<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement</title>
        <author>Cragg</author>
        <author>Keeble</author>
        <author>Richardson</author>
        <author>Roome</author>
        <author>Gilmore</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher>Cognition</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">cragg2017-direct-and-indirect-influences-of</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">cragg2017-direct-and-indirect-influences-of.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">0b2faa250924bc9bdfae5d3dfa865a2aca7b30d7</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>executive function contributions to mathematics achievement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Achievement tests additionally require locating the mathematical problem inside a verbal or visual description and building a problem representation, and working memory maintains and manipulates that representation - which is why a direct working-memory path survives beyond the component skills</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Working memory activates and retrieves number facts from long-term memory while inhibition suppresses the neighbouring but incorrect answers that are co-activated during retrieval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Conceptual information is stored in a verbal code whereas arithmetic facts also carry a visuospatial component from how sums are presented and encoded, so only verbal working memory supports conceptual retrieval while both domains support fact retrieval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Because age-appropriate mathematics content was chosen separately for each group, the study may have measured only the application of already-mastered material, which could explain the absence of age-related change.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The direct working-memory-to-achievement pathway has not been shown to survive control for working memory&#x27;s role in performing the arithmetic operation itself.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>IQ was not included, so its share of the variance in each mathematics component is unknown.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The field&#x27;s existing evidence cannot be put side by side, because it comes from separate studies — which is the stated reason this study exists.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the accumulated literature on executive functions and arithmetic: the paper states the evidence is drawn across separate studies, so the contributions cannot be directly compared across the three core competencies</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The three-part division of the central construct is inherited from one paper rather than derived here.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the executive-function components in this analysis: they follow the three-component division of Miyake et al. (2000) rather than being derived from these data</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a DIFFERENT item set chosen for each age band - 8-9, 11-12, 13-14, and young adults</label>
        <note>eliminates: floor and ceiling effects as the explanation of an age difference - a task easy enough for adults compresses their scores at ceiling and would make the developmental difference an artefact of the scale rather than of the ability · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the full list of acceptable strategies - counting in the head, on fingers, decomposition, retrieval - stated explicitly to participants</label>
        <note>eliminates: younger children suppressing the strategy they actually used because they believed it was not allowed, which would bias the self-report measure precisely in the age group the study is about · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>executive functions</label>
        <term>executive functions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>inhibition</label>
        <term>inhibition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>shifting</label>
        <term>shifting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>updating</label>
        <term>updating</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>working memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>updating → executive functions</label>
        <note>A CUE-LIST GAP, NOT A VOCABULARY GAP - &#x27;part-of&#x27; IS THE RIGHT TYPE. &#x27;ARE TYPICALLY DIVIDED…&#x27; The gate refused it because its containment cue list holds &#x27;within / part of / comprises / consists of / includes / belongs to&#x27; and not &#x27;divided into&#x27;. Measured over all 711 staged bodies: &#x27;composed of&#x27; 262 occurrences in 151 bodies and &#x27;divided into&#x27; 201 in 137 - each MORE COMMON than &#x27;comprises&#x27; (68 in 51), which IS in the list; also &#x27;made up of&#x27; 28 and &#x27;subdivided into&#x27; 17. I could have passed this edge by omitting relation evidence, because the type-specific cue test only fires when that field is supplied - which is the same shape, and the fact that I can is not a reason to. The edge is filed here until the cue list is amended by whoever owns the gate, and should be promoted to &#x27;part-of&#x27; when it is. Note also that this record was MISSING the third Miyake component entirely: it carried &#x27;inhibition&#x27; and &#x27;shifting&#x27; and not &#x27;updating&#x27;. the project, 2026-08-26.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>executive functions - AS DIVIDED HERE: three components following Miyake et al. (2000) — updating or working memory, inhibition, and shifting</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>working memory - the Baddeley and Hitch (1974) model, described as adopted by the MAJORITY of researchers in the field rather than as established</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>`updating` / `working memory` - AN ALIAS ASSERTED BY A BARE `OR`, AND IT IS THE LOOSEST JOIN IN THIS PAPER. `These are (i) updating or working memory, the ability to monitor and manipulate information held in mind`. Miyake&#x27;s component is `updating`; `working memory` is a much older and much broader term that this sentence quietly equates with it. The paper&#x27;s own later sections then distinguish VERBAL from VISUOSPATIAL working memory and report they behave differently - a distinction `updating` does not carry. The `or` does more work than it admits.