standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
"What Do We Know about Hope in Nursing Care?": A Synthesis of Concept Analysis Studies.
Abstract
Hope is a central concept within the nursing literature, which is crucial towards the development of nursing knowledge. Nursing teams play a crucial role in exploring the meaning of hope and promoting hope among patients and their families. This study aims to synthesize concept analysis studies of hope in the context of nursing care and to propose an evidence-based update of the definition of hope in the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP ® ). Method: method↗This is a literature review, involving the synthesis of studies concerning the concept analysis of hope in nursing practice. Peer-reviewed articles with fully accessible Portuguese or English text were considered. As we aimed to include a historical perspective of the concept, no restriction upon the time of publication was set. Articles were selected in March 2022 and updated in July 2023 using the Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were “hope” AND “concept” AND “analysis” AND “nurs*”. Only articles written in English or Portuguese were included. Two reviewers conducted the research synthesis and report independently to minimize the risk of bias in the included studies. This paper adheres to the PRISMA checklist. To clarify the concept of hope as perceived by patients and develop hope as an evidence-based nursing concept, 13 studies were reviewed. The concept of hope, its attributes, antecedents, and consequences, as well as similar concepts, were studied by nurses and synthesized into a definition. The identified antecedents include pivotal life events, stressful stimuli, and experiencing satisfaction with life. claim_typeThe analysis of its attributes, antecedents, and consequences has contributed to understanding its relevance in nursing care and provided a proposed update of hope in the ICNP ® . This review provides conceptual clarity on how hope is defined and used in nursing practice and the potential factors that may impact the promotion of hope to provide opportunities for future nursing research.
Keywords: holistic health, hope, nursing diagnosis, nursing theory, review literature, nurse-patient relations, therapeutical approaches
1. Introduction
Hope is an integral part of being human and a dynamic and multidimensional phenomenon with numerous meanings. The concept of hope has been studied extensively in many academic fields, including philosophy, psychology, and medicine, although it only appeared in the nursing literature in the 1980s, which defined the concept for specific populations and inspired the first strategies. Since then, hope research and its inclusion in nursing care have become a priority [ 1 ]. Hope has become an important and crucial factor in the care of people with health problems and their families [ 2 ], with three main focuses: (a) hope as an inner power that facilitates transcending the present situation and conceiving a reality-based expectation of a better future for oneself or others; (b) hope as a state of being, characterized by the anticipation of a good and improved state, or a release from perceived entrapment or a human experience [ 1 , 3 ]; (c) hope as a personal experience, centered on personal responsibility and convictions about the world and our chances of achieving what we want [ 4 ].
sensesScholars agree on describing hope as an idiosyncratic complex process that is essential to life, future-oriented, deliberate, and highly personalized [ 2 , 5 ]. It also entails the presence of substantial goals that are both desired and achievable, as well as the motivation and capacity to make judgments and choices [ 6 ].
Dufault and Martocchio provide the most extensive analysis of hope in the nursing literature [ 7 ]. concepts↗They define hope as a dynamic process, a multidimensional “life force” that anticipates achieving a practically attainable and personally relevant good, with some degree of confidence despite marked uncertainty. concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesWithin the hoping process, the authors differentiate between generalized hope (a more global longing for some positive, yet undefined, future) and particularized hope (focused on a specific goal) [ 7 , 8 ].
sensesFarran et al. [ 9 ] conceptualized hope as a psychological and cognitive process that can possess spiritual or transcendent dimensions. It involves the formation of positive expectations and optimistic beliefs about future outcomes [ 9 ]. These positive expectations are influenced by various factors, including self-belief (confidence in one’s abilities and potential), trust in others (confidence in the reliability and support of others), and adherence to a religious doctrine (faith in a higher power or spiritual principles) [ 9 ].
Hope emerges as a forward-looking process that involves a dynamic interplay among cognition, action, emotions, and interpersonal connections. This process is oriented toward the pursuit of future accomplishments that hold personal significance [ 10 ].
concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesThe International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP ® ) defines hope as “the feeling of having possibilities, a trust in others or in the future, a zest for life, an expression of reasons and will to live, and inner peace and optimism, associated with setting goals and mobilizing energy” [ 11 ] (p. 1), which can constitute a nursing diagnosis (despair), intervention (promoting hope), or outcome (hope). The continuous updating of this classification ensures its usefulness, relevance, and ongoing quality, as well as supporting future health models and nursing. Regarding the definition of the diagnosis of hope proposed by the ICNP ® , recent scientific findings point to a better clarification of the concept. In this way, nurses can consider this focus more easily, considering its attributes when making the initial assessment and monitoring nursing care in this area.
