standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.
Motivational goal-priming with or without awareness produces faster and stronger force exertion
Yudai Takarada Yudai Takarada
1 Faculty of Sports Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192 Japan
Find articles by Yudai Takarada
1, ✉ , Daichi Nozaki Daichi Nozaki
2 Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan
Find articles by Daichi Nozaki
2
Author information
Article notes
Copyright and License information
1 Faculty of Sports Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192 Japan
2 Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan
✉ Corresponding author.
Received 2017 Oct 25; Accepted 2018 Jun 20; Collection date 2018.
© The Author(s) 2018
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
PMC Copyright notice
PMCID: PMC6031684 PMID: 29973646
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that barely visible (subliminal) goal-priming with motivational reward can alter the state of the motor system and enhance motor output. Research shows that these affective-motivational effects result from associations between goal representations and positive affect without conscious awareness. phenomenonconcepts↗concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesHere, we tested whether motivational priming can increase motor output even if the priming is fully visible (supraliminal), and whether the priming effect occurs through increased cortical excitability. Groups of participants were primed with either barely visible or fully visible words related to effort and control sequences of random letters that were each followed by fully visible positively reinforcing words. method↗concepts↗concepts↗sensesThe priming effect was measured behaviourally by handgrip force and reaction time to the grip cue after the priming was complete. Physiologically, the effects were measured by pupil dilation and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation during the priming task. claim_typeAnalysis showed that for both the supraliminal and subliminal conditions, reaction time decreased and total force, MEP magnitude, and pupil dilation increased. content_tagsNone of the priming-induced changes in behaviour or physiology differed significantly between the supraliminal and the subliminal groups, indicating that implicit motivation towards motor goals might not require conscious perception of the goals.
Introduction
Decisions about motor actions are completed before we are aware of having made them. Indeed, Libet et al . 1 showed that readiness potential—a change in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity over the motor cortex—begins more than 350 ms before a person becomes aware of the decision to act. Moreover, the activity in several cortical regions, such as the precuneus and the fronto-polar cortex, reflects decision classification up to 2–3 seconds before an individual becomes aware of their decision to act. Thereafter, the supplementary motor area (SMA) determines the timing of that decision 2 . These studies indicate that voluntary action is initiated unconsciously, with movement selection always preceding awareness, and the feeling of intention (sense of self-agency) or sense of ownership coming afterward. This scenario also fits with Hallet’s model that treats free will as a perception 3 .
concept_edgesFocussing on the automatic and unconscious motor activation processes, we have shown that subliminal goal-priming with motivational reward actually altered the background state of the motor system, resulting in a 7% increase in the force level of the maximum voluntary hand-grip contraction 4 . This kind of affective-motivational effect on the motor system is related to both the reward-associated dopaminergic system and the pupil-linked neuromodulatory system 5 , which have functionally and anatomically close connections 6 . The interaction between these systems and between them and their mutual connections to the PFC is regulated by the locus ceruleus (LC) 6 . concepts↗The release of noradrenaline from the LC leads to pupil dilation via α2-receptors, and thus dilation has been used extensively as an indirect measure of LC activity 7 – 9 . A large number of studies have reported that pupillary dilation is related to mental effort (cognitive load), and the correspondence between cognitive load and pupillary dilation has been documented in several contexts, including paired-associate learning 10 , 11 and imagery tasks with abstract and concrete words 12 – 14 . The pupillary size at any time during a cognitive task reflects the subject’s participation in the task, and the precision of these changes has been identified to enable the second-by-second analysis of task-load and mental effort 15 . In humans, changes in pupil size at constant luminance have long been used as a marker of central autonomic processes linked to cognition, including attentional effort 15 – 17 .
Our decision to use a subliminal presentation of a behavioural (motor) goal in our studies was based on a previous study 18 . This procedure eliminates the possibility of demand-like properties, such as desirability of the goal, because participants cannot consciously detect the presented behavioural states during the affective shaping procedure. Thus, participants are unaware of the source for the association with positive affect. Positive affect can work as a reward signal that motivates behaviour 19 , 20 , and such reward signals can also motivate behaviour outside awareness 21 , 22 . Thus we consider those affective-motivational effects to result from associations between motor goal representations and positive affect without conscious awareness, which directly boosts physical resources. claim_relationsThe current study substantially follows the earlier study with the same paradigm of the affective-motivational priming and conceptual analysis as those in the present study, in which physical exerting verbs have been shown to acts as motor goals 23 .
This line of thought is consistent with the previously proposed mechanism for unconscious goal pursuit. Unconscious goal pursuit is thought to be produced by two processes 24 . mechanisms↗In the first, action is prepared at the perceptual, sensory, and motor levels, based on an ideomotor principle. In the second, positive reward signals are detected and processed in subcortical regions such as the basal ganglia in the limbic system, allowing effort for action to be recruited 21 . Coactivation of these processes may play a key role in the proposed mechanism of unconscious goal pursuit 4 , 23 .
