). In addition, subjects practiced the task in advance of scanning so that their performance was stable during the fMRI. content_tagsAcross runs, subjects’ performance was 75–85% correct.

fMRI protocol

Stimulus presentations occurred every 12 s while high-resolution (1.2-mm cubic voxels) T2*-weighted images were collected in a sparse-sampling approach. mechanismscontent_tags↗content_tags↗In sparse-sampling designs, one attempts to sample the hyperoxic peak of the BOLD response evoked by preceding stimulus, then allocate a sufficient delay to allow that response to decay away before the next sample is obtained. Moreover, the delay is adjusted so that the nuisance response from the scanner-acquisition noise is minimized (Hall et al., 1999 ). The purpose of the long presentation period is to drive the desired stimulus-evoked response into a fairly stable “flat-top” so that it can be sampled by the fairly long 3-s-duration 3-shot acquisition that immediately follows each stimulation period. Our timing choice was guided by previous sparse-sampling approaches that have examined auditory processing in cortical and subcortical structures (e.g., Gaab et al., 2003 ; Wong et al., 2008 ; Chandrasekaran et al., 2012 ).

method↗Imaging was performed on a 3 T scanner (GE Signa Excite HD) using an eight-channel head coil. Ten 1.2-mm-thick quasi-coronal slices were acquired sequentially over a 170-mm field-of-view during a 3-s period immediately following each sound pair. A set of T1-weighted structural images was obtained on the same prescription using a three-dimensional (3D) RF-spoiled GRASS (SPGR) sequence (15°flip angle, 0.78-mm pixels). These images produced good gray-white tissue contrast and were used to align the functional data to a segmented structural reference volume, described below.

Functional image acquisition used a 3-shot spiral trajectory (Glover and Lai, 1998 ) with TE = 40 ms and TR = 1 s that has provided good results in human midbrain (Katyal et al., 2010 , 2012 ). Between acquisitions, T1 equilibrium was maintained by continual slice excitation, but acquisition and crusher gradients were suppressed to create quiet-periods for presentation of the audio stimuli. Noise was further reduced by setting slew limits for the excitation pulses to 30 T/m/s. The scheme resulted in a noise reduction of ∼15 dB during the quiet-periods. A similar approach was used previously with EPI acquisitions (Schwarzbauer et al., 2006 ).

mechanismsThe use of the three-shot spiral acquisition acts as a temporal anti-aliasing filter that substantially reduces high-frequency physiological nuisance effects, particularly cardiac pulsations. In single-shot acquisition, each fMRI slice is acquired very quickly (∼20–30 ms) compared to hemodynamic time scales, but the samples are widely spaced (e.g., 2–3 s). This results in aliasing of high-frequency fluctuations driven by cardiac pulse (>1 Hz) and respiration (∼0.25 Hz). In our multi-shot imaging, acquisition is now distributed over multiple brief sampling periods separated by the relatively short TR = 1 s. This preparation implements a low-pass filter upon the data. This avoided the use of cardiac gating, and also reduced respiratory artifacts (Ress et al., 2007 ; Katyal et al., 2010 , 2012 ).

The same monotonically increasing sequence of five sound frequencies and quiet-period was repeated five times in each fMRI run (6-min duration, 120 fMRI volumes per run), and 10–12 runs were collected in each scanning session. The fMRI data were compensated for subject motion using a robust intensity-based scheme (Nestares and Heeger, 2000 ). Data were also corrected for spatial variations, introduced mostly by receiver-coil inhomogeneity, using a spatially smoothed homomorphic normalization to the temporal mean of the fMRI time series, and high-pass filtered to reduce the effects of slow image-intensity drifts. The anatomical images collected in each session were then used to align and transform the functional data to a structural 3D reference volume, which was acquired for each subject in a separate session (Figure 2 A). The structural reference volume was T1-weighted with good gray-white contrast, acquired using a 3D, inversion-prepared, SPGR sequence ( T I  = 450 ms, 0.7-mm isometric voxel size).

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Surface-model construction . (A) MRI volumes obtained with 0.7-mm voxels were segmented to delineate the boundaries of brainstem tissue (blue). (B) A smooth surface was constructed at the segmentation boundary; gray overlay shows curvature. (C) Enlargement showing IC boundaries (black).

The noise in fMRI data is known to have a non-Gaussian distribution (Biswal et al., 1995 ; Holmes et al., 1997 ; Glover et al., 2000 ; Kruger and Glover, 2001 ). content_tags↗Typically, fMRI data is therefore “whitened” by performing a mixture of spatial and temporal blurring (Worsley and Friston, 1995 ; Friston et al., 2000 ). To maintain high spatial resolution, we wanted to avoid any blurring. content_tags↗Therefore, we used “bootstrapping,” a non-parametric method to estimate statistical significance. content_tags↗The bootstrapping procedure obtains a high-quality estimate of the statistical distribution of the observed data. The data, for example, the BOLD response from 55 presentations of a particular stimulus frequency, are resampled with repetition, and then averaged together. Each iteration of this procedure thus selects both a random subset of the original data, and a random set of weight factors. It can be shown analytically (Ephron and Tibshirani, 1998 ), that many repetitions of this procedure converges very nearly to the original distribution of the data. Thus, bootstrapping entirely avoids the need for assumptions of a particular, usually Gaussian, noise distribution. Instead, the actual distribution is estimated, and this distribution is used to directly calculate confidence intervals upon the data. content_tags↗content_tagsFor our data here, we resampled the data with replacement 1000 times; error bars then show the 68% confidence intervals on the bootstrapped distribution, which is similar to what would be presented for the standard-error-of-the-mean for a normal distribution.

