standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 22 of 22 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | deep learning as a field - its concepts, network types, CNN architectures, named challenges, applications and computational substrate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether one review can supply a full understanding of DL, against a review literature in which each paper covers a single aspect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a holistic survey of DL with twelve named challenges and their proposed solutions, a CNN-architecture lineage from AlexNet to HRNet, and a declared search methodology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | critique Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | a field whose knowledge is fragmented across partial reviews, so that assembling a working understanding requires reading past the reviews Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | review Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: review | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | back-propagation multiplies each layer's derivative down the network, so with a squashing activation like the sigmoid, N small derivatives multiplied together make the gradient decline exponentially - and the first layers, which recognise the essential elements of the input, are the ones that stop updating Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | incorporating new information into a trained model interferes with what it already learned; fine-tuning on only the new class leaves performance on the old classes unsuccessful, so continually renewed data forces retraining from scratch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | pre-training transfers representations learned from the source distribution; where the source is natural images and the target is raw medical images the learned representation does not apply, so the transferred model performs no better than one trained from scratch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: domain mismatch defeating transfer | mechanisms[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | many parameter settings satisfy the training objective equally well, so the pipeline does not determine which one is chosen; small modifications force the model toward a completely different solution and hence different predictions in deployment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the paper recommends transfer learning for scarce data and then reports that cross-domain TL does not significantly affect medical imaging performance - its own central recommendation carries a negative result three paragraphs later Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | `RL` is defined as representation learning in the introduction and used for reinforcement learning in the classification section; a reader carrying the first definition forward misreads the second Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | underspecification puts major constraints on the credibility of ML predictions and the proposed remedy - stress tests - requires already knowing how the model can fail Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | CNN performance is greatly influenced by hyper-parameter selection, so any small change affects the result - which limits how much a reported architecture comparison can be attributed to architecture Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | labelling remains the binding constraint: crowdsourced workers cannot annotate medical or biological images, expert labelling is costly and slow, so producing the volume of labels deep networks need is called unfeasible Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | despite the stated transition toward semi-supervised and unsupervised learning, most current deep-learning models still use supervised learning - so the data constraint above is not being relieved Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the architecture of the mammalian visual cortex, carried into network design - the CNN's local receptive fields are presented as a simulation of cells that sense only small regions of a scene Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | pre-trained representations carried from natural-image datasets into medical imaging, and the paper's own report that this particular transfer does not work Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a declared corpus for the review - a stated floor on papers read and their distribution by year - so that 'we focused on recent work' is a number rather than a claim Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a review's coverage claim resting on the reviewers' sense of having read enough · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | declared review objectives - list and define approaches, list architectures, present challenges, assess applications and computational approaches - fixed in advance of the reading Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a review whose scope is settled after the reading, by fixing the five objectives in advance · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | cross-domain transfer learning checked against models trained from scratch - the control that decides whether transfer contributed anything, run by others and reported here Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the reported performance is owed to the pre-trained source domain rather than to the architecture and the target data - models trained from scratch are the comparison that decides it · outcome: absent-stated-about-other | controls[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | representation learning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: representation learning | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | RL Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: RL | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | deep reinforcement learning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: deep reinforcement learning | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | DL Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: DL | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ML Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ML | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | TL Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: TL | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Same-domain TL Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Same-domain TL | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | underspecification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: underspecification | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | stress tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stress tests | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Sparse Connectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Sparse Connectivity | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Weight Sharing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Weight Sharing | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Dropout Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Dropout | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Dying ReLU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Dying ReLU | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | catastrophic forgetting Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: catastrophic forgetting | concepts[13] | 0.85 | the paper's words |
| concepts | vanishing gradient problem Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: vanishing gradient problem | concepts[14] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | overfitting Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: overfitting | concepts[15] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | black box Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: black box | concepts[16] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | imbalanced Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: imbalanced | concepts[17] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | hyper-parameter selection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: hyper-parameter selection | concepts[18] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | lightweight models trained from scratch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[19] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | feature engineering Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: feature engineering | concepts[20] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[21] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[22] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | bag of words (BoW) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: bag of words (BoW) | concepts[23] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | feature extraction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: feature extraction | concepts[24] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | multi-layer data representation architecture Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[25] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | low-level features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: low-level features | concepts[26] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | high-level features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: high-level features | concepts[27] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | unsupervised Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: unsupervised | concepts[28] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | partially supervised (semi-supervised) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[29] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | supervised Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: supervised | concepts[30] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | labeled data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: labeled data | concepts[31] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | recurrent neural networks (RNNs) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: recurrent neural networks (RNNs) | concepts[32] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | convolutional neural networks (CNNs) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: convolutional neural networks (CNNs) | concepts[33] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | deep neural networks (DNNs) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: deep neural networks (DNNs) | concepts[34] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | gated recurrent units (GRUs) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: gated recurrent units (GRUs) | concepts[35] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | long short-term memory (LSTM) approaches Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[36] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | decision boundary Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: decision boundary | concepts[37] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | generative networks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: generative networks | concepts[38] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | dimensionality reduction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dimensionality reduction | concepts[39] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | clustering Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clustering | concepts[40] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | restricted Boltzmann machines Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: restricted Boltzmann machines | concepts[41] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | auto-encoders Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: auto-encoders | concepts[42] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | GANs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GANs | concepts[43] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | reward function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reward function | concepts[44] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | environment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: environment | concepts[45] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | supervised learning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: supervised learning | concepts[46] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | RNN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: RNN | concepts[47] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | sequential data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sequential data | concepts[48] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | short-term memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: short-term memory | concepts[49] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | state (hidden) layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: state (hidden) layer | concepts[50] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | exploding gradient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: exploding gradient | concepts[51] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | LSTM Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: LSTM | concepts[52] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | memory blocks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: memory blocks | concepts[53] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | memory cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: memory cells | concepts[54] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | gated units Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: gated units | concepts[55] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | conventional networks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: conventional networks | concepts[56] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | CNN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CNN | concepts[57] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | equivalent representations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: equivalent representations | concepts[58] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | sparse interactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sparse interactions | concepts[59] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | parameter sharing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: parameter sharing | concepts[60] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | shared weights Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: shared weights | concepts[61] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | local connections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: local connections | concepts[62] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 2D input-data structures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 2D input-data structures | concepts[63] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | convolution layers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: convolution layers | concepts[64] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | sub-sampling (pooling) layers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sub-sampling (pooling) layers | concepts[65] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | FC layers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FC layers | concepts[66] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | feature maps Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: feature maps | concepts[67] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | softmax Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: softmax | concepts[68] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | support vector machines (SVMs) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: support vector machines (SVMs) | concepts[69] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | kernel weight Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: kernel weight | concepts[70] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | convolutional operation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: convolutional operation | concepts[71] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | feature map Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: feature map | concepts[72] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | stride Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stride | concepts[73] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | padding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: padding | concepts[74] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | convolutional layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: convolutional layer | concepts[75] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | convolutional filters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: convolutional filters | concepts[76] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | pooling layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: pooling layer | concepts[77] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | pooling methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: pooling methods | concepts[78] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | max pooling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: max pooling | concepts[79] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | min pooling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: min pooling | concepts[80] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | global average pooling (GAP) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: global average pooling (GAP) | concepts[81] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | global max pooling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: global max pooling | concepts[82] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | activation function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: activation function | concepts[83] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Sigmoid Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Sigmoid | concepts[84] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Tanh Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Tanh | concepts[85] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ReLU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ReLU | concepts[86] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Leaky ReLU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Leaky ReLU | concepts[87] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Noisy ReLU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Noisy ReLU | concepts[88] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Parametric Linear Units Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Parametric Linear Units | concepts[89] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Fully Connected Layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Fully Connected Layer | concepts[90] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | loss functions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: loss functions | concepts[91] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Cross-Entropy or Softmax Loss Function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[92] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | log loss function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: log loss function | concepts[93] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Euclidean Loss Function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Euclidean Loss Function | concepts[94] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | mean square error Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mean square error | concepts[95] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Hinge Loss Function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Hinge Loss Function | concepts[96] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Drop-Weights Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Drop-Weights | concepts[97] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Data Augmentation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Data Augmentation | concepts[98] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Batch Normalization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Batch Normalization | concepts[99] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | internal covariance shift Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: internal covariance shift | concepts[100] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | over-fitted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: over-fitted | concepts[101] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | under-fitted model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: under-fitted model | concepts[102] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | just-fitted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: just-fitted | concepts[103] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | learning rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: learning rate | concepts[104] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | training epoch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: training epoch | concepts[105] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Batch Gradient Descent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Batch Gradient Descent | concepts[106] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Stochastic Gradient Descent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Stochastic Gradient Descent | concepts[107] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Mini-batch Gradient Descent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Mini-batch Gradient Descent | concepts[108] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam) | concepts[109] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Adam Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Adam | concepts[110] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | learning strategy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: learning strategy | concepts[111] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | residual links Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: residual links | concepts[112] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | deep network convergence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: deep network convergence | concepts[113] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | highway network Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: highway network | concepts[114] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ResNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ResNet | concepts[115] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | DenseNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: DenseNet | concepts[116] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | CapsuleNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CapsuleNet | concepts[117] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | CapsNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CapsNet | concepts[118] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | High-Resolution Network (HRNet) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: High-Resolution Network (HRNet) | concepts[119] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | HRNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: HRNet | concepts[120] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | training data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: training data | concepts[121] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | simulated data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: simulated data | concepts[122] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | data augmentation techniques Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: data augmentation techniques | concepts[123] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | data-space solutions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: data-space solutions | concepts[124] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | model interpretability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: model interpretability | concepts[125] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | perturbation-based approaches Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: perturbation-based approaches | concepts[126] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | back-propagation-based techniques Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: back-propagation-based techniques | concepts[127] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | score of confidence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: score of confidence | concepts[128] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | temperature scaling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: temperature scaling | concepts[129] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | incorporating new information into a plain DL model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[130] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | parameter pruning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: parameter pruning | concepts[131] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | knowledge distillation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: knowledge distillation | concepts[132] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | compact convolution filters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: compact convolution filters | concepts[133] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | low-rank factorization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: low-rank factorization | concepts[134] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | lack of training data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lack of training data | concepts[135] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | stress tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stress tests | concepts[136] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | classification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: classification | concepts[137] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | localization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: localization | concepts[138] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | detection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: detection | concepts[139] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | segmentation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: segmentation | concepts[140] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | registration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: registration | concepts[141] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Target Selection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Target Selection | concepts[142] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Feature Extraction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Feature Extraction | concepts[143] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Feature Matching Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Feature Matching | concepts[144] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Pose Optimization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Pose Optimization | concepts[145] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | CPU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CPU | concepts[146] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | GPU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GPU | concepts[147] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | FPGA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FPGA | concepts[148] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Accuracy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Accuracy | concepts[149] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Sensitivity or Recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Sensitivity or Recall | concepts[150] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Specificity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Specificity | concepts[151] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Precision Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Precision | concepts[152] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | F1-Score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: F1-Score | concepts[153] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | J Score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: J Score | concepts[154] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Youdens J statistic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Youdens J statistic | concepts[155] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Area Under the ROC Curve Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Area Under the ROC Curve | concepts[156] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | RNN category Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: RNN category | concepts[157] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | increasing the stride value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: increasing the stride value | concepts[158] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | a feature map of lower dimensions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: a feature map of lower dimensions | concepts[159] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | sub-sampling layers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sub-sampling layers | concepts[160] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | a reduction in the network parameters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[161] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | how confident the model is in its prediction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[162] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | overfitting problem Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: overfitting problem | concepts[163] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: visual cortex | concepts[164] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | exploding gradient and vanishing problems Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[165] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | model compression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: model compression | concepts[166] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | DNN training Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: DNN training | concepts[167] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | inference accelerators Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: inference accelerators | concepts[168] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Sensitivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Sensitivity | concepts[169] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Recall | concepts[170] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| unhoused_relations | CNN → visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. CNN structure is described as inspired by visual-cortex organization; inspired-by is absent from the eight governed types. — the relation stated: Convolutional neural networks Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | LSTM → exploding gradient and vanishing problems Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. LSTM is presented as handling the recurrent network's exploding/vanishing-gradient issue; mitigates is absent from the eight governed types. — the relation stated: Recurrent neural networks Typical unfolded RNN diagram Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | parameter pruning → model compression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Parameter pruning is one of four methods used for model compression; method-for is absent, and the prose does not support forcing an ontological part-of edge. — the relation stated: Model compression Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | knowledge distillation → model compression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Knowledge distillation trains a compact model from a larger model for compression; method-for is absent from the governed types. — the relation stated: Model compression Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | registration → Target Selection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Target Selection is the first named stage of image registration; stage-of is absent from the eight governed types. — the relation stated: Registration Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | registration → Pose Optimization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Pose Optimization is the distance-minimization stage of image registration; stage-of is absent from the eight governed types. — the relation stated: Registration Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | GPU → DNN training Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. The GPU is described as optimized for DNN training; optimized-for is absent from the eight governed types. — the relation stated: CPU-based approach Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | FPGA → inference accelerators Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. FPGAs are commonly used to implement inference accelerators; used-for is absent from the governed relation types. — the relation stated: FPGA-based approach Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Sensitivity → Recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Sensitivity and Recall are presented as alternate names for one metric; the slash/or naming construction lacks a governed same-as cue, so the alias is filed unhoused. — the relation stated: Evaluation metrics Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | CapsuleNet → CapsNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. CapsNet is the short form used for CapsuleNet; abbreviation expansion is absent from the eight governed types. — the relation stated: CapsuleNet Quotation withheld | unhoused_relations[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | RL - REPRESENTATION LEARNING. Given in the introduction as another name for deep learning itself Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | RL - REINFORCEMENT LEARNING. Given 16,670 characters later as another name for deep reinforcement learning, a distinct technique the same paper classifies separately. Neither definition acknowledges the other Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | transfer learning - AS RECOMMENDED: enhances accuracy across pattern recognition and computer vision, and is the paper's answer to insufficient training data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | transfer learning - AS MEASURED ACROSS DISSIMILAR DOMAINS: does not significantly affect performance, with models trained from scratch performing nearly as well. Same technique, opposite verdict, and the disambiguator is source-target similarity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Feature engineering versus deep representation learning - conventional ML constructs task-specific features manually, whereas DL extracts layered discriminative features automatically Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Recurrent state - the hidden layer functions as short-term memory carrying information from earlier elements of a sequence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | CNN locality - sparse local connections and shared weights exploit image structure while reducing parameter and memory requirements Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Pooling trade-off - subsampling reduces parameters and computation but can discard the location of a detected feature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Activation-function family - ReLU reduces computation but can permanently deactivate neurons; leaky, noisy, and parametric variants modify that behavior Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Fitting-state distinction - over-fitting fails on unseen data, under-fitting fails to learn enough, and just-fitting succeeds on both training and test sets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Dense connectivity - DenseNet concatenates all preceding feature maps, improving information flow at the cost of more feature maps and parameter expense Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Uncertainty calibration - raw softmax probabilities may be overconfident and require post-scaling before they function as reliable confidence estimates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Compression taxonomy - parameter pruning, knowledge distillation, compact filters, and low-rank factorization reduce different sources of model cost Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Application-task boundary - localization uses one bounding box, detection may use many, segmentation outlines pixels, and registration aligns images Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[13] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Hardware specialization - CPU favors memory and generality, GPU favors parallel DNN training, and FPGA favors configurable low-latency inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[14] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Metric-role distinction - evaluation metrics guide classifier selection during training and assess efficiency on hidden data during testing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[15] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → existing DL review papers, each of which addresses a single application or topic and so leaves an overall lack of knowledge about the field Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the 2020 Google identification of underspecification as a distinct failure mode of ML pipelines Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → transfer learning from ImageNet as the standard remedy for insufficient training data in medical imaging Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | DL —part-of→ ML Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · the relation stated: deep learning is a subset of machine learning | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | representation learning —same-as→ RL Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · the relation stated: given in apposition in the introduction also in: representation learning · RL | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | deep reinforcement learning —same-as→ RL Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · the relation stated: given as another name 16,670 characters later, for a different concept also in: deep reinforcement