<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>A large-scale standardized physiological survey reveals functional organization of the mouse visual cortex</title>
        <author>de Vries</author>
        <author>Lecoq</author>
        <author>Buice</author>
        <author>Groblewski</author>
        <author>Ocker</author>
        <author>Oliver</author>
        <author>Feng</author>
        <author>Cain</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>A large-scale standardized physiological survey reveals functional organization of the mouse visual cortex</title>
          <date>2020</date>
          <publisher>Nature Neuroscience</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/s41593-019-0550-9</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">de-Vries2020-a-large-scale-standardized-physiological-sur</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">de-Vries2020-a-large-scale-standardized-physiological-sur.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">c35510c84a7d6729b95052f272c7e6984c976058</note>
          <note type="rights">not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>how stimulus representations ARE TRANSFORMED THROUGHOUT THE VISUAL CORTEX, surveyed rather than sampled</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether the standard account of visual cortex survives a survey that does not select its neurons by their responses - A KEY CHALLENGE RESULTS FROM THE FACT THAT THIS UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON MANY SMALL STUDIES, RECORDING RESPONSES FROM DIFFERENT STAGES IN THE CIRCUIT, USING DIFFERENT STIMULI AND ANALYSES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>an open survey in which THE LARGEST CLASS IS NOT RELIABLY RESPONSIVE TO ANY OF THE STIMULI AND BECOMES PROGRESSIVELY LARGER IN HIGHER VISUAL AREAS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>functional organization of mouse visual cortex</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>calcium-imaging</label>
        <term>calcium-imaging</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Hand-tuning stimuli to each recorded neuron builds selection bias into the classical literature, which is why the standard model looks better in small studies than in an unbiased survey.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The unresponsive &#x27;none&#x27; neurons may in fact be visually driven but tuned to highly sparse, specific natural features constructed by hierarchical processing, which the presented stimulus set never hits.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Because responses are so sparse, different neurons are active at different moments, which is what keeps their pairwise noise correlations weak.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the bias this survey is built against, described as a procedure: NEURONS WERE IDENTIFIED BY RESPONDING TO A TEST STIMULUS - THE STIMULUS WAS THEN HAND-TUNED TO ELICIT THE STRONGEST RELIABLE RESPONSE FROM THAT NEURON, AND THE EXPERIMENT PROCEEDED USING MANIPULATIONS AROUND THIS CONDITION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and what that procedure cannot see: THESE STUDIES MAY HAVE FAILED TO CAPTURE THE VARIABILITY OF RESPONSES, THE BREADTH OF FEATURES THAT WILL ELICIT A NEURAL RESPONSE, AND THE BREADTH OF FEATURES THAT DO NOT ELICIT A RESPONSE - THIS RESULTS IN SYSTEMATIC BIAS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF NEURONS AND A CONFIRMATION BIAS REGARDING MODEL ASSUMPTIONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the one design decision that removes it: THIS PIPELINE REDUCED CRITICAL EXPERIMENTAL BIASES BY SEPARATING QUALITY CONTROL OF DATA COLLECTION FROM RESPONSE CHARACTERIZATION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the reason it matters for a whole literature: THIS UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON MANY SMALL STUDIES, RECORDING RESPONSES FROM DIFFERENT STAGES IN THE CIRCUIT, USING DIFFERENT STIMULI AND ANALYSES - THE INHERENT EXPERIMENTAL SELECTION BIASES AND LACK OF STANDARDIZATION OF THIS APPROACH INTRODUCE ADDITIONAL OBSTACLES TO CREATING A COHESIVE UNDERSTANDING OF CORTICAL FUNCTION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The putative ventral higher visual areas could not be imaged, so the expected inverse (spatial-over-motion) organisation could not be tested.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[4] - the putative ventral higher visual areas could not be imaged, so the expected inverse organisation is missing for a reason about the window, not the brain</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Neurons classed as responding only to natural stimuli may be conventional cells tuned to spatial or temporal frequencies the stimulus set did not sample.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the class of neurons responding only to natural stimuli: THESE NEURONS COULD BE &#x27;CLASSICAL&#x27; NEURONS AS WELL BUT ARE TUNED FOR SPATIAL OR TEMPORAL FREQUENCIES THAT WERE NOT INCLUDED IN OUR STIMULUS SET</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The wavelet models leave a large amount of visually responsive activity unexplained.