Hope research in nursing care has focused on different populations, life spans, and stages of the health–disease transition process [ 1 , 12 ], varying according to the experienced events and cultural environments [ 13 ]. concepts↗Several studies on hope are grounded in nursing’s totality paradigm. In this paradigm, nurses view individuals not just as a collection of isolated symptoms or medical conditions but as whole beings with physical, emotional, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions. Nurses consider the interplay of these various aspects of a person’s life when providing care, aiming to address the individual’s needs in a comprehensive and integrated manner and are frequently developed to promote healing and quality of life through interventions with specific individuals or certain health conditions [ 2 ]. Some examples include elders [ 14 ], individuals with chronic medical conditions [ 15 , 16 ], children and adolescents [ 13 , 17 ], caregivers and spouses [ 17 , 18 ], homeless people [ 19 ], and people with mental health disorders [ 20 , 21 ].
Recently, there has been an increased interest in the promotion of hope in advanced clinical nursing practice to aid and support clients in managing the complexity of physical and emotional suffering. mechanisms↗The nurse’s ability to foster hope necessitates a deliberate approach and the establishment of circumstances for therapeutic interaction through interpersonal engagement. This occurs in response to situations characterized by suffering, uncertainty, or emotional distress, ultimately leading to mutual personal growth for both the nurse and the client [ 22 ]. Some of the hope-promoting strategies included making a meaningful impact on their patients’ lives, establishing deep connections with them, accompanying them on their journey, and gradually building trust over time. Additionally, the nurses emphasized that the way they approached their tasks and interactions was more important than the specific actions they took [ 23 ]. In this regard, the nursing team plays a crucial role in exploring the meaning of hope and promoting hope in patients and their families. Promoting hope is a professional responsibility and a moral and ethical obligation, which is foundational to all nursing care [ 24 ].
There is extensive research on the topic of hope, including several concept analyses, justifying our need to synthesize the evidence, allowing the discipline to attain a clearer comprehension of the concept and contributing to illuminating what “hides in veiled shades of obscurity” [ 2 ]. concepts↗A concept analysis is a valuable approach used in nursing to bring clarity to concepts that are often used with ambiguity. By subjecting these concepts to thorough examination, nurses can achieve a heightened level of insight and a more refined delineation of their role and significance within the scope of their profession. A better understanding of the attributes of a concept makes it possible to increase the accuracy of nursing diagnoses and to target nursing interventions to human responses in health and disease processes. The primary objective of a concept analysis is to identify and explore the essential properties of a concept within the nursing field. Through this process, the aim is to achieve a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of the concept’s meaning and its inherent characteristics, thereby providing a more precise and explanatory framework for its application in nursing practice [ 25 ]. A concept analysis, in essence, involves the methodical deconstruction and examination of a particular phenomenon or concept. Undertaking this analytical process allows us to gain a more profound understanding of the concept’s intricacies and nuances, thereby enhancing our comprehension of the essential aspects and significance of quality in bedside nursing care [ 26 ].
object_of_studyTherefore, our aims were: (1) to synthesize the research regarding concept analyses of hope in the context of nursing care; (2) to propose an update for the definition of hope in the ICNP ® .
2. Materials and Methods
This focused literature review ultimately aimed to provide an updated definition of hope based on articles that use concept analyses to characterize the concept of hope. This review was conducted and reported independently by two reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [ 27 ].
2.1. Review Question
research_questionThe question of this review is what are the attributes, antecedents, and consequences that define the concept of hope in nursing care?
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
This literature review uses theoretical–methodological models describing the concept of hope in nursing practice. Peer-reviewed articles with fully accessible Portuguese or English text were considered. As we aimed to include a historical perspective of the concept, no restriction upon the time of publication was set. We included concept analyses covering all ages, settings, contexts, and study designs. No filters were established for the year of publication. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) grey literature sources, such as theses, dissertations, and conference proceedings; (b) papers on hope or hoping of nurses or other allied healthcare professions, since one of the aims was to contribute to the nursing taxonomy, which requires a patient-centered approach.
