<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>How Markets Slowly Digest Changes in Supply and Demand</title>
        <author>Jean-Philippe Bouchaud</author>
        <author>J. Doyne Farmer</author>
        <author>Fabrizio Lillo</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>How Markets Slowly Digest Changes in Supply and Demand</title>
          <date>2009</date>
          <publisher>Handbook of Financial Markets / arXiv</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">0809.0822</idno>
          <idno type="record">bouchaud2008-market-impact</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">bouchaud2008-market-impact.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">10558f3abcfe117b4b4606a39e56f32a86a61518</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>quantitative-finance</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>market impact and long-memory of order flow</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A TERM IS COINED BY AN OPERATIONAL TEST RATHER THAN BY A DESCRIPTION, FOR OBJECTS THAT DO NOT COME PRE-SORTED: to treat these different types IN A UNIFIED MANNER we classify them BASED ON WHETHER AN ORDER RESULTS IN AN IMMEDIATE TRANSACTION, in which case WE CALL IT AN EFFECTIVE MARKET ORDER, or whether it leaves a limit order sitting in the book, in which case WE CALL IT AN EFFECTIVE LIMIT ORDER. The definition is a procedure a reader could run, and it replaces the types the paper started from with a classification produced by an outcome</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AND THEN THE QUALIFIER IS DROPPED BY ANNOUNCEMENT, SO THE FIELD&#x27;S ORDINARY WORD NOW DENOTES THE AUTHORS&#x27; CONSTRUCT: Quotation withheld The redefinition of an existing term is stated as a notational convenience, in one sentence, and every later use of the word carries it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A THREE-WORD COMPOUND TERM IS DEFINED ONE WORD AT A TIME, EACH WORD GIVEN ITS OWN CLAUSE: “auction” INDICATES that participants may place quotes stating the quantities and prices at which they are willing to trade; “continuous” INDICATES that they can update, cancel or place new quotes at any time; and “double” INDICATES that the market is symmetric between buyers and sellers. The name of the institution is decomposed into three separately checkable properties</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>WHETHER A CENTRAL CONCEPT IS VALID AT ALL IS ASKED AS A QUESTION, WITH COMPUTABILITY AS THE CRITERION: IS THE FUNDAMENTAL VALUE OF A STOCK OR A CURRENCY A VALID CONCEPT, in the sense that it CAN BE COMPUTED, AT LEAST AS A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE, WITH ARBITRARY ACCURACY with all information known at the time? The test proposed for whether a term denotes anything is whether a number could in principle be produced for it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>VAGUENESS IS DECLARED INTENTIONAL, AND REMOVING IT IS NAMED AS THE POINT OF THE CHAPTER: WE ARE INTENTIONALLY BEING VAGUE AT THIS STAGE ABOUT THE DEFINITION of the return and the volume; DEFINING THESE MORE PRECISELY IS ONE OF THE MAIN POINTS OF THIS CHAPTER. The imprecision is positioned as a stage of the argument rather than as a defect of it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AN EQUATION IS WRITTEN AND THEN DECLARED NOT TO BE READ LITERALLY, WITH THE TWO PROPERTIES IT ASSERTS BOTH DENIED: the above equation SHOULD BE INTERPRETED RATHER LOOSELY: as we shall see below, IMPACT IS IN FACT NEITHER LINEAR NOR PERMANENT. The formalism is retained as an expository device after its content has been withdrawn</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A SCARE-QUOTED TERM IS CONTRADICTED BY THE MEASUREMENT IN THE SAME SENTENCE: a very important empirical fact is that EVEN “highly liquid” MARKETS ARE IN FACT NOT THAT LIQUID. The quotation marks mark the received usage and the clause after them denies it, so the word survives with its reference reversed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A DEFINITION&#x27;S OWN STRICTNESS IS ASSESSED BY THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE IT: Quotation withheld The boundary of the term is traced back to the requirement that produced it, and the requirement is named</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A QUANTITY IS DEFINED BY A COUNTERFACTUAL NOBODY CAN STAGE, AND THE IMPOSSIBILITY IS PART OF THE DEFINITION: WE DEFINE A MECHANICAL IMPACT AS WHAT HAPPENS IF SOMEONE PLACES AN ORDER in the order book IF THIS ORDER HAS NO EFFECT ON ANY FUTURE ORDERS - we are essentially asking what happens IF AN ORDER IS INJECTED INTO THE ORDER BOOK AT RANDOM, BUT NO ONE PAYS ANY ATTENTION TO IT. The term denotes the outcome of an intervention the market makes impossible by responding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A TERM IS DEFINED BY WHAT THE AGENTS CANNOT KNOW, NOT BY WHAT IS THE CASE: Quotation withheld The property named is an absence in someone&#x27;s knowledge, and the definition says whose</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A MECHANISM IS COINED AND ITS TWO HALVES ARE STATED