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the explanatory reach of the wavelet models: THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF VISUALLY RESPONSIVE ACTIVITY THAT IS NOT BEING CAPTURED BY THESE MODELS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The epileptiform-event screening used to exclude mice could not be applied to the inhibitory Cre lines.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the epileptiform screening, and therefore the quality control on the inhibitory lines: INHIBITORY LINES WERE EXCLUDED FROM THIS ANALYSIS AS THE NEURONAL LABELLING WAS TOO SPARSE TO RELIABLY ASSESS THESE EVENTS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>one half of the expected organisation is missing for a reason that is about the window, not the brain - WE WERE UNABLE TO IMAGE THE PUTATIVE VENTRAL AREAS LI, POR, OR P WITHIN OUR CRANIAL WINDOW</label>
        <note>what this limits: reading the absence of a ventral counterpart to the dorsal specialisation as a finding about the cortex</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the largest class may be an artefact of the stimulus set rather than a property of the cells - IT IS POSSIBLE THESE NEURONS ARE VISUALLY DRIVEN, BUT ARE RESPONSIVE TO HIGHLY SPARSE AND SPECIFIC NATURAL FEATURES, or THESE NEURONS COULD BE INVOLVED IN NON-VISUAL COMPUTATION</label>
        <note>what this limits: reading &#x27;does not respond to visual stimuli&#x27; as &#x27;is not visual&#x27;</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the stimulus parameters may have been set too low - AS OUR STIMULUS PARAMETERS WERE CHOSEN TO MATCH PREVIOUS MEASUREMENTS OF MOUSE ACUITY, THIS COULD SUGGEST THAT THE ACUITY OF MOUSE HAS BEEN UNDERESTIMATED</label>
        <note>what this limits: reading poor prediction for artificial stimuli as a property of the neurons rather than of the parameter range</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the models fail for most of the cortex - EVEN WITH THE INCLUSION OF RUNNING, OUR MODELS PREDICT RESPONSES IN A MINORITY OF NEURONS</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim that the standard models describe this cortex: EVEN WITH THE INCLUSION OF RUNNING, OUR MODELS PREDICT RESPONSES IN A MINORITY OF NEURONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>the pipeline itself - STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES WITH INTEGRATED ENGINEERING TOOLS, applied to make 243 mice comparable to each other</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>quality control of the recording separated from characterisation of the response</label>
        <note>eliminates: the dataset selecting for cells that respond - STRICT QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES NOT DEPENDENT UPON STIMULUS-DRIVEN ACTIVITY · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>the functional classes validated against a model containing the standard machinery plus running speed</label>
        <note>eliminates: the classes being an artefact of the reliability clustering - the models contain MOST OF THE BASIC FEATURES FOUND IN VISUAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MODELING as well as THE RUNNING SPEED OF THE MOUSE · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>both artificial and natural stimuli presented to the same neurons</label>
        <note>eliminates: a conclusion that holds only for parameterised stimuli - RESPONSES TO NATURAL SCENES CANNOT BE WELL PREDICTED BY RESPONSES TO NOISE OR GRATING STIMULI · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>running checked as an explanation for the unresponsive class</label>
        <note>eliminates: locomotion accounting for the &#x27;none&#x27; class - WE FOUND LITTLE EVIDENCE THAT THESE NEURONS WERE CORRELATED WITH THE MOUSE&#x27;S RUNNING · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="controls" ana="#controls[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a STANDARDISED survey - fixed operating procedures and stimuli applied identically across 59,610 neurons in 243 mice - in place of experiment-specific stimulus choices</label>
        <note>eliminates: the experimenter&#x27;s choice of stimulus as the determinant of what is found. The paper states the fault it is answering: earlier studies &#x27;may have failed to capture…&#x27;, producing &#x27;a CONFIRMATION BIAS regarding…&#x27; · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>none</label>
        <term>none</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE LARGEST CLASS OF NEURONS RESPONDS TO NOTHING: REMARKABLY, THE LARGEST CLASS OF NEURONS WAS THE “none” CLASS, CONSTITUTING THOSE NEURONS THAT DID NOT RESPOND RELIABLY TO ANY OF THE STIMULI (34% OF NEURONS) - THESE NEURONS ARE THE LEAST LIKELY TO BE DESCRIBED BY “classical receptive fields,” AS EVIDENCED BY THEIR POOR MODEL PERFORMANCE FOR ALL STIMULI</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and in one area it is almost everything: AREA RL HAS THE LARGEST PROPORTION OF NEURONS IN THE “none” CLASS, OVER 85%, CONSISTENT WITH THE VERY LOW PERCENT OF RESPONSIVE NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE PAPER ASKS THE QUESTION ITSELF AND LEAVES IT OPEN: WHAT, THEN, DO THESE NEURONS DO? - and offers both readings, that they ARE RESPONSIVE TO HIGHLY SPARSE AND SPECIFIC NATURAL FEATURES