standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.
Deterministic strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters in a two-dimensional semiconductor
Abstract
research_questionsensesAn outstanding challenge in quantum photonics is scalability, which requires positioning of single quantum emitters in a deterministic fashion. Site positioning progress has been made in established platforms including defects in diamond and self-assembled quantum dots, albeit often with compromised coherence and optical quality. The emergence of single quantum emitters in layered transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors offers new opportunities to construct a scalable quantum architecture. object_of_studyclaim_typemethod↗Here, using nanoscale strain engineering, we deterministically achieve a two-dimensional lattice of quantum emitters in an atomically thin semiconductor. We create point-like strain perturbations in mono- and bi-layer WSe 2 which locally modify the band-gap, leading to efficient funnelling of excitons towards isolated strain-tuned quantum emitters that exhibit high-purity single photon emission. contributionWe achieve near unity emitter creation probability and a mean positioning accuracy of 120±32 nm, which may be improved with further optimization of the nanopillar dimensions.
Nanoscale strain engineering of the electronic band structure to create quantum confinement has long been pursued in bulk semiconductors. In particular, the exploitation of local elastic strain to laterally confine carriers has been achieved in epitaxially grown heterostructures such as quantum wells 1 2 3 or wires 4 . Unfortunately, robust strain-induced quantum confinement of carriers suitably isolated from detrimental surface states in bulk systems has not been realized due to the combination of: (i) the limited elastic strain possible before plastic deformation and (ii) small vertical strain propagation distances. concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgesOptically active two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors with a high elastic strain limit 5 offer renewed opportunities for nanoscale strain engineering of three-dimensional quantum confinement, which we pursue here.
Our approach is to engineer nanoscale strain perturbations in atomically thin WSe 2 . concepts↗concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgescontent_tags↗Mono-layer (1L) WSe 2 is a direct band-gap 2D semiconductor with a dark excitonic ground state 6 7 . In this system, at sufficiently low temperatures, a dense ensemble of localized excitons emerges at lower energy than the broad (few meV) delocalized 2D excitons 8 9 10 . limitationsWhile their precise nature is not fully understood, the optically bright localized excitons are possibly related to disorder, scattering or crystal imperfections 11 12 . Under certain conditions, such as at flake interfaces or edges 13 14 or at local strain pockets due to flake wrinkling, folding or bubbling 15 16 17 18 19 , individual localized excitons with narrow linewidths (sub-100 micro-eV) can be isolated and shown to emit single photons 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .
Here we exploit the correlation of spectrally and spatially isolated single quantum emitters and point-like strain perturbations 16 to engineer quantum emitter arrays in a deterministic fashion. Figure 1 shows a sketch of the concept. Owing to Van der Waals' forces a 2D flake conforms to the contours of a lithographically patterned nanopillar lattice ( Fig. 1a ), inducing significant elastic, point-like strain at the nanopillar lattice points 24 25 . mechanisms↗The bi-axial strain at the nanopillar locations locally modifies the band-gap and spatially modulates the potential landscape of the 2D excitons ( Fig. 1b ). As a result, photogenerated excitons funnel from larger band-gap regions (in between the nanopillars) into smaller band-gap regions (nanopillar centres) 25 26 27 . Superimposed onto the artificially induced potential energy landscape are a high density of randomly distributed localized excitons, shown in Fig. 1b as small perturbations with quantized energy levels. In the unstrained regions (between the nanopillars), the localized excitons overlap in energy and cannot be distinguished. However, with the appropriate nanopillar dimensions and localized exciton density, an individual localized exciton will be strain tuned at each lattice site. The strain tuned quantum emitters at the nanopillar locations phenomenonconcepts↗concepts↗concept_edgeswill dominate the photoluminescence (PL) spectrum at low temperature and excitation power due to efficient exciton funnelling from the surrounding high band-gap regions to the single lowest energy localized exciton.
We implement this concept to achieve arrays of robust quantum emitters in both mono- and bi-layer (2L) WSe 2 . In addition, by varying the aspect ratio of the lithographically patterned nanopillar arrays we are able to fully characterize the technique and optimize the positioning accuracy of the localized excitons, ultimately achieving an accuracy of 120±32 nm with near unity yield. This precision can likely be further improved by refining the nanopillar geometry and dimensions.