Activating behavioural representations during action-word recognition potentiates the corresponding motor programs in the premotor cortex (PMC) 25 . One fMRI study showed that viewing action-related pictures, as well as mere mental imagery of actions (mirror system), activates the PMC in a somatotopic fashion 26 . Thus, compared with subliminal presentation, supraliminal presentation of the behavioural goal in reward goal-priming might cause greater enhancement of the affective-motivational effect on the motor system, including the PMC. Alternatively, if the above interaction between action preparation/execution and positive reward-signal detection and processing affects recruitment of physical resources regardless of whether the goal-priming words are consciously perceived, the affective-motivational effect should not differ between supraliminal and subliminal presentations.
As mentioned above, for explicit motor preparation, the assumption is that people consciously assess the goal state before developing conscious intentions or deliberate strategies to attain that state 27 – 29 . In contrast, previous studies have suggested that unconscious (implicit) goal-directed activity is produced by a different mechanism that uses the affective valence directly attached to representations of behavioural states to automatically direct effort toward attaining those states 18 , 30 . Thus, content_tags↗unconscious goal pursuit, which is triggered by a positive affect that is associated with the representation of the primed behavioural state, will emerge independently from conscious goal pursuit.
Here, we aimed to clarify this issue and determine how awareness of a motor goal can modulate the effect of affective motivational priming in a motor task by using the same paradigm and conceptual analysis as those in an earlier study 23 . We ensured conscious reward-goal priming by presenting the priming words for an extended duration, and then compared how supraliminal and subliminal reward-goal priming affect the motor and pupil-linked neuromodulatory systems. Our results demonstrated that both types of affective behavioural goal priming can influence these systems such that voluntary motor actions are more forceful, possibly via enhanced dopaminergic activity.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Thirty-six healthy Japanese right-handed individuals (evaluated using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory 31 ) participated (23 males, 13 females; mean age ± SD: 21.7 ± 3.2 years) in the study after providing both written and oral informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki (1991; p. 1194). We confirmed that pregnant women were not among our participants to avoid the unknown risks of TMS on an unborn foetus. The experimental procedures complied with relevant laws and institutional guidelines, and were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Sport Sciences at Waseda University (approval number 2014–272).
Stimuli and the task
We opted for a between-participants design to optimize enhancement of the motor system (corticospinal excitability) via subliminal goal-priming with rewards 4 , 5 : the choice of the between-participants design prevents enhancement of corticospinal excitability. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: supraliminal or subliminal. Each group (n = 18) received two (control and experimental) sets of tests, with a break of at least 15 min between sets. controlsBoth groups completed the control condition (random letter primes with subsequent “reward” words) before their respective experimental conditions. In the experimental condition, priming words related to physical exertion were paired with subsequently displayed “reward” words. content_tags↗content_tags↗The primes were invisible for the subliminal group and visible for the supraliminal group (Fig. 1A ).
Figure 1.
Open in a new tab
Experimental procedures. ( A ) The timeline of a trial for each condition and group. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: supraliminal or subliminal. Each group participated in two (control and experimental) conditions, with a break of at least 15 min between each. Both supraliminal and subliminal groups completed the control condition first, followed by supraliminal or subliminal condition, respectively. ( B ) Priming procedure. In the subliminal condition, the subliminal exertion primes were always paired with supraliminal positive words. The supraliminal condition was identical, except that the initial presentations of exertion verbs and random letters were fully visible (supraliminal). Thus, the subliminal and supraliminal exertion primes were always paired with positive words. In the control condition, only random letter strings were used as primes, and these were paired with positive or neutral words. Thus, exertion primes were never displayed. The order of possible stimulus pairs was randomized within each condition. Exertion, positive, and neutral words were Japanese. Each trial in each condition began with a 1000-ms presentation of a random eight letter string (e.g., DZXLTOTM) as a forward mask. This was followed by the prime (33-ms duration in the subliminal condition and 150-ms duration in the supraliminal condition). A random letter string was again displayed for 100 ms as a backward mask, after which a consciously visible word was presented for 150 ms. Occasionally, a dot was presented for 33 ms (it was visible because of the absence of a backward mask), either above or below the neutral or positive word.
To investigate the excitability of the motor cortex, TMS was applied to the left primary motor cortex (M1) 1.5 s after the positive or neutral word (see “ Priming procedure ” below for details) disappeared. content_tagsThus, 50 motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained for each condition. We investigated the influence of conscious goal pursuit on the pupil-linked noradrenergic system by examining pupil dilation during each manipulation. To examine each condition’s effect on motor behaviour, after each priming condition, we asked participants to squeeze a handgrip-force apparatus three times with their right hand (5 s per squeeze), with a 6-s inter-squeeze interval.
Testing of subliminal stimuli
To confirm that the subliminal primed words were not consciously perceived, we conducted a separate experiment in which different participants (32 males and 8 females; mean age: 22.05 ± 2.07 years) completed the subliminal and supraliminal conditions. Participants were asked to indicate whether they saw a word related to physical exertion. The post-masked subliminal exertion-related primes were attended, but not reported. sensesResponse accuracy was 50.15% ± 6.23%, content_tagsindicating that their judgements did not differ from chance, and that they could not see the priming words.