or COULD BE INVOLVED IN NON-VISUAL COMPUTATION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE CLASS THE STANDARD MODEL EXPLAINS IS A TENTH OF THE CORTEX: NEURONS IN THE “DG-SG-NS-NM” CLASS WERE WELL PREDICTED, WITH VALUES COMPARABLE TO THOSE FOUND IN PRIMATES - HOWEVER, THIS CLASS CONSTITUTES ONLY 10% OF THE MOUSE VISUAL CORTEX. And EVEN WITH THE INCLUSION OF RUNNING, OUR MODELS PREDICT RESPONSES IN A MINORITY OF NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE SELECTION BIAS OF A WHOLE LITERATURE, DESCRIBED AS A PROCEDURE: NEURONS WERE IDENTIFIED BY RESPONDING TO A TEST STIMULUS - THE STIMULUS WAS THEN HAND-TUNED TO ELICIT THE STRONGEST RELIABLE RESPONSE FROM THAT NEURON... THIS RESULTS IN SYSTEMATIC BIAS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF NEURONS AND A CONFIRMATION BIAS REGARDING MODEL ASSUMPTIONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the fix is one sentence of study design: THIS PIPELINE REDUCED CRITICAL EXPERIMENTAL BIASES BY SEPARATING QUALITY CONTROL OF DATA COLLECTION FROM RESPONSE CHARACTERIZATION - the decision to include a cell is made before anyone knows whether it responds</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE PROBLEM STATED AS A PROBLEM OF SYNTHESIS: THIS UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON MANY SMALL STUDIES, RECORDING RESPONSES FROM DIFFERENT STAGES IN THE CIRCUIT, USING DIFFERENT STIMULI AND ANALYSES - THE INHERENT EXPERIMENTAL SELECTION BIASES AND LACK OF STANDARDIZATION OF THIS APPROACH INTRODUCE ADDITIONAL OBSTACLES TO CREATING A COHESIVE UNDERSTANDING OF CORTICAL FUNCTION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the field asked for exactly this: INFLUENTIAL REVIEWS HAVE QUESTIONED THE VALIDITY OF THIS STANDARD MODEL, AND HAVE ARGUED THAT “What would be most helpful is to accumulate a database of single unit or multi-unit data that would allow modelers to test their best theory under ecological conditions.”</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A MISSING HALF OF THE ANSWER, ATTRIBUTED TO THE WINDOW AND NOT THE BRAIN: THE LACK OF AN INVERSE RELATIONSHIP, WHEREIN SPATIAL INFORMATION IS OVERREPRESENTED RELATIVE TO MOTION IN A PUTATIVE “ventral” STREAM, LIKELY REFLECTS THE FACT THAT WE WERE UNABLE TO IMAGE THE PUTATIVE VENTRAL AREAS LI, POR, OR P WITHIN OUR CRANIAL WINDOW</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>TWO INTERNEURON CLASSES, 94% AGAINST 9%, TO THE SAME STIMULUS: 94% OF Sst NEURONS IN V1 ARE RESPONSIVE TO DRIFTING GRATINGS, AND RESPOND QUITE RELIABLY ACROSS TRIALS, FAR MORE THAN THE OTHER CRE LINES - Vip NEURONS, ON THE OTHER HAND, ARE LARGELY UNRESPONSIVE, EVEN SUPPRESSED, BY DRIFTING GRATINGS, WITH ONLY 9% OF Vip NEURONS IN V1 LABELLED RESPONSIVE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="senses" ana="#senses[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the same cells are highly responsive to a different stimulus class: Vip NEURONS ARE VERY RESPONSIVE TO BOTH NATURAL SCENES AND NATURAL MOVIES, but SHOW LITTLE SELECTIVITY TO THESE STIMULI, AS THEIR MEDIAN LIFETIME SPARSENESS IS LOWER THAN BOTH THE Sst AND THE EXCITATORY NEURONS. `Vip cells are unresponsive` is true of one stimulus set and false of another</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="senses" ana="#senses[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A MEASUREMENT THAT REVERSES AN EARLIER ONE, WITH THE STIMULUS NAMED: RECEPTIVE FIELD MAPPING USING LOCALLY SPARSE NOISE REVEALED THAT Vip NEURONS IN V1 HAVE REMARKABLY LARGE RECEPTIVE FIELD AREAS, LARGER THAN BOTH Sst AND EXCITATORY NEURONS, IN CONTRAST TO THE SMALLER SUMMATION AREA FOR Vip NEURONS, PREVIOUSLY MEASURED USING WINDOWED DRIFTING GRATINGS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="senses" ana="#senses[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE STIMULUS CLASS DECIDES THE ANSWER, AND THE PAPER SAYS SO BEFORE MEASURING: IT IS KNOWN THAT STIMULUS STATISTICS AFFECT VISUAL RESPONSES, SUCH THAT RESPONSES TO NATURAL SCENES CANNOT BE WELL PREDICTED BY RESPONSES TO NOISE OR GRATING STIMULI - WHILE ARTIFICIAL STIMULI CAN BE EASILY PARAMETERIZED AND INTERPRETED, NATURAL STIMULI ARE CLOSER TO WHAT IS ETHOLOGICALLY RELEVANT</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="senses" ana="#senses[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the headline positive, with its complement: 77% OF NEURONS IN THE MOUSE VISUAL CORTEX RESPOND TO AT LEAST ONE OF THESE VISUAL STIMULI - and THE RESPONSES TO ALL STIMULI ARE HIGHLY SPARSE AND VARIABLE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="senses" ana="#senses[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE DIFFERENCES ARE BETWEEN THE INHIBITORY LINES, NOT THE EXCITATORY ONES: WHILE SUBTLE DIFFERENCES DO EXIST BETWEEN THE EXCITATORY CRE LINES, THESE POPULATIONS ARE LARGELY SIMILAR; THE MORE MARKED DIFFERENCES ARE AMONG THE INHIBITORY INTERNEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="senses" ana="#senses[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and yet the excitatory lines are not interchangeable either: RORB, SCNN1A-TG3, AND NR5A1, WHICH LABEL DISTINCT LAYER 4 POPULATIONS IN V1, EXHIBIT DISTINCT SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL TUNING PROPERTIES, DIFFERENT