<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements</title>
        <author>Lisa Feldman Barrett</author>
        <author>Ralph Adolphs</author>
        <author>Stacy Marsella</author>
        <author>Aleix M. Martı́nez</author>
        <author>Seth D. Pollak</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements</title>
          <date>2019</date>
          <publisher>Psychological Science in the Public Interest</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1177/1529100619832930</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">barrett2019-emotional-expressions-reconsidered</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">barrett2019-emotional-expressions-reconsidered.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">bf3968ace26d0f11694407d3546229fa39f4f4be</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by-sa</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>the inference from facial movements to emotional states, and whether the scientific evidence licenses the way that inference is being used in law, hiring, security, education and commercial software</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether the existing research on emotional expression and emotion perception is strong enough to justify how it is increasingly being used by those who consume it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>a systematic review of production and perception studies against four named criteria, and a prescription for naming: call a facial configuration what was measured until the evidence licenses calling it an expression</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>a measurement routinely given the name of the construct it is taken to reveal, so that the name carries an inference the data do not support</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>systematic-review</label>
        <term>systematic-review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>offering a participant six emotion words and one face forces a choice among them, so agreement measures how the options were built rather than what the face conveys; remove the array and let people supply their own word and the rates fall</label>
        <term>response-set constraint manufacturing agreement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>where happiness is the only pleasant category in the array, every distractor differs from the target in valence, so a participant can score perfectly by discriminating pleasant from unpleasant without perceiving any emotion category at all</label>
        <term>valence perception passing as emotion perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>calling a measured facial movement an &#x27;emotional display&#x27; imports the conclusion into the description, so a later reader inherits an inference nobody tested; the same happens with &#x27;recognizing&#x27; rather than &#x27;inferring&#x27; and &#x27;accuracy&#x27; rather than &#x27;agreement&#x27;</label>
        <term>naming carrying the inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a result reliable enough to publish can still be low in absolute terms, so a literature of individually valid findings accumulates into a consensus that no single finding supports</label>
        <term>above-chance publication threshold</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the review covers six emotion categories, not the twenty-plus currently studied, because the evidence base for the other categories is far smaller - the conclusions are extended to them by argument rather than by review</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>evidence from small-scale remote cultures on expression PRODUCTION is inconclusive rather than negative: there are no systematic controlled observations of how people in these contexts spontaneously move their faces</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>validity - the fourth criterion - is not evaluated by the review either, because the underlying studies almost never address it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the authors&#x27; own earlier papers used exactly the design they criticise, presenting posed configurations without context; the critique includes its own authors</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>reliability, specificity, generalizability and validity - the criteria of psychological measurement - carried into an audit of what a whole literature&#x27;s vocabulary is entitled to assert</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>reverse inference, and the conditional probability that formalises it, carried from neuroimaging methodology into the reading of faces</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>four criteria fixed in advance - reliability, specificity, generalizability, validity - so that the review&#x27;s verdict is not a matter of the reviewers&#x27; impression</label>
        <note>eliminates: a review verdict that is the reviewers&#x27; impression of a literature they already disagreed with · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>evidence sought across four independent populations - developed-nation adults, small-scale remote cultures, infants and children, and congenitally blind people - so that no single literature&#x27;s method could carry the conclusion</label>
        <note>eliminates: a conclusion about facial expression drawn from one population - Western adults - and stated about people · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>results partitioned by the METHOD used to collect them, to test whether support for the common view is a property of the phenomenon or of the task</label>
        <note>eliminates: support for the common view that is a property of the TASK used to collect it rather than of the phenomenon · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the authors turning the same critique on their own published work rather than only on other laboratories&#x27;</label>
        <note>eliminates: a critique that applies to every laboratory except the one making it · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>testing the common view against specific alternative hypotheses about context, rather than only against chance</label>
        <note>eliminates: specific alternative accounts of the expression-emotion link, in particular context-based ones - testing against the null alone rules out chance and nothing else · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): absent-stated-about-other</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>reverse inference</label>
        <term>reverse inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>reliability</label>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>specificity</label>
        <term>specificity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>generalizability</label>
        <term>generalizability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>validity</label>
        <term>validity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>emotional expression</label>
        <term>emotional expression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>facial configuration</label>
        <term>facial configuration</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>emotional expressions</label>
        <term>emotional expressions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>facial configurations</label>
        <term>facial configurations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>accuracy</label>
        <term>accuracy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Consistency</label>
        <term>Consistency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Common view</label>
        <term>Common view</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>stereotype</label>
        <term>stereotype</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>prototype</label>
        <term>prototype</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Choice-from-array tasks</label>
        <term>Choice-from-array tasks</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>free labeling</label>