Priming procedure
To manipulate unconscious goal pursuit, we adopted an experimental procedure used in previous studies 4 , 23 (Fig. 1B ). Specifically, content_tagswe used five Japanese verbs related to physical exertion (‘to exert’ [hakki-suru], ‘to struggle’ [funtou-suru], ‘to work hard’ [mogaku], ‘to energize’ [sei wo dasu], and ‘to strive’ [doryoku suru]) as motor goals, five positive adjectives (‘nice’ [suteki na], ‘great’ [subarashii], ‘fantastic’ [kibunsaikou no], ‘satisfactory’ [manzoku na], and ‘enjoyable’ [tanoshii]) as positive reward, and five neutral adverbs (‘almost’ [hotondo], ‘at least’ [sukunaku tomo], ‘finally’ [saigoteki ni], ‘nearly’ [hobo], and already [sude ni]) as non-reward words. For the subliminal group, for half of the 50 experimental trials, subliminal presentation of one of the five exertion verbs was followed by supraliminal presentation of one of the five positive adjectives. For the remaining 25 trials, subliminal presentation of a random letter string was followed by supraliminal presentation of one of the five neutral words. For the supraliminal group, the pattern was identical, except that the initial presentations of exertion verbs and random letters were fully visible. Thus, the exertion primes were always paired with positive words. In the control condition, only random letter strings were used as primes, and these were paired with positive words on 25 trials and with neutral words on 25 trials. Note that exertion words (subliminal or supraliminal) were never displayed in the control condition. content_tagsIn this way, the viewing of positive and neutral words was balanced at 25 trials apiece in all conditions. content_tagsThe 25 trials for each group of word pairs in each condition comprised exactly one presentation of each possible word pair (5 initial words × 5 subsequent words), the order of which was randomized.
Each trial in each condition began with a 1000-ms presentation of five different strings of eight pseudorandom letters (DZXLTOTM, YSTZBXTU, VCFTHYPC, CBEXGTVY, and ZTAWYDBH) as a forward mask. content_tagsThis was followed by a 33-ms presentation of the subliminal prime or a 150-ms presentation of the supraliminal prime, depending on the group. One randomly selected letter string among the original five was again displayed for 100 ms as a backward mask, after which a supraliminal word was presented for 150 ms. Occasionally, a dot was presented for 33 ms (visible because of the absence of a backward mask), either above or below the neutral or positive word. Participants were instructed to indicate whether they had seen a dot, which served to bring the post-masked subliminal primes to their attention. Trials were carried out every 3.5 s within each condition. We used a 60-Hz CRT screen to display the words, and the experimental procedure was created with software designed for psychological experiments (Inquisit 3 Desktop Edition, Millisecond Software, Seattle, WA, USA). All word stimuli were displayed in black on a white screen during priming, and immediately before the word presentation, the colour of the screen was momentarily white without any black words. Thus, pupil diameter transiently decreased because of the preceding large increase in luminance by the white screen with the maximum luminance. limitationsWe are unable to completely eliminate the possibility that this transient change in luminance affected pupil diameter; however, this type of contamination should be small because this phenomenon was common across all participants.
Handgrip force measurement and subjective perception of effort
Force was measured using a handgrip device (KFG-5-120-C 1-1 6, Kyowa Electronic Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). After viewing all 50 stimulus pairs, participants completed a squeeze task in which they were asked to squeeze the handgrip device with their right (dominant) hand when the word ‘squeeze’ appeared on the display, and to stop squeezing when the word disappeared. The squeeze instruction was displayed for 5 s, and was repeated three times with a 6-s inter-squeeze interval. After completing the squeeze task, participants were asked to rate how hard they had tried to squeeze the device on a category-ratio (CR-10) scale 32 . A rating of 1 signified ‘very weak’, and 10 signified ‘very, very strong’. content_tags↗content_tags↗content_tags↗content_tags↗Reaction time (time from the ‘squeeze’ instruction to the production of handgrip force), the rate of force increase (the first peak in force curve divided by the time of the first peak), and total effort (mean force over time) were quantified as motor actions (behaviours) from the force curve that was obtained based on paradigms used in previous research 4 , 23 .
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
In both control and experimental conditions, single-pulse TMS was administered via a stimulator (M200 2 , Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK) using a coil with a double, figure-eight shaped winding (4150-00 Double 70 mm Alpha Coil, Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK) with a maximum magnetic field strength of 1.55 T. The stimulation was delivered 1.5 s after the positive or neutral words disappeared in each trial. Each participant sat upright with their elbows bent in front of them and resting on their thighs. content_tags↗The TMS coil was positioned over the finger area of the left M1, which was determined as the area with the lowest resting motor threshold (rMT). That is, the area for which MEPs with peak-to-peak amplitudes greater than 50 µV were induced in the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle in at least 5 out of 10 trials when participants were totally relaxed with their eyes closed 33 , 34 . content_tags↗Coil position was stabilized throughout the experiment with a coil stand made from multiple products (Manfrotto Distribution KK, Tokyo, Japan). The optimal scalp position of M1 was marked directly on the scalp with a black magic marker. Here, rMTs ranged from 50% to 85% of the maximum stimulator output, and stimulus intensity for each participant was set at 110% of their rMT.
