<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Operant conditioning</title>
        <author>Staddon</author>
        <author>Niv</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Operant conditioning</title>
          <date>2008</date>
          <publisher>Scholarpedia</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.4249/scholarpedia.2318</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Staddon2008-operant-conditioning</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Staddon2008-operant-conditioning.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">1bf9a6a5a71e3ff3e2f8e22756e89e9e80bdf43c</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>behavioural-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>Operant conditioning as a process and as an experimental paradigm - how behaviour is selected by its consequences.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>What is the relation between behaviour and its consequences, and how far does the analogy with natural selection actually carry?</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>Sets out operant conditioning as ontogenetic selection - behaviour varied then selected by reinforcement - and flags that the variation half of the analogy has gone unstudied.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>operant conditioning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Reinforcement acts as a selective agent on emitted behaviour, its strength set by how soon the reinforcer follows the response, how often the pairing occurs, and how well the response predicts the reinforcer</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The predictive properties of the situation build, through innate food-related response tendencies, the repertoire of activities out of which reinforcement can then select</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A food-predicting stimulus recruits built-in mechanisms that bias the animal&#x27;s repertoire towards food-getting acts, which is why behaviour appears before any operant reinforcement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Arousal has a bitonic effect because increasing predictiveness simultaneously raises response vigour and narrows the repertoire, so past a point the effective response drops out</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Matching emerges because reinforcement probability on a VI schedule falls as responses accumulate and rises with time away, so any reward-following rule produces it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>reinforcement acts as a selective agent through three quantities: how soon it follows the response, how often, and how well the response predicts it</term>
        <note>duplicate of: mechanisms[0]</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>contingency is about predictiveness, not pairing: adding free food WEAKENS lever pressing, because the lever stops predicting the food</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the act closest in time to the reinforcer is the one strengthened - the principle of postremity, and the origin of the Law of Effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the elicited/emitted distinction: reflexive behaviour is triggered by a stimulus, operant behaviour is emitted before any stimulus is attached to it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The theoretical account is incomplete by the article&#x27;s own statement - the empirical space is mapped, the mechanism is not.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the mechanistic account: EXACTLY HOW ALL THIS WORKS IS STILL NOT UNDERSTOOD IN FULL THEORETICAL DETAIL, though the empirical space is mapped</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A century of research has studied selection and not variation: where the first successful response comes from is unexamined.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the scope of the whole research programme: OMITTED IS ANY DISCUSSION OF WHERE THE SUCCESSFUL RESPONSE COMES FROM IN THE FIRST PLACE - selection is studied, variation is not</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The framework that organised the field is described as not really a theory.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any use of the Skinnerian framework as an explanatory theory: SKINNER&#x27;S &#x27;THEORY&#x27; WAS MORE AN ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK THAN A TRUE THEORY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The credit-assignment problem is taken over from AI and made the central question that an operant conditioning process must answer</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Darwin&#x27;s natural selection is imported as the model for operant conditioning, with reinforcement as the selective agent acting on a variable repertoire of emitted acts</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The reinforcement-learning framework is adopted as the normative account within which both Pavlovian and operant behaviour are interpreted</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Darwinian selection from a varied population, imported to explain how one behaviour is picked out of an emitted repertoire by reinforcement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>operant conditioning</label>
        <term>operant conditioning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>instrumental conditioning</label>
        <term>instrumental conditioning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>ontogenetic selection</label>
        <term>ontogenetic selection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>phylogenetic selection</label>
        <term>phylogenetic selection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>Pavlovian conditioning</label>
        <term>Pavlovian conditioning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>reinforcer</label>
        <term>reinforcer</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>punisher</label>
        <term>punisher</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>contingency</label>
        <term>contingency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>natural selection</label>
        <term>natural selection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>selection - ontogenetic: consequences shaping behaviour within one animal&#x27;s lifetime</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>selection - phylogenetic: consequences shaping a species over evolutionary time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>conditioning - operant: the animal has control, and outcomes are contingent on its behaviour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>conditioning - Pavlovian: the animal only observes, and no response is required for the outcome</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: critique — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: review</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: review — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: selection of behaviour by its consequences within the lifetime of an individual</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: operant conditioning — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Herrnstein&#x27;s matching law (Richard Herrnstein, 1961), as a general law relating response rate to reinforcement rate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>builds-on → Thorndike&#x27;s Law of Effect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>contradicts → Skinner&#x27;s framework as a theory in the ordinary sense</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>instrumental conditioning —same-as→ operant conditioning</label>
