standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.
The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package
Abstract
object_of_studycontributionclaim_typeconcepts↗concepts↗claim_relationsThe Astropy Project supports and fosters the development of open-source and openly developed Python packages that provide commonly needed functionality to the astronomical community. A key element of the Astropy Project is the core package astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects and packages. In this article, we provide an overview of the organization of the Astropy project and summarize key features in the core package, as of the recent major release, version 2.0. We then describe the project infrastructure designed to facilitate and support development for a broader ecosystem of interoperable packages. We conclude with a future outlook of planned new features and directions for the broader Astropy Project.
1. Introduction
phenomenonAll modern astronomical research makes use of software in some way. Astronomy, as a field, has thus long supported the development of software tools for astronomical tasks, such as scripts that enable individual scientific research, software packages for small collaborations, and data reduction pipelines for survey operations. Some software packages are, or were, supported by large institutions and intended for a wide range of users. These packages therefore typically provide some level of documentation and user support or training. Other packages are developed by individual researchers or research groups, are then typically used by smaller groups for more domain-specific purposes, and may have less extensive user support. For both packages meant for wider distribution and for scripts specific to particular research projects, a library that addresses common astronomical tasks simplifies the software development process by encouraging the reuse of common functions. The users of such a library then also benefit from a community and ecosystem built around a shared foundation. The Astropy project has grown to become such a community for Python astronomy software, and the astropy core package has become this shared foundation.
The development of the astropy core package began as a largely community-driven effort to standardize core functionality for astronomical software in Python. In this way, its genesis differs from, but builds upon, many substantial and former astronomical software development efforts that were commissioned or initiated through large institutional support, such as IRAF (developed at NOAO; Tody 1993), MIDAS (developed at ESO; Banse et al. 1988), or Starlink (originally developed by a consortium of UK institutions and now maintained by the East Asian Observatory; Disney & Wallace 1982; Currie et al. 2014). More recently, community-driven efforts have seen significant success in the astronomical sciences (e.g., Turk et al. 2011).
Python is an increasingly popular, general-purpose programming language that is available under a permissive open-source software license and is free of charge for all major operating systems. This programming language has become especially popular in the quantitative sciences, where researchers must simultaneously conduct research, perform data analysis, and develop software. A large part of this success owes itself to the vibrant community of developers and a continuously growing ecosystem of tools, web services, and stable, well-developed packages that enable easier collaboration on software development, easier writing and sharing of software documentation, and continuous testing and validation of software. While dedicated libraries provide support for array representation and arithmetic (numpy; Van der Walt et al. 2011), a wide variety of functions for scientific computing (scipy; Jones et al. 2001), and publication-quality plotting (matplotlib; Hunter 2007), tens of thousands of other high-quality and easy-to-use packages are available to help with tasks that are not specific to astronomy but might be performed in the course of astronomical research, e.g., interfacing with databases, or statistical inferences. More recently, the development and mainstream adoption of package managers such as Anaconda has significantly streamlined the installation process for many libraries, lowering the barriers to entry for new users.
research_questionconcepts↗sensessensescontent_tagscontent_tags↗The Astropy Project aims to provide an open-source and open-development core package (astropy) and an ecosystem of affiliated packages that support astronomical functionality in the Python programming language. “Open development” describes a process where anybody with an internet connection can suggest changes to the source code and contribute their opinion when new features, bug fixes or other code changes, governance, or any other aspect of the development process is discussed (see Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of how this is organized in practice). The astropy core package is now a feature-rich library of sufficiently general tools and classes that supports the development of more specialized code. An example of such functionality is reading and writing FITS files: it would be time-consuming and impractical for multiple groups to implement the FITS standard (Pence et al. 2010) and maintain software for such a general-purpose need. Another example of such a common task is in dealing with representations of and transformations between astronomical coordinate systems.
The Astropy Project aims to develop and provide high-quality code and documentation according to the best practices in software development. The project makes use of different tools and web services to reach those goals without central institutional oversight. The first public release of the astropy package is described in Astropy Collaboration et al. (2013). Since then, the astropy package has been used in hundreds of projects and the scope of the package has grown considerably. At the same time, the scientific community contributing to the project has grown tremendously and an ecosystem of packages supporting or affiliated with the astropy core has developed. In this paper, we describe the current status of the Astropy community and the astropy core package and discuss goals for future development.
method↗We start by describing the way the Astropy Project functions and is organized in Section 2. We then describe the main software efforts developed by the Astropy Project itself: a core package called astropy (Section 3) and several separate packages that help maintain the infrastructure for testing and documentation (Section 4). We end with a short vision for the future of Astropy and astronomical software in general in Section 5. The full paper, including the code to produce the figures, is available in a GitHub repository (Price-Whelan et al. 2018).
limitationsclaim_relationsThis article is not intended as an introduction to astropy, nor does it replace the astropy documentation. Instead, it describes the way the Astropy community is organized and the current state of the astropy package.
2. Organization and Infrastructure
2.1. Coordination of Astropy
From its inception, Astropy has required coordination to ensure the project as a whole and its coding efforts are consistent and reasonably efficient. While many Python projects adopt a “Benevolent Dictator For Life” (BDFL) model, Astropy has instead opted for a coordination committee. This is partly due to the nature of the project as a large-scale collaboration between many contributors with many interests, and partly due to the sheer amount of work that needs to get done. For the latter reason, the project has expanded the committee from three to four members starting in 2016.
For resolving disagreements about the astropy core package or other Astropy-managed code, the coordination committee primarily acts to work toward consensus, or when consensus is difficult to achieve, generally acts as a “tie-breaker.” The committee also oversees affiliated package applications to ensure that they are in keeping with Astropy’s vision and philosophy, as well as the associated procedures. Additionally, the committee oversees the assignment of roles (primarily driven by already-existing contributions), and increasingly has acted as the “face” of the Project, providing contact with organizations like NumFOCUS (the body that holds any potential funding in trust for Astropy) and the American Astronomical Society (AAS).
2.2. Astropy Development Model
mechanisms↗concepts↗concepts↗content_tagsCode is contributed to the astropy core package or modified through “pull requests” (via GitHub ) that often contain several git commits. Pull requests may fix bugs, implement new features, or improve or modify the infrastructure that supports the development and maintenance of the package. Individual pull requests are generally limited to a single conceptual addition or modification, to make code review tractable. Pull requests that modify or add code to a specific subpackage must be reviewed and approved by one of the subpackage maintainers before they are merged into the core codebase. Bugs and feature requests are reported via the GitHub issue tracker and labeled with a set of possible labels that help classify and organize the issues. The development workflow is detailed in the astropy documentation.
limitationscontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tags↗As of version 2.0, astropy contains 212,244 lines of code contributed by 232 unique contributors over 19,270 git commits. Figure 1, left, shows the distribution of total number of commits per contributor as of early 2018. The relative flatness of this distribution (as demonstrated by its log-log slope of −0.5) shows that the astropy core package has been developed by a broad contributor base. A leading group of six developers have each added over 1000 commits to the repository, and ∼20 more core contributors have contributed at least 100 commits. However, the distribution of contribution level (number of commits) continues from 100 down to a single commit. In this sense, the development of the core package has been a true community effort and is not dominated by a single individual. It is also important to note that the number of commits is only a rough metric of contribution, as any single commit could be a critical fix in the package or merely a fix for a typographical error. Figure 1, middle, shows the number of commits as a function of time since the genesis of the astropy core package. The package is still healthy: new commits are and have been contributed at a steady rate throughout its existence. Figure 1, right, shows that, ≈20–25 people contribute to the core package each month. While we would like for this number to grow, this demonstrates that the core package is still being developed and maintained by a substantial group of contributors.
Figure 1. Left panel: distribution of number of commits per committer. Middle panel: cumulative number of commits to the astropy core package over time. Right panel: number of unique committers per month to the astropy core package.
Download figure:
2.3. APEs—Astropy Proposals for Enhancement
mechanisms↗concepts↗content_tags↗The Astropy project has a formal mechanism to propose significant changes to the core package (e.g., re-writing the coordinates subpackage; Tollerud et al. 2014), to plan out major new features (e.g., a new file format; Aldcroft 2015), or to institute new organization-wide policies (e.g., adopting a code of conduct; Cruz et al. 2015). This mechanism is called “Astropy Proposal for Enhancement” (APE) and is modeled after the “Python Enhancement Proposals” (PEP) that guide the development of the Python programming language. In an APE, one or more authors describe in detail the proposed changes or additions, including a rationale for the changes, how these changes will be implemented, and in the case of code, what the interface will be (Greenfield 2013). The APEs are discussed and refined by the community before much work is invested into a detailed implementation; anyone is welcome to contribute to these discussions during the open consideration period. APEs are proposed via pull requests on a dedicated GitHub repository ; therefore, anyone can read the proposed APEs and leave in-line comments. When a community consensus emerges, the APEs are accepted and become the basis for future work. In cases where consensus cannot be reached, the Astropy coordination committee may decide to close the discussion and make an executive decision based on the community input on the APE in question.