2.3. Search and Selection Strategy
In March 2022, the authors (M.A., Z.C.) searched four databases: Medline (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Scopus. We updated the search in July 2023. The key Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used included ‘hope’ combined with the free-text keywords ‘concept’ and ‘analyses,’ as well as the truncations ‘nur*’ and ‘hope*’ with the Boolean operator AND. The terms were searched in the title field. The bibliographies of selected articles were searched manually to improve the retrieval of relevant articles. The process of study selection is summarized using a PRISMA flow chart [ 27 ] in Figure 1 .
PRISMA flow chart of the study selection [ 27 ] (adapted to https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/prisma/ , accessed on 1 June 2023).
2.4. Data Extraction
To eliminate duplicates and aid each reviewer with independent screening, reference manager software was employed. Two reviewers independently read the titles and abstracts of the papers chosen for inclusion. When there was a disagreement or an abstract met the inclusion criteria, it was retrieved for full-text reading. A spreadsheet was shared among the reviewers that included the article’s authors, year of publication, and context; the antecedents, consequents, and definition or attributes of the hope concept; and the empirical referents ( Table 1 ).
A narrative synthesis was used as a methodological strategy to clarify and construct a conceptual model of hope [ 28 ].
The synthesis of concept analysis studies on hope.
2.5. Data Analysis
The studies were synthesized separately by two researchers while considering the main categories needed for the synthesis—antecedents, consequents, and attributes. To ensure the study’s validity and reliability, the procedure was overseen by researchers acquainted with this method of analysis.
3. Results
content_tagsA total of 322 articles were initially identified. After removing duplicates, 218 titles or abstracts were excluded were deemed irrelevant, resulting in 17 articles whose full text was read. Four of these articles were excluded as they did not comply with the inclusion criteria; specifically, they did not use a conceptual analysis or evaluate other concepts (e.g., hopelessness, resilience, spirituality). content_tagsIn total, 13 articles were included after data extraction.
Those articles were published from 1991 to 2021 in English. content_tagsThe theoretical–methodological model used most often was Walker and Avant’s [ 40 ] concept analysis model [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Among other models used were the evolutionary approach of Rodgers [ 35 , 41 ], Wilson and Norris’ method [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], and Morse’s concept analysis [ 26 ].
Different populations and clinical settings were included in this analysis: palliative care from Portugal [ 29 ] and the United Kingdom [ 33 ]; patients with a terminal illness from New Zealand [ 41 ] and Nigeria [ 30 ]; adolescents with cancer from the USA [ 37 ]; parents of critically ill newborns [ 31 ]; psychiatric population [ 35 ]; patients with early-stage dementia [ 32 ]; families and pediatric caregivers during a child’s serious illness [ 26 ]; orthopedic and trauma settings from the United Kingdom [ 25 ]; elderly adults with chronic heart failure from the USA [ 39 ] ( Table 1 ).
Some authors [ 36 , 38 , 39 ] have elucidated the concept of hope with a review of definitions and conceptual uses. Additionally, another author provided mutually exclusive theoretical definitions of four concepts simultaneously—spirituality, hope, acceptance, and self-transcendence—highlighting their interrelationships and distinguishing characteristics [ 34 ]. In the process of result formulation, we conducted a review of the antecedents, attributes, and consequences of hope ( Figure 2 ). concepts↗For the antecedents, we identified variables that precede or influence hope, such as life events, personal characteristics, or environmental factors. concepts↗Regarding the attributes, we established clear definitions and quantified the constituent elements or features that comprise the construct of hope, including agency, pathways of thinking, and emotional experiences. concepts↗The consequences of hope determined the outcomes and effects associated with hope, encompassing both positive and negative manifestations [ 22 ].
The synthesis model of hope.
sensesFigure 2 illustrates the link between antecedents, attributes, and consequences in a synthesis model, resulting in two main dimensions: “hope is a dynamic emotional state” and “hope is central to the process of adaptation”. These dimensions highlight that hope is not a static emotion (dynamic emotional state); it changes over time and plays a central role in how individuals adapt to and navigate the challenges and uncertainties of life (adaptative process). For this reason, it serves as a motivating and adaptive force that can help people persevere and thrive in various situations.
