<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Perceived variety, psychological needs satisfaction and exercise-related well-being</title>
        <author>Sylvester</author>
        <author>Standage</author>
        <author>Dowd</author>
        <author>Martin</author>
        <author>Sweet</author>
        <author>Beauchamp</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Perceived variety, psychological needs satisfaction and exercise-related well-being</title>
          <date>2014</date>
          <publisher>Psychology &amp; Health</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1080/08870446.2014.907900</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">Sylvester2014-perceived-variety-psychological-needs-satisf</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">Sylvester2014-perceived-variety-psychological-needs-satisf.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">2017579a77f96dc02f20eb7de6d897b6cf018ec8</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>health-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>prediction</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>perceived variety in exercise and exercise-related well-being</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>survey</label>
        <term>survey</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the instrument is built in three declared steps - item development, focus groups, and expert review - used to develop AND refine the items rather than only to produce them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the focus groups use a modified retrospective think-aloud protocol, whose stated purpose is to understand how members of the target population INTERPRET and respond to the items</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the refinement has a STOPPING RULE rather than a fixed number of rounds: transcripts are coded by constant comparison for places where a participant raised concern with an item, and the cycle repeats after each group until no new suggestions emerge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>latent variable regression is chosen over multiple regression for a stated reason: multiple regression assumes the variables are measured without error, and the authors say that assumption would produce biased estimates here</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the chi-square test is deliberately not relied on alone, because a non-significant chi-square is called unrealistic, so supplementary indices are examined too - with separate numerical bands DESIGNATED for good fit and for excellent fit</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>discriminant validity is given a numerical criterion rather than an impression: the average variance extracted for a construct must exceed the SQUARED CORRELATION between it and any other construct, alongside stated floors for loadings and composite reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>relative importance among predictors is decided by an index with a cut-off DERIVED from the number of predictors rather than chosen - one over twice the predictor count, which in this analysis makes the threshold 0.13</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE KEY TEST IS BUILT AS A COMPETING MODEL, NOT A CORRELATION: a three-factor structure is fitted specifically to see whether the new construct is empirically synonymous with one of the three established needs, and the authors state in advance what result would count against their own claim</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The design is non-experimental, so no causal inference is licensed; experiments are needed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any causal reading: EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS WILL BE NECESSARY IN FUTURE RESEARCH TO EXAMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH CHANGES ... RELATES TO CHANGES IN EXERCISE-RELATED WELL-BEING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Variety was assessed only at the contextual level.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the level at which the finding holds: assessments of perceived variety were operationalised AT THE CONTEXTUAL LEVEL only</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The results say nothing about acute/episodic effects of perceived variety or about global life-level effects.</label>
        <note>what this limits: acute and global claims: THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY DO NOT PROV[ide evidence] about episodic effects or life-level outcomes</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The factor structure was verified on the same sample used to derive it, only at a different time point.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the factor structure itself: THE USE OF THE SAME SAMPLE TO VERIFY THE FACTOR STRUCTURE (ALBEIT AT DIFFERENT TIME POINTS) AND RESULTS SHOULD BE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Whether the new construct is distinct from the three established needs, or subsumed by them, was an open question this study set out to examine rather than assume.</label>
        <note>what this limits: perceived variety as an established separate need: the paper examines whether it is distinct from or subsumed by competence, relatedness and autonomy</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The construct it is measured alongside has been operationalised inconsistently in the literature, sometimes as a single latent variable.</label>
        <note>what this limits: comparisons with other needs-satisfaction studies: the paper notes the construct has at times been operationalised as a single latent variable, and tests a one-factor model for that reason</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the trimmed item pool was reviewed by three people with expertise in instrument development and in the exercise domain</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the items measure something other than the construct they are named for - expert content review is the check on that before any data is collected · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>perceived variety</label>
        <term>perceived variety</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>psychological needs satisfaction</label>
        <term>psychological needs satisfaction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>felt variety</label>
        <term>felt variety</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>variety support</label>
        <term>variety support</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Competence</label>
        <term>Competence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Relatedness</label>