Image analysis

We segmented the brainstem tissue (Figure 2 A) using the ITK-SNAP application (Yushkevich et al., 2006 ). A smooth surface was then interpolated at cerebrospinal fluid-tissue interface of the IC (Figure 2 B) using a deformable-surface algorithm (Xu et al., 2006 ). This surface provided vertices and outward normal vectors used as a reference for the depth calculations described below as well as a means to visualize the functional data (Figure 2 C). A nearest-neighbor Euclidean distance map was calculated between the IC tissue voxels and the vertices of the refined IC surface. Thus, each volume voxel was associated with a frequency response across the five tones, and a depth coordinate (Ress et al., 2007 ; Khan et al., 2011 ).

content_tags↗As a first form of analysis, we calculated the BOLD response amplitude differences between the highest and lowest stimulus frequencies (Figure 3 D). claim_relationsThis procedure is analogous to that used by Baumann et al. ( 2011 ).

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Response differences between the highest and lowest frequency stimuli for subject 1 . (A–C) Response difference is shown as a color overlay upon axial high-resolution structural anatomy images of the IC. Transparency is modulated by statistical significance of the sound stimuli vs. quiet-periods. Insets show location of each slice on the IC surface model. (D) Responses as a function of depth to the lowest- (red) and highest-frequency stimuli (blue); difference is shown in black. These responses were obtained from a single depth penetration with a strong tonotopic gradient shown by the black rectangle in (A) . Thin dashed lines show 68% confidence intervals (e.g., SEM). (E) Response difference vs. depth for all voxels in another penetration marked in (B) . Red line is a linear fit the data beginning at 1-mm depth into the tissue. (F) The slopes of these linear fits are shown as a color overly upon this surface rendering of the subject’s IC.

As a second form of analysis, we characterized the frequency response for each voxel within the tissue of IC by calculating the centroid (first moment) of its frequency response (Figure 4 D): f cent = Σ i f i A ( f ) ∕ Σ i A ( f i ) , where A ( f i ) is the fMRI response amplitude to sound at frequency f i , and i indexes across the five frequencies. Amplitudes for each sequence of five stimuli were made positive definite by subtracting the minimum value. Because the difference between sound pairs was small (typically <5%), the frequency increment was neglected in these calculations. Each sound was repeated typically 55 times in a session. Using a bootstrapping approach as described above, we estimated confidence intervals on the centroid frequencies. To estimate tuning width we used the second moment of the amplitude response: f tune = Σ i ( f i − f cent ) 2 A ( f i ) ∕ Σ i A ( f i ) .

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Centroid frequencies in IC tissue . (A–C) Color overlays of centroid frequency within IC, which vary from 0.25 kHz (red) to 8 kHz (blue). (D) Frequency response data for three sample voxels in a region in panel A. Line colors are color-coded in correspondence to the centroid frequency overlay. Red curve has a centroid near 0.3 kHz, green curve near 1.5 kHz, and blue near 3.5 kHz. (E) Centroid frequency for all voxels in the penetration marked by the black rectangle in (B) . A strong depth gradient that begins 1 mm below the surface is captured by the linear fit shown by the red line. (F) The linear fit slope data is marked as a color overlay upon the IC surface model.

We had originally planned to use a phase-encoded analysis approach, similar to what has been used in the measurement of visual retinotopy and tonotopy in cortex (Engel et al., 1997 ; Barton et al., 2012 ). However, the very slow period, 72-s, of each stimulus cycle made this analysis susceptible to low-frequency scanner drift noise. Although they were therefore noisier, the phase-encoding results were qualitatively similar to those obtained by the centroid-frequency approach described above.

We evaluated the gradients of both high-low response difference and centroid frequency with depth across the IC in a depth range of 0–5 mm. The notion that IC frequency preference is organized by depth is has been suggested by previous animal studies (e.g., Schreiner and Langner, 1997 ; Loftus et al., 2008 ), and the utility of such methods with high-resolution fMRI was demonstrated by our previous work (Katyal et al., 2010 ). The portion of the surface corresponding to IC, estimated based on positive tissue curvature, ranged from 110 to 182 mm 2 across the four subjects. At every vertex in this portion (328–433 locations) on each IC surface model, we created normally oriented, 1.2-mm-diam cylinders. Specifically, we start from each surface vertex and create a patch corresponding to all surface vertices with manifold distances <0.6 mm from the starting vertex. These surface vertices are then extended along the inward-directed mean surface normal of the patch to penetrate the full depth of the tissue with a cylinder of constant diameter. transferscontent_tags↗We use these cylinders to probe the variation of response difference (Figure 3 E) or centroid frequency (Figure 4 E) with depth in the tissue, a hemodynamic analog to making electrode penetrations into the tissue. content_tags↗We then recorded the centroid frequency as a function of depth along the virtual penetration, and fit the result with a straight line; the slope of the fitted line, g , was an estimate of tonotopic gradient with depth. Linear fits were attempted after removing a variable amount of superficial tissue that varied from 0 to 1.5 mm, and the starting depth that yielded the best linear fit was chosen. Significance of the slope values was again obtained by a bootstrapping procedure. The amplitude-difference or preferred-frequency data obtained from each of 1000 resampled averages was fit as a function of depth by a straight line. content_tags↗The fraction of the resampled data sets with negative slopes provides an estimate of the p value for the gradient.

The orientations of those penetrations that corresponded to significant tonotopic depth gradients were used to obtain a measure of the mean tonotopic depth gradient. content_tags↗Specifically, we formed a weighted average: ⟨ n ⟩ = Σ i g i n i ∕ Σ i g i , where n i is the direction of each significant penetration i , having depth gradient g i . The resulting unit vectors yield two angles, one in the sagittal plane, and the other in the axial plane. We adopt the convention that an angle of 0°points directly anterior, with positive sagittal angles rotating superior, and positive axial angles rotating to the right.

Results

The sparse-sampling scheme captured large amplitude changes that often exceeded 1% of the local mean. Response differences showed strong depth gradients in many portions of each IC that was studied (Figure 3 ). The gradients had a complex spatial distribution, but bands of low- and high-frequency responsive tissue could be seen on particular slices (Figures 3 A–C). Virtual penetrations were made by constructing cylinders were normally oriented to the superficial surface of the tissue (shown schematically by black rectangles in Figures 3 A,B). A thin band of overlaying tissue, consistent with the anatomic location of the external cortex, 0–1.5-mm thick, was observed in some regions, e.g., the lateral surface of the right colliculus in Figure 3 B. mechanismsSince tonotopy is not a feature of the external cortex of the IC, this region is ignored in the subsequent depth analysis.