During MEP recording, participants were asked to remain in a resting state. Surface electromyograms were obtained from the right FCU muscles with bipolar surface silver electrodes (bandpass, 15–10 kHz) using the tendon-belly method. content_tags↗For each condition, the peak-to-peak amplitude of the averaged MEP across 50 trials was calculated, the size of which reflects corticospinal excitability 35 , 36 . content_tags↗The background electromyogram (EMG) was calculated as the integral of the rectified EMG signal during the 100 ms before TMS.
Pupil diameter measurement
We investigated the influence of conscious goal pursuit on the pupil-linked neuromodulatory system by examining modulations in pupil dilation. Pupil diameters were measured using a TalkEye Lite system (Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The image around the pupil was obtained by a camera employing near-infrared light-emitting diodes (NIR LEDs) and a VGA (640 × 480) (DSP built in) Camera Module (NCM03-V, Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). content_tags↗Banalization processing was performed on the image, and then pupil diameter was measured according to methods in Wang et al . 37 . Change in pupil size was estimated by considering the horizontal ( x ) and vertical ( y ) diameters in the experimental conditions relative to the control condition. Mean x and y diameters are expressed as a percentage of baseline values obtained from the control condition while participants viewed the 50 pairs of words.
Skin potential level (SPL) measurement and range index
We also measured skin potential level (SPL). SPL is related to activation of postganglionic sympathetic fibres 38 – 40 , and is an indicator of general arousal. content_tags↗If goal pursuit is successfully induced unconsciously, SPL should not differ across the two experimental conditions. SPL was measured with Ag-AgCl skin electrodes (NS-111T and NS-115T, Nihon Kohden, Saitama, Japan), which were 7 mm in diameter and attached to the skin by 10-mm-diameter electrode collars (H261, Nihon Kohden). The face of each electrode was coated with a conductive electrolyte. Electrodes were tested in saline before experimental sessions to ensure a low and stable bias potential. The active electrode was placed on the thenar eminence of the left palm, which had been cleaned with ethanol. The inactive reference electrode was placed over the inner surface of the left forearm. The reference site was cleaned and abraded lightly with an electrode gel (YZ-0019, Nihon Kohden) at the beginning of each experimental session. SPL was amplified using a DC pre-amplifier and recorded onto a personal computer (Panasonic CF-R4, Tokyo, Japan).
The range index ( y ) of the SPL that corresponded to the original value ( x ) is defined by y = 100 × ( x − m 1)/( M − m 2) (%), where x and m 1 are the most negative and the least negative SPL values, respectively, that were obtained while viewing the 50 pairs of words in the experimental (supraliminal and subliminal) and control conditions, and where M and m 2 are the most negative and the least negative SPL values obtained during a 5-min closed-eyed resting state before the tasks 40 .
Statistical analysis
content_tags↗Motor behaviour, MEP, pupil size, and SPL data were analysed using repeated-measures two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with a between-participant factor of Group (supraliminal or subliminal) and a within-participant factor of Condition (control or experimental. content_tags↗Greenhouse–Geisser corrections were applied when appropriate to adjust for non-sphericity, changing the degrees of freedom using a correction coefficient. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was chosen for all tests. content_tags↗We also performed a Bayesian Repeated Measures ANOVA on the data (repeated-measures factor: Condition; between-participants factor: Group) using JASP ( https://jasp-stats.org/ ) to content_tags↗quantify how the observed data supported evidence in favour of the null hypothesis (i.e., the absence of difference between supraliminal and subliminal groups).
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed for this study are included in this published article.
Results
Motor action
Effort
We found that total effort was enhanced in both the supraliminal and subliminal experimental conditions. A two-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of Condition (control vs. experimental for supraliminal and subliminal groups) on total effort ( F (1,34) = 7.464; MSE = 494.32; p = 0.010; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.1800), but no significant effect of Group (supraliminal vs. subliminal) ( F (1,34) = 0.223; MSE = 11277.66; p = 0.640; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.007), or any interaction between Condition and Group ( F (1,34) = 2.53; MSE = 494.32; p = 0.121; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.069) (Fig. 2A–C ; Table 1 ).
Figure 2.
Open in a new tab
Effect of unconscious goal pursuit on motor action. ( A , B ) Typical recordings of handgrip force in each experimental (supraliminal or subliminal) condition. ( C , D , E ) Total effort ( C) , reaction time ( D ), and rate of force ( E ) for the two conditions. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *Experimental vs. control condition p < 0.05.
Table 1.
Motor action responses for the two conditions.
Reaction time (ms) Rate of force (N/s) Total effort (N)
Control set Experimental set Control set Experimental set Control set Experimental set
Supraliminal 491.2 ± 37.5 412.0 ± 36.5* 218.4 ± 37.3 244.7 ± 48.7 128.8 ± 11.8 134.8 ± 13.1
Subliminal 509.6 ± 64.6 378.9 ± 28.2* 204.6 ± 36.2 205.4 ± 28.6 132.3 ± 17.5 155.0 ± 21.6*
Open in a new tab
Values indicate means ± SEM.
* Significant differences at p < 0.05 vs. values from the control condition.
Reaction time
We found that reaction times tended to decrease in both groups in the experimental tasks. A two-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of Condition ( F (1,34) = 5.209; MSE = 38064.86; p = 0.029; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.133), but no significant effect of Group ( F (1,34) = 0.022; MSE = 43883.39; p = 0.883; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.001), or any interaction between Condition and Group ( F (1,34) = 0.314; MSE = 38064.86; p = 0.579; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.009) (Fig. 2A,B,D ; Table 1 ).