Results
Fabrication and structural characterization
To achieve point-like strain perturbations in atomically thin WSe 2 , we use an all-dry transfer technique 28 to place mechanically exfoliated flakes onto a substrate with a square lattice (4 μm pitch) of dielectric nanopillars fabricated by electron beam lithography. This technique takes advantage of Van der Waals' forces to ensure the 2D flake conforms to the contours of the patterned substrate and induces significant elastic strain at the locations of the nanopillars. A WSe 2 flake consisting of 1L and 2L regions is shown in Fig. 2a,b before and after transfer, respectively. In Fig. 2b the nanopillars are identified by the change in contrast: the dark points in the micrograph correspond to locations of the nanopillars. The transferred flake's topography is characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM), as shown in Fig. 2c,d . Scanning electron imaging of the same region ( Supplementary Fig. 1 ) confirms the same physical features. Figure 2d compares the cross-section of a bare nanopillar (#0 in Fig. 2c ) with an aspect ratio (height to width) of ∼0.3 to that of a flake over a nanopillar (#7 in Fig. 2c ). Ideally, the flake conforms to the nanopillar without significant wrinkling as it does in #7. At other lattice positions, the flake does not conform closely to the substrate topography but rather stretches over the nanopillar analogously to a canvas over a tent-pole. Randomly oriented pleats emerging from nanopillars are observed as well as ripples which in some cases extend towards neighbouring nanopillars. These features are typical of 2D flakes suspended over corrugated substrates and can be further engineered 24 25 . Importantly, for the 4 μm pitch array used here, the wrinkles do not mask the point-like strain perturbation created by the nanopillars.
A monolayer WSe 2 quantum emitter array
Hyperspectral confocal PL imaging is performed to fully characterize the atomically thin WSe 2 flake and the effects of strain perturbations. Figure 2f shows a colour-coded spatial map of the peak intensity of the PL spectrum (660–830 nm). The PL peak (integrated) intensity significantly increases by a factor of 50 (2) at the locations of the nanopillars, likely due to efficient diffusion of excitons towards the lower energy states at the strain-tuned sites 25 26 27 . The spectra from several nanopillar sites as well as typical 1L and 2L regions between the nanopillars are exhibited in Fig. 2g . A broad defect band with weak intensity is observed in the homogeneous 1L and 2L regions (at low excitation powers the 2D excitons are not visible). On the other hand, for each spectrum obtained at a location of a nanopillar (including nanopillar #1 in the 2L region), a few discrete narrow linewidth (<200 μeV) peaks with high intensity are typically observed. Each of these peaks signify emission from single quantum emitters 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 . content_tagsA second-order correlation measurement is presented in Fig. 2e , where a fit to the data yields g (2) (0)=0.07±0.04 with a decay time of τ =2.8±0.2 ns. This demonstrates photon antibunching and the quantum nature of the 1L discrete lines.
A bilayer WSe 2 quantum emitter array
To demonstrate the universality of nanoscale strain engineering to generate strain-induced quantum emitters in atomically thin semiconductors, we create an array of pure single photon emitters in 2L WSe 2 . Bi-layer WSe 2 is an intriguing host for quantum emitters as it offers an additional pseudo-spin based on the layer degree of freedom 29 . While 2L WSe 2 is an intrinsically indirect band-gap semiconductor, the indirect and direct transitions are nearly degenerate and under tensile strain the band structure can be modified such that the direct transition becomes preferred 30 . We exfoliate a flake with a large 2L region (see Fig. 3a ) and transfer it to an array of nanopillars (with h:w ∼0.3) on an Si substrate ( Fig. 3b ). Once again, we observe a significant increase of 150 × (3 × ) in the peak (integrated) PL intensity at the nanopillar sites ( Fig. 3c ), evidencing the transition to a direct electronic gap and the exciton funnel effect due to local strain. We note there is also a small 1L and a large 3L region of the flake in Fig. 3b that cover nanopillar sites. While the 1L region shows similar properties to the flake in Fig. 2 , the 3L remains dark in PL. Crucially, bright narrow-linewidth spectral lines ( Fig. 3h ) are again observed at the strain-induced sites. Figure 3d shows a high-resolution spatial map of six nanopillars in the centre of the array superimposed with the locations of the quantum emitters in Fig. 3h . A wavelength histogram (2 nm binning) of all strain-induced emitters (53 in total) created in the 2L WSe 2 array is shown in Fig. 3e . The histogram shows that emitters span a wavelength region from 775 to 835 nm. A Gaussian fit to the data is used to quantify the inhomogeneous distribution of the emitters, yielding 33 meV full width at half maximum (FWHM). Notably, several emitters at very similar wavelengths are observed (for example, in Fig. 3h peaks at 793 nm in spectra 2 and 5; peaks at 785 nm in spectra 4 and 6). The second-order correlations from each individual peak measured exhibit highly pure single photon emission, for example, the single peak at λ =801.08 nm from nanopillar #1 in Fig. 2g shows g (2) (0)=0.03±0.02 with a decay time of τ =4.8±0.1 ns ( Fig. 3f ). content_tagsFor spectra recorded over a 20-h period, this emitter does not blink. Figure 3g shows a histogram of the spectral jitter recorded over 20 h (using 3 s time-bin, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2 ) from the 2L emitter at nanopillar #1. The histogram is fit by a Gaussian distribution with 131 μeV FWHM. Further, these quantum emitter arrays are optically stable and robust, surviving multiple sample cooling and heating cycles.