Responses to the lowest and highest-frequency stimuli often showed opposing gradients with depth for many of the virtual penetrations, yielding a strong positive depth gradient in the high-low response difference (Figure 3 D). The difference is initially noisy or constant as we penetrate through what we assume to be external cortex, then rises strongly. For each penetration, we fitted a straight line to the depth gradient after discarding the putative external cortex (Figure 3 E). These virtual penetrations and linear fits were performed across the entire surface of both ICs in each subject. The slopes of the fits could then be visualized as color overlay upon the IC surface models (Figure 3 F). Depth-gradient results for all subjects show regions of significant positive depth gradients across both ICs, with a patchy spatial organization very similar to that obtained from the frequency-centroid analysis presented below.

Figures 4 A–C shows the spatial structure of centroid frequency on three axial slices in subject 1; examples from other slice orientations and subjects are shown in Figure S1 in Supplementary Material. Color overlay shows centroid frequency with the transparency modulated by the sound > quiet p value: voxels with p  < 0.05 are opaque, logarithmically transitioning to transparent for voxels with p  ≥ 0.5. content_tagsMuch like the amplitude-difference data, the preferred-frequency responses exhibit patchy bands of frequency selectivity.

Example voxel responses taken from a region with significant tonotopic depth gradients in centroid frequency illustrate their selectivity (Figure 4 D). content_tagsSuperficial voxels often displayed low-frequency preference, with a distinct low-pass response characteristic. Similarly, deep voxels often had high-pass characteristics. Voxels at intermediate depths had mid-frequency preferences overall, but had more heterogeneous response patterns that often included a mixture of low- and high-frequency response.

sensescontent_tags↗content_tags↗The centroid frequency, f cent , was quite stable in all IC voxels. Bootstrapped confidence intervals had a mean value <0.5 octaves, and did not exceed 0.9 octaves. Thus, compared to the 5-octave frequency band of the stimuli, the experimental variability in centroid frequency was small, typically <±10%.

In portions of IC, the centroid frequency showed positive gradients with depth. Examples of virtual “penetrations” into the tissue clearly show the depth gradients (Figure 4 E). The linear fit captured the depth gradient magnitude, which was then displayed upon the IC surfaces models (Figure 4 F).

alternativescontent_tagscontent_tagsSignificant ( p  < 0.05) patches of tonotopic representation with depth were evident in all subjects (Figure 5 ). content_tagsSignificant gradients varied from 0.3 to 1.2 octaves/mm. The transparency of the depth-gradient color overlay is modulated by its statistical significance: the overlay is opaque for p  < 0.05, and becomes more transparent as p approaches 0.5. The spatial distribution of the tonotopic gradients was complex and varied substantially amongst the four subjects. limitationscontent_tagsGradients were typically stronger and more extensive on the left colliculus then on the right. Left-colliculus gradients were typically larger on the lateral and rostral surfaces, with less distinct gradients on the medial surface. Gradients were generally least significant over the very center of the colliculus. Weak but significant regions of reversed depth gradients were present around the edges of the ICs of subjects 1 and 2. The centroid-frequency depth gradients were somewhat stronger than those obtained by the high-low response differences described above, but both exhibited qualitatively similar spatial distribution across the IC surfaces.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Depth gradients of centroid frequency are displayed as a color overlay upon IC surface models of all four subjects . Transparency is modulated by the statistical significance of the depth gradients.

Various features of the centroid-frequency data are summarized in Table 1 . Total collicular area varied from 110 to 182 mm 2 . limitationscontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagsAreas of significant depth gradients varied from 19 to 32 mm 2 (mean across subjects of 25 mm 2 ), which was 18% of the total area of bilateral IC. About twice that area (53 mm 2 ) showed trends ( p  < 0.16) toward depth gradients. limitationscontent_tags↗content_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagsMean gradient was 0.53 octaves/mm, about half of what would be required to linearly resolve the full stimulus gamut in a 5-mm depth of tissue (see Discussion ). Linear fits within each penetration were typically of high-quality, R 2  ∼ 0.5. Mean tonotopic depth gradients for 3/4 subjects were inclined downward; subject 2 had a mean gradient pointing slightly upward. Three of the four subjects also displayed small rightward tilts to their mean gradients. The initial depth used to maximize the fit quality varied from 0.57 to 0.9 mm across subjects.

Table 1.

Summary of quantitative results from the tonotopic depth analysis .

Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4 Mean

Significant tonotopic area ( p  < 0.05, mm 2 ) 30 19 32 19 25 ± 7

Trend tonotopic area ( p  < 0.16, mm 2 ) 62 38 72 42 53 ± 16

Total area (mm 2 ) 121 138 182 110 138 ± 31

Depth slope (octaves/mm) 0.59 ± 0.22 0.68 ± 0.19 0.49 ± 0.17 0.36 ± 0.13 0.53 ± 0.14

Sagittal plane angle −22° 7° −34° −17° −14°

Axial plane angle 11° 8° 21° 33° −18°

Variance explained by linear fit 0.43 ± 0.20 0.62 ± 0.20 0.57 ± 0.21 0.37 ± 0.18 0.50 ± 0.12

Initial depth (mm) 0.57 ± 0.42 0.90 ± 0.46 0.72 ± 0.51 0.71 ± 0.55 0.73 ± 0.14

Open in a new tab

concept_edgescontent_tagsWe examined the effects of spatial smoothing on our data by blurring the original fMRI data volumes with a 2-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel, then repeating the same depth analysis (Figure S2 in Supplementary Material). Significant positive depth gradients are still evident, with spatial structure largely similar to that observed in the original data. However, the blurring tends to reduce the absolute magnitude of the depth gradients, and increases the area of reversed gradients observed at the margins of the colliculi.