Rate of forc
No significant changes were observed in either group relative to the control condition. A two-way ANOVA revealed no significant main effects or any interaction between factors (Condition: F (1,34) = 1.539; MSE = 2098.21; p = 0.223; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.043; Group: F (1,34) = 0.227; MSE = 56391.9; p = 0.637; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.007; Interaction: F (1,34) = 1.367; MSE = 2098.21; p = 0.250; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.039) (Fig. 2A,B,E ; Table 1 ).
Subjective effort
Although subjective effort increased in both groups relative to the control condition (subliminal: control baseline, 5.94 ± 0.42; subliminal condition, 6.27 ± 0.41; supraliminal: control baseline, 5.83 ± 0.38; supraliminal condition, 6.33 ± 0.43), the two-way ANOVA revealed that the effect of Condition just missed significance ( F (1,34) = 3.899; MSE = 0.801; p = 0.056; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.103). The analysis also showed no significant main effect of Group ( F (1,34) = 0.003; MSE = 5.347; p = 0.960; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.000076) or a significant interaction ( F (1,34) = 0.156; MSE = 0.801; p = 0.695; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.005).
Motor evoked potential (MEP)
We found that compared with the control condition, MEP amplitude was enhanced after both supraliminal and subliminal priming (Fig. 3 ). The two-way ANOVA revealed that this effect of Condition was indeed significant ( F (1,34) = 7.864; MSE = 463.24; p = 0.008; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.188). Additionally, it showed no significant effect of Group ( F (1,34) = 0.373; MSE = 5214.14; p = 0.545; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.011) or any interaction between Condition and Group ( F (1,34) = 0.475; MSE = 463.24; p = 0.495; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.014). content_tagsThese results show that priming with goal-related exertion words acted to excite corticospinal activity in both groups.
Figure 3.
Open in a new tab
Effects of unconscious goal pursuit on motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Amplitudes of MEPs of the flexor carpi ulnaris for the two experimental conditions. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with control condition (* p < 0.05).
We also observed that background EMG decreased in both groups. Analysis revealed a significant main effect of Condition ( F (1,34) = 12.542; MSE = 7224.52; p = 0.001; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.269), but no significant main effect of Group ( F (1,34) = 0.148; MSE = 106651.47; p = 0.703; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.004) and no significant interaction between Condition and Group ( F (1,34) = 0.012; MSE = 7224.52; p = 0.912; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.00036).
content_tagsThe behavioural and MEP results showed that behavioural goal priming with positive (motivational) words enhanced corticospinal excitability despite the lack of conscious awareness, as evidenced by the increased total force and MEP amplitude, the lower reaction times in the experimental conditions, and the lack of a main effect for Group in any test. Thus, both subliminal and supraliminal primed behavioural goals lead to faster and more forceful voluntary motor action.
Pupil diameter and skin potential level (SPL)
Figure 4 shows the time-course of pupil-diameter measures from the onset of word presentation to the third disappearance of the word ‘squeeze’. content_tagsIn both groups, we found that pupil size increased in the vertical ( y ) and horizontal and vertical ( x and y ) directions during the priming procedure. Analysis revealed that this effect of Condition was significant (vertical: F (1,34) = 12.77; MSE = 2.094; p = 0.001; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.273; horizontal and vertical: F (1,34) = 9.640; MSE = 1.359; p = 0.004; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.221). It also showed no significant effect of Group (vertical: F (1,34) = 0.082; MSE = 2.094; p = 0.777; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.002; horizontal and vertical: F (1,34) = 0.002; MSE = 1.359; p = 0.965; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.00005) or any interaction between Condition and Group (vertical: F (1,34) = 0.632; MSE = 37.95; p = 0.432; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.018; horizontal and vertical: F (1,34) = 0.714; MSE = 35.75; p = 0.404; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.021). Additionally, pupil size tended to increase horizontally in both groups (Fig. 4 ), but the increase was not statistically significant (Condition: F (1,34) = 3.35; MSE = 1.276; p = 0.076; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.009). As with other tests, no main effect of Group ( F (1,34) = 0.680; MSE = 39.86; p = 0.415; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.002) or any interaction between Condition and Group ( F (1,34) = 0.075; MSE = 1.276; p = 0.785; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.002) was observed.
Figure 4.
Open in a new tab
The effects of unconscious goal pursuit on pupil size over time. Top and middle rows . Horizontal (left), vertical (middle), and horizontal + vertical (right) pupil diameter (dots) starting at the onset of word presentation in the priming procedure and lasting until the end of the handgrip task. Diameter is expressed as the mean for each experimental (supraliminal or subliminal) group. The data were low-pass filtered with a cut-off frequency of 1 Hz using a fourth-order Butterworth filter. The bidirectional arrows (↔) after the word presentation period indicate the period of the handgrip task. Bottom row . Pupil-size data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, vs. control condition.