AS A CONCESSION AND A QUALIFICATION: Quotation withheld The name is minted for a claim that concedes the standard result and then makes it conditional</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A COMPARISON IS DECLARED MISLEADING UNLESS A THEORY THE FIELD DOES NOT HAVE IS SUPPLIED FIRST: Quotation withheld The condition on a valid comparison is named, and it is a theory rather than a measurement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A DEFINITION IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE FIELD AND QUALIFIED BY WHICH SENSE OF THE WORD IT DEFINES: Quotation withheld The parenthesis concedes that the term has other senses, and the definition is scoped to one of them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AND A SECOND SENSE OF THE SAME WORD IS GIVEN ITS OWN STRICT DEFINITION, IN OTHER PEOPLE&#x27;S VOCABULARY: Quotation withheld. One word given a second technical sense, defined strictly and in another field&#x27;s vocabulary</term>
        <note>about this quote: The paper&#x27;s other sense of the same word is mechanism [12] of this record - “a standard definition of market efficiency (in the informational sense)”. Neither sense is presented as the primary one, but that is visible only across both spans, so it is recorded here rather than asserted by either tag.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A MEASUREMENT THE FIELD RELIES ON IS SAID TO HAVE NO GOOD METHOD, AND THE SUBSTITUTE IS NAMED AS ROUGH: UNFORTUNATELY THERE ARE STILL NOT GOOD STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSIGNING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR EXPONENTS OF POWER LAWS, particularly when the observations have long-memory - but THE ERRORS CAN BE ROUGHLY ASSESSED BY EXAMINING SUB-SAMPLES. The exponents are quoted throughout the literature; the uncertainty on them is admitted to be unavailable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the analysis assumes universality across markets</label>
        <note>what this limits: every cross-market claim: Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The reviewed programme is admitted to be early-stage and unsettled, with the authors&#x27; own view still changing.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the standing of the whole programme: THE WORK DESCRIBED HERE IS STILL IN AN EARLY STAGE, AND IS VERY MUCH IN FLUX ... OUR OWN VIEW IS STILL CHANGING AS NEW RESULTS APPEAR</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Measured hidden-order exponents do not match the value 1.5 predicted by the order-splitting theory, so the theory needs more careful testing.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the order-splitting theory specifically: THE VALUE OF THE EXPONENT ... IS SLIGHTLY LARGER THAN THE VALUE 1.5 EXPECTED BY THE THEORY, and A MORE CAREFUL TESTING is needed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The market-ecology picture lacks the comprehensive empirical study it would need, because databases linking participants to strategies are hard to obtain.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the market-ecology account: IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY VALUABLE TO HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE EMPIRICAL STUDY THAT CONNECTS THE HETEROGENEITY OF MARKET PARTICIPANTS WITH THEIR STRATEGY - the data linking participants to strategies do not exist</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Instantaneous prices are stated not to be equilibrium prices reflecting all known information, because much of the information is withheld.</label>
        <note>what this limits: an instantaneous price as an efficient price reflecting known information: the review states there is no reason to believe that, because much information is latent and withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Equilibrium is said to hold at best over long time scales; high-frequency prices are described as necessarily noisy.</label>
        <note>what this limits: high-frequency prices as equilibrium values: the review states equilibrium can make sense at best over a long time scale</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the scale of elementary transactions is named by borrowing physics&#x27; own word for its smallest level of description</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the Hurst exponent and the diffusion picture are carried into order-flow analysis, so that a market&#x27;s memory is measured the way an anomalous diffusion process is</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the order series reduced to its SIGN (+/-1) instead of the signed order sizes</label>
        <note>eliminates: the heavy tail of order size dominating the statistic - a handful of very large orders would otherwise set the correlation almost by themselves, so the measured impact would describe those orders rather than the market · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>revealed liquidity</label>
        <term>revealed liquidity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>latent liquidity</label>