        <term>instrumental conditioning</term>
        <term>operant conditioning</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ontogenetic selection —same-as→ operant conditioning</label>
        <term>ontogenetic selection</term>
        <term>operant conditioning</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · operant conditioning —distinct-from→ Pavlovian conditioning</label>
        <term>operant conditioning</term>
        <term>Pavlovian conditioning</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span states the difference but names the wrong term for one end - that &#x27;…in CLASSICAL conditioning no…&#x27; response is required, unlike operant conditioning. The edge&#x27;s endpoint is Pavlovian conditioning, and the span says CLASSICAL, which is the same thing under another name and therefore attests nothing for that endpoint. The replacement names both terms as the edge does AND gives the basis of the distinction: &#x27;BETWEEN PAVLOVIAN…&#x27; conditioning, resting on whether the animal only observes the relations between events. Both spans carry a differentiation cue - &#x27;unlike&#x27; and &#x27;distinct&#x27; - so this is not a trade of strength for form; the new one simply uses the vocabulary the edge does. — strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by synonym: the span writes &#x27;classical conditioning&#x27;, which the previous sentence introduces as Pavlovian conditioning; the contrast is stated.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reinforcer —contrasted-with→ punisher</label>
        <term>reinforcer</term>
        <term>punisher</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reinforcer —part-of→ contingency</label>
        <term>reinforcer</term>
        <term>contingency</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span describes reinforcement contingencies; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>operant conditioning —distinct-from→ Pavlovian conditioning</label>
        <term>operant conditioning</term>
        <term>Pavlovian conditioning</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · the relation stated: The distinction between Pavlovian and operant conditioning therefore rests on</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Adding free food pellets that arrive independently of lever pressing makes the rat press less, not more.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Matching can be seen as a result of the negative-feedback properties of the concurrent variable-interval schedule in which it is measured.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Matching depends on the animal&#x27;s switching history: pigeons trained on each option separately and only then given the choice abandon matching and respond exclusively to the richer schedule.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>That steady-state behaviour is often reversible does not mean the animal&#x27;s state is equally reversible.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The field concentrated almost entirely on how reinforcement strengthens behaviour and neglected where the reinforced behaviour comes from in the first place — the problem of behavioural variation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Research of the last two decades has convincingly shown that both stimulus-response and action-outcome control structures exist.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In autoshaping, a pigeon is likely to keep pecking the key even when pecking removes the food.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Much evidence suggests dopamine provides basal ganglia targets with a reward prediction error that can influence learning and action selection.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Because simple operant behaviour occurs even in bacteria, the essentials of operant conditioning need not depend on specific neural structures.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Behaviour guided by consequences is universal across animals, from protists to humans.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Adding reward that is NOT contingent on the response reduces responding - the animal tracks predictiveness, not frequency of pairing.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The field&#x27;s own gap, stated plainly: research has studied how responses are strengthened and almost never where they come from.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Early neo-behaviourists were led to an exponential learning curve and a learning principle of the form V(t+1) = A(1-V(t)).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>assignment of credit</label>
        <term>assignment of credit</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Yerkes-Dodson law</label>
        <term>Yerkes-Dodson law</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>interval schedule</label>
        <term>interval schedule</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ratio schedule</label>
        <term>ratio schedule</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>matching law</label>
        <term>matching law</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>habitual behavior</label>
        <term>habitual behavior</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>operant conditioning</label>
        <term>operant conditioning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>ontogenetic selection</label>
        <term>ontogenetic selection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>reinforcer</label>
        <term>reinforcer</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>punisher</label>
        <term>punisher</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>response rate</label>
        <term>response rate</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>reinforcement delay, rate and contingency</label>
        <term>reinforcement delay, rate and contingency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>response strength</label>
        <term>response strength</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>twice — How much faster rats press the lever on the richer RI15 schedule than on the leaner RI30 schedule, illustrating matching</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>V(t+1) = A(1-V(t)) — the neo-behaviourist exponential learning rule, with V response strength and A a learning rate below one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.2318.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