SPL on the palmar surface did not appear to change in either the supraliminal (control: 183.8 ± 37.2%; experimental: 186.9 ± 51.2%) or subliminal (131.8 ± 13.4%, 136.9 ± 22.1%) groups. Analysis confirmed this by indicating no main effects or any interaction (Condition: F (1,34) = 0.025; MSE = 11882.06; p = 0.875; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.001; Group: F (1,34) = 1.564; MSE = 29974.87; p = 0.220; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.044; Interaction: F (1,34) = 0.002; MSE = 11882.00; p = 0.967; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.00005). content_tagsThis indicates that the experiment did not induce any significant changes in the level of general arousal.
Results of bayesian testing
The classical statistical testing described above demonstrated there was no significant interaction between condition and group. However, this result cannot be interpreted as the evidence of supporting the absence of interaction. Thus, content_tags↗in order to examine more explicitly how the absence of interaction was supported by the observed data, we also performed Bayesian testing 41 , 42 . Tables 2 – 10 summarized the results of Bayesian testing. As for the effort (Table 2 ), the BF 01 for Condition + Group, and that for Condition + Group + Condition*Group are 0.398 and 0.453, respectively. The addition of interaction increased the BF 01 by a factor of 1.14 (=0.453/0.398) and the similar testing results were obtained for other variables (Tables 3 – 9 ). The factors by the inclusion of interaction greater than 1 (1.14~3.22), content_tagsindicating that the data supported more likely the absence of interaction. However, it should be noted that those values are classified as anecdotal evidence 43 . limitationssensesTherefore, it is clear that both subliminal and supraliminal goal-priming with positive words increased the variables, while we should be cautious about the interpretation that the degree of increase was identical between the two conditions.
Table 4.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Rate of force
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.384 2.491 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.171 0.825 2.244 0.792
Group 0.200 0.269 1.401 1.480 2.711
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.120 0.548 3.187 3.225
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.065 0.280 5.885 3.751
Open in a new tab
Table 5.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Subjective effort
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.293 1.657 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.347 2.124 0.845 0.678
Group 0.200 0.134 0.621 2.180 1.846
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.168 0.806 1.747 2.188
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.058 0.247 5.038 2.626
Open in a new tab
Table 6.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
MEP
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.088 0.387 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.460 3.405 0.192 0.790
Group 0.200 0.051 0.214 1.734 2.037
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.289 1.630 0.305 2.349
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.112 0.503 0.790 2.836
Open in a new tab
Table 7.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Pupil size in the x direction
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.269 1.470 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.261 1.409 1.031 1.170
Group 0.200 0.213 1.082 1.262 8.158
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.193 0.957 1.392 2.072
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.065 0.277 4.146 3.003
Open in a new tab
Table 8.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Pupil size in the y direction
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.017 0.068 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.510 4.157 0.033 1.357
Group 0.200 0.011 0.045 1.608 0.654
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.349 2.140 0.048 1.110
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.114 0.515 0.148 2.279
Open in a new tab
Table 2.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Effort
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.097 0.432 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.379 2.490 0.254 1.824
Group 0.200 0.065 0.251 1.653 2.522
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.244 1.298 0.398 2.903
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.215 1.095 0.453 3.347
Open in a new tab
Table 10.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
SPL
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.483 3.733 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.116 0.526 4.152 1.269
Group 0.200 0.304 1.747 1.588 0.833
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.074 0.320 6.520 2.389
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.023 0.094 21.043 2.050
Open in a new tab
Table 3.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Reaction time
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.169 0.816 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.546 4.818 0.310 0.705
Group 0.200 0.052 0.211 3.234 5.300
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.170 0.822 0.993 4.229
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.061 0.262 2.769 1.961
Open in a new tab
Table 9.
Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA results. All models include subject.
Pupil size in the x and y directions
Model Comparison P(M) P(M|data) BF M
BF 01
error %
Models
Null model (incl.subject) 0.200 0.045 0.187 1.000
Condition 0.200 0.472 3.583 0.094 1.904
Group 0.200 0.032 0.134 1.378 1.336
Condition+ Group 0.200 0.341 2.071 0.131 2.875
Condition+ Group+ Condition*Group 0.200 0.109 0.491 0.408 2.549
Open in a new tab
Discussion
Here we showed that pupil diameter and MEP increased significantly when participants were presented either subliminal or supraliminal goal-priming words that were followed by explicit positive reward words. Similarly, the submaximal force level measured after the priming procedure was also enhanced. These changes occurred without any detectable changes in general arousal state, as demonstrated by the SPL results. concepts↗Our findings indicate that the motor and pupil-linked neuromodulatory systems were more excitable regardless of whether the goal-priming words were visible or not, and that this led to more forceful voluntary motor action.