        <term>Relatedness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>variety - the general stipulated definition: the pursuit and experience of diverse activities, behaviours and opportunities in one&#x27;s social milieu</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>variety - the narrower sense used in this study, which explicitly admits simple, mundane and conventional experiences and so is not sensation-seeking</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`felt variety` / `variety support` - TWO TERMS COINED IN ONE SENTENCE TO PREVENT A CONFLATION, WITH THE REASON STATED. `For the sake of conceptual clarity Quotation withheld` The pre-existing literature had one word, `variety`, doing both jobs - an experience and an affordance - and the split is announced as a methodological requirement rather than discovered. The paper then measures only the first.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>`competence` / `relatedness` / `autonomy` - THREE NEEDS DEFINED BY A SINGLE `refers to` EACH, AND ALL THREE ARE ATTRIBUTED. Every definition ends in a citation to Deci &amp; Ryan; the paper is importing a vocabulary intact rather than building one, which is the opposite move to `felt variety` two pages earlier. The same article both borrows a settled partition and coins a new one, and the writing does not mark the difference.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Sheldon and Lyubomirsky (2012), conclusion that perceptions of variety directly predict well-being</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Sheldon and Lyubomirsky (2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Kahn and Ratner (2005) and Sheldon and Lyubomirsky (2012), definition of variety</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>perceived variety —distinct-from→ psychological needs satisfaction</label>
        <term>perceived variety</term>
        <term>psychological needs satisfaction</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the paper EXAMINED &#x27;the extent to which&#x27; perceived variety is distinct; stated as a question.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>felt variety —distinct-from→ variety support</label>
        <term>felt variety</term>
        <term>variety support</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;distinguish between&#x27; is the differentiation cue and it is in the gate&#x27;s list, so this edge is cue-tested rather than merely accepted. Weight 1.0 - the paper does not hedge the distinction, it requires it.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exploratory factor analysis</label>
        <term>exploratory factor analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confirmatory factor analysis</label>
        <term>confirmatory factor analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>weighted least squares estimation</label>
        <term>weighted least squares estimation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-squared</label>
        <term>chi-squared</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>model fit indices (RMSEA, CFI, TLI)</label>
        <term>model fit indices (RMSEA, CFI, TLI)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>composite reliability</label>
        <term>composite reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>average variance extracted</label>
        <term>average variance extracted</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>relative importance index</label>
        <term>relative importance index</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>oblique factor rotation</label>
        <term>oblique factor rotation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Perceived variety together with competence, relatedness and autonomy measured at Time 1 explained 37.2% of the variance in exercise-related positive affect six weeks later.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The same four predictors explained 33.1% of the variance in exercise-related subjective vitality.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For exercise-related negative affect, autonomy was the only statistically significant predictor; perceived variety did not predict it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A four-factor structure that keeps perceived variety separate from competence, relatedness and autonomy fitted the data better than one-factor or three-factor structures.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>None of the five perceived-variety items cross-loaded onto the competence, relatedness or autonomy subscales at the |0.30| threshold.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Perceived variety in exercise is empirically distinct from, and not subsumed by, perceived competence, relatedness and autonomy.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A supplementary test found no significant curvilinear relationship between perceived variety and positive affect, negative affect or subjective vitality.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors state that the observational design prevents any causal claim about variety and well-being.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variety</label>
        <term>variety</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>felt variety</label>
        <term>felt variety</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>basic psychological needs theory (BPNT)</label>
        <term>basic psychological needs theory (BPNT)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>composite reliability</label>
        <term>composite reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Relative Pratt Index</label>
        <term>Relative Pratt Index</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exercise-related positive affect</label>
        <term>exercise-related positive affect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exercise-related subjective vitality</label>
        <term>exercise-related subjective vitality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>perceived variety</label>
        <term>perceived variety</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>competence</label>
        <term>competence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>relatedness</label>
        <term>relatedness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>autonomy</label>
        <term>autonomy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>N = 507 — community adults who completed the baseline survey</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>six weeks — interval between the two identical online questionnaire administrations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>13.5% — variance in exercise-related negative affect explained by variety plus the three needs</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>19.76% — share of the explained variance in positive affect attributable to perceived variety (Relative Pratt Index)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>27.02% — share of the explained variance in subjective vitality attributable to perceived variety, against 37.70% for competence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>χ2 (758) = 1746.98, p &lt; .001, CFI = .974, TLI = .972 — fit statistics for the latent variable regression model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>.97 — ordinal composite reliability of the perceived variety scores</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.907900.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