Optimization of strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters
Having established a technique to successfully create robust strain-induced quantum emitters, we seek to optimize the process. We tailor the local elastic strain by varying the height to change the aspect ratio of five rows of nanopillars, from h:w 0.15 to 0.59, as shown in the scanning electron micrograph in Fig. 4a . Further information on these nanopillars is provided in Supplementary Fig. 3 . Precise measurements of the pillar size are made by AFM which confirms uniform pillar dimensions within each row. Their cross-sections are displayed in Fig. 4c . Figure 4b shows an optical micrograph of a large (∼100 × 25 μm) 1L WSe 2 flake covering 101 nanopillars in the array. Here the pillar locations are identified by the bright points in the micrograph. Also visible in Fig. 4b in some cases for the high aspect ratio nanopillars (for example, Row 5, Columns 3–5) is a small ring surrounding the pillar. This feature is not observed for any of the low aspect ratio nanopillars in Rows 1 and 2 or with the nanopillars used in Figs 2 and 3 . Figure 4d,e shows a spatial map of the integrated and peak intensities (logarithmic scale) of the entire PL spectrum (690–850 nm) from Columns 2 to 5 (as labelled in Fig. 4b ). Mapping the peak intensity reveals the locations of the intense, narrow linewidth peaks that signify quantum light emission. PL maps of the entire flake with several spectra are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4 . A mixture of peaks with large (700–900 μeV) fine-structure splittings (for example, Supplementary Fig. 5 ) and single linearly polarized peaks are observed, as reported previously 18 . concepts↗concepts↗concept_edgescontent_tags↗The PL intensity at the nanopillars increases with increasing nanopillar aspect ratio, as expected for the diffusion of excitons towards the local regions with strain-tuned band-gaps. In the cases for the high aspect ratio nanopillars where the ring surrounding the pillar is visible in Fig. 4b (for example, Row 5, Columns 3–5), low intensity emission at the nanopillar centre is surrounded by a ring of intense PL. We believe this effect is caused by the flake being pierced during the transfer process for some high aspect ratio nanopillars. Alternatively, the flake could conform quite closely to the nanopillar topography and sit flat at the top and then bend at the top edge of the nanopillar, leading to high strain at the circumference.
Statistics of all emitters identified (285 in total) in the entire 1L WSe 2 flake over the 101 nanopillars is shown in Fig. 4f,g . limitationsHere we do not account for the possibility that multiple emission lines arise from a single emitter (for example, due to different charge states or bi-excitons 23 ) and assume that each narrow linewidth peak in a spectrum is an individual quantum emitter. Second-order correlation measurements on numerous narrow linewidth peaks yield g (2) (0)<0.5, unambiguously demonstrating the quantum nature of the emission. Figure 4f shows the statistics for the number of emitters per pillar. While distinct emitters are sometimes found at the nanopillar sites in Row 1 (for example, the spectra in Supplementary Fig. 4c ), they tend to be difficult to distinguish from the broad background. With the increased aspect ratio of the nanopillars in Row 2, one or two distinct bright emitters are found with a yield of 85% (17 of 20 nanopillars contain pure single emitters). content_tagsRows 3 and 4 have near unity yields: 96% (45 of 47 nanopillars yield at least 1 quantum emitter).