content_tags↗Frequency tuning was examined by plotting the tuning width as a function of centroid frequency (Figure 6 ). The results show an “inverted-U” shape for all individual subjects, with a similar profile for all subjects taken together. Each data point shows tuning width for a single IC voxel, while the red lines show a regridded average with bootstrapped 68% confidence intervals. content_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagsOn average, tuning widths are about 40% broader at intermediate frequencies than they are at the lower and higher ends of the stimulus frequency band. Bootstrapped reliability estimates indicate that tuning widths at both the lowest centroid frequencies (0.25–0.5 kHz) and highest centroid frequencies (4–8 kHz) are both significantly lower ( p  < 0.02) than tuning widths at intermediate frequencies (1.5–3 kHz) for each individual subject.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Frequency tuning width vs. centroid frequency . Points (black) for individual voxels plotted with a regridded average (red) with bootstrapped confidence intervals all display an “inverted-U” shape.

Discussion

We used high-resolution imaging and surface-based analyses at traditional 3 T field strength to assess frequency representation within the human IC. Maps of centroid frequency showed a consistent depth-wise frequency organization in portions of both ICs of all subjects. To examine the laminar topography of the IC, we computationally modeled the surface of the IC, which permitted electrode-like “penetrations” into the depth of tissue. content_tagsWe observed significant tonotopy in the depth of IC tissue, with superficial layers showing greater preference to low frequencies and deeper layers to high frequencies. The depth gradients were evident by examining a simple subtraction of response to high-frequency stimuli from that evoked by low-frequency stimuli, or by evaluating centroid frequencies for each voxel sampled.

claim_relationsWhile several studies have documented midbrain activity to auditory stimulation (Guimaraes et al., 1998 ; Hawley et al., 2005 ; Sigalovsky and Melcher, 2006 ; Rinne et al., 2007 ; Chandrasekaran et al., 2012 ), these studies could not determine the complex 3D functional topography of the IC because of their limited spatial resolution. More recently, neuroimaging studies have used very high-field fMRI to evaluate tonotopy at the IC. Baumann et al. ( 2011 ) showed a dorsolateral-to-medioventral tonotopic gradient in rhesus monkeys at 4.7 T. Similar results were found in humans for 7 T imaging (De Martino et al., 2013 ). In the current study, the use of an auditory-optimized fMRI pulse sequence at a resolution of 1.2 mm enabled frequency analysis within the IC at 3 T field strength. In addition, surface-based analysis allowed the examination of functional variation in frequency preference across the laminar depth of IC, which can be viewed as a hemodynamic analog of electrode depth penetrations.

The mean depth gradient for 3/4 subjects was fairly well aligned to a vector pointing toward the neuraxis. Subject 2, with perhaps the weakest data of the four, displayed a mean gradient that was almost horizontal. All subjects also exhibited small left-right asymmetries in the gradient direction, probably reflecting a combination of lateral-medial and left-right asymmetries. mechanismstransferssensescontent_tags↗content_tags↗Thus, the notion of using tissue depth as a reference frame was proven to work fairly well, despite the patchy character of the data. limitationsHowever, IC has a great deal more curvature than SC, so it is not surprising that we see some regions of reverse gradients at the margins of the colliculi, particularly on caudal regions where curvature is largest. limitationslimitationsAnother drawback of the depth-penetration approach is that voxels in deeper regions tend to get more heavily resampled by adjacent penetrations because of curvature effects.

claim_relationsclaim_relationsOur results obtained from humans using non-invasive high (1.2 mm) resolution are largely consistent with invasive animal measurements of frequency preference in CN (Schreiner and Langner, 1997 ) as well as high-field neuroimaging studies, which indicate that individual neuronal frequency preferences are organized systematically by depth. content_tagsIn contrast to these studies, the detailed spatial structure of our preferred-frequency measurements shows a patchy character. sensesclaim_relationsconcept_edgesThe patchy nature of the topographical representation in our study may reflect the different neural sensitivity of BOLD fMRI. Specifically, various experiments indicate that fMRI is more sensitive to neuronal inputs (Logothetis et al., 2001 ), or to local-circuit activity (Angenstein et al., 2009 ). mechanisms↗Accordingly, our results may more closely reflect the patchy, somewhat interdigitated tonotopic organization of bottom-up neuronal inputs to IC from the cochlear nucleus, as reported by anterograde labeling studies (Oliver and Morest, 1984 ; Hofstetter and Ehret, 1992 ; Loftus et al., 2008 ).

claim_relationsclaim_relationsThe patchy character of our results disagree with the much more continuous spatial gradient of tonotopic selectivity observed by Baumann et al. ( 2011 ) and De Martino et al. ( 2013 ). The observed gradients, by construction, are oriented normal to the tissue surface, but the aggregate weighted mean shows an angle that is oriented more perpendicular to the neuraxis than the nearly superior-inferior gradient direction observed by De Martino et al. content_tagsThe observed structure is unlikely to be consequence of noise; they are a real feature of the data. Accordingly, they are likely either to reflect one or more neural or hemodynamic effects. limitationsOn the neural side, the observed patchiness could be the consequence of task-related recruitment of sub-regions of IC tissue. Task demands such as selective attention have been shown to affect IC (Rinne et al., 2008 ), but such effects have not yet been evaluated at these fine spatial scales. The observed patchiness could also be hemodynamic in character, as related to the particular vascular compartment sensitivities of the BOLD response evoked at 3 T field strength as compared to higher fields (Gati et al., 1997 ; Yacoub et al., 2001 ; Duong et al., 2003 ; van der Zwaag et al., 2009 ). Specifically, at 3 T, only about half of the BOLD contrast corresponds to the extravascular component that is dominant in the capillary parenchyma, while half of the signal comes from the intravascular component in larger blood vessels. Although the relative contribution of venous and capillary signals was estimated to be similar at 3 and 7 T in cerebral cortex (van der Zwaag et al., 2009 ), the situation could be different in subcortical tissue. mechanisms↗If so, the observed patchy structure may reflect stronger contrast from regions of IC where there are larger concentrations of draining veins, while little contrast is observed in other regions.