The participants in the supraliminal group saw all the primes and were able to produce more forceful voluntary motor action through the enhancement of the corticospinal pathway. They may have consciously assessed the primes and adopted the desired goal state; thus, the activation of the motor system including the PMC via motor-goal representation could have involved in the enhancement of the corticospinal pathway 25 , 26 . Alternatively, the mental representations of goals might have been activated without an act of conscious will, guiding a participant’s motor goal-relevant cognition, affect, and motor behaviour from the activated point onward 30 , 44 , 45 . Thus, mechanisms↗the goal-priming effect on task performance might have resulted from unconscious activation of the goal to perform well rather than the conscious perception of the goal. Indeed, content_tagsthe debriefing after the experimental task indicated that participants in the supraliminal group had been aware of the exertion words; however, none realized the true nature of the study, particularly the idea of affective shaping or the link between affective shaping and subsequent motor performance. Thus, they were unaware of any activated motor goals or any causal linkage between the goal-priming words and the positive reward words during reward goal-priming manipulation. This means that the motor-goal pursuit was triggered unconsciously. sensesMeanwhile, they did not experience any subjective difference in effort immediately after the motor action as participants in the subliminal group did. This suggests that the enhancing effect of supraliminal goal priming with rewards in physical resources was automatic. At the same time, limitationswe must keep in mind that memory-based self-report (such as the CR-10 scale) is not the most sensitive or powerful measure of actual awareness during past actions 30 . mechanisms↗Therefore, based on the proposed mechanism for unconscious goal pursuit 24 , an association of a motor-goal representation with positive affect can similarly arise in the background of consciousness and act as a reward signal, inducing unconscious motivation for the motor goal, regardless of whether the goal is consciously perceived or not. This leads motor action to be enhanced in the same way as when conscious perception of the goal barely exists.
Delivering several single TMS pulses repeatedly over M1 has been shown to induce cumulative changes in neural activity during stimulation, which serves to increase motor cortical excitability within the same block of stimulation 46 . limitationsThis possibility was never completely excluded in our study; however, we were convinced that such a cumulative effect on corticospinal excitability would not be able to conceal the increase in corticospinal excitability that was induced by rewarding physical exertion primes in our study. This was because the trend analyses for the cumulative change have been shown to have a perfect linear trend (R2 = 1) for inter-block levels and a nearly linear trend for intra-block levels (R2 = 0.97) 46 .
Pupillometry at steady luminance has long been utilized as an indirect measure of brain states associated with cognition that involves mental effort 15 – 17 . Pupil dilation is directly and/or indirectly modulated by the release of noradrenaline from the locus coeruleus (LC) that acts on noradrenergic α2-receptors and is proposed to be causally responsible for pupil dilation, and is thus widely used as an indirect marker of LC activity 7 – 9 . LC activation does not influence the neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) that project to the nucleus accumbens, which is implicated in dopamine release. However, as neurons in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) project indirectly to the VTA, LC activation regulates reciprocal connections between the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems, and their reciprocal associations in the PFC 6 . These two biochemically analogous catecholaminergic neuromodulatory systems are functionally and anatomically tightly associated.
mechanisms↗Therefore, potentiated dopaminergic activity might enhance activity within the pupil-linked noradrenergic system, which in turn might boost the gain of neuronal interactions in the cortex 8 , 47 and facilitate goal pursuit outside of conscious awareness via simultaneous action preparation and the detection of positive reward signals. It might also potentiate the reciprocal actions between the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems and their reciprocal associations within the PFC. In fact, the role of the noradrenergic system in motivation of goal pursuit has been proposed to complement that of the dopaminergic system 48 , 49 . The dopaminergic system is involved in value-based decision making, whereas the noradrenergic system is involved in energizing behaviour and enhancing efforts to face challenges. Taken together, the current results also suggest that unconscious goal pursuit might enhance the noradrenergic system and be relevant to more potently motivated voluntary motor behaviour, perhaps via potentiation of dopaminergic system activity. Additionally, we must keep in mind that because of the length of the presented word—and other factors—the difference in screen luminance might have had some effect on pupil diameter. However, we believe that even if this contamination were real, it would not cancel out the observed pupil dilation. This is because the observed pupil dilation in both the supraliminal and subliminal groups was accompanied by enhanced corticospinal excitability. claim_relationsThis is consistent with our previous study, which showed how the affective motivational effect on the motor system is related to both the reward-associated dopaminergic system and the pupil-linked neuromodulatory system 5 .
We note that the potentiation of the pupil-linked neuromodulatory system and the more forceful voluntary motor actions occurred regardless of whether the goal-priming words were fully visible or not. content_tagsThis indicates that conscious awareness of behavioural goal-priming is not a necessary condition for goal pursuit processes to recruit resources for motor action. This in turn suggests that the effect of implicit motivation, which is induced by an association between physical exertion and positive affect, underlies motor-goal priming and acts as a reward signal.