Figure 4g shows the emitter wavelength histogram. While the overall energy distribution of the single emitters is broad (spanning ∼200 meV), all emitters emit at lower energy than the bright 2D exciton peak in WSe 2 (∼1.74 eV). The emitter wavelength histogram is also post-selected for emitter brightness (the peak intensity at ∼0.8 saturation power) for this flake. Fitting a Gaussian distribution to the histogram gives 73 meV FWHM, more than twice as large as the 2L emitters.
Positioning accuracy
To determine the positioning accuracy of the strain-induced quantum emitters we map the emitter locations relative to the centre of the nanopillar. While the individual emitters are resolved by the hyperspectral spatial maps (see Figs 4e and 5c ) the precise position of the nanopillars is not known a priori but can be extracted using spectral weighted averaging (WA λ ), as illustrated in Fig. 5 . WA λ accounts for the global shift in the PL spectrum due to the strain, as can be observed in two representative spectra from the centre of the nanopillar and the nominally unstrained region between the nanopillars shown in Fig. 5a . At each spatial location, we quantify this spectral shift using the formula:
The outcome yields smooth, clean contour maps, as shown in Fig. 5b for nanopillars from Column 5 and Rows 2–5. Assuming the strain is at its highest in the middle of the nanopillar, we fit Gaussian curves to the WA λ cross-sections to determine the centre of each nanopillar with high accuracy. Further, a rough estimate of the strain can be based on the spectral shift 30 . For example, a maximum change in WA λ =30.8 meV (13.3 nm) for nanopillar 4 corresponds to 0.60% strain. This value is three times larger than that previously reported for local strain pockets 16 . Finally, in order to obtain the emitter displacement, we distill the locations of the single quantum emitters from the peak intensity maps (for example, as in Fig. 5c ) and overlap them with the centres of the nanopillars determined by the Gaussian fits to WA λ , as shown in Fig. 5d for Column 5. To assess the accuracy of emitter positioning we combine emitter displacements from Columns 2 to 5 and arrive with distributions as displayed in Fig. 5e . Here the red rings represent the mean distance and the ring thickness corresponds to one standard deviation.
We observe that when the flake is pierced or bends over the circular edge of a flat-topped nanopillar, the emitters are found at the circumference of the nanopillar. On the other hand, the quantum emitters are created in the centre of the nanopillars for flakes that conform to the substrate topography to create a point-like strain perturbation. In particular, the statistics of the positioning accuracy of the emitters in Row 2 reveals high precision: =120±32 nm, where σ D is the average displacement of the emitter from the nanopillar centre. Displacement statistics of the emitters in Rows 3–5 are: =262±46 nm, =476±85 nm and =521±64 nm. Row 1 did not yield sufficient emitter numbers for useful statistics. In the best case (Column 5, Row 2), the displacement is 30 nm.
Discussion
Layered transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors are attractive hosts for quantum emitters due to the unique valley degree of freedom and strong spin-orbit coupling. Using nanoscale elastic strain engineering, we have achieved local modification of the electronic and optical properties to deterministically generate robust quantum emitters in this emerging quantum photonic platform. The straightforward fabrication procedure presented here is scalable and likely to be applicable to other 2D materials. We obtain the best results, including near unity success in generating an emitter at each nanopillar and a positioning accuracy of 120 nm, using nanopillars with 0.3 aspect ratio. Further improvement in the positioning accuracy of single emitters is likely possible with smaller diameter nanopillars that maintain an aspect ratio similar to 0.3. Notably, we observe negligible background signal at the base of the discrete spectral lines, enabling high purity single photon emission in both 1L and 2L WSe 2 . concepts↗concept_edgesCompared to mono-layer WSe 2 , the bi-layer appears additionally attractive as a host for single excitons due to a narrower inhomogeneous distribution and the potential for spin-layer locking. These results open a path to deterministically embed 2D quantum emitters in electronic devices for further investigation of their spin, electronic and optical properties or to couple to cavity or waveguide modes for cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments and integrated quantum photonics applications 31 32 .