2.4. Concept of Affiliated Packages
concepts↗concepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgescontent_tags↗A major part of the Astropy Project is the concept of “Affiliated Packages.” An affiliated package is an astronomy-related Python package that is not part of the astropy core package, but has requested to be included as part of the Astropy Project’s community. These packages support the goals and vision of Astropy of improving code re-use, interoperability, and embracing good coding practices such as testing and thorough documentation.
mechanisms↗concept_edgescontent_tagsAffiliated packages contain functionality that is more specialized, have license incompatibilities, or have external dependencies (e.g., GUI libraries) that make these packages more suitable to be separate from the astropy core package. Affiliated packages may also be used to develop substantial new functionality that will eventually be incorporated into the astropy core package (e.g., astropy.visualization.wcsaxes). New functionality benefits from having a rapid development and release cycle that is not tied to that of the astropy core (Section 2.5). These projects may also have less stringent requirements for style, testing, or development as compared to the core package.
concepts↗unhoused_relationsAffiliated packages are listed on the main Astropy website and advertised to the community through Astropy mailing lists; a list of current affiliated packages is included in Table 1. Becoming an affiliated package is a good way for new and existing packages to gain exposure while promoting Astropy’s high standard for code and documentation quality. This process of listing and promoting affiliated packages is one way in which the Astropy Project tries to increase code re-use in the astronomical community.
Packages can become affiliated with Astropy by applying for this status on a public mailing list. The coordination committee (Section 2.1) reviews such requests and issues recommendations for the improvement of a package, where applicable.
2.5. Release Cycle and Long-term Support
concepts↗concepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgescontent_tagscontent_tags↗content_tagscontent_tagsThe astropy package has a regular release schedule consisting of new significant releases every six months, with bugfix releases as needed (Tollerud 2013). The major releases contain new features or any significant changes, whereas the bugfix releases only contain fixes to code or documentation but no new features. Some versions are additionally designated as “Long-term support” (LTS) releases, which continue to receive bug fixes for two years following the release with no changes to the API. The LTS versions are ideal for pipelines and other applications in which API stability is essential. The latest LTS release (version 2.0) is also the last one that supports Python 2; it will receive bug fixes until the end of 2019 (Robitaille 2017).
The version numbering of the astropy core package reflects this release scheme: the core package version number uses the form x.y.z, where “x” is advanced for LTS releases, “y” for non-LTS feature releases, and “z” for bugfix releases. This is similar to Semantic Versioning.
The released versions of the astropy core package are available from several of the Python distributions for scientific computing (e.g., Anaconda) and from the Python Package Index (PyPI). Effort has been made to make astropy available and easily installable across all platforms; the package is constantly tested on different platforms as part of a suite of continuous integration tests.
2.6. Support of Astropy
limitationsThe Astropy Project, as of the version 2.0 release, does not receive any direct financial support for the development of astropy. Development of the software, all supporting materials, and community support are provided by individuals who work on the Astropy Project in their own personal time, by individuals or groups contributing to Astropy as part of a research project, or contributions from institutions that allocate people to work on Astropy. A list of organizations that have contributed to Astropy in this manner can be found in the Acknowledgments.
limitationsDifferent funding models have been proposed for support of Astropy (e.g., Muna et al. 2016), but a long-term plan for sustainability has not yet been established. The Astropy Project has the ability to accept financial contributions from institutions or individuals through the NumFOCUS organization. NumFOCUS has, to date, covered the direct costs incurred by the Astropy Project.
2.7. Reuse of the Scientific Python Ecosystem
mechanisms↗concepts↗concepts↗concepts↗unhoused_relationsclaim_relationsThe Astropy Project is built on a philosophy of building from the existing Python scientific ecosystem wherever possible. Many of the enabling technologies like numpy, scipy, matplotlib, or cython, are necessary as the core underpinnings of Astropy packages. Often, this means using these packages as “building blocks” (e.g., the ubiquitous use of numpy arrays throughout astropy). In other cases, this means wrappers around more general algorithms that make them more convenient for astronomy use cases (e.g., the model-fitting in the astropy.modeling subpackage discussed in Section 3.7). Sometimes these simple wrappers evolve into more complex implementations that address astronomically relevant use cases the general tool does not support (e.g., astropy.convolution, see Section 3.8). As a broad rule, the Project explicitly encourages re-use of code where possible.
limitationsHowever, the boundaries of when this re-use is called for is often ambiguous. Some of the examples above only evolved after significant debate in the community over whether these algorithms were sufficient. Other times, even apparently general functionality did not exist in the wider ecosystem that met the Astropy community’s needs, and hence the functionality had to be developed wholly from the developer resources available in the community (e.g., astropy.units, or astropy.table when it began). At the same time, however, the Astropy Project has provided the wider community with myriad bug fixes to the enabling technologies listed above, as well as the testing and documentation architecture. Functionality is only “extracted” from Astropy to other packages after careful consideration that includes considering the impact on the maintenance and support of Astropy.
3. Astropy Core Package Version 2.0
claim_relationsThe Astropy Project aims to provide Python-based packages for all tasks that are commonly needed in a large subset of the astronomical community. At the foundation is the astropy core package, which provides general functionality (e.g., coordinate transformations, reading and writing astronomical files, and units) or base classes for other packages to utilize for a common interface (e.g., NDData). In this section, we highlight new features introduced or substantially improved since version 0.2 (previously described in Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013). The astropy package provides a full log of changes over the course of the entire project and more details about individual subpackages are available in the documentation. Beyond what is mentioned below, most subpackages have seen improved performance since the release of the version 0.2 package.
3.1. Units
content_tags↗The astropy.units subpackage adds support for representing units and numbers with associated units—“quantities”—in code. Historically, quantities in code have often been represented simply as numbers, with units implied or noted via comments in the code because of considerations about speed: having units associated with numbers inherently adds overhead to numerical operations. In astropy.units, Quantity objects extend numpy array objects and have been designed with speed in mind.
As of astropy version 2.0, units and quantities, prevalent in most of its subpackages, have become a key concept for using the package as a whole. Units are intimately entwined in the definition of astronomical coordinates; thus, nearly all functionality in the astropy.coordinates subpackage (see Section 3.3) depends on them. Most astropy subpackages have been made compatible with Quantity objects, although they are not always required.
The motivation and key concepts behind this subpackage were described in detail in the previous paper (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013). Therefore, we primarily highlight new features and improvements here.
3.1.1. Interaction with numpy Arrays
mechanisms↗concepts↗concepts↗sensescontent_tagsQuantity objects extend numpy.ndarray objects and therefore work well with many of the functions in numpy that support array operations. For example, Quantity objects with angular units can be directly passed in to the trigonometric functions implemented in numpy. The units are internally converted to radians, which is what the numpy trigonometric functions expect, before being passed to numpy.
3.1.2. Logarithmic Units and Magnitudes
By default, taking the logarithm of a Quantity object with non-dimensionless units intentionally fails. However, some well-known units are actually logarithmic quantities, where the logarithm of the value is taken with respect to some reference value. Examples include astronomical magnitudes, which are logarithmic fluxes, and decibels, which are more generic logarithmic ratios of quantities. Logarithmic, relative units are now supported in astropy.units.
3.1.3. Defining Functions that Require Quantities
concepts↗concepts↗unhoused_relationscontent_tags↗When writing code or functions that expect Quantity objects, we often want to enforce that the input units have the correct physical type. For example, we may want to require only length-type Quantity objects. astropy.units provides a tool called quantity_input() that can perform this verification automatically to avoid repetitive code.
3.2. Constants
The astropy.constants subpackage provides a selection of physical and astronomical constants as Quantity objects (see Section 3.1). A brief description of this package was given in Astropy Collaboration et al. (2013). In version 2.0, the built-in constants have been organized into modules for specific versions of the constant values. For example, physical constants have codata2014 (Mohr et al. 2016) and codata2010 versions. Astronomical constants are organized into iau2015 and iau2012 modules to indicate their sources (resolutions from the International Astronomical Union, IAU). The codata2014 and iau2015 versions are combined into the default constant value version: astropyconst20. For compatibility with astropy version 1.3, astropyconst13 is available and provides access to the adopted versions of the constants from earlier versions of astropy. To use previous versions of the constants as units (e.g., solar masses), the values have to be imported directly; with version 2.0, astropy.units uses the astropyconst20 versions.
Astronomers using astropy.constants should take particular note of the constants provided for Earth, Jupiter, and the Sun. Following IAU 2015 Resolution B3 (Mamajek et al. 2015), nominal values are now given for mass parameters and radii. The nominal values will not change even as “current best estimates” are updated.
