<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: Terminology, classification, and origins</title>
        <author>Robert C. Buck</author>
        <author>James M. Franklin</author>
        <author>Urs Berger</author>
        <author>Jason Conder</author>
        <author>Ian T. Cousins</author>
        <author>Pim de Voogt</author>
        <author>Allan Astrup Jensen</author>
        <author>Kurunthachalam Kannan</author>
        <author>Scott A. Mabury</author>
        <author>S.P.J. van Leeuwen</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: Terminology, classification, and origins</title>
          <date>2011</date>
          <publisher>Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1002/ieam.258</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">buck2011-perfluoroalkyl-and-polyfluoroalkyl</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">buck2011-perfluoroalkyl-and-polyfluoroalkyl.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">2ebbd3b045bea937763806ddd33d0a63fa00a016</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by-nc</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>environmental-science</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>A NOMENCLATURE, WRITTEN DOWN BECAUSE THE FIELD&#x27;S NAMES HAD STOPPED REFERRING RELIABLY - 42 families and 268 compounds given recommended names, acronyms and structural formulas so that industry, science and regulators can mean the same substances by the same words</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what to call these substances, when one compound has several names, one acronym has several referents, and one acronym is already taken by a treaty</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>the PFAS/PFC split, definitions of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a fluorinated-polymer/fluoropolymer distinction, an OECD-based numeric definition of &#x27;long-chain&#x27;, and a table of correct and incorrect usages</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>a vocabulary that grew faster than its referents could be pinned down - over 400 papers a year using names that had never been agreed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>expert-consensus</label>
        <term>expert-consensus</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE PUBLISHED RULE FOR WHEN TWO FIELDS MAY SHARE AN ACRONYM: `many authors began using the acronym PFC and have defined it in many different ways. As a result, the meaning of the acronym PFC is unclear and not well defined ... the acronym PFC has been used in official KYOTO PROTOCOL documents since 1997 to specifically designate PERFLUOROCARBONS. Quotation withheld.` A criterion for tolerable homonymy - distance between the spheres, not the collision itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND BOTH DIRECTIONS OF THE MANY-TO-MANY FAILURE, IN ONE SENTENCE: `a given compound has often been denoted by a variety of different names and acronyms, or a given acronym has been used to represent different substances. In addition, names to describe broad groups of substances have proliferated that in some instances mistakenly portray substances that are very different from one another as being the same. As a result, the scientific literature for these substances has at times become confusing.` One name to many things, one thing to many names, and a third failure where the GROUP name asserts a false identity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE NOMENCLATURE COMPROMISES CORRECTNESS AGAINST INSTALLED USAGE, ON PURPOSE: `We have nevertheless refrained from creating an all new nomenclature but have retained - as far as possible - the most popular terms and acronyms used by authors to date. In other words, our proposals result from A pragmatic compromise among textbook and/OR IUPAC CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE, UNIVERSAL CONSISTENCY, AND FREQUENTLY ADOPTED `LEGACY` USAGE.` The same decision EWGSOP made keeping `sarcopenia`, stated here as a three-way trade-off with the axes named</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND TWO NOMENCLATURES COEXIST BY A DECLARED DIVISION OF LABOUR: `the substance terminology, names and acronyms proposed in this article are IN NO WAY INTENDED TO COMPETE WITH OR SUPPLANT IUPAC OR CAS NOMENCLATURE. The latter names are the designations of choice when A specific substance needs to be unequivocally identified, e.g., in official regulatory documents. Our intention is to provide terminology ... for pragmatic everyday use.` One vocabulary for identification, one for conversation, and the second says so - with the worked example running from a 58-character IUPAC name to the acronym EtFOSE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND AN IDENTIFIER IS OFFERED AS THE REPAIR FOR A NAME: `Rigor can always be ensured by appending the appropriate CAS Registry Number when each compound is first mentioned in a publication. We encourage this practice and provide CAS numbers for many commonly discussed compounds.