standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 1 relation here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | dreaming as conscious experience during sleep Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The hot zone was identified by averaging across many awakenings and subjects, so individual episodes of experience may involve additional regions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the anatomical completeness of the hot zone: SINCE THE POSTERIOR HOT ZONE WAS HIGHLIGHTED BY AVERAGING EEG RECORDINGS PRECEDING MANY AWAKENINGS FROM MANY SUBJECTS, THE FULL NEURAL CORRELATES OF EXPERIENCES IN SLEEP COULD OCCASIONALLY INCLUDE ADDITIONAL BRAIN REGIONS | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Parts of the posterior hot zone may support unconscious dream-generating processes rather than experience itself. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the interpretation of the hot zone as supporting experience: WE CANNOT RULE OUT THAT [it] MAY INCLUDE ... AREAS THAT MIGHT SUPPORT UNCONSCIOUS ASPECTS OF DREAM GENERATION | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Source modelling does not fully remove volume conduction, which inflates absolute low-frequency power values. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the absolute low-frequency power values: SOURCE MODELING STRONGLY REDUCES BUT DOES NOT COMPLETELY ELIMINATE THE EFFECTS OF VOLUME CONDUCTION | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The behavioural state does not settle whether there was an experience, and the paper says so of both the traditional EEG features and the neuroimaging correlates. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: sleep stage as an indicator of whether a subject was having an experience: the paper states this cannot be determined from behavioural state, traditional EEG features or neuroimaging correlates | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The identification the field worked with is reported as failing in both directions: dreams are absent from some REM awakenings and present in NREM sleep. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: REM sleep as the state of dreaming: the paper reports a consistent minority of REM awakenings with no reported experience, and dreaming occurring in NREM sleep | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a longer 20-second pre-awakening window used for the experience/no-experience contrast than the 0 to -8s windows used for content-specific contrasts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a report being assigned to the wrong stretch of sleep - subjects could tie CONTENT to a moment but not the bare presence or absence of an experience, so that contrast is given more room · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | dreaming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dreaming | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | REM sleep Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: REM sleep | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | no experience Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: no experience | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| senses | absence of a dream report - AS NO EXPERIENCE (NE): the subject reports not experiencing anything Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | absence of a dream report - AS EXPERIENCE WITHOUT RECALL (DEWR): the subject reports experiencing something but cannot remember the content, which is a different state from having had none Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | dreaming - traditionally IDENTIFIED WITH REM sleep and its wake-like high-frequency EEG, an identification the paper reports as broken because dreaming also occurs in NREM sleep Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → the fMRI dream-content decoding study cited as ref. 43 (a wake-trained pattern classifier decoding content reported at the wake–sleep transition) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the influential neuroimaging-derived notion (ref. 54) that the neural correlates of consciousness correspond to a broad fronto-parietal network Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE PARADIGM, AND IT IS NAMED IN THE SAME SENTENCE AS THE CONCLUSION. 'Quotation withheld' The fronto-parietal result is not called wrong - it is attributed to paradigms that require a task and a report, which this one removes. A bare 'contradicts' records a dispute about ANATOMY; the parameter shows it is a dispute about METHOD. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | dreaming —distinct-from→ REM sleep Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | repeated-measures ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repeated-measures ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANCOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANCOVA | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | paired t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: paired t-test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Spearman rank correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Spearman rank correlation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | permutation test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: permutation test | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | nonparametric multiple-comparison correction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | false discovery rate correction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: false discovery rate correction | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spectral power density estimation (Welch periodogram) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | general linear model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: general linear model | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | F-test for interaction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: F-test for interaction | content_tags.statistics[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In both NREM and REM sleep, dreaming was associated with a local decrease in low-frequency activity in posterior cortical regions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Reports of having experienced something without recalling its content also showed the posterior low-frequency decrease relative to no-experience reports, so the posterior marker tracks having an experience rather than remembering it. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Awakenings triggered in real time by a bispectral low/high-frequency threshold over the posterior hot zone predicted the presence or absence of dreaming in NREM sleep with 87% overall accuracy (91.6% for dreaming predictions, 80.7% for no-experience predictions). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | High-frequency activity correlated with the thinking dimension of dreams in frontal regions and with the perceiving dimension in parietal, occipital and temporal areas. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Dreams containing faces were accompanied by increased high-frequency activity in a temporo-occipital region closely matching the fusiform face area. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Dreams with a definite spatial setting showed increased high-frequency activity in right posterior parietal cortex, an area supporting spatial perception and visuo-spatial attention in wakefulness. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Dreams containing speech showed increased high-frequency activity in a left posterior temporal region corresponding to Wernicke's area. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The results showed no reliable hemispheric asymmetry, apart from a borderline right-sided effect for the high-frequency dreaming-versus-no-experience contrast in REM sleep. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The low- and high-frequency effects on dreaming survived control for participant age, with a significant main effect of report type and no age effect. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Because the correlate of experience was confined to a posterior region rather than a lateral fronto-parietal network, the authors conclude the neural correlate of consciousness is posterior rather than fronto-parietal. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | posterior cortical 'hot zone' Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: posterior cortical 'hot zone' | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | bispectral threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: bispectral threshold | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | EEG slow waves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: EEG slow waves | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | dreaming experience Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dreaming experience | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | DEWR Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: DEWR | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | no experience Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: no experience | content_tags.definitions[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | type of report Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: type of report | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | low-frequency power Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: low-frequency power | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | high-frequency band power Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: high-frequency band power | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | hemisphere Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: hemisphere | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | age Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: age | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 87% — Overall accuracy of real-time prediction of the presence or absence of dreaming in NREM sleep from posterior hot-zone EEG Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | N=32, 233 awakenings; N=7, 815 awakenings — Sample sizes for experiment 1 (many naive subjects, few awakenings each) and experiment 2 (few trained subjects, many awakenings each) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 84 — Total number of algorithm-triggered awakenings in the real-time prediction experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p=0.023 — Region-of-interest test showing higher high-frequency activity in the right fusiform face area for dreams containing faces Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | r>0.14 — Correlation threshold at which high-frequency power tracked the thinking-versus-perceiving rating of REM dreams Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p=0.003 / p=0.005 — Main effect of report type on low-frequency and high-frequency activity after controlling for age Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p= 0.046 — The single borderline hemispheric lateralization effect, for high-frequency DE-vs-NE in REM sleep Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.