learning · RL | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | TL —contrasted-with→ lightweight models trained from scratch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: performance on medical imaging tasks when source and target domains differ · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): performance on medical imaging tasks when source and target domains differ · the relation stated: cross-domain transfer does not beat training from scratch on medical imaging also in: TL · lightweight models trained from scratch | concept_edges[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | RNN —contrasted-with→ conventional networks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The review explicitly contrasts recurrent use of sequential state with conventional networks. also in: RNN · conventional networks | concept_edges[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | CNN —contrasted-with→ RNN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper directly compares their power and feature compatibility. | concept_edges[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | gated recurrent units (GRUs) —part-of→ RNN category Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The RNN category is explicitly said to include GRUs. also in: gated recurrent units (GRUs) · RNN category | concept_edges[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | long short-term memory (LSTM) approaches —part-of→ RNN category Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The RNN category is explicitly said to include LSTM approaches. | concept_edges[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | convolutional filters —part-of→ convolutional layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The convolutional layer is stated to consist of a collection of filters. also in: convolutional filters · convolutional layer | concept_edges[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | max pooling —part-of→ pooling methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Max pooling is explicitly included among pooling methods. also in: max pooling · pooling methods | concept_edges[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | global average pooling (GAP) —part-of→ pooling methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: GAP is explicitly included among pooling methods. also in: global average pooling (GAP) · pooling methods | concept_edges[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | increasing the stride value —causes→ a feature map of lower dimensions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The lower-dimensional map is stated to result from increasing stride. | concept_edges[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | sub-sampling layers —causes→ a reduction in the network parameters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Down-sampling is stated to lead to fewer parameters. | concept_edges[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Cross-Entropy or Softmax Loss Function —same-as→ log loss function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The review explicitly gives log loss as another name. | concept_edges[13] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Drop-Weights —contrasted-with→ Dropout Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Weights rather than neurons are dropped; the paper calls this the only difference.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but Drop-Weights is 'highly similar to dropout', differing in what is dropped; contrasted-with is loose. also in: Drop-Weights · Dropout | concept_edges[14] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Adam —is-a→ learning strategy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper directly classifies Adam as a learning strategy. also in: Adam · learning strategy | concept_edges[15] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | ResNet —contrasted-with→ highway network Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The review contrasts ResNet's always-open parameter-free shortcuts with highway gates. also in: ResNet · highway network | concept_edges[16] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | High-Resolution Network (HRNet) —same-as→ HRNet Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The long name is explicitly followed by the short name. also in: High-Resolution Network (HRNet) · HRNet | concept_edges[17] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | catastrophic forgetting —operationalised-as→ incorporating new information into a plain DL model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper gives an explicit definition. · the relation stated: Catastrophic forgetting Quotation withheld
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'This' = catastrophic forgetting (the heading immediately before); the definition is stated. | concept_edges[18] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | score of confidence —operationalised-as→ how confident the model is in its prediction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper explicitly defines the confidence score. | concept_edges[19] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | FPGA —contrasted-with→ GPU Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The processors are directly compared on floating-point performance and configuration. | concept_edges[20] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | J Score —same-as→ Youdens J statistic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper explicitly states the alternate metric name. also in: J Score · Youdens J statistic | concept_edges[21] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | transfer learning from a dissimilar domain does not significantly affect medical imaging performance; models trained from scratch do nearly as well Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | underspecification means small modifications force a model toward a completely different solution and different deployment predictions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the remedy proposed for underspecification requires already understanding how the model can fail Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | CNN performance is greatly influenced by hyper-parameter selection; any small change affects it. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | most current deep-learning models still use supervised learning despite the stated transition toward semi- and unsupervised methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a ranking-type metric that, in contrast to probability and threshold metrics, exposes the entire classifier ranking performance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: AUC | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a subset of ML, inspired by the information processing patterns of the human brain, which requires no human-designed rules and maps input to labels from data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: DL | content_tags.definitions[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | only a few weights between two adjacent layers, against fully connected networks where every neuron links to every neuron in the next layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Sparse Connectivity | content_tags.definitions[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | no weights allocated between any two neurons of neighbouring layers; one set of weights operates over every pixel of the input matrix Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Weight Sharing | content_tags.definitions[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | neurons randomly dropped during each training epoch, distributing feature-selection power across the whole group and forcing independent features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Dropout | content_tags.definitions[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | incorporating new information into a plain DL model by interfering with the learned information - fine-tuning on a new class breaks the old ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: catastrophic forgetting | content_tags.definitions[5] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the reason ML models show surprisingly poor behaviour when tested in real-world applications despite passing their own validation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: underspecification | content_tags.definitions[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | using images that look similar to the target dataset for training - e.g. X-rays of other chest diseases before fine-tuning on COVID-19 chest X-rays Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Same-domain TL | content_tags.definitions[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | papers reviewed from 2020, of more than 300 total Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the floor on the number of papers reviewed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AUC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: AUC | content_tags.statistics[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Sensitivity or Recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Sensitivity or Recall | content_tags.statistics[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Specificity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Specificity | content_tags.statistics[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | hyper-parameter selection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: hyper-parameter selection | content_tags.variables[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | amount of data Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: amount of data | content_tags.variables[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.