` The convenient name is allowed to be imprecise because a precise key travels beside it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND A THRESHOLD IS ADOPTED SPECIFICALLY TO REMOVE SUBJECTIVITY: `PFASs ... are frequently referred to as `LONG-CHAIN` or `SHORT-CHAIN`. To avoid any subjectivity associated with these adjectives, we urge scientists to adopt the definition provided by the OECD` - eight carbons and greater for the carboxylic acids, SIX for the sulfonates. Two numbers for one adjective, in one paper</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE TWO NUMBERS DIFFER FOR AN EMPIRICAL REASON, NOT A CHEMICAL ONE: `The `LONG-CHAIN` DEFINITIONS FOR PFCAs AND PFSAs are different in number of C ATOMS BECAUSE a PFSA with a given number of carbons HAS A greater tendency to bioconcentrate and/OR BIOACCUMULATE than a PFCA with the same number of C atoms.` The class boundary tracks the behaviour the regulators care about, so one word carries two thresholds</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND LEGACY USAGE IS ENCODED DELIBERATELY IN A SUBSET RULE: `In compliance with time-honored usage within the industry, we recommend further that the term `FLUOROPOLYMERS` be applied only to a distinct subset of fluorinated polymers, namely, those made by (co)polymerization of olefinic monomers ... to form a carbon-only polymer backbone with F atoms directly attached to it.` The narrower term is kept narrow because the industry already uses it that way</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND FOUR WORDS ARE DECLARED INTERCHANGEABLE WITH A NAMED EXCEPTION: `the terms `SUBSTANCE,` `COMPOUND,` `CHEMICAL,` AND `SPECIES` ARE USED INTERCHANGEABLY for designating a given molecular structure, although it is recognized that in other contexts their meanings may not be identical. For example, in the European REACH legislation, a `SUBSTANCE` may include impurities and stabilizers in addition to the main constituent.` A local synonymy declared, scoped, and shown where it fails</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A NEW AXIS FOR NAME-SPLITTING: LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION. `Quotation withheld.` Every other split in this corpus runs across disciplines or across time. This one runs across a language boundary, and an English-language review has to name both to be searchable.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND A SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION DEFERRING EXPLICITLY TO COMMERCIAL CUSTOM: `Quotation withheld.` The justification is neither composition nor function nor measurability - it is INCUMBENT USAGE IN A COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY, and the paper gives it as sufficient reason.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE NOMENCLATURE HAS TO COVER MORE THAN IT LISTS: `Quotation withheld` `Selected` is the load-bearing word: the families are enumerable, the compounds are not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE NAMES SIT ON TOP OF A COMBINATORIAL PROBLEM: `PFOS is routinely present in many environmental samples AS A mixture of the linear isomer and 10 BRANCHED ISOMERS, WHEREAS 89 congeners are theoretically possible.` One recommended name covers eleven observed substances out of eighty-nine possible ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and the field it is trying to standardise was already producing over four hundred papers a year: `the scientific literature on the environmental and toxicological aspects of PFASs has burgeoned rapidly, and the rate of publication currently exceeds 400 articles per year` - a decade after the first reports. The nomenclature arrives after the usage it must harmonise</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>retaining the most popular existing terms and acronyms instead of minting a new system</label>
        <note>eliminates: a correct nomenclature nobody adopts - the failure mode of every naming reform · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>appending the CAS Registry Number when a compound is first mentioned</label>
        <note>eliminates: ambiguity in the short convenient name, without making the short name longer · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>adopting the OECD&#x27;s numeric definition of &#x27;long-chain&#x27; rather than the adjective</label>
        <note>eliminates: &#x27;any subjectivity associated with these adjectives&#x27; · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>PFAS</label>
        <term>PFAS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>PFC</label>
        <term>PFC</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>fluoropolymers</label>
        <term>fluoropolymers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>fluorinated polymers</label>