3.3. Coordinates
The astropy.coordinates subpackage is designed to support representing and transforming celestial coordinates and—new in version 2.0—velocities. The framework heavily relies on the astropy.units subpackage, and most inputs to objects in this subpackage are expected to be Quantity objects. Some of the machinery also relies on the Essential Routines of Fundamental Astronomy (ERFA) C library for some of the critical underlying transformation machinery (Tollerud et al. 2017), which is based on the Standards Of Fundamental Astronomy (SOFA) effort (Hohenkerk 2011).
concepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgescontent_tagsA key concept behind the design of this subpackage is that coordinate representations and reference systems/frames are independent of one another. For example, a set of coordinates in the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) reference frame could be represented as spherical (right ascension, declination, and distance from solar system barycenter) or Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z with the origin at barycenter). They can therefore change representations independent of being transformed to other reference frames (e.g., the Galactic coordinate frame).
mechanisms↗concepts↗concepts↗The classes that handle coordinate representations (the Representation classes) act like three-dimensional vectors and thus support vector arithmetic. The classes that represent reference systems and frames (the Frame classes) internally use Representation objects to store the coordinate data—that is, the Frame classes accept coordinate data, either as a specified Representation object, or using short-hand keyword arguments to specify the components of the coordinates. These preferred representation and short-hand component names differ between various astronomical reference systems. For example, in the ICRS frame, the spherical angles are right ascension (ra) and declination (dec), whereas in the Galactic frame, the spherical angles are Galactic longitude (l) and latitude (b). Each Frame class defines its own component names and preferred Representation class. The frame-specific component names map to corresponding components on the underlying Representation object that internally stores the coordinate data. For most frames, the preferred representation is spherical, although this is determined primarily by their common use in the astronomical community.
Many of the Frame classes also have attributes specific to the corresponding reference system that allow the user to specify the frame. For example, the Fifth Fundamental Catalogue (FK5) reference system requires specifying an equinox to determine the reference frame. If required, these additional frame attributes must be specified, along with the coordinate data, when a Frame object is created. Figure 2 shows the network of possible reference frame transformations as currently implemented in astropy.coordinates. Custom user-implemented Frame classes that define transformations to any reference frame in this graph can then be transformed to any of the other connected frames.
Figure 2. The full graph of possible reference frame transformations implemented in astropy.coordinates. Arrows indicate transformations from one frame to another. Arrows that point back to the same frame indicate self-transformations that involve a change of reference frame parameters (e.g., equinox).
Download figure:
concepts↗sensescontent_tags↗The typical user does not usually have to interact directly with the Frame or Representation classes. Instead, astropy.coordinates provides a high-level interface to representing astronomical coordinates through the SkyCoord class, which was designed to provide a single class that accepts a wide range of possible inputs. It supports coordinate data in any coordinate frame in any representation by internally using the Frame and Representation classes.
In what follows, we briefly highlight key new features in astropy.coordinates.
3.3.1. Local Earth Coordinate Frames
concepts↗concepts↗concepts↗unhoused_relationsIn addition to representing celestial coordinates, astropy now supports specifying positions on the Earth in a number of different geocentric systems with the EarthLocation class. With this, astropy now supports Earth-location-specific coordinate systems such as the altitude-azimuth (AltAz) or horizontal system. Transformations between AltAz and any Barycentric coordinate frame also requires specifying a time using the Time class from astropy.time. With this new functionality, many of the common tasks associated with observation planning can now be completed with astropy or the Astropy-affiliated package astroplan (Morris et al. 2018).
3.3.2. Proper Motion and Velocity Transformations
limitationsIn addition to positional coordinate data, the Frame classes now also support velocity data. As the default representation for most frames is spherical, most of the Frame classes expect proper motion and radial velocity components to specify the velocity information. The names of the proper motion components all start with pm and adopt the same longitude and latitude names as the positional components. Transforming coordinates with velocity data is also supported, but in some cases the transformed velocity components have limited accuracy because the transformations are done numerically instead of analytically. The low-level interface for specifying and transforming velocity data is currently experimental. As such, in version 2.0, only the Frame classes (and not the SkyCoord class) support handling velocities.
3.3.3. Solar System Ephemerides
Also new is support for computing ephemerides of major solar system bodies and outputting the resulting positions as coordinate objects. These ephemerides can be computed either using analytic approximations from ERFA or from downloaded JPL ephemerides (the latter requires the jplephem optional dependency and an internet connection).
3.3.4. Accuracy of Coordinate Transformations
limitationscontrolsconcepts↗sensescontent_tagsIn order to check the accuracy of the coordinate transformations in astropy.coordinates, we have created a set of benchmarks that we use to compare transformations between a set of coordinate frames for a number of packages. Because no package can be guaranteed to implement all transformations to arbitrary precision and some transformations are sometimes subject to interpretation of standards (particularly in the case of Galactic coordinates), we do not designate any of the existing packages as the “ground truth” but instead compare each tool to all other tools. The benchmarks are thus useful beyond the Astropy Project because they allow all of the tools to be compared to all other tools. The tools included in the benchmark at the moment include the astropy core package, Kapteyn (Terlouw & Vogelaar 2015), NOVAS (Barron et al. 2011), PALpy (Jenness & Berry 2013), PyAST (a wrapper for AST, described in Berry et al. 2016), PyTPM, PyEphem (Rhodes 2011), and pySLALIB (a Python wrapper for SLALIB, described in Wallace 1994).
mechanisms↗controlsconcepts↗content_tagscontent_tags↗content_tags↗The benchmarks are meant to evolve over time and include an increasing variety of cases. At the moment, the benchmarks are set up as follows—we have generated a standard set of 1000 pairs of random longitudes/latitudes that we use in all benchmarks. Each benchmark is then defined using an input and output coordinate frame, using all combinations of FK4, FK5, Galactic, ICRS, and Ecliptic frames. For now, we set the epoch of observation to J2000. We also set the frame to J2000 (for FK5 and Ecliptic) and B1950 (for FK4). In the future, we plan to include a larger variety of epochs and equinoxes, as well as tests of conversion to/from Altitude/Azimuth. For each benchmark, we convert the 1000 longitudes/latitudes from the input/output frame with all tools and quantify the comparison by looking at the median, mean, maximum, and standard deviation of the absolute separation of the output coordinates from each pair of tools.
Figure 3 visualizes the relative accuracy of the conversion from FK4 to Galactic coordinates for all pairs of tools that implement this transformation. In this figure, the color of the cell indicates the maximum difference (in arcseconds) between the two tools over the 1000 longitude-latitude pairs tested. This figure shows, for example, that astropy, Kapteyn, and PyTPM agree with sub-milliarcsecond differences (light colors, small differences), while PALpy, pySLALIB, and PyAST also agree among themselves. However, there is an offset of around 02 between the two groups. Finally, PyEphem disagrees with all other packages by 04–08 (darker colors, large differences). These values are only meant to be illustrative and will change over time as the benchmarks are refined and the packages updated.
Figure 3. Comparison matrix of the maximum difference between longitude-latitude values in a set of 1000 random points transformed from FK4 to Galactic with the different packages. Darker colors (larger differences) are more significant disagreements.
Download figure:
3.4. Time
The astropy.time subpackage focuses on supporting timescales (e.g., UTC, TAI, UT1) and time formats (e.g., Julian date, modified Julian date) that are commonly used in astronomy. This functionality is needed, for example, to calculate barycentric corrections or sidereal times. astropy.time is currently built on the ERFA (Tollerud et al. 2017) C library, which replicates the Standards of Fundamental Astronomy (SOFA; Hohenkerk 2011) but is licensed under a three-clause BSD license. The package was described in detail in Astropy Collaboration et al. (2013) and has remained stable for the last several versions of astropy. Thus, in what follows, we only highlight significant changes or new features since the previous Astropy paper.
3.4.1. Barycentric and Heliocentric Corrections
Detailed eclipse or transit timing requires accounting for light traveltime differences from the source to the observatory because of the Earth’s motion. It is therefore common to instead convert times to the solar system barycenter or heliocenter where the relative timing of photons is standardized. With the location of a source on the sky (i.e., a SkyCoord object), the location of an observatory on Earth (i.e., an EarthLocation object), and time values as Time objects, the time corrections to shift to the solar system barycenter or heliocenter can now be computed with astropy.time using the light_travel_time method of a Time object.
3.5. Data Containers
3.5.1. nddata
The astropy.nddata subpackage provides three types of functionality: an abstract interface for representing generic arbitrary-dimensional data sets intended primarily for subclassing by developers of other packages, concrete classes building on this interface, and utilities for manipulating these kind of data sets.
The NDDataBase class provides the abstract interface for gridded data with attributes for accessing metadata, the world coordinate system (WCS), uncertainty arrays matched to the shape of the data, and other traits. Building on this interface, the NDData class provides a minimal working implementation for storing numpy arrays. These classes serve as useful base classes for package authors wishing to develop their own classes for specific use cases and as containers for exchanging gridded data.
The classes NDDataRef, NDDataArray, and CCDData extend the base storage functionality with options to do basic arithmetic (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division), including error propagation in limited cases, and slicing of the data set based on grid coordinates that appropriately handles masking, errors, and units (if present). Additionally, the CCDData class also provides reading and writing from and to FITS files, and uses data structures from astropy, like WCS, to represent the file contents abstractly.
