standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 5 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | whether operant conditioning of a spinal reflex can change locomotion after spinal cord injury Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether descending input shaped by reflex conditioning can improve motor function in the injured spinal cord Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | shows a targeted reflex conditioning protocol removes a lesion-induced locomotor asymmetry, establishing the principle that descending-input conditioning can change a complex motor behaviour Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | H-reflex operant conditioning after spinal cord injury Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | up-conditioning raises the locomotor burst, probably by recruiting more motoneurons to primary afferent input, and the burst also broadens Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the lesion spares the corticospinal tract, which is the only descending path known to be essential for H-reflex conditioning - so the protocol can still work Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | in intact animals other muscles compensate and symmetry is preserved; after injury that compensation is impaired, so the same conditioning changes locomotion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | conditioning is delivered continuously in the home cage, 3000-9000 stimulus trials per day over 50 days Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | H-reflex size is expressed in units of background EMG rather than peak-to-peak, because the rat H-reflex form is too variable for a peak measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The study only establishes the principle; the functional and clinical significance of the effect is not yet assessed. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: what the study establishes, stated by the authors as principle only: THE PRESENT RESULTS MERELY VALIDATE THE PRINCIPLE THAT SPINAL REFLEX CONDITIONING CAN AFFECT A COMPLEX MOTOR FUNCTION AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Whether treadmill results in quadrupedal rats transfer to over-ground walking in bipedal humans is unknown. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: transfer to human walking: THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE EFFECTS OF CONDITIONING ON TREADMILL LOCOMOTION IN THE QUADRIPEDAL RAT PREDICT ITS EFFECTS ON OVER-GROUND LOCOMOTION IN THE BIPEDAL HUMAN REMAINS TO BE DETERMINED | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | How long the conditioning effects last is not established. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim about how long the effect lasts: THE LONG-TERM PERSISTENCE OF THE EFFECTS OF H-REFLEX CONDITIONING IS NOT YET WELL DEFINED | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Large between-rat variability in absolute EMG measures limits the power to detect group differences. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: between-group comparisons on absolute measures: THIS WIDE INTER-RAT VARIABILITY MEANS THAT VERY LARGE GROUPS OF LC AND NORMAL RATS WOULD BE NEEDED FOR INTERGROUP DIFFERENCES TO BECOME SIGNIFICANT | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the measured asymmetry is an EMG proxy, and whether it corresponds to an actual limp is stated to be unknown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the step from the EMG measure to the behaviour: IT IS NOT AS YET CLEAR WHETHER THE SOLEUS EMG ASYMMETRY CREATED BY THE LC LESION IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ACTUAL LIMP IN WALKING | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the results are said to merely validate a principle, with clinical significance unassessed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - the principle, not the clinical application: MUCH REMAINS TO BE LEARNED BEFORE THE POTENTIAL of the method is known | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | only soleus bursts were measured; stance and swing need direct measurement and other muscles are untested Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the soleus-burst proxy for stance and swing: THE DATA PRESENTED HERE RELY ON THE RIGHT AND LEFT SOLEUS LOCOMOTOR BURSTS TO ASSESS SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF LOCOMOTION, and these measures only APPEAR TO PARALLEL THE RIGHT AND LEFT STANCE PHASES OF LOCOMOTION | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | whether quadrupedal treadmill results predict bipedal over-ground human locomotion is undetermined Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[1] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - prediction from quadrupedal treadmill work to BIPEDAL HUMAN over-ground locomotion | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the long-term persistence of the effect is not well defined, and up-conditioning decays faster than down-conditioning in monkeys Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2] - persistence, where the human comparison is that THE EFFECTS OF DOWN-CONDITIONING ARE STILL EVIDENT 4 MONTHS LATER | limitations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | inter-rat variability in absolute EMG measures is so wide that very large groups would be needed for group differences to reach significance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: absolute measures specifically: ABSOLUTE MEASURES SUCH AS SOLEUS BURST AMPLITUDE DIFFER WIDELY ACROSS NORMAL RATS AND EVEN BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND LEFT LEGS OF INDIVIDUAL RATS | limitations[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the locomotor analysis uses only the seven rats in which conditioning succeeded Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the up-conditioning locomotion analysis, which used only the animals in which conditioning worked: THE SEVEN SUCCESSFUL RATS CONSTITUTED THE EXPERIMENTAL GROUP OF HRup RATS FOR EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF UP-CONDITIONING ON TREADMILL LOCOMOTION | limitations[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | 13 female rats only Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any sex-general reading: SUBJECTS WERE 13 FEMALE SPRAGUE DAWLEY RATS | limitations[11] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | reward-contingent shaping, applied to a spinal reflex rather than to a voluntary action Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | evidence that far fewer trials suffice in people, used to argue the rat protocol's intensity is not a barrier Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | five rats that were never exposed to up-conditioning, run through the same two sessions as the conditioned animals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the passage of time and repeated testing as the explanation of the change - if the unconditioned rats changed too, the effect would not be the conditioning · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | locomotor abnormality here means an EMG burst-onset asymmetry, not an observed gait defect - the paper says whether there is a limp at all is unknown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | successful conditioning is stipulated as a change of at least 20% in the intended direction, a criterion carried over from earlier papers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the abnormality is PHYSIOLOGICALLY defined and the lesion ANATOMICALLY defined - the paper states the two bases separately Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | symmetry is an index constructed so that 0.5 means symmetric, built from burst-onset times rather than from limb kinematics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: right lateral column transection, then 50 days of H-reflex up-conditioning by nerve-cuff stimulation and food reward in the freely moving rat, with treadmill locomotion measured before and after Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: H-reflex operant conditioning after spinal cord injury — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Chen et al., 2005 (H-reflex conditioning in normal rats) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Chen et al., 2001a and Chen et al., 2005 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → work showing that patterned sensory input from locomotor training induces spinal plasticity, by adding a descending-input route Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → the feasibility of reflex conditioning in people with partial spinal cord injuries who retain a functioning CST Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → its own translational claim, by stating the rat-to-human locomotion question is undetermined Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: remains to be determined | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | distinguishes-from → the same conditioning in normal rats, where it does not change locomotor symmetry at all Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE ANIMAL IS INJURED. 'Quotation withheld' The same conditioning does nothing in an intact animal and changes locomotion in an injured one - so the effect is a property of the DAMAGED system, and a therapy claim depends entirely on that. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | H-reflex —causes→ locomotor asymmetry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: SCOPE: this holds in lesioned rats and explicitly does NOT hold in normal rats, where the same conditioning leaves symmetry unchanged also in: H-reflex · locomotor asymmetry | concept_edges[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | lateral column —distinct-from→ corticospinal tract Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the whole design rests on this separation - the lesion removes one and spares the other