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`executive functions` - DEFINED BY WHAT THEY ARE FOR, THEN IMMEDIATELY BY A THREE-WAY PARTITION. `Executive functions, the skills used to guide and control thought and action, Quotation withheld` The functional gloss is the paper&#x27;s own; the partition is attributed, and `typically` marks it as convention rather than fact. Each component then gets a one-clause definition in the same sentence - updating, inhibition, shifting - so the whole construct is fixed in 60 words.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Geary (2004); Geary &amp; Hoard (2005) hierarchical framework of mathematics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → previous hierarchical multi-component models of mathematics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Cowan and Powell (2014); Fuchs et al. (2005)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Andersson (2010); Clark et al. (2010)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Hecht et al. (2003); Jordan et al. (2013)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · inhibition —part-of→ executive functions</label>
        <term>inhibition</term>
        <term>executive functions</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span had an elided subject - &#x27;are typically divided into…&#x27; three components - so the term executive functions was never named. This sentence names both and places one inside the other: the contribution of executive functions, &#x27;…IN PARTICULAR INHIBITION…&#x27; and shifting, to procedural skill. — strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: the span continues the sentence whose subject is &#x27;Executive functions&#x27; (immediately before the span).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>inhibition —part-of→ executive functions</label>
        <term>inhibition</term>
        <term>executive functions</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hierarchical regression</label>
        <term>hierarchical regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance partitioning</label>
        <term>variance partitioning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mahalanobis distance (outlier detection)</label>
        <term>Mahalanobis distance (outlier detection)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>multiple imputation</label>
        <term>multiple imputation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standardization (z-scores)</label>
        <term>standardization (z-scores)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>descriptive statistics</label>
        <term>descriptive statistics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mediation analysis</label>
        <term>mediation analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The domain-specific skills of factual knowledge, procedural skill and conceptual understanding only partially mediated the executive-function/achievement link, with numerical inhibitory control acting on achievement through factual knowledge and procedural skill.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Executive function measures explained far more variance in overall mathematics achievement (34%) than in any single component skill, and least of all in conceptual understanding (5%).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Verbal working memory uniquely predicted all four outcomes - factual knowledge, procedural skill, conceptual understanding and mathematics achievement.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Shifting and non-numerical inhibition independently predicted none of the outcomes, whereas numerical inhibition uniquely predicted factual knowledge and procedural skill.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Contrary to prediction, the relationships between executive functions and mathematics were the same from 8 years to adulthood.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Visuospatial working memory had a substantial direct effect on mathematics achievement (b = 0.25).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Verbal working memory influenced achievement indirectly through all three component skills, with the procedural-skill route the largest of the three indirect paths.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The predicted relationship of inhibition and shifting with overall mathematics achievement was not found.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>executive functions</label>
        <term>executive functions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>factual knowledge</label>
        <term>factual knowledge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>working memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>inhibition</label>
        <term>inhibition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>shifting</label>
        <term>shifting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mathematics achievement</label>
        <term>mathematics achievement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>factual knowledge, procedural skill and conceptual understanding</label>
        <term>factual knowledge, procedural skill and conceptual understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>executive function measures</label>
        <term>executive function measures</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>verbal working memory</label>
        <term>verbal working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>age contrasts</label>
        <term>age contrasts</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>total number of words correctly recalled</label>
        <term>total number of words correctly recalled</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>293 — total participants tested, aged 8-25 years</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>34% — variance in mathematics achievement explained by the executive function measures alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>b = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.15–0.34 — direct effect of visuospatial working memory on mathematics achievement after the mediators were included</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>9% — unique variance in mathematics achievement attributable to the working memory tasks once storage and processing speed were controlled</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.3% — proportion of missing data replaced by multiple imputation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