The http://docs.astropy.org/en/stable/nddata/utils.html astropy.nddata.utils module provides utilities that can operate on either plain numpy arrays or any of the classes in the astropy.nddata subpackage. It features a class for representing two-dimensional image cutouts, allowing one to easily link pixels in the cutout to those in the original image or vice versa, to convert between world and pixel coordinates in the cutout, and to overlay the cutout on images. Functions to enlarge or reduce an image by doing block replication or reduction are also provided.
3.5.2. Tables
The astropy.table subpackage provides functionality for representing and manipulating heterogeneous data. In some respects, this is similar to numpy record arrays (Van der Walt et al. 2011) or pandas DataFrame objects (McKinney 2010), but with modifications for astronomical data. Most notably, tables from astropy.table allow for table or column metadata and can handle vectors/arrays or arbitrary objects (with suitable column-like characteristics) as table entries. The subpackage was described in detail in Astropy Collaboration et al. (2013). Thus, in what follows, we only summarize key new features or updates to astropy.table since the previous Astropy paper. These are support for grouped table operations, table concatenation, and using array-valued astropy objects as table columns.
A table can contain data that naturally form groups; for example, it may contain multiple observations of a few sources at different points in time and in different bands. We may want to split the table into groups based on the combination of source observed and the band, after which we combine the results for each combination of source and band in some way (e.g., finding the mean or standard deviation of the fluxes or magnitudes over time) or filter the groups based on user-defined criteria. These kinds of grouping and aggregation operations are now fully supported by Table objects.
Table objects can now be combined in several different ways. If two tables have the same columns, we may want to stack them “vertically” to create a new table with the same columns but all rows. If two tables are row-matched but have distinct columns, we may want to stack them “horizontally” to create a new table with the same rows but all columns. For other situations, more generic table concatenation or joining are also possible when two tables share some columns.
The Table object now allows array-valued Quantity, celestial coordinate (SkyCoord), and date/time (Time) objects to be used as columns. It also provides a general way for other user-defined array-like objects to be used as columns. This makes it possible, for instance, to easily represent catalogs of sources or time series in Astropy, while having both the benefits of the Table object (e.g., accessing specific rows/columns or groups of them and combining tables) as well as, for example, the SkyCoord or the Time classes (e.g., converting the coordinates to a different frame or accessing the date/time in the desired timescale).
limitationsAdditionally, there is now interoperability between Table and pandas DataFrame objects using the Table.to_pandas() and Table.from_pandas() methods. Table.to_pandas() is, however, limited to a subset of possible Table objects, because several of the features outlined above cannot be represented as pandas data frames. While these features might be contributed to or combined with pandas at a later date, the architectural differences that enable these areas are significant, so this would be a major undertaking that would require substantial investment from the core maintainers and communities of both packages.
3.6. io
The astropy.io subpackages provide support for reading and writing data to a variety of ASCII and binary file formats, such as a wide range of ASCII data table formats, FITS, HDF5, and VOTable. It also provides a unified interface for reading and writing data with these different formats using the astropy.table subpackage. For many common cases, this simplifies the process of file input and output (I/O) and reduces the need to master the separate details of all the I/O packages within astropy. The file interface allows transparent compression of the gzip, bzip2, and lzma (.xz) formats; the latter two require the Python installation to have been compiled with support the respective libraries.
3.6.1. ASCII
concepts↗sensescontent_tagscontent_tags↗One of the problems when storing a table in an ASCII format is preserving table metadata such as comments, keywords and column data types, units, and descriptions. The newly defined Enhanced Character Separated Values (ECSV, Aldcroft 2015) format makes it possible to write a table to an ASCII-format file and read it back with no loss of information. The ECSV format has been designed to be both human-readable and compatible with most simple CSV readers.
limitationsconcepts↗concepts↗content_tagscontent_tagsThe astropy.io.ascii subpackage now includes a significantly faster Cython/C engine for reading and writing ASCII files. This is available for most of the common formats. It also offers some additional features like parsing of different exponential notation styles, such as commonly produced by Fortran programs. On average, the new engine is about four to five times faster than the corresponding pure-Python implementation and is often comparable to the speed of the pandas (McKinney 2010) ASCII file interface. The fast reader has a parallel processing option that allows harnessing multiple cores for input parsing to achieve even greater speed gains. By default, read() and write() will attempt to use the fast Cython/C engine when dealing with compatible formats. Certain features of the full read / write interface are unavailable in the fast version, in which case the reader will by default fall back automatically to the pure-Python version.
The astropy.io.ascii subpackage now provides the capability to read a table within an HTML file or web URL into an astropy Table object. A Table object can now also be written out as an HTML table.
3.6.2. FITS
The astropy.io.fits subpackage started as a direct port of the PyFITS project (Barrett & Bridgman 1999). Therefore, it is pretty stable, with mostly bug fixes but also a few new features and performance improvements. The API remains mostly compatible with PyFITS, which is now deprecated in favor of astropy.
Command-line scripts are now available for printing a summary of the HDUs in FITS file(s) (fitsinfo) and for printing the header information to the screen in a human-readable format (fitsheader).
mechanisms↗FITS files are now loaded lazily by default, i.e., an object representing the list of HDUs is created but the data are not loaded into memory until requested. This approach should provide substantial speed-ups when using the convenience functions (e.g., getheader() or getdata()) to get an HDU that is near the beginning in a file with many HDUs.
3.6.3. HDF5
The astropy.io.misc.hdf5 subpackage provides support for binary read and write access to files in the Hierarchical Data Format (HDF5), if the h5py package is installed. Astropy table I/O is offered transparently through Table.read() and Table.write(), analogously to the other auto-detected formats. The keyword path=’group/subgroup/data set’ specifies the path to the data inside the file’s hierarchical structure.
3.7. Modeling
The astropy.modeling subpackage provides a framework for representing analytical models and performing model evaluation and parameter fitting. The main motivation for this functionality was to create a framework that allows arbitrary combination of models to support the Generalized World Coordinate System (GWCS) package. The current FITS WCS specification lacks the flexibility to represent arbitrary distortions and does not meet the needs of many types of current instrumentation. The fact that the astropy modeling framework now supports propagating units also makes it a useful tool for representing and fitting astrophysical models within data analysis tools.
concepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgesModels and fitters are independent of each other: a model can be fit with different fitters and new fitters can be added without changing existing models. The framework is designed to be flexible and easily extensible. The goal is to have a rich set of models, but also facilitate creating new ones, if necessary.
3.7.1. Single Model Definition and Evaluation
Models are defined by their parameters and initialized by providing values for them. The names of the parameters are stored in a list, Model.param_names. Parameters are complex objects. They store additional information—default value, default unit, and parameter constraints. Parameter values and constraints can be updated by assignment. Supported constraints include fixed and tied parameters, as well as bounds on parameter values. The framework also supports models for which the number of parameters and their names are defined by another argument. A typical example is a polynomial model defined by its degree. A model is evaluated by calling it as a function.
If an analytical inverse of a model exists, it can be accessed by calling Model.inverse. In addition, Model.inverse can be assigned another model that represents a computed inverse.
mechanisms↗concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgescontent_tags↗Another useful settable property of models is Model.bounding_box. This attribute sets the domain over which the model is defined. This greatly improves the efficiency of evaluation when the input range is much larger than the characteristic width of the model itself.
3.7.2. Model Sets
content_tags↗Using astropy.modeling provides an efficient way to set up the same type of model with many different sets of parameter values. This creates a model set that can be efficiently evaluated. For example, in PSF (point-spread function) photometry, all objects in an image will have a PSF of the same functional form, but with different positions and amplitudes.
3.7.3. Compound Models
Models can be combined using arithmetic expressions. The result is also a model, which can further be combined with other models. Modeling supports arithmetic (+, −, *, /, and **), join (&), and composition (∣) operators. The rules for combining models involve matching their inputs and outputs. For example, the composition operator, ∣, requires the number of outputs of the left model to be equal to the number of inputs of the right one. For the join operator, the total number of inputs must equal the sum of number of inputs of both the left and the right models. For all arithmetic operators, the left and the right models must have the same number of inputs and outputs. An example of a compound model could be a spectrum with interstellar absorption. The stellar spectrum and the interstellar extinction are represented by separate models, but the observed spectrum is fitted with a compound model that combines both.
3.7.4. Fitting Models to Data
The astropy.modeling subpackage also provides several fitters that are wrappers around some of the numpy and scipy.optimize functions and provide support for specifying parameter constraints. The fitters take a model and data as input and return a copy of the model with the optimized parameter values set. The goal is to make it easy to extend the fitting framework to create new fitters. The optimizers available in astropy version 2.0 are Levenberg–Marquardt (scipy.optimize.leastsq), Simplex (scipy.optimize.fmin), SLSQP (scipy.optimize.slsqp), and LinearLSQFitter (numpy.linalg.lstsq which provides exact solutions for linear models).