        <term>latent liquidity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>effective market order</label>
        <term>effective market order</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>off-book market</label>
        <term>off-book market</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>upstairs market</label>
        <term>upstairs market</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>Marketable limit orders</label>
        <term>Marketable limit orders</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>crossing limit orders</label>
        <term>crossing limit orders</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>market impact</label>
        <term>market impact</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>liquidity</label>
        <term>liquidity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>long-memory processes</label>
        <term>long-memory processes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>quotes</label>
        <term>quotes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>orders</label>
        <term>orders</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>urgency → informativeness</label>
        <note>THE INDEXING / PROXY RELATION - &#x27;from&#x27; STANDS IN FOR &#x27;to&#x27;. We have no type for it: &#x27;causes&#x27; asserts production, and &#x27;operationalised-as&#x27; says the authors CHOSE a measure, whereas a proxy claim says THIS STANDS IN FOR WHAT WE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT AND WE KNOW IT IS NOT THE SAME THING. Measured at 8% of papers. A proxy held UNDER A THEORY, not asserted: &#x27;under the theory that urgency is a proxy for informativeness, empirical work on the subject has often defined an informed trade as one that is executed by a market order&#x27;. The whole downstream definition depends on a substitution the sentence flags as theoretical.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>liquidity → market impact</label>
        <note>IS-AN-ASPECT-OF / IS-DEFINED-IN-TERMS-OF, AND NONE OF THE EIGHT TYPES HOLDS IT. &#x27;liquidity REFERS…&#x27; - the paper gives &#x27;liquidity&#x27; no content of its own; it is the size parameter of the other quantity. &#x27;operationalised-as&#x27; is the nearest type and the gate refused it correctly: the cue vocabulary wants &#x27;measured / defined as / quantified / computed as&#x27;, and &#x27;refers to the scale of&#x27; is a definitional gloss, not a measurement procedure. &#x27;part-of&#x27; is wrong because a scale is not a component. &#x27;same-as&#x27; is wrong because the two are not interchangeable - one is a response, the other is how big that response is. Filed rather than forced: typing this as &#x27;operationalised-as&#x27; would put a measurement claim in the corpus that the paper does not make. Reached 2026-08-26 by the project during the schema 0.3 pass.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>liquidity - REVEALED: the liquidity a market actually shows, which the review says is vanishing</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>liquidity - LATENT: the large volume that exists but is deliberately not shown, which is why revealed liquidity is small</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>information - mostly generated by supply and demand itself rather than arriving from outside the market</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>effective market order - a stipulated classification by OUTCOME rather than by order type: whether it results in an immediate transaction</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>`off-book market` / `upstairs market` - ONE INSTITUTION, TWO EXCHANGE-LOCAL NAMES, AND THE REVIEW GIVES THE SHARED DEFINITION IMMEDIATELY AFTER: `the London Stock Exchange has what is called the off-book market and the New York Stock Exchange has what is called the upstairs market. These are both bilateral exchanges, in which members of the exchange can interact in person or via telephone.` THE AXIS IS THE VENUE, NOT THE DISCIPLINE. This corpus already carries naming split by field (`newman2003`), by language of publication (`buck2011`, tenside/surfactant) and by profession (`bishop2017`); an exchange is a fourth kind of community that names things its own way, and the two names are not even metaphorically related - one is about the order book, the other about a floor of a building.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`market impact` / `liquidity` - TWO TERMS STIPULATED IN ONE PARENTHESIS, AND THE SECOND IS DEFINED OUT OF THE FIRST. `(Quotation withheld).` `liquidity` is one of the most used words in finance and it is given here no independent content at all - it is the size parameter of the other term. A reader who imports `liquidity` from any neighbouring paper imports a different quantity. NO EDGE IS PROPOSED FOR THIS PAIR. `refers to the scale of` is a definitional gloss, and the gate correctly refuses it as `operationalised-as` (which wants measured / defined as / quantified / computed as). The relation the paper states is `is an aspect of` / `is defined in terms of`, and the eight edge types do not contain it - the same gap `NOTES/RELATION_TYPE_VOCABULARY_PROPOSAL.md` is open on. Forcing the nearest type would put a measurement claim in the corpus that the paper does not make.