        <term>fluorinated polymers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>PFCAs</label>
        <term>PFCAs</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>PFSAs</label>
        <term>PFSAs</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>tenside</label>
        <term>tenside</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`PFAS` (this paper) - `perfluoroalkyl AND polyfluoroalkyl substances`: aliphatic substances containing the perfluoroalkyl moiety CnF2n+1-, covering BOTH the fully-substituted and the partly-substituted cases</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`PFC` - reserved here EXCLUSIVELY for `perfluorocarbons`, because the Kyoto Protocol has used it that way since 1997; its use for `perfluorochemicals` is called `an unfortunate and inappropriate` choice</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`fluoropolymers` vs `fluorinated polymers` - the broad term covers any polymer with F in a monomer unit; the narrow one is restricted to a `distinct subset` by `time-honored usage within the industry`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`long-chain` - defined numerically by the OECD to remove subjectivity, and with TWO different carbon counts: 8 or more for the carboxylic acids, 6 or more for the sulfonates</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`tenside` / `surfactant` - TWO NAMES FOR ONE THING, SPLIT BY THE LANGUAGE OF THE PUBLISHING COMMUNITY, AND THE PAPER SAYS SO OUTRIGHT: `Quotation withheld.` Not two fields, not two decades - two languages.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>extends → IUPAC and Chemical Abstracts Service nomenclature, which this paper explicitly does NOT seek to supplant - &#x27;the designations of choice when a specific substance needs to be unequivocally identified&#x27;</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>extends → the OECD (2011) numeric definition of &#x27;long-chain&#x27;, adopted here to remove the subjectivity of the adjective</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>PFAS —distinct-from→ PFC</label>
        <term>PFAS</term>
        <term>PFC</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: &#x27;A GIVEN ACRONYM MAY…&#x27; This is the rule the corpus lacked for &#x27;priming effect&#x27; meaning one thing in psychology and another in soil science: the homonymy is fine until the fields touch · the relation stated: two classes too closely related to share an acronym - the criterion is the DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SPHERES OF USE, not the collision itself</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>fluoropolymers —part-of→ fluorinated polymers</label>
        <term>fluoropolymers</term>
        <term>fluorinated polymers</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: `In compliance with time-honored usage within the industry, we recommend further that the term `fluoropolymers` be applied only to a distinct subset of fluorinated polymers.` The containment is a naming decision, not a chemical fact - the narrower term could have been the broader one and the paper says why it is not · the relation stated: &#x27;fluoropolymers&#x27; is restricted to a DISTINCT SUBSET of fluorinated polymers, in compliance with time-honoured industry usage</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>PFCAs —distinct-from→ PFSAs</label>
        <term>PFCAs</term>
        <term>PFSAs</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: `The `LONG-CHAIN` DEFINITIONS FOR PFCAs AND PFSAs are different in number of C ATOMS because a PFSA with a given number of carbons HAS A greater tendency to bioconcentrate and/OR BIOACCUMULATE than a PFCA with the same number.` One word, two thresholds, and the gap between them is a measurement · the relation stated: &#x27;long-chain&#x27; means eight carbons for one family and six for the other, because the sulfonates bioaccumulate more at the same chain length</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A PUBLISHED RULE FOR WHEN TWO FIELDS MAY SHARE AN ACRONYM: `a given acronym may legitimately be used in different spheres of activity to denote different concepts, provided these activities are sufficiently disconnected from each other`</label>
        <term>A PUBLISHED RULE FOR WHEN TWO FIELDS MAY SHARE AN ACRONYM: `a given acronym may legitimately be used in different spheres of activity to denote different concepts, provided these activities are sufficiently disconnected from each other`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND BOTH DIRECTIONS OF THE MANY-TO-MANY FAILURE, PLUS A THIRD: `a given compound has often been denoted by a variety of different names and acronyms, or a given acronym has been used to represent different substances ... names ... mistakenly portray substances that are very different from one another as being the same`</label>