DEGREES OF RUNNING CORRELATION, AND SUBTLE DIFFERENCES IN THEIR CLASS DISTRIBUTION - THESE DIFFERENCES SUGGEST THAT THERE ARE SEPARATE CHANNELS OF FEEDFORWARD INFORMATION</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="senses" ana="#senses[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE CLASSES DO NOT RESPECT THE AREAS: Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="senses" ana="#senses[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and what organisation there is comes from proportions rather than presence: THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF CLASSES RESPONSIVE TO NATURAL MOVIES AND MOTION STIMULI IN AREAS AL, PM, AND AM RELATIVE TO THE OTHER CLASSES IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ASSIGNMENT OF THESE AREAS TO THE PUTATIVE “dorsal” OR “motion” STREAM</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="senses" ana="#senses[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE DATASET IS THE CONTRIBUTION AND IT IS ALREADY BEING REUSED: THESE DATA HAVE BEEN USED BY OTHER RESEARCHERS TO DEVELOP IMAGE PROCESSING METHODS, TO EXAMINE STIMULUS ENCODING AND DECODING, AND TO TEST MODELS OF CORTICAL COMPUTATIONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: existence</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger">
        <label>method: run every animal through one standardised pipeline with QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES NOT DEPENDENT UPON STIMULUS-DRIVEN ACTIVITY, so that entry into the dataset is decided before any response is measured</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: calcium-imaging — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: a population of cortical neurons that respond reliably to none of the stimuli a field has spent decades building</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: functional organization of mouse visual cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Jewell et al. L0-penalized event detection method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Vinje and Gallant definition of lifetime sparseness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Schoppe et al. computation of CCmax</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → the standard model of visual cortex built from hand-tuned single-neuron recordings</label>
        <note>differs in: how the neurons enter the sample - NEURONS WERE IDENTIFIED BY RESPONDING TO A TEST STIMULUS and THE STIMULUS WAS THEN HAND-TUNED TO ELICIT THE STRONGEST RELIABLE RESPONSE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>contradicts → the smaller summation area reported for Vip neurons</label>
        <note>differs in: the stimulus used to map it - LOCALLY SPARSE NOISE here, against WINDOWED DRIFTING GRATINGS previously</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>extends → previous work showing functional differences among cortical areas in layer 2/3, extended across layers and 12 transgenic lines</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>qualifies → the assignment of AL, PM and AM to a dorsal stream</label>
        <note>differs in: that the complement was not testable - WE WERE UNABLE TO IMAGE THE PUTATIVE VENTRAL AREAS LI, POR, OR P WITHIN OUR CRANIAL WINDOW</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>none —is-a→ class</label>
        <term>none</term>
        <term>class</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE LARGEST CLASS OF NEURONS WAS THE &#x27;none&#x27; CLASS, CONSTITUTING THOSE NEURONS THAT DID NOT RESPOND RELIABLY TO ANY OF THE STIMULI (34% OF NEURONS)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>none —part-of→ RL</label>
        <term>none</term>
        <term>RL</term>
        <note>depends on: which area is measured - the same class is 34% of the survey as a whole · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: AREA RL HAS THE LARGEST PROPORTION OF NEURONS IN THE &#x27;none&#x27; CLASS, OVER 85%
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but RL has the largest share of non-responsive neurons; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>quality control —causes→ bias</label>
        <term>quality control</term>
        <term>bias</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: THIS PIPELINE REDUCED CRITICAL EXPERIMENTAL BIASES BY SEPARATING QUALITY CONTROL OF DATA COLLECTION FROM RESPONSE CHARACTERIZATION
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the pipeline reduced biases; the edge carries no direction.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>natural —contrasted-with→ gratings</label>
        <term>natural</term>
        <term>gratings</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: RESPONSES TO NATURAL SCENES CANNOT BE WELL PREDICTED BY RESPONSES TO NOISE OR GRATING STIMULI
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the source endpoint &#x27;natural&#x27; is a bare adjective; the span writes &#x27;natural (scenes and movies) stimuli&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Kolmogorov-Smirnov test</label>
        <term>Kolmogorov-Smirnov test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bonferroni correction</label>
        <term>Bonferroni correction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-squared test</label>
