<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Syntactic Persistence in Language Production</title>
        <author>J. Kathryn Bock</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Syntactic Persistence in Language Production</title>
          <date>1986</date>
          <publisher>Cognitive Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">bock1986-syntactic</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">bock1986-syntactic.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">46f60d3d7140ce6a1c098d09edfc120035768bc0</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>linguistics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>syntactic persistence in language production</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>syntactic (structural) priming: producing or hearing a sentence structure makes speakers more likely to reuse that same structure in a later, content-unrelated utterance - so syntax is represented and primed independently of meaning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>it is unclear whether syntactic intrusions/perseverations can be accounted for in the same way</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The null effect of the agency manipulation carries the usual indeterminacy of null results and may reflect a weak manipulation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The symmetry between syntactic and conceptual matching rests on unreliable differences and a very small item sample.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Both lines of evidence for the isolability of syntactic processing are described by the author as tentative.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the filler items were tested on a schedule that reached 33, 78, 85 and 100 per cent by the end of each successive quarter of the list</label>
        <note>eliminates: that recognition performance depends on how recently an item appeared rather than on the priming manipulation · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>syntactic persistence</label>
        <term>syntactic persistence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming effect</label>
        <term>priming effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>lexical repetition</label>
        <term>lexical repetition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>passive</label>
        <term>passive</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE EFFECT IS ON WHAT SPEAKERS CHOOSE, AND IT IS SYMMETRIC: `Quotation withheld` Not a latency, not an accuracy - a shift in which of two grammatical options a speaker takes, in both directions equally. The symmetry matters: a bias toward one form would be explicable by that form being easier, and a bias toward whichever form was just heard is not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE DEFLATIONARY READING IS CLOSED IN ONE SENTENCE: `Quotation withheld` Prime and target share no words, and the effect survives. This is the sentence that makes it SYNTACTIC priming rather than a long-range word priming - and every other priming record in this corpus (meyer1971, neely1977, hutchison2003) is about exactly the relation Bock is ruling out</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>IT MEETS lashley1951 ACROSS THIRTY-FIVE YEARS AND NEITHER CITES THE OTHER. Lashley: `syntax is NOT INHERENT in the words employed or in the idea to be expressed` - argued from the impossibility of associative chains, with no experiment attached. Bock: syntactic form persists across utterances sharing neither words nor message. The argument and the demonstration, both merged into this corpus tonight, thirty-five years and one discipline apart</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>AND THE STRATEGIC EXPLANATIONS ARE NAMED AND REMOVED: `Quotation withheld` Not rehearsal, not cohesion. The same move as marcel1983&#x27;s second mask and erb2019&#x27;s overlap control - naming the alternatives and closing them rather than reporting the effect and leaving them standing</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → activation-based theories of language production</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the competition model of Bates and MacWhinney (1982; MacWhinney, Bates, &amp; Kliegl, 1984)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Levelt and Kelter (1982) and Weiner and Labov (1983) on repetition of syntactic form in natural speech</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Experiment 2 of this paper</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>lexical repetition —distinct-from→ priming effect</label>
        <term>lexical repetition</term>
        <term>priming effect</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE EDGE THAT MAKES THE PAPER SYNTACTIC. &#x27;lexical repetition does…&#x27; - both endpoints named, the relation is exactly non-inclusion, and it is the paper&#x27;s own conclusion rather than a framing. Weight 0.95. &#x27;distinct-from&#x27; is the right type here for once - elsewhere tonight it has had to stand in for &#x27;co-occurs but does not cause&#x27; (mcmahon-olson2007) and lost half a sentence doing it; here non-necessity IS distinctness and nothing is lost. &#x27;seem to&#x27; is the authors&#x27; hedge and stays inside the quote.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but lexical repetition &#x27;does not seem to be a necessary component&#x27; of priming; hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>syntactic persistence</label>
        <term>syntactic persistence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>activation</label>
        <term>activation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence-interval</label>
        <term>confidence-interval</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hypothesis-testing</label>
        <term>hypothesis-testing</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