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>`quotes` / `orders` - AN ALIAS OFFERED IN PASSING BECAUSE THE PAPER IS EXPLAINING AN AUCTION TO PEOPLE WHO KNOW MARKETS. `participants may place quotes (also called orders)`. The auction vocabulary is the formal one and the market vocabulary is the working one; the parenthesis exists to let the reader carry their own word through the rest of the section.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → a rival explanation for concave market impact</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the Kyle model of linear, permanent price impact (Kyle [1985])</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Hasbrouck [1988] on impact depending on the predictability of trades</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the long-memory order-flow discovery of Bouchaud et al. [2004] and Lillo and Farmer [2004]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>revealed liquidity —distinct-from→ latent liquidity</label>
        <term>revealed liquidity</term>
        <term>latent liquidity</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>off-book market —renamed-across-fields→ upstairs market</label>
        <term>off-book market</term>
        <term>upstairs market</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: FILED AS &#x27;renamed-across-fields&#x27; BECAUSE THE GATE&#x27;S TEST IS THE RIGHT ONE - both names present, a naming cue (&#x27;what is called&#x27;), and a shared definition in the next sentence. But the axis is INSTITUTIONAL rather than disciplinary, and the type name says &#x27;fields&#x27;. Recording the mismatch rather than forcing a different type: the vocabulary has one label for what are at least four axes of renaming - discipline, language, profession, and venue. · the relation stated: the two exchanges call the same bilateral venue by different local names</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Marketable limit orders —same-as→ crossing limit orders</label>
        <term>Marketable limit orders</term>
        <term>crossing limit orders</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;Marketable limit orders (also called crossing limit orders)&#x27; - a bare parenthetical synonym, no hedge. · the relation stated: the review gives the second name parenthetically as an alternative for the first</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>quotes —same-as→ orders</label>
        <term>quotes</term>
        <term>orders</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;also called&#x27; - an explicit alias with both names inside the span. Confidence 0.85 rather than higher because both words are ordinary English and only this parenthesis ties them. · the relation stated: quotes (also called orders)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>months — period over which large orders are traded incrementally</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>revealed liquidity is so low that large orders must trade incrementally</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>most processed information comes from supply and demand, not external news</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>agents are at best weakly informed with noisy price impact</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>market impact</label>
        <term>market impact</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>order flow</label>
        <term>order flow</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bid-ask spread</label>
        <term>bid-ask spread</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>liquidity</label>
        <term>liquidity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>tatonnement</label>
        <term>tatonnement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>long-memory of order flow</label>
        <term>long-memory of order flow</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>market efficiency</label>
        <term>market efficiency</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the liquidity paradox</label>
        <term>the liquidity paradox</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bayesian</label>
        <term>Bayesian</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence-interval</label>
        <term>confidence-interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hypothesis-testing</label>
        <term>hypothesis-testing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-deviation</label>
        <term>standard-deviation</term>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - a running head and a page number: &#x27;INFORMATION, LIQUIDITY &amp; EFFICIENCY 13&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-error</label>
        <term>standard-error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note>about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:96). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0822.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
