<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation</title>
        <author>Sebastian Bach</author>
        <author>Alexander Binder</author>
        <author>Grégoire Montavon</author>
        <author>Frederick Klauschen</author>
        <author>Klaus‐Robert Müller</author>
        <author>Wojciech Samek</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>PLoS ONE</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0130140</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">bach2015-on-pixel-wise-explanations-for-non</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">bach2015-on-pixel-wise-explanations-for-non.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">61074252fd380df41485a39bf257484518c82c81</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>machine-learning</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>the contribution of each individual input pixel to one non-linear classifier&#x27;s decision on one image</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>how to explain why a non-linear image classifier reached a particular decision, at the resolution of single pixels</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>layer-wise relevance propagation - a heatmapping concept defined as a set of constraints rather than an algorithm - together with a Taylor-type alternative, both applicable to pre-trained Bag-of-Words and neural classifiers</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>classifier opacity: a non-linear model gives a decision without saying what in the input produced it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>system-or-tool-building</label>
        <term>system-or-tool-building</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the relevance held by a unit is redistributed onto the units that fed it, and the total is preserved from one layer to the next, so the prediction survives intact all the way down to the pixels</label>
        <term>relevance conservation between layers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance is computed one layer at a time rather than globally, which is cheap but can strand relevance in a lower layer where it is then distributed randomly</label>
        <term>greedy layer-at-a-time propagation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the gradient at the prediction point points toward the nearest local optimum, which may carry the SAME SIGN as the prediction - so it does not point at the boundary the explanation is relative to</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a root is found by taking any candidate with the opposite prediction sign and searching the line between them - the segment must cross zero, so interval intersection locates it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the root point is specified by CONSTRAINTS rather than by a formula - it must be a root and must lie near the data point, with the rest deferred</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the two approaches differ in what they conserve: the earlier work rectifies activations to keep feature maps non-negative, this one uses SIGNED activations to conserve the relevance quantity across layers</label>
        <note>about this quote: THE QUOTE&#x27;S SUBJECT IS A CITATION THE TEXT EXTRACTION DROPPED: the paper&#x27;s sentence opens with a reference to earlier work, so what &#x27;uses rectified linear units&#x27; is that work, which the paragraph compares with this paper&#x27;s approach - not this paper.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the propagation is greedy - computed one layer at a time - and some relevance may hit a dead end in the lower layers and be distributed randomly</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the proposed propagation rules are heuristic: whether relevance proportional to weighted neuron activations can be analytically justified is open</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>there is no way to evaluate the quality of a heatmap beyond looking at it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>no universal metric for quantifying heatmap quality exists; the paper defers it to future work</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a decomposition satisfying the conservation equation is neither unique nor guaranteed to be meaningful - the constraint set does not pin down an answer</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the Taylor approach needs a second point besides the input, and finding it is called a technical difficulty in the paper&#x27;s own words</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>where several minimal-norm roots exist the method must average or integrate over them rather than pick one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a competing method is specific to convolutional architectures, which the paper contrasts with its own range of applicability</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the conservation law, taken from physics and imposed on relevance flowing between network layers</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a quantitative test that can separate two heatmaps which look equally good to a human</label>
        <note>eliminates: two heatmapping methods being ranked on how good they look to a human, which is the judgement the paper exists to replace · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a counterexample testing whether the conservation constraint alone yields a meaningful decomposition</label>
        <note>eliminates: the conservation constraint being credited with producing a meaningful decomposition when it constrains only the total · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>application to a classifier the authors did not train, to show no retraining is needed</label>
        <note>eliminates: a heatmapping result that depends on the authors having trained the classifier themselves · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>pixel-wise decomposition</label>
        <term>pixel-wise decomposition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>layer-wise relevance propagation</label>
        <term>layer-wise relevance propagation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance</label>
        <term>relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>heatmap</label>
        <term>heatmap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>conservation law</label>
        <term>conservation law</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>black box</label>
        <term>black box</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>pixel-flipping</label>
        <term>pixel-flipping</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>segmentation</label>
        <term>segmentation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>pre-trained classifier</label>
        <term>pre-trained classifier</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>non-linearity</label>
        <term>non-linearity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>Taylor reference point</label>
        <term>Taylor reference point</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Taylor-type decomposition</label>
        <term>Taylor-type decomposition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>root point</label>
        <term>root point</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>sensitivity maps</label>
        <term>sensitivity maps</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Taylor residuum</label>
        <term>Taylor residuum</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>locally linear</label>
        <term>locally linear</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>layer-wise relevance propagation = whatever satisfies the constraints; several different algorithms qualify</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>R_d &lt; 0 = evidence AGAINST the structure being present; R_d &gt; 0 = evidence FOR it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance at the output layer = the prediction f(x) itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>heatmap = relevances mapped to a colour space - named, then explicitly put out of scope</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>&#x27;admissible&#x27; = satisfying the constraints, which is weaker than &#x27;correct&#x27; and the paper says so</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>claim_type: method</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: method — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>method: system-or-tool-building</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: system-or-tool-building — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>phenomenon: which parts of an input image drive a nonlinear classifier&#x27;s decision</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: classifier opacity: a non-linear model gives a decision without saying what in the input produced it — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>distinguishes-from → the standard task of optimising a classifier for accuracy and generalisation</label>
        <note>note: the paper&#x27;s framing move: explaining one decision is ORTHOGONAL to training a good classifier, so a better classifier does not make a better explanation</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>critiques → the claim that non-linear models&#x27; success justifies their opacity</label>
        <note>note: highly successful AND prevented from contributing understanding - the paper puts those in one sentence</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>non-linearity —causes→ black box</label>
        <term>non-linearity</term>
        <term>black box</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.95 · direction on the measure (stated by the tagger, no quotation): increases
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: &#x27;This lack of interpretability&#x27; = the classifier acting as a black box (previous sentence).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>relevance —part-of→ conservation law</label>
        <term>relevance</term>
        <term>conservation law</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: the conservation law is a property required OF relevance, which is why it constrains rather than computes it
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the formula is read as a conservation law for relevance; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a decomposition satisfying the layer-wise equation is neither unique nor necessarily meaningful</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a trivially valid decomposition makes every input point the same way as the prediction, which is not a realistic interpretation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>The method was applied to a third-party pre-trained ImageNet network without retraining.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Further specification of the relevance propagation rule is deferred to the user or to future work.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>there is no direct relationship between a classifier&#x27;s value at a point and its derivative at the same point, which is the first reason a gradient map is not an explanation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Derivatives at the prediction point are not useful for the paper&#x27;s aim.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>layer-wise relevance propagation needs no second reference point at all, which is the practical advantage claimed over Taylor decomposition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>In the example, the local-gradient explanation gives too large a contribution to an irrelevant direction.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>pixel-wise decomposition</label>
        <term>pixel-wise decomposition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>layer-wise relevance propagation</label>
        <term>layer-wise relevance propagation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance</label>
        <term>relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>heatmap</label>
        <term>heatmap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>pixel-flipping</label>
        <term>pixel-flipping</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the sign convention that makes a root the state of maximal uncertainty - positive means presence, negative means absence</label>
        <term>state of maximal uncertainty</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>conservation of total relevance across layers</label>
        <term>conservation of total relevance across layers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>relevance</label>
        <term>relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>prediction</label>
        <term>prediction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130140.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