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the procedure transected the LC and left the CST intact; distinct-from is loose. also in: lateral column · corticospinal tract | concept_edges[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | locomotor asymmetry —operationalised-as→ step-cycle symmetry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span defines step-cycle symmetry; 'locomotor asymmetry' is not named. also in: locomotor asymmetry · step-cycle symmetry | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · H-reflex —operationalised-as→ background EMG Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span explained why the measure is used. This sentence IS THE OPERATIONALISATION, as a formula: '…and was expressed in units of average background EMG…'. The second endpoint appears twice - as the subtrahend and as the unit. — strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: the measurement unit was chosen because the animal's reflex form is too variable for the obvious measure
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'in this manner' = measured relative to average background EMG amplitude (previous sentence). also in: H-reflex · background EMG | concept_edges[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | H-reflex —operationalised-as→ background EMG Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but H-reflex size is expressed IN UNITS of background EMG; operationalised-as is loose. also in: H-reflex · background EMG | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | post hoc multiple comparison (Tukey's test) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | coefficient of variation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: coefficient of variation | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | one-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey's test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[6] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | coefficient of variation across step cycles Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[7] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Up-conditioning the soleus H-reflex enlarged the right soleus burst and corrected the locomotor asymmetry. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Right lateral-column transection shortened the right stance phase: right-to-left burst-onset time was only 77% of left-to-right. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The conditioning protocol roughly doubled the size of the conditioning H-reflex while leaving background EMG and the direct muscle (M) response unchanged, showing the change was reflex-specific rather than a general increase in muscle activation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In up-conditioned rats the locomotor H-reflexes and right soleus burst amplitude and width grew significantly between the first and second sessions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Step-cycle duration did not change in either the up-conditioned or the control group. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In normal rats neither up- nor down-conditioning affects right/left step symmetry. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Up-conditioning succeeded in 7 of 8 lesioned rats (87.5%). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | lateral column transection left a persistent burst-onset asymmetry: right-to-left time was 0.43 of the cycle against 0.50 in normal rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the right stance phase was shortened to 77% of the opposite interval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | up-conditioning succeeded in 7 of 8 rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | locomotor H-reflexes and right soleus burst amplitude and width all increased in the conditioned group Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the asymmetry disappeared in the up-conditioned group Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a stance H-reflex increase came with a burst amplitude increase 0.32 times as large Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same conditioning does not change locomotor symmetry in normal rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 72% of the right lateral column was destroyed, with other structures mostly intact Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | conditioning H-reflex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: conditioning H-reflex | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | step-cycle symmetry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: step-cycle symmetry | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | successful conditioning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: successful conditioning | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | step-cycle symmetry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: step-cycle symmetry | content_tags.definitions[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | successful conditioning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: successful conditioning | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | burst onset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: burst onset | content_tags.definitions[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | burst offset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: burst offset | content_tags.definitions[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | H-reflex up-conditioning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: H-reflex up-conditioning | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | step-cycle symmetry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: step-cycle symmetry | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | treadmill speed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: treadmill speed | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | M-response size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: M-response size | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | H-reflex size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: H-reflex size | content_tags.variables[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | burst amplitude Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: burst amplitude | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | burst width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: burst width | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 212 ± 49% — final size of the conditioning H-reflex in successfully up-conditioned rats, as a percentage of its pre-conditioning control size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 87.5% — proportion of rats (7 of 8) in which up-conditioning met the success criterion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.43 ± 0.02 — right-to-left burst-onset interval as a fraction of the whole step cycle in lesioned rats, versus the 0.50 of symmetrical locomotion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 280 ± 38% — increase in the stance-phase locomotor H-reflex after up-conditioning, as a percentage of its first-session value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 158 ± 22% — increase in right soleus locomotor burst amplitude after up-conditioning, as a percentage of its first-session value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 72 ± 18% — proportion of the right lateral column destroyed by the transection, verified histologically Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p = 0.008 — significance of the disappearance of the right/left step-cycle asymmetry in the up-conditioned group Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 13 — number of rats used in the study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 13 female Sprague Dawley rats — the sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 10% of peak — the stipulated threshold defining burst onset and offset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | at least 20% change — the stipulated criterion for successful conditioning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 0.43 versus 0.50 of the step cycle, p = 0.009 — the lesion-induced asymmetry against normal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 212% of control, 7 of 8 rats, 87.5% success — the conditioning effect and its success rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 0.32 times as large, r = 0.60, p = 0.04 — burst amplitude change per unit H-reflex change Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 72 plus or minus 18% of the right lateral column destroyed — verified lesion extent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.