        <term>chi-squared test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Sidak multiple-comparisons correction</label>
        <term>Sidak multiple-comparisons correction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Gaussian mixture model clustering with Bayesian Information Criterion model selection</label>
        <term>Gaussian mixture model clustering with Bayesian Information Criterion model selection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>K-nearest-neighbors classification (decoding)</label>
        <term>K-nearest-neighbors classification (decoding)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cross-validation</label>
        <term>cross-validation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ridge regression</label>
        <term>ridge regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>polynomial regression</label>
        <term>polynomial regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>coefficient of variation</label>
        <term>coefficient of variation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>interquartile range</label>
        <term>interquartile range</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[12]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[13]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>permutation/shuffle test</label>
        <term>permutation/shuffle test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>lifetime sparseness</label>
        <term>lifetime sparseness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>IN TOTAL, 77% OF NEURONS WERE RESPONSIVE TO AT LEAST ONE OF THE VISUAL STIMULI PRESENTED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>BY FAR THE LARGEST SINGLE CLASS REVEALED BY THIS ANALYSIS IS THAT OF NEURONS THAT ARE LARGELY UNRESPONSIVE TO ALL STIMULI, TERMED `none,` WHICH CONTAINS 34±2% OF THE NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Area RL is the extreme case, with over 85% of its neurons falling into the unresponsive &#x27;none&#x27; class.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>How reliably a neuron responds to one stimulus type predicts almost nothing about how reliably it responds to another.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A standard linear-plus-quadratic Gabor wavelet encoding model fits only about 2% of the population well, with median correlations near 0.2.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Adding the mouse&#x27;s running speed to the encoding model gave essentially no extra predictive power except for Vip neurons in V1.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Most neurons do not respond on most individual trials, even to the stimulus condition that drives their largest average response.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Sst interneurons are the most reliably driven population, with 94% of Sst neurons in V1 responsive to drifting gratings.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Vip interneurons are the mirror image: only 9% of Vip neurons in V1 are responsive to drifting gratings, and many are suppressed by them.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>COMPARISONS ACROSS AREAS AND LAYERS REVEALED THAT DIRECTION SELECTIVITY IS HIGHEST IN LAYER 4 OF V1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Excitatory neurons had a median lifetime sparseness of 0.77 for natural scenes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>THIS DIVERGENCE IN REPRESENTATION OF THE MOTION CLASSES FROM THE NATURAL CLASSES IN AREAS AL, PM, AND AM IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PUTATIVE DORSAL AND VENTRAL STREAM SEGREGATION IN THE VISUAL CORTEX</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[12]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Vip neurons in V1 have unusually large receptive fields mapped with sparse noise, larger than Sst or excitatory neurons and at odds with their small summation area measured with windowed gratings.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>REMARKABLY, THE LARGEST CLASS OF NEURONS WAS THE `none` CLASS, CONSTITUTING THOSE NEURONS THAT DID NOT RESPOND RELIABLY TO ANY OF THE STIMULI (34% OF NEURONS)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AREA RL HAS THE LARGEST PROPORTION OF NEURONS IN THE `none` CLASS, OVER 85%</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the well-predicted class CONSTITUTES ONLY 10% OF THE MOUSE VISUAL CORTEX, and EVEN WITH THE INCLUSION OF RUNNING, OUR MODELS PREDICT RESPONSES IN A MINORITY OF NEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>77% OF NEURONS IN THE MOUSE VISUAL CORTEX RESPOND TO AT LEAST ONE OF THESE VISUAL STIMULI, and THE RESPONSES TO ALL STIMULI ARE HIGHLY SPARSE AND VARIABLE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>94% OF Sst NEURONS IN V1 ARE RESPONSIVE TO DRIFTING GRATINGS, while ONLY 9% OF Vip NEURONS IN V1 are LABELLED RESPONSIVE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Vip NEURONS IN V1 HAVE REMARKABLY LARGE RECEPTIVE FIELD AREAS, LARGER THAN BOTH Sst AND EXCITATORY NEURONS, IN CONTRAST TO THE SMALLER SUMMATION AREA PREVIOUSLY MEASURED USING WINDOWED DRIFTING GRATINGS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>WHILE SUBTLE DIFFERENCES DO EXIST BETWEEN THE EXCITATORY CRE LINES, THESE POPULATIONS ARE LARGELY SIMILAR; THE MORE MARKED DIFFERENCES ARE AMONG THE INHIBITORY INTERNEURONS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>lifetime sparseness</label>