3.1. The Antecedents of Hope
The data indicate that hope is a comprehensive concept that requires support to achieve positive outcomes [ 39 , 42 ]. Antecedents of hope may consist of a pivotal life event or a stressful stimulus, such as loss, major decisions, hardship, suffering, pain, despair, and uncertainty due to illness, chronic diseases, or terminal illness. Antecedents of hope may also include a predicament or threat [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 41 ], such as an uncertain prognosis, experience of a trusting and loving relationship [ 26 , 29 , 41 ], a successful learning experience, reaching a goal [ 32 , 35 , 37 ], and connectedness with others and God or spirituality [ 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 ]. Antecedents such as “trust, interpersonal relationships, effective communication, and relationships with health professionals” underline the importance of holistic care [ 30 , 41 ] (p. 1029). It is crucial to consider and prioritize these aspects, as they play a vital role in the overall well-being and satisfaction of patients or individuals receiving healthcare services.
3.2. The Attributes of Hope
Hope was defined and described in several ways: an expectation of positive outcome [ 25 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 41 ]; an orientation towards the present and future [ 26 , 36 ]; a multidimensional and dynamic process of goal identification [ 25 , 26 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 ]; a personal quality [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 41 ]; a cognitive decision-making process [ 25 ]; spirituality [ 26 , 41 ]; a feeling of comfort and safety [ 30 , 41 ]; an interpersonal relationship and feeling of belonging and being needed [ 36 , 41 ]; a legacy [ 41 ]; an energy–action towards the future [ 26 , 31 , 34 , 36 ]; an ongoing adjustment to personal and observed experiences during illness and loss to daily living [ 32 , 33 , 35 ]; a sense of limitation [ 39 ]; a coping strategy [ 26 , 29 , 37 , 38 ]; mutuality experiences [ 41 ]; a positive social support [ 37 ].
These attributes frame a more pragmatic view (see the Supplementary File ) and can help understand how nurses might identify hope in the continuum of care.
3.3. The Consequences of Hope
Possible consequences of the concept indicated in the literature included the following: returning to a more stable life, with better physical health and quality of life [ 26 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]; finding hope and meaning in life [ 29 , 34 , 37 , 38 ]; overcoming a difficult situation and obtaining greater healing and satisfaction [ 29 , 38 ]; facing uncertain future constructively [ 29 , 36 , 38 , 41 ]; accepting a health condition [ 29 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 41 ]; coping with pain and suffering [ 29 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 38 ]; promoting a sense of renewal, peace, and legacy, and developing new strategies and a positive outlook for family and friends [ 29 , 36 , 38 ]; survival [ 29 , 35 , 36 , 38 ]; positive changes in self-concept and growth opportunities [ 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 ]; developing new feelings of safety or comfort, formulating new and realistic goals, and promoting confidence in the future and trust in the support from others [ 30 , 34 , 37 , 39 , 41 ]; faith and spirituality [ 35 ]; a winning position [ 34 ]. Faith and the perception of the transcendent emerge as consequences, as they become resources for individuals, particularly in times of uncertainty and vulnerability.
3.4. Updating the Definition of Hope
contributionThe authors compared classifications (NANDA international diagnoses, ICNP ® axis, and similar terms) and proposed a new definition for the hope diagnosis and a new term for the ICNP ® ( Table 2 ).
Proposed update of the definition of hope in the ICNP ® .
The data suggest that is possible to update the definition of hope in nursing practice in the ICNP ® [ 11 ], providing a new insight into the relationship between hope and nursing practice and focusing on how people endure and sustain a positive outlook on life, despite their difficulties. Compared to the ICNP ® definition, which is more concise and emphasizes certain emotional aspects of hope, our proposed definition of hope is more detailed, multidimensional, and contextually flexible. Our proposed definition also explicitly includes a cognitive element and highlights the connection between hope and the present, as well as the future.