Methods
Sample fabrication
We fabricate the nanopillars out of negative resist (AZ 2070 from MicroChemicals) using electron beam lithography. First the resist was spin-coated (∼200 nm thickness) onto the Si substrate (for the samples in Figs 1 and 2 ) or an Si substrate with 285 nm SiO 2 (for the sample in Fig. 3 ) and then exposed using electron beam lithography (Raith Pioneer). For Samples 1 and 2 a constant dose was used for all nanopillars. For Sample 3 the dose was varied but the pillar size was kept constant. The nanopillars were then developed (AZ 726 MIF Developer from Electronic Materials) and structurally characterized by SEM and AFM. Mechanical exfoliation was used to obtain mono- or bi-layer WSe 2 flakes which are identified by optical microscopy. The chosen flakes were then transferred to the nanopillars using the all-dry viscoelastic stamping procedure outlined in ref. 28 . Each flake's thickness is then confirmed by low-temperature PL.
Low-temperature confocal photoluminescence
A home-made confocal microscope with an objective lens (NA of 0.82 yielding a diffraction limited focus of ∼560 nm at λ =750 nm) is used to spatially map the PL from the sample which is placed on automated nanopositioners in a T =3.5 K closed-cycle cryostat. All spectra were acquired with a 0.5 m focal length spectrometer and a nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device with a measured spectral resolution of ∼75 μeV at λ =750 nm for an 1,800 l mm −1 grating. A fibre-based Hanbury-Brown and Twiss interferometer was used for second-order correlation measurements, and photon counting was performed using Si APDs.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Branny, A. et al . Deterministic strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters in a two-dimensional semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 8, 15053 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15053 (2017).
Publisher's note : Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Notes
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 5 of 5 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no relations between claims or controls. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | arrays of strain-induced single-photon emitters in mono- and bi-layer WSe2 on nanopillars | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | how to position single quantum emitters deterministically for scalable quantum photonics | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | near-unity emitter creation at each nanopillar with about 120 nm positioning accuracy | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | strain-induced funnelling of excitons into localized single-photon emitters | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | experiment also in: experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | Bi-axial strain at each nanopillar lowers the band-gap locally, so excitons funnel to the pillar. also in: strain-tuned band-gap | mechanisms[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The precise nature of the localized excitons is not fully understood. | limitations[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Several emission lines from one emitter are counted as separate emitters. | limitations[1] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | 2D also in: 2D | concepts[0] | 0.9 | the paper's words |
| concepts | two-dimensional also in: two-dimensional | concepts[1] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 1L also in: 1L | concepts[2] | 0.9 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Mono-layer also in: Mono-layer | concepts[3] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | PL also in: PL | concepts[4] | 0.9 | the paper's words |
| concepts | photoluminescence also in: photoluminescence | concepts[5] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | nanopillar aspect ratio also in: nanopillar aspect ratio | concepts[6] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | PL intensity also in: PL intensity | concepts[7] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| concepts | mono-layer WSe 2 also in: mono-layer WSe 2 | concepts[8] | 0.8 | the paper's words |
| concepts | bi-layer also in: bi-layer | concepts[9] | 0.7 | the paper's words |
| senses | deterministic - emitters placed at chosen lattice sites rather than found at random | senses[0] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | 2D —same-as→ two-dimensional the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 also in: 2D · two-dimensional | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | 1L —same-as→ Mono-layer the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 also in: 1L · Mono-layer | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | PL —same-as→ photoluminescence the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 also in: PL · photoluminescence | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | nanopillar aspect ratio —causes→ PL intensity direction on the measure: increases · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · the relation stated: increases with increasing also in: nanopillar aspect ratio · PL intensity | concept_edges[3] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | mono-layer WSe 2 —contrasted-with→ bi-layer the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.8 · the relation stated: compared to also in: mono-layer WSe 2 · bi-layer | concept_edges[4] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A bilayer emitter did not blink over a 20-hour measurement. | content_tags.findings[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a direct band-gap 2D semiconductor with a dark excitonic ground state also in: mono-layer WSe 2 | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | second-order correlation showing single-photon antibunching | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | emitter yield on the optimal rows | content_tags.quantities[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | nanopillar aspect ratio also in: nanopillar aspect ratio | content_tags.variables[0] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.