        <term>lifetime sparseness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>population sparseness</label>
        <term>population sparseness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reliability</label>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>response class</label>
        <term>response class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>imaging depths</label>
        <term>imaging depths</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean response</label>
        <term>mean response</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>tuning metrics</label>
        <term>tuning metrics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t104" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>running state</label>
        <term>running state</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t105" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>pupil position and area</label>
        <term>pupil position and area</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t106" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>running</label>
        <term>running</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t107" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>class</label>
        <term>class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t108" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>59,610 — neurons imaged in the survey, drawn from 432 experiments</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t109" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>77% — share of neurons responsive to at least one visual stimulus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t110" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>34±2% — share of clustered neurons in the &#x27;none&#x27; class, unresponsive to every stimulus</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t111" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>33% — share of neurons in area RL responding to any stimulus, the lowest of the six areas</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t112" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>median 0.36 — WHILE Sst NEURONS WERE COMPARABLE TO EXCITATORY NEURONS (MEDIAN 0.77), Vip NEURONS EXHIBITED LOW LIFETIME SPARSENESS (MEDIAN 0.36)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t113" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>13% — share of neurons whose evoked responses were significantly modulated by running</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t114" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>1.9 fold — increase in the median evoked response when the mouse was running versus stationary</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t115" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>median 0.02 — noise correlation of excitatory populations, against 0.06 for Sst and 0.15 for Vip</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t116" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>517451 — number of free parameters in the 3D Gabor wavelet encoding model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t117" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>33.6% — share of neurons successfully matched across all three imaging sessions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t118" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>21% — share of responsive neurons whose trial responses the average tuning curve predicts with r above 0.5 (11% of all neurons)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t119" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>over 85% — share of area RL neurons in the unresponsive &#x27;none&#x27; class</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t120" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>34% — of neurons in the &#x27;none&#x27; class - the largest single class in the survey</label>
        <note>depends on: the area - AREA RL HAS THE LARGEST PROPORTION OF NEURONS IN THE &#x27;none&#x27; CLASS, OVER 85%</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t121" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>only 10% — of the mouse visual cortex in the class the standard model predicts well</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t122" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>77% — of neurons responding to AT LEAST ONE of the stimuli - so 23% respond to none of them</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t123" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>94% — of Sst neurons in V1 responsive to drifting gratings</label>
        <note>depends on: the cell class - the matched Vip figure is 9%</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t124" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>over 85% — of neurons in area RL falling in the &#x27;none&#x27; class</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0550-9.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