Modeling also supports a plugin system for fitters, which allows using the astropy models with external fitters. An example of this is SABA, which is a bridge between Sherpa (Doe et al. 2007), and astropy.modeling, to bring the Sherpa fitters into astropy.
3.7.5. Creating New Models
If arithmetic combinations of existing models are not sufficient, new model classes can be defined in different ways. The astropy.modeling package provides tools to turn a simple function into a full-featured model, but it also allows extending the built-in model class with arbitrary code.
3.7.6. Unit Support
The astropy.modeling subpackage now supports the representation, evaluation, and fitting of models using Quantity objects, which attach units to scalar values or arrays of values. In practice, this means that one can, for example, fit a model to data with units and get parameters that also have units out, or initialize a model with parameters with units and evaluate it using input values with different but equivalent units. For example, the blackbody model (BlackBody1D) can be used to fit observed flux densities in a variety of units and as a function of different units of spectral coordinates (e.g., wavelength or frequency).
3.8. Convolution
mechanisms↗controlsconcepts↗concepts↗unhoused_relationssensescontent_tagscontent_tags↗The astropy.convolution subpackage implements normalized convolution (e.g., Knutsson & Westin 1993), an image reconstruction technique in which missing data are ignored during the convolution and replaced with values interpolated using the kernel. An example is given in Figure 4. In astropy versions ≤1.3, the direct convolution and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) convolution approaches were inconsistent, with only the latter implementing normalized convolution. As of version 2.0, the two methods now agree and include a suite of consistency checks.
Figure 4. An example showing different modes of convolution available in the Python ecosystem. Each red x signifies a pixel that is set to NaN in the original data (top left). If the data are convolved with a Gaussian kernel on a 9 × 9 grid using scipy’s direct convolution (top right), any pixel within range of the original NaN pixels is also set to NaN. The bottom left panel shows what happens if the NaNs are set to zero first: the original NaN regions are depressed relative to their surroundings. Finally, the bottom right panel shows astropy’s convolution behavior, where the missing pixels are replaced with values interpolated from their surroundings using the convolution kernel.
Download figure:
3.9. Visualization
concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesThe astropy.visualization subpackage provides functionality that can be helpful when visualizing data. This includes a framework (previously the standalone astropy.visualization.wcsaxes package) for plotting astronomical images with coordinates via matplotlib, functionality related to image normalization (including both scaling and stretching), smart histogram plotting, red-green-blue (RGB) color image creation from separate images, and custom plotting styles for matplotlib.
3.9.1. Image Stretching and Normalization
content_tagscontent_tags↗Using astropy.visualization provides a framework for transforming values in images (and more generally, any arrays), typically for the purpose of visualization. The two main types of transformations are normalization and stretching of image values.
Normalization transforms the image values to the range [0, 1] using lower and upper limits (vmin, vmax),
where x represents the values in the original image.
Stretching transforms the image values in the range [0, 1] again to the range [0, 1], using a linear or nonlinear function:
Several classes are provided for automatically determining intervals (e.g., using image percentiles) and for normalizing values in this interval to the [0, 1] range.
Using matplotlib allows a custom normalization and stretch to be used when displaying data by passing in a normalization object. The astropy.visualization package also provides a normalization class that wraps the interval and stretches objects into a normalization object that matplotlib understands.
3.9.2. Plotting Image Data with World Coordinates
Astronomers dealing with observational imaging commonly need to make figures with images that include the correct coordinates and optionally display a coordinate grid. The challenge, however, is that the conceptual coordinate axes (such as longitude/latitude) need not be lined up with the pixel axes of the image. The astropy.visualization.wcsaxes subpackage implements a generalized way of making figures from an image array and a WCS object that provides the transformation between pixel and world coordinates.
World coordinates can be, for example, right ascension and declination, but can also include, for example, velocity, wavelength, frequency, or time. The main features from this subpackage include the ability to control which axes to show which coordinate on (e.g., showing longitude ticks on the top and bottom axes and latitude on the left and right axes), controlling the spacing of the ticks either by specifying the positions to use or providing a tick spacing or an average number of ticks that should be present on each axis, setting the format for the tick labels to ones commonly used by astronomers, controlling the visibility of the grid/graticule, and overlaying ticks, labels, and/or grid lines from different coordinate systems. In addition, it is possible to pass data with more than two dimensions and slice on-the-fly. Last but not least, it is also able to define non-rectangular frames such as, for example, Aitoff projections.
concepts↗concept_edgesThis subpackage differs from APLpy (Robitaille & Bressert 2012), in that the latter focuses on providing a very high-level interface to plotting that requires very few lines of code to get a good result, whereas astropy.visualization.wcsaxes defines an interface that is much closer to that of matplotlib (Hunter 2007). This enables significantly more advanced visualizations.
An example of a visualization made with astropy.visualization.wcsaxes is shown in Figure 5. This example illustrates the ability to overlay multiple coordinate systems and customize which ticks/labels are shown on which axes around the image. This also uses the image stretching functionality from Section 3.9.1 to show the image in a square-root stretch (automatically updating the tick positions in the colorbar).
Figure 5. An example of a figure made using the astropy.visualization.wcsaxes subpackage, using Spitzer/IRAC 8.0 μm data from the Cygnus-X Spitzer Legacy survey (Beerer et al. 2010).
Download figure:
3.9.3. Choosing Histogram Bins
content_tagscontent_tags↗The astropy.visualization subpackage also provides a histogram function, which is a generalization of matplotlib’s histogram function, to allow for a more flexible specification of histogram bins. The function provides several methods of automatically tuning the histogram bin size. It has a syntax identical to matplotlib's histogram function, with the exception of the bins parameter, which allows specification of one of four different methods for automatic bin selection: “blocks,” “knuth,” “scott,” or “freedman.”
3.9.4. Creating Color RGB Images
Lupton et al. (2004) describe an “optimal” algorithm for producing RGB composite images from three separate high-dynamic range arrays. The astropy.visualization subpackage provides a convenience function to create such a color image. It also includes an associated set of classes to provide alternate scalings. This functionality was contributed by developers from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) and serves as an example of a contribution to Astropy from a more traditional engineering organization (Jenness et al. 2016).
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) SkyServer color images were made using a variation on this technique. As an example, in Figure 6, we show an RGB color image of the Hickson 88 group, centered near NGC 6977. This image was generated from SDSS images using the astropy.visualization tools.
Figure 6. An RGB color image of the region near the Hickson 88 group constructed from SDSS images and the astropy.visualization tools. This example uses astropy.visualization.wcsaxes to display the sky coordinate grid, and the http://docs.astropy.org/en/stable/api/astropy.visualization.make_lupton_rgb.html make_lupton_rgb() function to produce the RGB image from three SDSS filter images (g, r, i). The image on the left shows the image with the default parameters, whereas the image on the right has parameters set to show a greater dynamical range.
Download figure:
3.10. Cosmology
The astropy.cosmology subpackage contains classes for representing different cosmologies and functions for calculating commonly used quantities such as look-back time and distance. The subpackage was described in detail in Astropy Collaboration et al. (2013). The default cosmology in astropy version 2.0 is given by the values in Planck Collaboration et al. (2016).
3.11. Statistics
concepts↗The astropy.stats package provides statistical tools that are useful for astronomy and are either not found in or extend the available functionality of other Python statistics packages, such as scipy (Jones et al. 2001) or statsmodels (Seabold & Perktold 2010). The astropy.stats package also contains a range of functionality used by many different disciplines in astronomy. It is not a complete set of statistical tools, but rather a still growing collection of useful features.
3.11.1. Robust Statistical Estimators
concepts↗concepts↗concepts↗unhoused_relationsconcept_edgescontent_tags↗Robust statistics provide reliable estimates of basic statistics for complex distributions that largely mitigate the effects of outliers. The astropy.stats package includes several robust statistical functions that are commonly used in astronomy, such as sigma clipping methods for rejecting outliers, median absolute deviation functions, and biweight estimators, which have been used to calculate the velocity dispersion of galaxy clusters (Beers et al. 1990).
3.11.2. Circular Statistics
Astronomers often need to compute statistics of quantities evaluated on a circle, such as sky direction or polarization angle. A set of circular statistical estimators based on Jammalamadaka & Sengupta (2001) are implemented in astropy.stats. These functions provide measurements of the circular mean, variance, and moment. All of these functions work with both numpy.ndarrays (assumed to be in radians) and Quantity objects. In addition, the subpackage includes tests for Rayleigh Test, vtest, and a function to compute the maximum likelihood estimator for the parameters of the von Mises distribution.