limitationsOur high-resolution data had comparatively high levels of thermal noise. content_tagsConventional fMRI studies operate where the thermal SNR is typically >100; our images had SNR ∼20–30. This noise could also have caused the observed patchiness of the results. To address the effects of thermal noise on our results, we performed a parallel analysis in which the data were first blurred with a 2-mm FWHM Gaussian spatial kernel. The post-blurring is expected to improve thermal SNR by the square root of the voxel-volume ratio, that is (2/1.2) 1.5  = 2.2; this increase in SNR should greatly reduce the degradation of the thermal noise. The spatial structure of the results was qualitatively similar: a patchy distribution of tonotopically selective regions on the IC surface. content_tagsThis result indicates that the observed patchiness is a real feature of the data, and not the consequence of random noise. This similarity is also consistent with the bootstrapped evaluation of the data, which indicate the tonotopic gradients are significant only within the patchy regions presented in the results. The invariability of the tonotopy to the spatial resolution is also consistent with the results of higher-field fMRI studies (Baumann et al., 2011 ; De Martino et al., 2013 ).

concept_edgescontent_tagsIn particular, we tend to observe weaker tonotopic depth gradients in the very center of the IC, an area expected to have a clearly organized depth tonotopy. There are at least three possible reasons for this lack of clear tonotopy. First, tonotopic inputs to this region may too finely interdigitated to be resolved by our measurement. If, in fact, the measured hemodynamic response were evoked more strongly by the inputs to this portion of the colliculus, then the heterogeneity of responses in each voxel would tend to blur the frequency selectivity. Second, it is again possible that local vascular characteristics modulate the fMRI responses, yielding weaker contrast in the central portions of each colliculus. Third, the task demands of our protocol may tend to selectively recruit IC circuits in the observed sub-regions. Further experiments will be necessary to investigate these issues. In particular, it will be important to investigate the repeatability of the observed patterns across sessions.

Our stimulus protocol utilized a repetitive, monotonic cycle of stimulus frequencies. This choice was motivated by our original interest in a phase-encoded analysis (Engel et al., 1997 ; Barton et al., 2012 ), but has several drawbacks when used in conjunction with the current approach. In particular, the undershoot of the HRF evoked by each stimulus will impact the hyperoxic peak of the subsequent stimuli. However, the monotonic sequence somewhat softens this effect: the 0.25-kHz response undershoot will reduce the response to the 0.59-kHz stimulus, the 0.59-kHz response undershoot will reduce the response to the 1.41-kHz stimulus, and so forth. Thus, the undershoot acts as a form of blurring in the frequency domain, with relatively benevolent effects.

limitationsWe did not observe narrow frequency tuning in our voxels, particularly at intermediate frequencies. The most likely explanation for this result is the spatial resolution of our measurements. mechanisms↗Each voxel encompasses a volume of ∼1.7 μL containing several million neurons, so some heterogeneity of response can be expected. Interestingly, we observed sharper tuning at low and high frequencies, suggesting that the population response for these frequency bands is more spatially homogeneous than at intermediate frequencies. limitationsAlso, the observed depth gradients did not span the full range of the stimuli. Again, this is likely the consequence of the available spatial resolution. Sharply tuned responses from both the highest and lowest frequency stimuli cannot be resolved, so the preferred-frequency depth gradients show a smaller range. Nonetheless, we do resolve the presence of a tonotopic gradient as a function of depth, and bands of tissue with clearly evident preferences for low, intermediate, and high frequencies.

Tonotopic depth gradients were particularly evident in the left colliculus of all subjects, but were weaker in the right colliculus for three of our four subjects. There are two possible reasons for these left-right asymmetries. First, they may be a consequence of purely vascular effects. In our superior colliculus neuroimaging work (Katyal et al., 2010 ), we found that visual responses for a particular subject were frequently much greater in one colliculus or the other, without any obvious neural correlate. Second, such asymmetries (relatively stronger leftward bias) could be a consequence of the task used in this study. mechanisms↗Auditory tasks that require attentive processing are known to show a left-hemispheric bias (Bryden et al., 1983 ) and can modulate IC activity via corticocollicular connections (Rinne et al., 2007 , 2008 ). Corticocollicular connections are largely ipsilateral (from the auditory cortex) (Winer, 2006 ), and connect A1 neurons to neurons in the IC that have a similar frequency profile (Lim and Anderson, 2007 ). Thus, it is possible that the left-dominant collicular activity could reflect corticocollicular effects. Future studies need to compare the effects of task (e.g., compare passive listening to active task), and to evaluate the role of top-down corticocollicular pathways in determining frequency selectivity within the IC.

Examining the IC encoding of frequency information is of significant clinical relevance. The IC has been considered as an alternate site for implant in hearing-impaired individuals who have contraindications for cochlear implants. The IC implant was developed based on animal models that suggest tonotopic organization in the CN. In fact, a few patients have already received IC implants and their success has been varied (Lim and Anderson, 2007 ). A recent study showed that initial frequency resolution in an individual with an IC implant was poor, but more precise selectivity was found 4 months after implantation (Lim et al., 2013 ). limitationsWhile our data demonstrates tonotopic representation as a function of depth, we find that tonotopic gradients are patchy and variable across individuals, which could pose a significant challenge for the placement of midbrain implants. Accordingly, further studies using high-resolution fMRI could provide a critical tool for surgical planning.

