standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 1 relation here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | tonotopic and FM-sweep-rate maps in mouse auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | calcium-imaging Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: calcium-imaging | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Imaging was confined to the right auditory cortex, so lateralization of vocal processing could not be assessed. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any lateralisation claim: A CRANIOTOMY WAS MADE ONLY OVER THE RIGHT AC | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Isoflurane was used as a model of the sleeping brain, and whether the state effects are anaesthetic or sleep-related is unresolved. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the sleep interpretation of the state effects: REPLICATION OF OUR FINDINGS DURING NATURAL SLEEP WILL CLARIFY WHETHER CHANGES IN HEARING SENSITIVITY RESULT FROM USING ISOFLURANE OR ARE ASSOCIATED WITH SLEEP PROCESSES | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The comparison of natural sleep against awake and anaesthetized states is left to future work. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1]: THE IMPACT OF SLEEP COMPARED TO ANESTHETIZED AND AWAKE STATES SHOULD BE STUDIED IN THE FUTURE | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The map of this cortex has been revised repeatedly, and the paper attributes the revisions to advances in technique rather than to new anatomy. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any area label in the mouse auditory cortex literature: the paper states the tonotopic organisation of the belt area has been significantly updated as neuroimaging and recording advanced | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | An area in the classical map is reported as dissolvable into parts of two others, on the evidence of one technique. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the UF area as a unit in the mouse auditory map: electrophysiological measurements are reported as suggesting it should be considered subparts of AAF and AI | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The tonotopic map rests on a per-frequency threshold identified by the experimenters. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the tonotopic maps in this paper: for each frequency a threshold level was identified and used to determine the map | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The paper's own account of why the map keeps changing is an account of instruments, not of findings - decades of technological advancement producing significant updates to the organisation. On that account the current map is the current technique's map, and the paper is adding a fourth. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a deliberately LARGE craniotomy, 3 to 4 mm across, over the auditory cortical regions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the map is shaped by the size of the recording window rather than by the cortex - a small window would truncate the functional organisation being measured · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | responsive pixels were identified first and used to exclude the unresponsive ones from analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that unresponsive pixels dilute the signal and flatten the functional map · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | tonotopic organization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tonotopic organization | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | UF Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UF | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | AI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: AI | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: auditory cortex | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | AI (primary auditory cortex) - AS ONE AREA in the classical map, versus as an area containing TWO high-frequency regions, which is what optical calcium imaging reported Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AI (primary auditory cortex) - AND AS SPLIT DIFFERENTLY AGAIN by a third technique: flavoprotein autofluorescence with anatomy makes the dorsal high-frequency part a discrete region Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AI (primary auditory cortex) - AND AS PART OF A WHOLLY NEW LAYOUT: widefield calcium imaging in awake mice is reported as introducing a new layout for auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | revision of the map - attributed by the paper to TECHNIQUE rather than to anatomy: 'technological advancements in neuroimaging and recording have led to significant updates in the tonotopic organization of the belt area' Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → Issa et al. (2017), which reported no difference between upward and downward FM sweep maps Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Issa et al. (2017), whose imaging window was too small to resolve map borders Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Romero et al. (2020), whose VPAF is placed differently Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Issa et al. (2014) landmark-registration procedure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | UF —part-of→ AI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: WHICH TECHNIQUE IS ASKED. 'ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS suggest the UF area should be considered as SUBPARTS of the AAF and AI' - so on that instrument UF is not an area at all but pieces of two others. The record already carries THREE readings of AI as senses, one per technique: optical calcium imaging splits it into two high-frequency regions, flavoprotein autofluorescence makes the dorsal part discrete, widefield imaging introduces a new layout entirely · strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: AN AREA THAT DISSOLVES INTO PARTS OF TWO OTHERS DEPENDING ON THE METHOD. The boundary is not a fact the techniques disagree about - each technique constitutes a different partition, and all of them are current.