3.11.3. Lomb–Scargle Periodograms
limitationsPeriodic analysis of unevenly spaced time series is common across many subfields of astronomy. The astropy.stats package now includes several efficient implementations of the Lomb–Scargle periodogram (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982) and several generalizations, including floating mean models (Zechmeister & Kürster 2009), truncated Fourier models (Bretthorst 2003), and appropriate handling of heteroscedastic uncertainties. Importantly, the implementations make use of several fast and scalable computational approaches (e.g., Press & Rybicki 1989; Palmer 2009), and thus can be applied to much larger data sets than Lomb–Scargle algorithms available in, e.g., scipy.stats (Jones et al. 2001). Much of the Lomb–Scargle code in astropy has been adapted from previously published open-source code (VanderPlas et al. 2012; VanderPlas & Ivezic 2015). Users should be aware that correct interpretation of periodogram results involves some subtleties; for a thorough discussion of this issue, see (VanderPlas 2018, in press).
3.11.4. Bayesian Blocks and Histogram Binning
concepts↗sensesconcept_edgescontent_tags↗The astropy.stats package also includes an implementation of Bayesian Blocks (Scargle et al. 2013), an algorithm for analysis of breakpoints in nonperiodic astronomical time-series. One interesting application of Bayesian Blocks is its use in determining optimal histogram binnings, particularly binnings with unequal bin sizes. This code was adapted, with several improvements, from the astroML package (VanderPlas et al. 2012). An example of a histogram fit using the Bayesian Blocks algorithm is shown in the right panel of Figure 7.
Figure 7. Three approaches to a 1D histogram. Left: a standard histogram using matplotlib’s default of 10 bins. Center: a histogram with the number of equal-width bins determined automatically using numpy’s bins = ’auto’. Right: a histogram created by astropy, with irregularly spaced bins computed via the Bayesian Blocks algorithm. Compared to regularly spaced bins, the irregular bin widths give a more accurate visual representation of features in the data set at various scales.
Download figure:
4. Infrastructure for Astropy Affiliated Packages
In addition to astronomy-specific packages and libraries, the Astropy Project also maintains and distributes several general-purpose infrastructure packages that assist with the maintenance and upkeep of the astropy core package and other affiliated packages. The following sections describe the most widely used infrastructure packages developed by the Astropy Project.
4.1. Package Template
mechanisms↗Astropy provides a package template—as a separate GitHub repository, astropy/package-template —that aims to simplify setting up packaging, testing, and documentation builds for developers of affiliated packages or astropy-dependent packages. Any Python package can make use of this ready-to-go package layout, setup, installation, and Sphinx documentation build infrastructure that was originally developed for the astropy core package and affiliated packages maintained by the Astropy Project. The package template also provides a testing framework, template configurations for continuous integration services, and Cython build support.
4.2. Continuous Integration Helpers
Astropy also provides a set of scripts for setting up and configuring continuous integration (CI) services as a GitHub repository, astropy/ci-helpers. These tools aim to enable package maintainers to control their testing setup and installation process for various CI services through a set of environment variables. While the current development is mostly driven by the needs of the Astropy ecosystem, the actual usage of this package is extremely widespread. The current tools support configuration for Travis CI and Appveyor CI.
4.3. Sphinx Extensions
The documentation for many Python packages, including all the packages in the Astropy ecosystem, is written using the Sphinx documentation build system. Sphinx supports writing documentation using plain text files that follow a markup language called reStructuredText (RST). These files are then transformed into HTML, PDF, or LATEX documents during the documentation build process. For the Astropy Project, we have developed several Sphinx extensions that facilitate automatically generating API documentation for large projects, like the astropy core package. The main extension we have developed is sphinx-automodapi, which provides a convenient single RST command to generate a set of documentation pages, listing all of the available classes, functions, and attributes in a given Python module.
5. The Future of the Astropy Project
Following the release of version 2.0, development on the next major version of the astropy core package (version 3.0) began. On top of planned changes and additions to the core package, we also plan to overhaul the Astropy educational/learning materials and further generalize the infrastructure utilities originally developed for the core package for the benefit of the community.
5.1. Future Versions of the Astropy Core and Affiliated Packages
concepts↗concepts↗unhoused_relationsOne of the most significant changes coming in this next major release will be removing the support for Python 2 (Robitaille 2017): future versions of astropy will only support Python 3.5 or higher. Removing Python 2 support will allow the use of new features exclusive to Python 3, simplify the code base, and reduce the testing overhead for the package. Version 3.0 was released in February 2018.
limitationsIn the next major release after version 3.0, scheduled for mid-2018, the focus will be on algorithm optimization and documentation improvement. To prepare for this release, we are subjecting the core package to testing, evaluation, and performance monitoring. As a result, less new functionality may be introduced, as a trade-off for better performance.
Beyond the core code, the Astropy Project is also further developing the Astropy-managed affiliated packages. While these may not be integrated into the astropy core package, these projects provide code that is useful to the astronomical community and meet the testing and documentation standards of Astropy. Some of these new efforts include an initiative to develop tools for spectroscopy (Crawford et al. 2017, specutils, specreduc, specviz), integration of LSST software, and support for HEALPIX projection.
5.2. Learn Astropy
The documentation of the astropy core package contains narrative descriptions of the package’s functionality, along with detailed usage notes for functions, classes, and modules. While useful as a reference for more experienced Python users, it is not the proper point of entry for other users or learning environments. In the near future, we will launch a new resource for learning to use both the astropy core package and the many packages in the broader Astropy ecosystem, under the name Learn Astropy.
The new Learn Astropy site will present several different ways to engage with the Astropy ecosystem:
We encourage any users who wish to see specific material to either contribute or comment on these efforts via the Astropy mailing list or astropy/astropy-tutorials GitHub repository.
6. Conclusion
content_tagsThe astropy package is improving in stability, breadth, and reliability while the the Astropy project is still significantly growing. As the astropy core package becomes more mature, several subpackages have reached stability with a rich set of features that help astronomers worldwide to perform many daily tasks, such as planning observations, analyzing data or simulation results, and writing publications. The strong emphasis that the Astropy Project puts on reliability and high coding standards helps users to trust the calculations performed with astropy and to publish reproducible results. At the same time, the Astropy ecosystem and core package are both growing: new functionality is still being contributed and new affiliated packages are being developed to support more specialized needs.
concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesThe Astropy Project is also spreading awareness of best practices in community-driven software development. This is important because most practicing astronomers were not explicitly taught computer science and software development, despite the fact that a substantial fraction of many astronomers’ workload today is related to software use and development. The astropy package leads by example, showing all interested astronomers how modern tools like git version control or CI testing can increase the quality, accessibility, and discoverability of astronomical software without overly complicating the development cycle. Within Astropy, all submitted code is reviewed by at least one (but typically more than one) member of the Astropy community. Reviewers provide feedback to contributors, which helps to improve contributors’ software development skills. As a community, Astropy follows an explicit code of conduct (Cruz et al. 2015) and treats all contributors and users with respect, provides a harassment-free environment, and encourages and welcomes new contributions from all. Thus, while the Astropy Project provides and develops software and tools essential to modern astronomical research, it also helps to prepare the current and next generation of researchers with the knowledge to adequately use, develop, and contribute to those tools within a conscientious and welcoming community.
We thank the referee for an insightful report that improved the paper. We would like to thank the members of the community who have contributed to Astropy, who have opened issues and provided feedback, and who have supported the project in a number of different ways. We would like to acknowledge Alex Conley and Neil Crighton for maintaining the astropy.cosmology subpackage.
The Astropy community is supported by and makes use of a number of organizations and services outside the traditional academic community. We thank Google for financing and organizing the Google Summer of Code (GSoC) program, that has funded several students per year to work on Astropy related projects over the summer. These students often turn into long-term contributors. We also thank NumFOCUS and the Python Software Foundation for financial support. Within the academic community, we thank institutions that make it possible for astronomers and other developers on their staff to contribute their time to the development of Astropy projects. We acknowledge the support of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the South African Astronomical Observatory.
The following individuals would like to recognize support for their personal contributions. H.M.G. was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory contract SV3-73016 to MIT for Support of the Chandra X-Ray Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of the National Aeronautics Space Administration under contract NAS8-03060. J.T.V. was supported by the UW eScience Institute via grants from the Moore Foundation, the Sloan Foundation, and the Washington Research Foundation. S.M.C. acknowledges the National Research Foundation of South Africa. M.V.B. was supported by NASA’s Planetary Astronomy Program. T.L.A. was supported by NASA contract NAS8-03060. Support for E.J.T. was provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant No. 51316.01 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555, as well as a Giacconi Fellowship. M.B. was supported by the FONDECYT regular project 1170618 and the MINEDUC-UA projects codes ANT 1655 and ANT 1656. D.H. was supported through the SFB 881 “The Milky Way System” by the German Research Foundation (DFG). W.E.K was supported by an ESO Fellowship. C.M. is supported by NSF grant AST-1313484. S.P. was supported by grant AYA2016-75808-R (FEDER) issued by the Spanish government. J.E.H.T. was supported by the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., on behalf of the international Gemini partnership of Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, and the United States of America. Y.P.B was supported by the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, under the R&D program supervised by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning.
concepts↗unhoused_relationsFurthermore, the astropy packages would not exist in their current form without a number of web services for code hosting, continuous integration, and documentation; in particular, astropy heavily relies on GitHub, Travis CI, Appveyor, CircleCI, and Read the Docs.