4. Discussion
phenomenonThis analysis supports the theory that hope is a multidimensional concept, described as an emotion, state, and experiential process [ 10 ]. Based on the concept’s antecedents, attributes, and consequences, some authors formulated a conceptual definition. From a chronological perspective, several definitions have arisen: (a) hope as the anticipation of a positive possible future, accompanied by desire and expectation [ 38 ]; (b) hope as an energetic cognitive state, an action-oriented expectation of a positive future aim or outcome [ 25 ]; (c) hope as dynamic, multidimensional energy that promotes positive expectations, motivating actions to attain personally significant and realistic future goals [ 43 ]; (d) hope as the reassuring or life-sustaining, realistic belief in a positive future for self or others [ 31 ]; (e) “it is a belief in something positive without any guaranteed expectation that it will occur” [ 25 ] (p. 410); (f) hope in terminal illness represents “a calm, emotional, global focus on the hopes of loved ones” [ 42 ] (p. 458); (g) hope is “a multidimensional construct arising from our memories, beliefs, and values”, which permeates all our activities and thoughts, strengthening the spirit and facilitating behavior that promotes the desired outcome or level of comfort, while impacting life quality [ 44 ]; (h) hope is an expectation of a sustained good and improved state, or a release from perceived entanglement [ 45 ]; (i) hope is crucial to the adjustment processes in health–illness transitions [ 34 , 39 ].
Hope is a process with individual value derived from lived experiences [ 2 ]. Some authors report behaviors highlighting aspects such as self-therapy [ 34 ], medication adherence, a sense of well-being, a positive attitude, and self-management despite physical limitations [ 34 ]. The findings from studies indicate that hope plays a crucial role in sustaining determination and resilience, even in the absence of tangible positive evidence. Additionally, hope can broaden an individual’s perspective, opening new possibilities and potential pathways for coping and achieving positive outcomes [ 46 ]. Consequently, these findings would provide valuable empirical support, offering caregivers the opportunity to refine their abilities in fostering and strengthening hope in individuals during their routine interactions and experiences.
The empirical referents identified in six studies are helpful for decision-making in nursing care. Hope has been measured both qualitatively and quantitatively. From a qualitative perspective, the interview is the most used method to understand the experience of hope in different populations. From a quantitative perspective, the research has used relevant hope assessment instruments, including the Hope Communication Tool, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Snyder Hope Scale, Hopelessness Assessment in Illness, Children’s Hope Scale, Stoner Hope Scale, Hope Assessment Guide, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Hopefulness Scale for Adolescents.
content_tagsThe instruments used most often in the analyzed studies were the Herth Hope Index, Miller Hope Scale, and Nowotny Hope Scale. It should be noted that some of these instruments do not meet the gold standards of psychometric evaluation [ 45 ]. For that reason, is required to improve the quality of available hope scales and adapt them to different cultural scenarios.
The obtained results build upon evidence from conceptual analyses to clarify the concept of hope. This approach should be applied further in nursing research, contributing to a clearer understanding of how to improve hope in vulnerable people in clinical settings. In this sense, advocating and fostering hope might be a useful resource that allows people to maintain or regain their well-being [ 47 , 48 ].
This review contributes to advancing the comprehension of the concept of hope. This study’s antecedents, critical attributes, and consequences of hope offer valuable insights that can benefit nurses working in diverse healthcare environments. By utilizing this knowledge, nurses can more effectively recognize and grasp the experience of hope in their patients, thereby enhancing their ability to provide optimal care and support.
4.1. Strengths and Study Limitations
The narrow focus of the topic, the exhaustive search for evidence, the criterion-based selection of relevant evidence, and the objective summary offered for the conceptual hope map are all strengths.
limitationsThe review was not conducted using a systematic approach, and the gray literature, unpublished academic articles, and editorials were not included. limitationsAdditionally, a small number of databases were used to identify suitable research.
The results obtained need to be framed with caution, even though they provide important information for clarifying the concept of hope. limitationsBuilding a synthesis matrix to represent an ever-expanding and complex set of literature requires some degree of simplification and subjectivity. Therefore, this overview may evolve for new insights and should serve as the first step toward a more complete and comprehensive understanding of hope.
concepts↗concept_edgesThe presence of hope, even in stressful and life-changing events, often leads to a sense of control, optimism, and a new purpose in life. concepts↗However, having false hope about possible outcomes and denial of reality as a coping mechanism because one cannot accept reality is an unrealistic way to improve the situation. It is, therefore, vital to learn to distinguish between potentially feasible and impossible goals of self-change to avoid overconfidence and false hopes that ultimately lead to failure and suffering. In some of the studies reviewed, unrealistic hope is essential to consider when evaluating hope, requiring further research through a more widespread understanding. Additionally, it could be worthwhile to offer an interdisciplinary overview of different perspectives of hope across the different scientific disciplines.