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but measurements 'suggest' UF should be considered subparts of AAF and AI; hedged. | concept_edges[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Kruskal-Wallis test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Kruskal-Wallis test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | chi-squared goodness-of-fit test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chi-squared goodness-of-fit test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | bootstrap Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: bootstrap | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon rank-sum test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon rank-sum test | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: p-value | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard error of the mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard error of the mean | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | regression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: regression | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | coefficient of determination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: coefficient of determination | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | explained variance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: explained variance | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | singular value decomposition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: singular value decomposition | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The newly identified auditory cortex regions responded mainly to higher frequencies and lay in dorsal and caudal auditory cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Apart from a few sparse pixels, tonotopic maps were similar over time and between animals. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | High-frequency responses in AI-H and UF were larger in awake than in anesthetized mice. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Under anesthesia the cortical area encoding slow FM sweep rates expanded and the area encoding fast sweep rates shrank across AAF, DA and UF. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Contrary to an earlier report of no difference, upward and downward FM sweep maps do differ: the slow-rate centre in AI sits about 350 micrometres more rostral for downward sweeps. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Ultrasonic vocalizations drove stronger responses than pure tones specifically in the regions tuned to fast FM sweep rates (AII, DP, PAF, VPAF and a zone between UF and AAF), and not in the high-frequency tonotopic regions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Best frequency changes with distance along a tonotopic gradient as a sigmoid: middle frequencies change steeply over a short stretch of cortex while low and high frequencies occupy longer stretches. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED - THE POINTER WAS WRONG, NOT THE CLAIM) · Tonotopic maps were almost identical for averaging windows from 100 ms to 1000 ms after tone onset. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED - THE POINTER WAS WRONG, NOT THE CLAIM. The old evidence was verbatim, anchored and correctly cut, and it contained NONE of this claim's numbers (100, 1000). The paper states the claim in one sentence elsewhere and the tagger did not use it. the project, 2026-08-23: 'WE HAVE SPENT THE DAY VERIFYING THAT QUOTES ARE REAL AND NONE OF IT ASKS WHETHER THEY ARE RELEVANT.' Confirmed by reading the claim, the old span and the candidate together; the candidate carries every number AND the claim's own content words. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | A window larger than 2 mm in each axis is needed to include every region of the tonotopic organisation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | core auditory area Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: core auditory area | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | belt auditory region Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: belt auditory region | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | tonotopic organization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tonotopic organization | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | frequency sweep rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frequency sweep rate | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | V/T ratio Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: V/T ratio | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | responsive pixel Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: responsive pixel | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | tone frequency and sound pressure level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | best frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: best frequency | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | pixel responsiveness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: pixel responsiveness | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | body temperature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: body temperature | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sound pressure level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sound pressure level | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | frequency coverage Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frequency coverage | content_tags.variables[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sweep direction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sweep direction | content_tags.variables[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sweep duration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sweep duration | content_tags.variables[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 12 and 6 — Number of mice recorded awake and anesthetized respectively Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | R2 > 0.93 and 0.90 — Adjusted R-squared of the linear fit to the inverse-sigmoid frequency-distance relation, awake and anesthetized Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | R2 > 0.95 and 0.87 — Fit quality of the inverse-sigmoid function for the FM sweep-rate/distance relation, awake and anesthetized Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 1.36 and 1.51 — Median vocalization-to-tone response ratio in the USV-favouring pixels, awake and anesthetized Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 2 mm and 1.9 mm — Extent of the auditory cortex tonotopic map along the rostral-caudal and dorsal-ventral axes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | AI-L p = 0.0054, AI-H p = 0.0171, AAF-L p = 0.0181, UF p = 0.0216, DP p = 0.0165 — Median p-values for the five regions whose best frequency differed between awake and anesthetized maps Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: THE QUOTE CONTINUES A SENTENCE THAT THIS COPY CUTS IN TWO - a bioRxiv watermark stands between it and the words it follows, which read 'the high-frequency regions of AI, UF,'. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 350 µm — Rostral shift of the AI slow-sweep-rate landmark in the downward compared with the upward FM map Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 25 times — Repetitions of each frequency-SPL pair per imaging session Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 33.3ms (30 Hz) — Temporal resolution / frame rate of the wide-field calcium imaging Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.