        <term>AND BOTH DIRECTIONS OF THE MANY-TO-MANY FAILURE, PLUS A THIRD: `a given compound has often been denoted by a variety of different names and acronyms, or a given acronym has been used to represent different substances ... names ... mistakenly portray substances that are very different from one another as being the same`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND A NOMENCLATURE THAT COMPROMISES WITH INSTALLED USAGE ON PURPOSE: `A pragmatic compromise among textbook and/OR IUPAC CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE, UNIVERSAL CONSISTENCY, AND FREQUENTLY ADOPTED `LEGACY` USAGE`</label>
        <term>AND A NOMENCLATURE THAT COMPROMISES WITH INSTALLED USAGE ON PURPOSE: `A pragmatic compromise among textbook and/OR IUPAC CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE, UNIVERSAL CONSISTENCY, AND FREQUENTLY ADOPTED `LEGACY` USAGE`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND TWO NOMENCLATURES COEXISTING BY DECLARED DIVISION OF LABOUR: the recommended names are `IN NO WAY INTENDED TO COMPETE WITH OR SUPPLANT IUPAC OR CAS NOMENCLATURE`, which remain `the designations of choice when a specific substance needs to be unequivocally identified`</label>
        <term>AND TWO NOMENCLATURES COEXISTING BY DECLARED DIVISION OF LABOUR: the recommended names are `IN NO WAY INTENDED TO COMPETE WITH OR SUPPLANT IUPAC OR CAS NOMENCLATURE`, which remain `the designations of choice when a specific substance needs to be unequivocally identified`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND ONE ADJECTIVE CARRYING TWO THRESHOLDS FOR A MEASURED REASON: `The `LONG-CHAIN` definitions for PFCAs and PFSAs are different in number of C atoms because a PFSA ... has a greater tendency to bioconcentrate and/or bioaccumulate`</label>
        <term>AND ONE ADJECTIVE CARRYING TWO THRESHOLDS FOR A MEASURED REASON: `The `LONG-CHAIN` definitions for PFCAs and PFSAs are different in number of C atoms because a PFSA ... has a greater tendency to bioconcentrate and/or bioaccumulate`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND FOUR WORDS DECLARED INTERCHANGEABLE WITH THE EXCEPTION NAMED: `SUBSTANCE, COMPOUND, CHEMICAL, AND SPECIES ARE USED INTERCHANGEABLY ... For example, in the European REACH legislation, a SUBSTANCE MAY INCLUDE IMPURITIES AND STABILIZERS`</label>
        <term>AND FOUR WORDS DECLARED INTERCHANGEABLE WITH THE EXCEPTION NAMED: `SUBSTANCE, COMPOUND, CHEMICAL, AND SPECIES ARE USED INTERCHANGEABLY ... For example, in the European REACH legislation, a SUBSTANCE MAY INCLUDE IMPURITIES AND STABILIZERS`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES ... for which ALL of the H atoms ... have been replaced by F atoms` PLUS `POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES ... for which all H atoms attached to AT LEAST ONE (BUT NOT ALL) C atoms have been replaced`, provided they contain the perfluoroalkyl moiety CnF2n+1-</label>
        <term>PFAS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`perfluoroalkyl CARBOXYLIC acids with EIGHT carbons and greater` and `perfluoroalkane SULFONATES with SIX carbons and greater` - adopted `To avoid any subjectivity associated with these adjectives`</label>
        <term>long-chain</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`a distinct subset of fluorinated polymers, namely, those made by (co)polymerization of olefinic monomers ... to form a carbon-only polymer backbone with F atoms directly attached to it` - restricted `In compliance with time-honored usage within the industry`</label>
        <term>fluoropolymers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>with recommended names, acronyms, structural formulas and CAS registry numbers</label>
        <term>names the nomenclature had to supply</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>one adjective, two numbers, and the gap is a bioaccumulation measurement</label>
        <term>long-chain threshold</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>for PFOS alone - the recommended name covers eleven of eighty-nine</label>
        <term>isomers behind one name</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a decade after the first reports of global occurrence</label>
        <term>publication rate the nomenclature must catch up with</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the only arithmetic in the naming problem: 89 possible, 11 observed, 1 name - and the mixture `presents challenges in providing an accurate quantification`</label>
        <term>count of congeners</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>CnF2n+1- : the structural feature that decides membership of the PFAS family, and the reason `scattered` polyfluorinated compounds are excluded</label>
        <term>perfluoroalkyl moiety</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.258.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