        <term>free labeling</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>context</label>
        <term>context</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Ecological validity</label>
        <term>Ecological validity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Conditional probability</label>
        <term>Conditional probability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>classical view</label>
        <term>classical view</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Facial movement</label>
        <term>Facial movement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Facial expression</label>
        <term>Facial expression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[22]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Perceiver-dependent</label>
        <term>Perceiver-dependent</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[23]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Perceiver-independent</label>
        <term>Perceiver-independent</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[24]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Forward inference</label>
        <term>Forward inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[25]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Percent agreement</label>
        <term>Percent agreement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[26]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>percent accuracy</label>
        <term>percent accuracy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[27]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Recognition</label>
        <term>Recognition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[28]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>perception</label>
        <term>perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[29]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discrimination</label>
        <term>Discrimination</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[30]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>identification</label>
        <term>identification</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[31]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Emotional granularity</label>
        <term>Emotional granularity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>&quot;emotional expression&quot; - AS LICENSED: a facial configuration that reliably and specifically communicates an emotional state. The paper&#x27;s glossary adds that many so-called emotional expressions are errors of reverse inference</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>&quot;emotional expression&quot; - AS USED IN THE LITERATURE: any facial configuration labelled with an emotion category, applied without checking reliability, specificity, generalizability or validity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>&quot;accuracy&quot; - AS DEFINED: correspondence to an intended performance that must be perceiver-independent and not subject to the whims of the experimenter</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>&quot;accuracy&quot; - AS IT SHOULD BE RENAMED in this literature: agreement or consensus, because what these studies measure is whether people label a face the same way, not whether the label is correct</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>&#x27;common view&#x27; / &#x27;classical view&#x27; - THE FRAMEWORK THIS PAPER IS AGAINST HAS TWO NAMES, AND THE SECOND APPEARS EXACTLY ONCE: &#x27;a set of beliefs were refer to as the common view (also called the classical view)&#x27;. A definitions row already glosses &#x27;Common view&#x27;; what was missing is that the literature this paper argues with calls it something else. A reader searching the corpus for &#x27;classical view&#x27; - which is what the opposing literature calls itself - would not have reached this record.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Facial movement - an objective, perceiver-independent configuration description that makes no emotional inference</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Facial expression - a perceiver-dependent inference that a facial configuration expresses an internal state</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Perceiver-dependent - interpretation depends on human judgment and may be consistent without being accurate or valid</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Perceiver-independent - observation does not depend on human judgment, though independence comes in degrees</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="senses" ana="#senses[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Forward inference - inferring an effect from a known cause, such as frowning conditional on anger</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="senses" ana="#senses[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Percent agreement - inter-rater consistency, explicitly not percent accuracy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="senses" ana="#senses[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Percent accuracy - not interchangeable with agreement because agreement is more perceiver-dependent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="senses" ana="#senses[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Recognition - acknowledging an independently confirmed existent, contrasted with interpretive perception</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="senses" ana="#senses[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Perception - inference and interpretation rather than independently confirmed recognition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="senses" ana="#senses[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discrimination - deciding that stimuli differ without identifying what they are or recognizing what they mean</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="senses" ana="#senses[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Identification - deciding what a stimulus is, not merely that it differs from another</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="senses" ana="#senses[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Emotional granularity - experiencing or perceiving emotion through many differentiated categories</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>critiques → the common view that each of six emotion categories is reliably and specifically expressed by, and recognisable from, its own configuration of facial movements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>critiques → automated emotion-recognition technology that infers emotional states from facial movements alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>qualifies → choice-from-array emotion-perception findings, which supply the strongest support for the common view and cannot produce disconfirming evidence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>reinterprets → the canonical six facial configurations - as Western stereotypes rather than as prototypes or universal displays</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>emotional expressions —distinct-from→ facial configurations</label>
        <term>emotional expressions</term>
        <term>facial configurations</term>
        <note>differs in: whether reliability, specificity, generalizability and validity have been demonstrated · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether reliability, specificity, generalizability and validity have been demonstrated · the relation stated: the second is what was measured; the first adds an inference the evidence must license</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>accuracy —distinct-from→ Consistency</label>
        <term>accuracy</term>
        <term>Consistency</term>
        <note>differs in: whether there is a perceiver-independent correct answer to be right about · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether there is a perceiver-independent correct answer to be right about · the relation stated: a group can consistently believe something that is wrong</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>stereotype —distinct-from→ prototype</label>
