standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | automatic social behavior priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | behavioural-experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioural-experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The paper describes itself as a first demonstration whose boundary conditions are not yet known. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The Experiment 1 timing measure suffered from a severe ceiling effect because most participants never interrupted. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The authors concede the strength of behavioural versus judgemental priming effects cannot really be compared across their situations. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| controls | the priming condition was assigned by a SECOND EXPERIMENTER who had no contact with the participant Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the experimenter who ran the session knew the condition and shaped the behaviour being measured - the classic experimenter-expectancy route to a priming effect · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | participants were partially debriefed and questioned about whether they thought the scrambled-sentence task had influenced them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that participants worked out the manipulation and complied with what they took to be the hypothesis · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: priming | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | trait construct Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: trait construct | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | stereotype Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stereotype | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | behavior Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavior | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | PRIMING DEFINED AS AN ORDINARY FEATURE OF BEING SOMEWHERE: `Quotation withheld.` Not a laboratory operation - a description of what situations do to people continuously, of which the experiment is a controlled instance. That is the same move srull-wyer1979 makes when it says accessibility rises with the number of activations `in the past`, and it is what licenses generalising from a word-scramble task to walking down a corridor Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE DESIGN LOGIC IN ONE SENTENCE: `Quotation withheld.` Only the dependent measure changed. The manipulation is held constant against the 1977-79 accessibility work and the outcome is swapped from a judgement to an action - which makes this a claim about the SCOPE of an established effect rather than a new effect. And it means the replication debate about this paper is unavoidably also about higgins1977 and srull-wyer1979, both of which are in this corpus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE EFFECT TAKES THE CONTENT OF WHAT WAS PRIMED, WHICH IS WHAT RULES OUT AROUSAL OR MOOD: rudeness produced interrupting `more quickly and frequently`, the elderly stereotype produced walking `more slowly down the hallway ... consistent with the content of that stereotype`, and the third prime produced hostility. Three primes, three different behaviours, each matching its own prime - a general activation account predicts one direction for all three and gets none of them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND TWO THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES ARE OFFERED WITH NEITHER CHOSEN. First, situationally linked behaviour: `a person has behavioral responses (e.g., assertiveness, anger, patience) that are associatively linked to particular situations.` Then: `another theoretical perspective CONSISTENT WITH the present findings is that of an AUTOMATIC PERCEPTION-BEHAVIOR LINK.` Both are said to fit and the paper stops there. dijksterhuis1998, tagged one record earlier, takes the second and builds on it - so the corpus holds the fork and the branch that was taken Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → priming research on social perception Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Berkowitz and LePage (1967) and Carver et al. (1983) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Carver et al. (1983) behavioral schema model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Devine (1989, Experiment 2) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | trait construct —causes→ behavior Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: 'consistent with it' AND 'subsequent unrelated context' ARE BOTH IN THE QUOTE AND BOTH ARE LOAD-BEARING. The behaviour matches the CONTENT of what was primed, which excludes a general arousal account; and the second context is UNRELATED, which is what makes it a carry-over rather than a demand effect. Weight 0.9: the discussion's opening summary of three experiments, and this is the paper's central claim. also in: trait construct · behavior | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | stereotype —causes→ behavior Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: 'increases' MEANS MORE STEREOTYPE-CONSISTENT BEHAVIOUR, NOT MORE OF ANY MEASURED QUANTITY, AND THE DISTINCTION MATTERS HERE. In Experiment 2 the measurement WENT DOWN - participants primed with 'elderly' WALKED MORE SLOWLY. A reader taking 'increases' as 'the number went up' would have that experiment backwards. The axis is recording consistency with the primed content, which is what the quote says, and the three experiments move three different dependent variables in three directions. also in: stereotype · behavior | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 3 — studies of behavior priming reported Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: marked quote-not-in-current-staged-text - today's merge gate would REFUSE this quote: Paper.locate() does not find it in the current staged text, and no disclosure on the row explains why. Update, 15 September 2026: CLEARED evidence status='quote-not-in-current-staged-text' - the quote was replaced (RE-CUT) and the new quote locates exactly once in the current staged text. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 2 — span of automaticity research reviewed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | rudeness-primed participants interrupted more quickly and frequently Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | elderly-stereotype-primed participants walked more slowly Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | subliminal race-stereotype priming increased hostility Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | attitudes activate automatically on mere presence of the object Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | behavioral response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioral response | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: priming | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | automaticity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. also in: automaticity | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | stereotype activation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stereotype activation | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | self-fulfilling prophecies Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: self-fulfilling prophecies | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | hypothesis-testing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. also in: hypothesis-testing | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. also in: mean | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: p-value | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | statistical-significance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: statistical-significance | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | variance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: variance | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.