Our high-resolution surface-based fMRI methods and results provide a foundation for further non-invasive experimental work in small auditory subcortical structures. The ability to localize frequency selectivity with the depth of IC opens up new frontiers in auditory neuroscience, permitting the quantification of functional response in humans using complex stimuli and experimental paradigms. Moreover, the high-resolution sparse-sampling also enables investigations in other brainstem nuclei such as the cochlear nucleus and superior olivary complex. For clinical uses, these results open up the use of readily available 3 T MRI scanners for surgical planning and other treatment options. In conclusion, our methods are a significant advance for high-resolution fMRI research of auditory function in general, and will permit a host of critical auditory neuroscience experiments in small subcortical auditory structures that have been inaccessible to conventional auditory fMRI studies.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/Human_Neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00586/abstract

Figure S1 Additional color overlays of centroid frequency on anatomy slices . (A,B) Sagittal and coronal views of subject 1, respectively. (C–E) Sagittal, coronal, and axial views of subject 3. Inset surface figures show slice locations on surface models of each subject’s midbrain.

Click here for additional data file. (6.3MB, PDF)

Figure S2 Depth gradients obtained from data blurred with 2-mm FWHM kernel . Same format at Figure 5 .

Click here for additional data file. (6.3MB, PDF)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge grant support from NSF BCS 1063774, sequence development assistance from Rez Khan, data analysis assistance from Seth Koslov, and helpful discussions with Dr. Sari Andoni.

Every tag on this page

alternatives 3 · claim_relations 7 · claim_type 1 · concept_edges 4 · concepts 1 · content_tags 51 · contribution 1 · controls 1 · limitations 12 · mechanisms 9 · method 1 · object_of_study 1 · phenomenon 1 · research_question 1 · senses 4 · transfers 3

Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 4 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.