        <term>stereotype</term>
        <term>prototype</term>
        <note>differs in: whether the configuration is actually the most frequent instance of the category · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether the configuration is actually the most frequent instance of the category · the relation stated: a prototype is the typical instance; a stereotype is a belief over-applied</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Choice-from-array tasks —contrasted-with→ free labeling</label>
        <term>Choice-from-array tasks</term>
        <term>free labeling</term>
        <note>differs in: whether the participant may supply a word the experimenter did not offer · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether the participant may supply a word the experimenter did not offer · the relation stated: the constrained task inflates agreement and cannot produce disconfirming evidence
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span describes the choice-from-array method without naming it.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>common view —same-as→ classical view</label>
        <term>common view</term>
        <term>classical view</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: A bare parenthetical synonym, no hedge. THE AXIS IS THE AUTHOR&#x27;S OWN VS THE OPPOSING LITERATURE&#x27;S: Barrett coins &#x27;common view&#x27; for the position she is attacking, and notes that it already has a name. lists discipline, language, profession and venue as the axes this type carries; this is a fifth - THE NAME A POSITION&#x27;S CRITICS GIVE IT AGAINST THE NAME IT GIVES ITSELF. · the relation stated: the paper gives the second name parenthetically as an alternative for the first</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>facial configuration —distinct-from→ Facial expression</label>
        <term>facial configuration</term>
        <term>Facial expression</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The glossary explicitly says the objective configuration is not synonymous with the inference-laden expression.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Perceiver-independent —distinct-from→ Perceiver-dependent</label>
        <term>Perceiver-independent</term>
        <term>Perceiver-dependent</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The glossary contrasts the two categories through dependence on human judgment and a &#x27;whereas&#x27; example.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Percent agreement —distinct-from→ percent accuracy</label>
        <term>Percent agreement</term>
        <term>percent accuracy</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The glossary states directly that percent agreement is not percent accuracy.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discrimination —distinct-from→ identification</label>
        <term>Discrimination</term>
        <term>identification</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The glossary says discrimination is separate from identifying what stimuli are.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discrimination —distinct-from→ Recognition</label>
        <term>Discrimination</term>
        <term>Recognition</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The glossary says discrimination is separate from recognizing what stimuli mean.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the six canonical facial configurations occur during their predicted emotions above chance, but weakly, and evidence for specificity is lacking in almost all research domains</label>
        <term>the six canonical facial configurations occur during their predicted emotions above chance, but weakly, and evidence for specificity is lacking in almost all research domains</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>there are many-to-many mappings between facial configurations and emotion categories - anger is expressed more broadly than a scowl, and scowls express more than anger</label>
        <term>there are many-to-many mappings between facial configurations and emotion categories - anger is expressed more broadly than a scowl, and scowls express more than anger</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the strength of support for the common view varies systematically with the research method used, and the strongest support does not generalise</label>
        <term>the strength of support for the common view varies systematically with the research method used, and the strongest support does not generalise</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Choice-from-array tasks severely limit the chance of observing disconfirming evidence, because they restrict the labels offered.</label>
        <term>Choice-from-array tasks severely limit the chance of observing disconfirming evidence, because they restrict the labels offered.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>where happiness is the only pleasant option, apparent emotion perception may be valence perception</label>
        <term>where happiness is the only pleasant option, apparent emotion perception may be valence perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>emotion-reading technology detects facial movements, not emotional expressions</label>
        <term>emotion-reading technology detects facial movements, not emotional expressions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the literature confounds measurement with interpretation - calling movements expressions, inference recognition, and agreement accuracy</label>
        <term>the literature confounds measurement with interpretation - calling movements expressions, inference recognition, and agreement accuracy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a facial configuration, bodily movement or vocal expression that reliably and specifically communicates an emotional state - and many so-called emotional expressions are errors of reverse inference</label>
        <term>emotional expression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>that certain emotion categories reliably cause specific patterns of facial muscle movements, and that specific configurations are diagnostic of certain emotion categories</label>
        <term>Common view</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>extent to which a participant&#x27;s performance corresponds to the intended performance, which requires the correct answer to be perceiver-independent</label>
        <term>accuracy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an outcome that does not vary greatly across time, context or individuals - and not accuracy, since a group can consistently believe something wrong</label>
        <term>Consistency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the probability that X occurs given that Y has occurred; p(frown given sadness) is the form a face-reading claim takes</label>
        <term>Conditional probability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the extent to which findings generalise to real-life settings, and the extent to which a protocol captures valid aspects of the real world</label>
        <term>Ecological validity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>assuming an observed facial movement reveals an emotional state you cannot access directly</label>
        <term>reverse inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the correlation range the paper calls weak reliability - a person sometimes scowls in anger, but not most of the time</label>
        <term>r = .20 to .39</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>reliability</label>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>specificity</label>
        <term>specificity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>generalizability</label>
        <term>generalizability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>null hypothesis</label>
        <term>null hypothesis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>context</label>
        <term>context</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