4.2. Implications for Nursing Practice and Research
Applying this review’s results to real-life decision-making in care management is of central importance. This may result in specific nursing procedures to assess the existence or absence of hope in distinct groups. Thus, nurses might help clients discover and build successful hope-inspiring strategies [ 6 ], as well as achieve their desired abilities and goals. Nurses can take advantage of reflection on their clinical practice to identify their viewpoints on hope and how they incorporate hope-inspiring approaches into their professional work. These reflections could play a vital role in fostering fresh or enriched perspectives on hope through descriptive analyses, self-awareness, emotional examination, critical thinking, syntheses, and evaluations.
The significance of hope in nursing practice is well-established, extending beyond a professional responsibility to a moral and ethical obligation for all nurses. Nursing curriculums should include teachings on hope, its assessment, and how to integrate hope-inspiring strategies into patient care plans. Clinical experiences should focus on empathetic connections with diverse clients, using the term “hope” comfortably. The proposed hope process model can serve as a framework for assessing hope and selecting appropriate nursing strategies based on the client’s phase of hoping [ 49 ]. In advanced nursing education, a comprehensive approach to promoting hope should be adopted. This could involve incorporating hope intervention programs into clinical practicums and program evaluation courses to assess their effectiveness. Additionally, conducting doctoral research on the phenomenon of hope could yield valuable insights for future studies, contribute to the development of knowledge, and enhance evidence-based nursing practices.
This hope synthesis review is also a significant subject for nursing research. Despite the small number of studies analyzing the concept of hope, the knowledge already developed around its attributes, antecedents, and consequences is relevant. For this reason, it is important to conduct clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and activities that promote hope [ 6 ]. The synthesis of the various components of the concept of hope raises the opportunity to construct assessment instruments that measure its attributes. The continuity of research about the concept of hope in nursing care and the increase in its conceptual understanding will influence methodological decisions, as well as the boundary variables, in experimental clinical studies. These studies will validate the proposed conceptual model.
The research should also focus on hopefulness mediators, such as general well-being, social support, spiritual well-being, coping responses, gender differences, and cultural issues. Given that most studies occurred in so-called “Western” countries [ 8 ], future studies should examine unexplored contexts and consider how different aspects of hope have a role in different settings, cultures, and groups (e.g., obstetric care settings, prison contexts, community settings, and ghettos).
5. Conclusions
This study’s primary purpose was to synthesize prior research components on concept analyses of hope in nursing and provide an updated definition, broader and more contemporary antecedents and attributes, and more specific consequences of hope in nursing than earlier concept analyses. This synthesis has provided detailed information regarding the causes, characteristics, and effects of hope, as well as vital insights into the needs of various groups and a deeper understanding of the idea of hope.
Overall, the review emphasizes hope as a multifaceted construct with emotional, cognitive, motivational, social, and identity-related components, bringing consolation when facing life’s challenges.
A better operationalization of the concept of hope can be achieved from the synthesis of concept analyses. Reducing ambiguity regarding its understanding will allow nurses to progress in measuring and selecting activities within the promoting hope intervention. Studying the activities and interactions between patients and healthcare professionals and how hope is experienced in healthcare settings could help clinicians understand what is currently happening in healthcare practice and show how this relates to the identified aspects of hope. This, in turn, could help the nurses improve healthcare workers’ abilities to preserve and foster hope in others. By employing evidence-based research, nurses could effectively anticipate potential outcomes and use appropriate interventions to nurture and bolster patients’ hope during nursing care.
Hope is a central concept in nursing, directly affecting nursing practice in patient care and nursing education. Although considered alongside other adjacent concepts, hope has its theoretical structure and measurement instruments and is definable based on knowledge in the scientific nursing literature. This review provides a better grasp of how hope is defined, actualized, and employed in nursing practice and the possible circumstances that may provide opportunities and promote hope.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11202739/s1 .