Astropy interfaces with the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. It also makes use of the ERFA library (Tollerud et al. 2017), which in turn derives from the IAU SOFA Collection developed by the International Astronomical Union Standards of Fundamental Astronomy (Hohenkerk 2011).
Software: astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013), numpy (Van der Walt et al. 2011), scipy (Jones et al. 2001), matplotlib (Hunter 2007), Cython (Behnel et al. 2011), SOFA (Hohenkerk 2011), ERFA (Tollerud et al. 2017).
Appendix: List of Affiliated Packages
The Appendix comprises Table 1.
Table 1. Registry of Affiliated Packages
Package Name
Stable
PyPI Name
Maintainer
Citation
APLpy
Yes
APLpy
Thomas Robitaille and Eli Bressert
Robitaille & Bressert (2012)
Astro-SCRAPPY
Yes
astroscrappy
Curtis McCully
van Dokkum (2001)
astroML
Yes
astroML
Jake Vanderplas
Vanderplas et al. (2012), Ivezić et al. (2014)
astroplan
No
astroplan
Brett Morris
Morris et al. (2018)
astroquery
Yes
astroquery
Adam Ginsburg and Brigitta Sipocz
Ginsburg et al. (2017b)
ccdproc
Yes
ccdproc
Steven Crawford, Matt Craig, and Michael Seifert
Craig et al. (2015)
cluster-lensing
No
cluster-lensing
Jes Ford
Ford (2016)
gala
Yes
astro-gala
Adrian Price-Whelan
Price-Whelan (2017)
galpy
Yes
galpy
Jo Bovy
Bovy (2015)
gammapy
No
gammapy
Christoph Deil
Deil et al. (2017)
ginga
Yes
ginga
Eric Jeschke and Pey-Lian Lim
ejeschke et al. (2017)
Glue
Yes
glueviz
Chris Beaumont and Thomas Robitaille
Beaumont et al. (2014)
gwcs
No
gwcs
Nadia Dencheva
Dencheva et al. (2017)
Halotools
Yes
halotools
Andrew Hearin
Hearin et al. (2017)
HENDRICS
Yes
hendrics
Matteo Bachetti
Bachetti (2015)
hips
No
hips
Christoph Deil and Thomas Boch
hips developers (2018)
imexam
No
imexam
Megan Sosey
Sosey (2017)
linetools
Yes
linetools
J. Xavier Prochaska, Nicolas Tejos, and Neil Crighton
Prochaska et al. (2017)
marxs
Yes
marxs
Hans Moritz Günther
Günther et al. (2017)
naima
Yes
naima
Victor Zabalza
Zabalza (2015)
omnifit
Yes
omnifit
Aleksi Suutarinen
Suutarinen (2015)
photutils
No
photutils
Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sipocz
Bradley et al. (2017)
poliastro
No
poliastro
Juan Luis Cano Rodríguez
Rodríguez et al. (2017)
PyDL
No
pydl
Benjamin Alan Weaver
Weaver et al. (2017)
pyregion
Yes
pyregion
Jae-Joon Lee and Christoph Deil
pyregions developers (2018)
pyspeckit
Yes
pyspeckit
Adam Ginsburg
Ginsburg & Mirocha (2011)
python-cpl
No
python-cpl
Ole Streicher
Streicher & Weilbacher (2012)
PyVO
No
pyvo
Stefan Becker
Graham et al. (2014)
regions
No
regions
Christoph Deil and Johannes King
pyregions developers (2018)
reproject
Yes
reproject
Thomas Robitaille
Robitaille (2018)
sncosmo
Yes
sncosmo
Kyle Barbary
Barbary (2014)
spectral-cube
Yes
spectral-cube
Adam Ginsburg
Ginsburg et al. (2017a)
specutils
No
specutils
Nicholas Earl, Adam Ginsburg, Steve Crawford, and Erik Tollerud
specutils developers (2018)
spherical_geometry
No
spherical-geometry
Bernie Simon
stingray
No
stingray
Daniela Huppenkothen, Matteo Bachetti, Abigail Stevens, Simone Migliari, and Paul Balm
Huppenkothen et al. (2016)
synphot
Yes
synphot
Pey Lian Lim
Lim (2016)
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 11 of 11 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the Astropy Project's organization, infrastructure, and version-2.0 core package | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | how an open-development astronomy-software community organizes, sustains, and extends a shared Python core and interoperable package ecosystem | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a structured account of Astropy governance and infrastructure plus a technical status survey of the version-2.0 core package | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | method | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | community-driven development of reusable, interoperable astronomical software around a shared core package | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | system-or-tool-building also in: system-or-tool-building | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | Single-concept pull requests and maintainer approval make review tractable and gate core changes. also in: pull-request review | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Open proposals are discussed and refined before implementation, then accepted by consensus or decided by the coordination committee. also in: APE consensus process | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Specialized or externally dependent functionality develops outside the core on an independent release cycle. also in: affiliated-package separation | mechanisms[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | NumPy, SciPy, matplotlib, and Cython provide building blocks that Astropy wraps or specializes for astronomy. also in: scientific-Python reuse | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Quantity converts angular inputs to radians before passing them to NumPy trigonometric functions. also in: unit conversion | mechanisms[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Frame classes store coordinate data in Representation objects while mapping frame-specific component names. also in: Frame-Representation composition | mechanisms[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | A shared random coordinate set is transformed by all tools and summarized by pairwise angular-separation statistics. also in: all-pairs coordinate benchmark | mechanisms[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | HDU-list objects are created first and their data are loaded only when requested. also in: lazy FITS loading | mechanisms[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Restricting a model's domain avoids evaluation over an input range much wider than the model. also in: bounding-box evaluation | mechanisms[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Missing samples are excluded during convolution and filled by kernel interpolation. also in: normalized convolution | mechanisms[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | A reusable repository supplies packaging, testing, documentation, CI, and Cython-build infrastructure. also in: package template | mechanisms[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The article is neither an introduction to Astropy nor a replacement for its documentation. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Commit count is only a rough contribution measure because commits vary greatly in importance. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The project had no direct financial support at version 2.0. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | A long-term sustainability plan had not been established. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The boundary between reusing external algorithms and developing Astropy functionality is ambiguous. | limitations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Some numerically transformed velocity components have limited accuracy, and the velocity interface is experimental. | limitations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | No coordinate package is treated as ground truth because implementations and standards can differ. | limitations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Table-to-pandas conversion supports only a subset of Astropy Table objects. | limitations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The fast ASCII reader lacks some features and must fall back to the pure-Python implementation. | limitations[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Correct interpretation of Lomb–Scargle periodograms involves subtleties. | limitations[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Performance-focused development may introduce less new functionality as a trade-off. | limitations[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | all-tools pairwise comparison eliminates: dependence on a single package as ground truth · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | standard set of 1000 random longitude/latitude pairs eliminates: different coordinate inputs across tools · outcome: held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | suite of consistency checks eliminates: inconsistency between direct and FFT convolution · outcome: held | controls[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | Astropy Project also in: Astropy Project | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | astropy also in: astropy | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Open development also in: Open development | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | affiliated package also in: affiliated package | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | pull requests also in: pull requests | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | code review also in: code review | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Astropy Proposal for Enhancement also in: Astropy Proposal for Enhancement | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Astropy Project’s community also in: Astropy Project’s community | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | astropy core package also in: astropy core package | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | major releases also in: major releases | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | bugfix releases also in: bugfix releases | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Long-term support also in: Long-term support | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | existing Python scientific ecosystem also in: existing Python scientific ecosystem | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | numpy also in: numpy | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Astropy packages also in: Astropy packages | concepts[14] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Quantity objects also in: Quantity objects | concepts[15] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | numpy.ndarray objects also in: numpy.ndarray objects | concepts[16] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | quantity_input() also in: quantity_input() | concepts[17] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | input units also in: input units | concepts[18] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | coordinate representations also in: coordinate representations | concepts[19] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | reference systems/frames also in: reference systems/frames | concepts[20] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Frame classes also in: Frame classes | concepts[21] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Representation objects also in: Representation objects | concepts[22] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | SkyCoord class also in: SkyCoord class | concepts[23] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | EarthLocation class also in: EarthLocation class | concepts[24] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Time class also in: Time class | concepts[25] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | coordinate transformations also in: coordinate transformations | concepts[26] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | standard set of 1000 pairs of random longitudes/latitudes | concepts[27] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ECSV also in: ECSV | concepts[28] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Cython/C engine also in: Cython/C engine | concepts[29] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | pure-Python implementation also in: pure-Python implementation | concepts[30] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | models also in: models | concepts[31] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | fitters also in: fitters | concepts[32] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Model.bounding_box also in: Model.bounding_box | concepts[33] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | efficiency of evaluation also in: efficiency of evaluation | concepts[34] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | normalized convolution also in: normalized convolution | concepts[35] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | missing data also in: missing data | concepts[36] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | astropy.visualization subpackage also in: astropy.visualization subpackage | concepts[37] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | astropy.visualization.wcsaxes also in: astropy.visualization.wcsaxes | concepts[38] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | APLpy also in: APLpy | concepts[39] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | astropy.stats package also in: astropy.stats package | concepts[40] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | robust statistical functions also in: robust statistical functions | concepts[41] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Robust statistics also in: Robust statistics | concepts[42] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | effects of outliers also in: effects of outliers | concepts[43] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Bayesian Blocks also in: Bayesian Blocks | concepts[44] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | removing the support for Python 2 also in: removing the support for Python 2 | concepts[45] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | testing overhead also in: testing overhead | concepts[46] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | feedback also in: feedback | concepts[47] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | contributors’ software development skills | concepts[48] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | exposure also in: exposure | concepts[49] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | AltAz also in: AltAz | concepts[50] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | web services also in: web services | concepts[51] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| unhoused_relations | numpy → Astropy packages NumPy is a core underpinning and building block of Astropy packages. | unhoused_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | affiliated package → exposure Affiliation helps packages gain exposure through Astropy promotion. | unhoused_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | quantity_input() → input units quantity_input automatically verifies that input units have the required physical type. | unhoused_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Time class → AltAz AltAz transformations require a time specified with the Time class. | unhoused_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Robust statistics → effects of outliers Robust statistics largely mitigate the effects of outliers. | unhoused_relations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | removing the support for Python 2 → testing overhead Removing Python 2 support reduces testing overhead. | unhoused_relations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | normalized convolution → missing data Normalized convolution ignores missing data and replaces them by kernel interpolation. | unhoused_relations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Astropy packages → web services Astropy packages rely on external code-hosting, CI, and documentation web services. | unhoused_relations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Astropy as both a core package and an open-development package ecosystem | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | open development as public participation in code, features, governance, and review | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | affiliation as community inclusion without membership in the astropy core package | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | LTS as two years of bug fixes with an unchanged API | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Quantity as a NumPy-compatible value carrying physical units | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | coordinate representation as independent from reference frame | senses[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | SkyCoord as the high-level wrapper over Frame and Representation classes | senses[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | coordinate accuracy as all-pairs implementation agreement rather than distance from a single ground truth | senses[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | ECSV as lossless table round-tripping in a human-readable ASCII format | senses[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | model and fitter as independently extensible components | senses[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | normalized convolution as ignoring missing samples and interpolating their values | senses[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Bayesian Blocks as breakpoint analysis applied to unequal-width histogram binning | senses[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → version 0.2 note: The paper highlights features introduced or improved since the first Astropy paper. | claim_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → existing Python scientific ecosystem note: Astropy explicitly reuses scientific-Python packages as core underpinnings and building blocks. | claim_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | complements → astropy documentation note: The article describes community organization and package status rather than replacing documentation. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → a broader ecosystem of interoperable packages note: The described project infrastructure facilitates and supports the broader package ecosystem. | claim_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | affiliated package —part-of→ Astropy Project’s community the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Categorical membership stated with 'part of'. · the relation stated: An affiliated package requests inclusion as part of the Astropy Project's community. also in: affiliated package · Astropy Project’s community | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | affiliated package —distinct-from→ astropy core package the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Flat separation claim grounded by 'separate from'. · the relation stated: Affiliated packages are kept separate from the astropy core package. also in: affiliated package · astropy core package | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | major releases —contrasted-with→ bugfix releases the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Direct whereas-contrast; gradable relation uses flat-assertion strength. · the relation stated: Major releases contain features or significant changes, whereas bugfix releases contain fixes but no new features. also in: major releases · bugfix releases | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | coordinate representations —distinct-from→ reference systems/frames the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Explicit flat independence claim. · the relation stated: Coordinate representations are independent of reference systems and frames. | concept_edges[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | models —distinct-from→ fitters the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Explicit flat independence claim. · the relation stated: Models and fitters are independent of each other. | concept_edges[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Model.bounding_box —causes→ efficiency of evaluation direction on the measure: increases · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Direct strong improvement claim. · the relation stated: Setting Model.bounding_box greatly improves evaluation efficiency. also in: Model.bounding_box · efficiency of evaluation | concept_edges[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | astropy.visualization.wcsaxes —contrasted-with→ APLpy the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Direct differs/whereas comparison. · the relation stated: astropy.visualization.wcsaxes differs from APLpy in interface level and visualization flexibility. also in: astropy.visualization.wcsaxes · APLpy | concept_edges[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | astropy.visualization.wcsaxes —part-of→ astropy.visualization subpackage the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Categorical package containment. · the relation stated: The astropy.visualization subpackage includes astropy.visualization.wcsaxes. | concept_edges[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | robust statistical functions —part-of→ astropy.stats package the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Categorical package containment. · the relation stated: The astropy.stats package includes robust statistical functions. | concept_edges[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Bayesian Blocks —part-of→ astropy.stats package the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Categorical package containment. · the relation stated: The astropy.stats package includes an implementation of Bayesian Blocks. also in: Bayesian Blocks · astropy.stats package | concept_edges[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | feedback —causes→ contributors’ software development skills direction on the measure: increases · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The paper says the feedback helps improvement; weight preserves that enabling hedge. · the relation stated: Reviewer feedback helps improve contributors' software-development skills. | concept_edges[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Astropy combines an open-development core package with an ecosystem of affiliated astronomy packages. | content_tags.findings[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Pull requests are limited to one conceptual change and require maintainer review before merge. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Version 2.0 comprised 212,244 lines of code, 232 contributors, and 19,270 commits. | content_tags.findings[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Affiliated packages house specialized, dependency-heavy, or license-incompatible functionality outside the core. | content_tags.findings[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Major releases occur every six months, while long-term-support releases receive bug fixes for two years. | content_tags.findings[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Quantity objects extend NumPy arrays and convert angular units to radians for NumPy trigonometric functions. | content_tags.findings[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Coordinate representations are independent of coordinate reference frames. | content_tags.findings[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The coordinate benchmark compares every tool against every other tool rather than designating a ground truth. | content_tags.findings[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ECSV permits an ASCII table to be written and read back without information loss. | content_tags.findings[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The Cython/C ASCII engine is about four to five times faster on average than the corresponding pure-Python implementation. | content_tags.findings[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Direct and FFT convolution agree in version 2.0 and are covered by consistency checks. | content_tags.findings[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The package's reliability and coding standards support trusted calculations and reproducible results. | content_tags.findings[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a process in which anyone online can propose code or governance changes and join discussion also in: Open development | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the formal mechanism for proposing major core, feature, or project-policy changes also in: Astropy Proposal for Enhancement | content_tags.definitions[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | an astronomy Python package outside the core that requests inclusion in the broader Astropy community also in: affiliated package | content_tags.definitions[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a release designation that receives fixes for two years without API changes also in: Long-term support | content_tags.definitions[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | numbers represented together with associated units also in: quantities | content_tags.definitions[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the high-level coordinate interface accepting many frames, representations, and inputs also in: SkyCoord class | content_tags.definitions[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a human-readable CSV-compatible ASCII table format preserving table information also in: ECSV | content_tags.definitions[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the settable domain over which a model is defined also in: Model.bounding_box | content_tags.definitions[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | image reconstruction that ignores missing values during convolution and replaces them by kernel interpolation also in: normalized convolution | content_tags.definitions[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | estimators for complex distributions that largely mitigate outlier effects also in: robust statistics | content_tags.definitions[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | an algorithm for analyzing breakpoints in nonperiodic astronomical time series also in: Bayesian Blocks | content_tags.definitions[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 212,244 lines of code — size of astropy version 2.0 | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 232 unique contributors — contributors to astropy version 2.0 | content_tags.quantities[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 19,270 git commits — commits accumulated by astropy version 2.0 | content_tags.quantities[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ≈20–25 people — monthly contributors to the core package | content_tags.quantities[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | every six months — interval between significant astropy releases | content_tags.quantities[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | two years — bug-fix support period for LTS releases | content_tags.quantities[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1000 pairs — random longitude-latitude inputs used in every coordinate benchmark | content_tags.quantities[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | four to five times faster — average Cython/C ASCII-engine speedup over pure Python | content_tags.quantities[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | [0, 1] — range used for image normalization and stretching | content_tags.quantities[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | four different methods — automatic histogram-bin selection choices | content_tags.quantities[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | number of commits also in: number of commits | content_tags.variables[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | input and output coordinate frame also in: input and output coordinate frame | content_tags.variables[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | median, mean, maximum, and standard deviation | content_tags.variables[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | input units also in: input units | content_tags.variables[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | parameter values also in: parameter values | content_tags.variables[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | lower and upper limits also in: lower and upper limits | content_tags.variables[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | histogram bin size also in: histogram bin size | content_tags.variables[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.