facettagfieldconf.whose words
object_of_studyfrequency representation across the depth of the human inferior colliculusobject_of_studythe paper's words
research_questionwhether tonotopic gradients in human IC can be measured at all at conventional 3 T field strengthresearch_questionthe paper's words
contributionshows laminar tonotopy in human IC at 3 T using 1.2 mm imaging and virtual depth penetrations, and finds it patchy rather than continuouscontributionthe paper's words
claim_typeexistenceclaim_typethe paper's words
phenomenontonotopy in the inferior colliculusphenomenonthe paper's words
methodfmri
also in: fmri
methodthe paper's words
mechanismsmechanismsmechanisms[0]the tagger's words
mechanismsmechanisms
status: the paper's own words: may reflect
mechanisms[1]the tagger's words
mechanismsmechanismsmechanisms[2]the tagger's words
mechanismsmechanismsmechanisms[3]the tagger's words
mechanismsa surface model of the IC allows virtual penetrations normal to the tissue, a hemodynamic analogue of an electrode trackmechanisms[4]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismssparse sampling puts the acquisition in the flat top of the BOLD response and in a quiet gap, so scanner noise does not drive the measurementmechanisms[5]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismsthree-shot spiral acquisition acts as a temporal anti-aliasing filter against cardiac and respiratory noise, avoiding the need for gatingmechanisms[6]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismsthe external cortex is identified and discarded before the depth analysis because tonotopy is not a feature of itmechanisms[7]1.0the tagger's words
mechanismsan adaptive staircase on a frequency-discrimination task holds attention roughly constant throughout scanningmechanisms[8]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsCurvature causes deep voxels to be resampled by adjacent virtual penetrations.
what this limits: measurements in the deeper regions: VOXELS IN DEEPER REGIONS TEND TO GET MORE HEAVILY RESAMPLED BY ADJACENT PENETRATIONS BECAUSE OF CURVATURE EFFECTS
limitations[0]the tagger's words
limitationsThe high-resolution acquisition had low thermal SNR (~20-30 versus >100 in conventional fMRI).
what this limits: everything measured at high resolution here: OUR HIGH-RESOLUTION DATA HAD COMPARATIVELY HIGH LEVELS OF THERMAL NOISE
limitations[1]the tagger's words
limitationsVoxel-level frequency tuning was broad rather than narrow, most likely because of the spatial resolution.
what this limits: tuning-width claims, at intermediate frequencies especially: WE DID NOT OBSERVE NARROW FREQUENCY TUNING IN OUR VOXELS, PARTICULARLY AT INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCIES
limitations[2]the tagger's words
limitationsThe measured depth gradients covered only part of the 5-octave stimulus range.
what this limits: any claim that the depth gradient covers the stimulus range: THE OBSERVED DEPTH GRADIENTS DID NOT SPAN THE FULL RANGE OF THE STIMULI
limitations[3]the tagger's words
limitationsThe patchiness and between-subject variability limit the method's usefulness for planning midbrain implant placement.
what this limits: the placement of midbrain implants, named as the use this result cannot support: TONOTOPIC GRADIENTS ARE PATCHY AND VARIABLE ACROSS INDIVIDUALS, WHICH COULD POSE A SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF MIDBRAIN IMPLANTS
limitations[4]the tagger's words
limitationsonly 18% of the total bilateral IC area showed significant depth gradients
what this limits: how much of the structure the finding covers: AREAS OF SIGNIFICANT DEPTH GRADIENTS VARIED FROM 19 TO 32 mm2 (MEAN ACROSS SUBJECTS OF 25 mm2), WHICH WAS 18% OF THE TOTAL AREA OF BILATERAL IC
limitations[5]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsthe mean gradient is about half what would be needed to span the stimulus range across the tissue depth
what this limits: any claim that the gradient resolves the full stimulus range: MEAN GRADIENT WAS 0.53 OCTAVES/mm, ABOUT HALF OF WHAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO LINEARLY RESOLVE THE FULL STIMULUS GAMUT IN A 5-mm DEPTH OF TISSUE
limitations[6]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsreversed gradients appear at the margins, attributed to the curvature of the structure
what this limits: the margins and caudal regions: IC HAS A GREAT DEAL MORE CURVATURE THAN SC, SO IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT WE SEE SOME REGIONS OF REVERSE GRADIENTS AT THE MARGINS OF THE COLLICULI, PARTICULARLY ON CAUDAL REGIONS WHERE CURVATURE IS LARGEST
limitations[7]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsdeep voxels are resampled by adjacent penetrations because of curvature
duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - deep voxels, resampled by adjacent penetrations
limitations[8]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsthe patchiness could be neural, from task-related recruitment, or hemodynamic - the paper offers both and settles neither
what this limits: the interpretation of the patchiness: THE OBSERVED PATCHINESS COULD BE THE CONSEQUENCE OF TASK-RELATED RECRUITMENT OF SUB-REGIONS OF IC TISSUE, and TASK DEMANDS SUCH AS SELECTIVE ATTENTION HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO AFFECT IC
limitations[9]1.0the tagger's words
limitationsfour male subjects
what this limits: the population every depth map describes: SUBJECTS WERE FOUR MALE ADULTS (AGE RANGE 21-31)
limitations[10]0.85the tagger's words
limitationsgradients were markedly stronger on the left colliculus than the right, without an account
what this limits: any bilateral claim: GRADIENTS WERE TYPICALLY STRONGER AND MORE EXTENSIVE ON THE LEFT COLLICULUS THEN ON THE RIGHT, and LEFT-COLLICULUS GRADIENTS WERE TYPICALLY LARGER ON THE LATERAL AND ROSTRAL SURFACES
limitations[11]0.9the tagger's words
transfersthe electrode depth-penetration technique, reimplemented as cylinders driven normal to a modelled tissue surface so that fMRI voxels can be sampled along depth the way an electrode track samples laminaetransfers[0]the tagger's words
transferssurface reconstruction and depth sampling, imported from cortex to a small subcortical nucleustransfers[1]1.0the tagger's words
transfersthe electrode penetration itself, reimplemented as a virtual penetration through a hemodynamic volumetransfers[2]1.0the tagger's words
controlsparticipants performed a demanding two-interval forced-choice frequency-discrimination task during the scan
eliminates: that a difference in cortical response reflects wandering attention rather than the stimulus · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held
controls[0]0.95the tagger's words
conceptsinferior colliculusconcepts[1]0.85the paper's words
sensestonotopy here is a DEPTH gradient measured along virtual penetrations normal to the tissue surface, not a gradient across a cortical sheet - the reference frame is the structure's own laminar geometrysenses[0]1.0the tagger's words
sensespatchy versus continuous is the axis on which this result differs from the 4.7 T and 7 T studies, and the paper attributes the difference to what BOLD is sensitive to rather than to errorsenses[1]1.0the tagger's words
sensesthe animal literature already contained both descriptions - electrophysiology finding fine continuous mapping, anterograde labelling finding patchy input - so patchy and smooth are both established before this study beginssenses[2]1.0the tagger's words
sensescentroid frequency is the per-voxel preferred frequency, and its bootstrapped stability is reported before it is usedsenses[3]1.0the tagger's words
alternativesclaim_type: existence
a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.
alternatives.claim_typethe tagger's words
alternativesmethod: sparse-sampling 1.2 mm fMRI at 3 T with an adaptive frequency-discrimination task, analysed by constructing an IC surface model and making virtual penetrations normal to it
a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: fmri — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.
alternatives.methodthe tagger's words
alternativesphenomenon: tonotopy in a subcortical laminated structure
a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: tonotopy in the inferior colliculus — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.
alternatives.phenomenonthe tagger's words
claim_relationsbuilds-on → Baumann et al. (2011)claim_relations[0]the tagger's words
claim_relationsreplicates → Schreiner and Langner (1997)claim_relations[1]the tagger's words
claim_relationscontradicts → Baumann et al. (2011) and De Martino et al. (2013)claim_relations[2]the tagger's words
claim_relationsconfirms → invasive animal measurements of frequency preference organised systematically by depth in the central nucleusclaim_relations[3]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationscontradicts → the continuous spatial gradient reported at 4.7 T in monkeys and 7 T in humansclaim_relations[4]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationssupports → anterograde labelling studies reporting a patchy, interdigitated tonotopic input from cochlear nucleusclaim_relations[5]1.0the tagger's words
claim_relationsqualifies → earlier midbrain fMRI, which could not resolve the internal topography at all
differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE INTERNAL TOPOGRAPHY CAN BE RESOLVED AT ALL. 'While several studies have documented midbrain activity to auditory stimulation, these studies could not determine the complex 3D FUNCTIONAL TOPOGRAPHY.' Detecting activity in a structure and mapping its interior are different measurements, and five citations of the first do not add up to the second.
claim_relations[6]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgestonotopy —operationalised-as→ depth gradient
strength of the relation: 1 · note: measured along virtual penetrations normal to the tissue surface, in octaves per mm - a different operationalisation from the position-regression used by Muniak2014 and Tabor2012 Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but weaker depth gradients appear where tonotopy is expected; operationalised-as is loose.
concept_edges[0]0.85the tagger's words
concept_edgesEVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · central nucleus —distinct-from→ external cortex
EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span said tonotopy is not a feature of the external cortex, naming one subdivision. This sentence names both AND CALLS THEM DISTINCT IN THE PAPER'S OWN WORDS - 'three prominent and FUNCTIONALLY DISTINCT subdivisions: the tonotopically organized central nucleus, the multisensory external cortex, and the dorsal cortex'. Worth noting against my own sibling-list rule: A LIST CAN ASSERT DISTINCTNESS, WHEN IT SAYS SO. — strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the distinction is load-bearing: the external cortex is discarded before analysis on the ground that tonotopy is not a feature of it
concept_edges[1]0.85the tagger's words
concept_edgesspatial smoothing —causes→ depth gradient
direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: reduces magnitude and INCREASES spurious reversed gradients - tested directly by smoothing the authors' own data
concept_edges[2]1.0the tagger's words
concept_edgesBOLD —causes→ patchy
strength of the relation: 0.6 — the record marks this weak · note: proposed: fMRI is more sensitive to inputs and local-circuit activity, so it may show the patchy input map rather than the smooth output map. offered as an explanation, not tested Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but patchiness MAY reflect BOLD sensitivity; causes is hedged.
also in: BOLD · patchy
concept_edges[3]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsbootstrap
also in: bootstrap
content_tags.statistics[0]the tagger's words
content_tagsconfidence intervalcontent_tags.statistics[1]the tagger's words
content_tagsp-value
also in: p-value
content_tags.statistics[2]the tagger's words
content_tagslinear regressioncontent_tags.statistics[3]the tagger's words
content_tagsweighted mean
also in: weighted mean
content_tags.statistics[4]the tagger's words
content_tagsbootstrapping instead of spatial blurringcontent_tags.statistics[5]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagslinear fit of centroid frequency against depthcontent_tags.statistics[6]0.9the tagger's words
content_tagsbootstrapped confidence intervals on centroid frequencycontent_tags.statistics[7]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsfMRI showed significant depth tonotopy in human inferior colliculus, with superficial layers preferring low frequencies and deeper layers high frequencies.content_tags.findings[0]the tagger's words
content_tagsUnlike earlier reports, the frequency map measured here is spatially patchy.content_tags.findings[1]the tagger's words
content_tagsThe authors conclude that the observed patchiness is a real feature of the data rather than a consequence of random noise.content_tags.findings[2]the tagger's words
content_tagsDepth gradients were stronger and covered more tissue in the left colliculus than the right.content_tags.findings[3]the tagger's words
content_tagsFrequency tuning is broadest in the middle of the stimulus range: tuning widths at mid frequencies exceed those at the low and high ends by about 40%, giving an inverted-U profile.content_tags.findings[4]the tagger's words
content_tagsParadoxically the very center of the colliculus, where a clean depth tonotopy was expected, showed the weakest gradients.content_tags.findings[5]the tagger's words
content_tagssignificant tonotopic depth gradients were found in all subjectscontent_tags.findings[6]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagssuperficial tissue prefers low frequencies and deeper tissue high frequenciescontent_tags.findings[7]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagssignificant gradients covered only 18% of total bilateral IC areacontent_tags.findings[8]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsthe mean gradient of 0.53 octaves/mm is about half what would span the stimulus range over 5 mm of tissuecontent_tags.findings[9]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsthe organisation is patchy rather than continuouscontent_tags.findings[10]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagssmoothing the data with a 2 mm kernel preserved the gradients but reduced their magnitude and increased spurious reversed gradients at the marginscontent_tags.findings[11]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsfrequency tuning width follows an inverted-U, about 40% broader at intermediate frequenciescontent_tags.findings[12]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsthe patchy structure is argued to be real rather than noisecontent_tags.findings[13]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagstonotopy
also in: tonotopy
content_tags.definitions[0]the tagger's words
content_tagssparse-sampling designcontent_tags.definitions[1]the tagger's words
content_tagsvirtual penetrationcontent_tags.definitions[2]the tagger's words
content_tagsbootstrapping
also in: bootstrapping
content_tags.definitions[4]the tagger's words
content_tagsreference framecontent_tags.definitions[5]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagssparse-samplingcontent_tags.definitions[6]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagscentral nucleuscontent_tags.definitions[7]the tagger's words
content_tagsexternal cortexcontent_tags.definitions[8]the tagger's words
content_tagsdorsal cortex
also in: dorsal cortex
content_tags.definitions[9]the tagger's words
content_tagscenter frequencycontent_tags.variables[0]the tagger's words
content_tagsBOLD response amplitude differencecontent_tags.variables[2]the tagger's words
content_tagsdepth along the virtual penetrationcontent_tags.variables[4]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagscentroid frequencycontent_tags.variables[5]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagstuning width
also in: tuning width
content_tags.variables[6]0.85the tagger's words
content_tags0.3 to 1.2 octaves/mm — range of the statistically significant tonotopic depth gradients measured across subjectscontent_tags.quantities[0]the tagger's words
content_tags0.53 octaves/mm — mean tonotopic depth gradient, about half the value needed to span the full stimulus range over 5 mm of tissuecontent_tags.quantities[1]the tagger's words
content_tags18% — share of the total bilateral IC surface area carrying a significant depth gradient (19-32 mm2 per subject)content_tags.quantities[2]the tagger's words
content_tags40% — how much broader frequency tuning is at intermediate frequencies than at the extremes of the stimulus bandcontent_tags.quantities[3]the tagger's words
content_tags75–85% — subjects' accuracy on the adaptive frequency-discrimination task across runscontent_tags.quantities[4]the tagger's words
content_tags∼20–30 — thermal SNR of the 1.2-mm images, against the >100 typical of conventional fMRIcontent_tags.quantities[5]the tagger's words
content_tags1000 — number of bootstrap resamples used to derive the 68% confidence intervalscontent_tags.quantities[6]the tagger's words
content_tagsfour — number of subjects scannedcontent_tags.quantities[7]the tagger's words
content_tags1.2 mm cubic voxels at 3 T — the resolution that made the measurement possiblecontent_tags.quantities[8]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags0.3 to 1.2 octaves/mm, mean 0.53 — the measured depth gradients
value source note: THE VALUE DRAWS ON THE PAPER BEYOND THIS QUOTE: part of it is printed elsewhere in the paper, not in this quote ('Mean gradient was 0.53 octaves/mm, about half of what would').
content_tags.quantities[9]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags18% of total bilateral IC area — how much of the structure showed a significant gradientcontent_tags.quantities[10]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsR-squared about 0.5 — quality of the linear fit within each penetrationcontent_tags.quantities[11]0.85the tagger's words
content_tagsIC under 9 mm — the size that made conventional imaging inadequatecontent_tags.quantities[12]1.0the tagger's words
content_tags3 to 10 mm sampling in conventional studies — the resolution at which the internal organisation is unresolvablecontent_tags.quantities[13]1.0the tagger's words
content_tagsabout 40% broader at intermediate frequencies — the inverted-U in tuning widthcontent_tags.quantities[14]1.0the tagger's words

Interpretive choices

Tags that could not be placed in the text:

What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.

© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824