Click here for additional data file.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.C. and M.A.; methodology, Z.C. and M.A.; software, M.A.; validation, Z.C. and M.A.; formal analysis, Z.C., C.L., A.Q. and M.A.; investigation, Z.C., C.L., A.Q. and M.A.; resources, Z.C. and M.A.; data curation, Z.C. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C., C.L., A.Q. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, Z.C., C.L., A.Q. and M.A.; visualization, Z.C., C.L., A.Q. and M.A.; supervision, Z.C.; project administration, Z.C.; funding acquisition, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Materials are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by Universidade Católica Portuguesa—Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS) and by National Funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the project UIDP/04279/2020. The study us also supported by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (UIDB/05704/2020 and UIDP/05704/2020), and under the Scientific Employment Stimulus—Institutional Call—(CEECINST/00051/2018).
Footnotes
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Click here for additional data file.
Data Availability Statement
Materials are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 3 of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no relations between claims or controls. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | concept analysis studies of hope in the context of nursing care | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | which attributes, antecedents and consequences define the concept of hope in nursing care | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a proposed new definition of the hope diagnosis for the ICNP | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | hope as a multidimensional concept in nursing care | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | conceptual-analysis also in: conceptual-analysis | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | Nurses foster hope through a deliberate approach that sets up therapeutic interaction by interpersonal engagement. also in: fostering hope | mechanisms[0] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The review was not systematic and left out grey literature, unpublished articles and editorials. | limitations[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Only a small number of databases were searched. | limitations[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Building the synthesis matrix required some simplification and subjectivity. | limitations[2] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | hope also in: hope | concepts[0] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | generalized hope also in: generalized hope | concepts[1] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | particularized hope also in: particularized hope | concepts[2] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | International Classification of Nursing Practice | concepts[3] | 0.65 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ICNP also in: ICNP | concepts[4] | 0.85 | the paper's words |
| concepts | totality paradigm also in: totality paradigm | concepts[5] | 0.8 | the paper's words |
| concepts | concept analysis also in: concept analysis | concepts[6] | 0.85 | the paper's words |
| concepts | false hope also in: false hope | concepts[7] | 0.75 | the paper's words |
| concepts | antecedents also in: antecedents | concepts[8] | 0.8 | the paper's words |
| concepts | attributes also in: attributes | concepts[9] | 0.75 | the paper's words |
| concepts | consequences also in: consequences | concepts[10] | 0.75 | the paper's words |
| concepts | sense of control also in: sense of control | concepts[11] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| senses | hope (Farran et al.) - a psychological and cognitive process that can have spiritual or transcendent dimensions | senses[0] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| senses | hope (this synthesis) - a dynamic emotional state that is central to adaptation | senses[1] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| senses | hope (scholars in general) - an idiosyncratic, complex, future-oriented and highly personal process | senses[2] | 0.75 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | generalized hope —distinct-from→ particularized hope the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: The distinction is Dufault and Martocchio's, reported by this review, not the review's own finding. · the relation stated: Within the hoping process, the authors differentiate between generalized hope (a more global longing for some positive, yet undefined, future) and particularized hope (focused on a specific goal) [ 7 , 8 ]. also in: generalized hope · particularized hope | concept_edges[0] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | International Classification of Nursing Practice —same-as→ ICNP the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · the relation stated: The International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP ® ) defines hope as “the feeling of having possibilities, a trust in others or in the future, a zest for life, an expression of reasons and will to live, and inner peace and optimism, associated with setting goals and mobilizing energy” [ 11 ] (p. 1), which can constitute a nursing diagnosis (despair), intervention (promoting hope), or outcome (hope). | concept_edges[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | hope —causes→ sense of control the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.6 — the record marks this weak · note: Hedged in the paper: hope often leads to a sense of control; stated as a general observation, not measured here. · the relation stated: The presence of hope, even in stressful and life-changing events, often leads to a sense of control, optimism, and a new purpose in life. also in: hope · sense of control | concept_edges[2] | 0.6 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Walker and Avant's concept analysis model was the model used most often in the reviewed studies. | content_tags.findings[0] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The Herth Hope Index, the Miller Hope Scale and the Nowotny Hope Scale were the instruments used most often. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | articles initially identified | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | articles included after data extraction | content_tags.quantities[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.