Author Contributions
Y.T. and D.N. designed the research. Y.T. performed the experiment and analysed the data. Y.T. and D.N. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared the figures and tables. Both authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | motivational goal-priming of voluntary force exertion | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | behavioural-experiment also in: behavioural-experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms | mechanisms[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The between-group equivalence is only weakly supported: Bayesian evidence for the absence of an interaction is described as anecdotal, so the claim that the increase was identical across conditions should be treated cautiously. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Awareness was assessed with a memory-based self-report scale, which is not a sensitive measure of what participants were actually aware of. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Transient screen-luminance changes before word presentation could have contaminated the pupil-diameter measurements. | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Cumulative effects of repeated single TMS pulses on motor cortical excitability were not experimentally excluded. | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| controls | both groups completed the CONTROL CONDITION FIRST, before their respective experimental conditions eliminates: that a difference between the supraliminal and subliminal groups is a difference in baseline rather than in the manipulation · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | goal-priming also in: goal-priming | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | supraliminal also in: supraliminal | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | force also in: force | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | motor output also in: motor output | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | pupil dilation also in: pupil dilation | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cortical excitability also in: cortical excitability | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | motor-evoked potentials also in: motor-evoked potentials | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | PRIMING MEASURED IN FORCE. The dependent variable is how hard somebody squeezes a handgrip, with pupil dilation and motor-evoked potentials alongside it. Nearly every other record in this corpus measures priming as speed, accuracy, choice or judgement; this one measures a physical output and a physiological state, which means the effect has to survive translation into the motor system rather than staying in a decision | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | BOTH CONDITIONS WORK - AND THE PAPER REFUSES THE EQUIVALENCE READING, WHICH IS THE ROW THAT MATTERS. `Therefore, it is clear that both subliminal and supraliminal goal-priming with positive words increased the variables, while we should be cautious about the interpretation that the degree of increase was identical between the two conditions.` The effect survives visibility; the SAMENESS of the effect is explicitly not claimed, and the discussion offers the opposite possibility too - that supraliminal presentation `might cause greater enhancement`. A paper declining an equivalence its own abstract could have been read as asserting | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE AWARENESS CHECK IS THE OBJECTIVE KIND, AND IT CARRIES ITS NUMBER: `Response accuracy was 50.15% +/- 6.23%, indicating that their judgements did not differ from chance, and that they could not see the priming words.` This is the zero-sensitivity criterion that Schmidt2011 argues should be retired because it presupposes an exhaustive awareness measure, and the design Van-den-Bussche2013 calls confounded because masking changes strength as well as visibility. The corpus now holds the criterion, its critique and a study using it | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND ONE ASYMMETRY SURVIVES THE EQUIVALENCE: the supraliminal participants `did not experience any subjective difference in effort immediately after the motor action as participants in the subliminal group did`. Force, reaction time, MEPs and pupil dilation all move alike across the awareness boundary - and the felt effort does not. A dissociation reported inside a paper whose headline is an equivalence, and the kind of detail a summary of the abstract would lose | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → the authors' earlier study using the same affective-motivational priming paradigm (reference 23) | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → the authors' previous study linking the affective motivational effect to the dopaminergic and pupil-linked neuromodulatory systems (reference 5) | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | goal-priming —causes→ force direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The title's claim - 'faster and stronger force exertion'. Grounded on the methods sentence rather than the results because that is where both endpoints are named; the direction is carried by the results sense. also in: goal-priming · force | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | cortical excitability —causes→ motor output direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: Weight 0.8 because this span states it as a QUESTION the study asked - 'we tested ... whether the priming effect occurs through increased cortical excitability' - not as a conclusion. The MEP increase is reported, but the mediation claim is exactly the shape the schema cannot hold, so the edge stays at the strength of the question.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span states what was TESTED; causes states a hypothesis as a finding. also in: cortical excitability · motor output | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ANOVA also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Greenhouse-Geisser sphericity correction | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Bayesian ANOVA also in: Bayesian ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Bayes factor also in: Bayes factor | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | evidence for the null hypothesis also in: evidence for the null hypothesis | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Neither the behavioural nor the physiological priming effects differed between the visible-prime and invisible-prime groups, so conscious perception of the goal appears unnecessary for the motivational effect. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Priming with exertion words paired with reward words raised grip force and MEP amplitude and shortened reaction time in both groups. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Motor-evoked potentials showed that the exertion-word priming excited the corticospinal pathway in both the supraliminal and the subliminal group. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Pupil size increased during priming in the vertical and in the combined horizontal-plus-vertical measures in both groups. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Skin potential level was unchanged, so the effects cannot be attributed to a rise in general arousal. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Participants' detection judgements of the primes did not differ from chance, indicating they could not see the priming words. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Bayesian model comparison favoured models without a Condition-by-Group interaction, but only at the anecdotal level of evidence, so equality of the two priming routes should not be overclaimed. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Supraliminal participants had been aware of the exertion words, but none realised the true nature of the study. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The authors conclude that awareness of the primed behavioural goal is not a necessary condition for goal pursuit to recruit physical resources. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | resting motor threshold (rMT) also in: resting motor threshold (rMT) | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | motor actions also in: motor actions | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | unconscious goal pursuit also in: unconscious goal pursuit | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | background electromyogram (EMG) also in: background electromyogram (EMG) | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | subliminal group also in: subliminal group | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | supraliminal group also in: supraliminal group | content_tags.definitions[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | amplitude of the averaged MEP also in: amplitude of the averaged MEP | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | pupil diameter also in: pupil diameter | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | skin potential level also in: skin potential level | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | coil position also in: coil position | content_tags.variables[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | reaction time also in: reaction time | content_tags.variables[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | rate of force increase also in: rate of force increase | content_tags.variables[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | total effort also in: total effort | content_tags.variables[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 33-ms / 150-ms — prime exposure duration in the subliminal versus the supraliminal condition | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 50 — motor-evoked potentials collected per condition | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 25 trials — exposure to positive and to neutral words was equated across every condition | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 5 initial words × 5 subsequent words — the full crossing of prime and following word that made up each block of 25 trials | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | five — Japanese physical-exertion verbs used as the motor-goal primes | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.