<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages</title>
        <author>Nidhi Agrawal</author>
        <author>Echo Wen Wan</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages</title>
          <date>2009</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Consumer Research</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1086/597331</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">agrawal2009-depletion-construal</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">agrawal2009-depletion-construal.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">5926f0bec7f3518c2b88a79d253b15d3ff40ced4</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>marketing</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>the depletion effect in self-control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Time spent reading was used as the main self-control measure, which the authors acknowledge need not indicate careful processing; they added a recall measure in response.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the self-control measure: SPENDING MORE TIME ON READING MIGHT NOT IMPLY BETTER SELF-CONTROL IF PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT CAREFULLY PROCESSING THE MESSAGE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The supporting recall analyses for experiment 2 are asserted rather than reported, so they cannot be evaluated from the article itself.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the experiment 2 recall support: DUE TO SPACE CONSTRAINTS, THESE DATA ARE NOT REPORTED IN DETAIL HERE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the health-risk literature&#x27;s account of how messages at different levels of construal are processed, carried into consumer research on self-regulatory depletion</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>risk estimation measured in the same participants both before and after the construal-level manipulation</label>
        <note>eliminates: between-person differences in baseline risk perception, which a post-only comparison would leave inside the effect · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the moderating effect of construal level on depletion replicated in a further experiment using the standard tasks of the literature - the paper states the result and marks the study &#x27;not reported in this article&#x27;</label>
        <note>eliminates: the effect depending on the particular tasks these authors chose - the replication uses the tasks the field already uses, and its outcome is asserted without being shown · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>depletion effect</label>
        <term>depletion effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>construal level</label>
        <term>construal level</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>self-control</label>
        <term>self-control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>resource accessibility cues</label>
        <term>resource accessibility cues</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A MODERATOR THAT REVERSES THE SIGN RATHER THAN WEAKENING IT: `Quotation withheld.` Not attenuation - inversion. So `depletion reduces self-control` is true at one level of a moderator and false at the other, and an edge carrying `effect_direction: reduces` would be wrong for half of this paper&#x27;s own design. Fourth record today where the axis vocabulary has no single sign to record</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>DEPLETION WORKS THROUGH A SELF-ASSESSMENT, NOT THROUGH A RESOURCE: `Quotation withheld. Hence, they exert less self-control only when they assess themselves as depleted.` The person reads their own tiredness as evidence about how much control they have left, and acts on the reading. That makes the depletion effect a judgement about oneself rather than a fact about oneself - and it predicts that anything which changes what you consult will change the effect, which is exactly what the construal manipulation does</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE CONTROL THAT TURNS THAT FROM AN INTERPRETATION INTO A RESULT: `Quotation withheld.` The resource state is held constant and the effect still disappears. Same tiredness, different use of it. That is the sentence that locates the phenomenon in what the person consults rather than in what they have, and without it the construal result would be compatible with high-level construal simply making people less tired</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>TWO CONSTRUAL LEVELS, TWO DIFFERENT MEDIATORS, ONE DESIGN: `A focus on resource limitations, specifically feelings of tiredness, MEDIATED the effect ... for individuals at LOWER construal levels`, while `At higher construal levels, individuals&#x27; perceptions of the benefits to goals attained by performing the second task mediated the treatment effects.` The moderator does not turn one mechanism up and down - it swaps which mechanism is running. A record that stored only `construal level moderates depletion` would lose the fact that the two arms are not the same process at different strengths</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Fujita et al. (2006), who called for integrating construal level theory with ego-depletion models</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Fujita et al. (2006)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Fujita et al. (2006)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>resource accessibility cues —causes→ self-control</label>
        <term>resource accessibility cues</term>
        <term>self-control</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE DIRECTION IS CONDITIONAL AND THE CONDITION IS IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS: &#x27;At low-level construals&#x27;. Reading a tiredness cue lowers self-control only for people construing concretely; at high construal the same tiredness does nothing, which the third sense quotes. Weight 0.85 for that reason - the edge is true inside one arm of the design and the arm is named in the quote.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exerting self-control on a prior task reduces self-control on a later task (the depletion effect)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>high-level construal reduces the resource focus and can even reverse the depletion effect</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>depleted participants showed poorer self-control than non-depleted participants</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>construal level</label>
        <term>construal level</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>depletion effect</label>
        <term>depletion effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1086/597331.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
