<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Imaging Unconscious Semantic Priming</title>
        <author>Stanislas Dehaene</author>
        <author>Lionel Naccache</author>
        <author>Gurvan Le Clec H</author>
        <author>Etienne Koechlin</author>
        <author>Michael Mueller</author>
        <author>Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz</author>
        <author>Pierre-Francois van de Moortele</author>
        <author>Denis Le Bihan</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Imaging Unconscious Semantic Priming</title>
          <date>1998</date>
          <publisher>Nature</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/26967</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">dehaene1998-unconscious-priming</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">dehaene1998-unconscious-priming.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">3c0ea83f8fa777ec5204f5382b6836030d98a66c</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>masked semantic priming of number comparison</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>fmri</label>
        <term>fmri</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ERP localisation of the covert priming effect is spatially imprecise, which is why fMRI was added</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The haemodynamic measure is too coarse to resolve the small activation delays produced by masked priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the lateralized readiness potential, an ERP measure of covert motor preparation, rebuilt in the haemodynamic signal and renamed the lateralized BOLD response</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the number-comparison task performed twice by every subject, in counterbalanced order</label>
        <note>eliminates: an order effect between the two runs, and between-subject differences, at once - each subject does both and the order is balanced across them · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>prime</label>
        <term>prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>motor cortex</label>
        <term>motor cortex</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>awareness</label>
        <term>awareness</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE INVISIBLE PRIME APPLIES THE TASK INSTRUCTIONS, WHICH IS A STRONGER CLAIM THAN SEMANTIC ACTIVATION. `the interference between prime and target can be attributed to a covert, prime-induced activation of motor cortex, a response bias that must be overcome in incongruent trials. This indicates that the prime was unconsciously processed according to task instructions, all the way down to the motor system.` The unseen numeral was compared to 5 and a hand was prepared. Most masked-priming records in this corpus argue about whether MEANING was reached; this one argues that a RULE was executed on something nobody saw</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE CONTROL ANSWERS THE OBJECTION THAT WEAKENED AN EARLIER RESULT IN THIS SAME CORPUS: `the entire response time distribution was shifted by ~24 ms in incongruent trials compared with congruent trials. Thus, there was no evidence that the effect was found in only A small proportion of subjects or A small number of trials with a distinct distribution of response times.` buchner2003 - tagged three records ago - reports that Driver &amp; Baylis&#x27;s cross-modal effect `was observed only for a small subgroup of 14 (out of 24) participants`, which `leaves some uncertainty as to the reality` of it. This paper pre-empts exactly that, with a distributional argument rather than an average, and reports that all 12 subjects showed the effect</label>
        <note>about this quote: the staged text carries a COMPARISON/APPROXIMATION OPERATOR REPLACED BY PUNCTUATION: the paper&#x27;s “~24 ms” is staged as “,24 ms”. Not a spurious space and not a reversal - the character is REPLACED and the result is still grammatical, so it reads as a stray comma rather than as damage. Settled from the paper&#x27;s own preceding sentence, which gives “average 24 ms, s.d. 13.5 ms”, and the same paragraph carries “(P , 0:0001)” for “P &lt; 0.0001”. The tag&#x27;s own label already reads “~24 ms”, so the reading was right and only the evidence is damaged; the quote is verbatim against the staged text and no re-slice avoids the character.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE WHOLE PROCESSING CHAIN IS PLACED OUTSIDE AWARENESS IN ONE SENTENCE: `Quotation withheld.` Three stages, named in order, and the claim is that none of them requires consciousness. That is the sentence the rest of this corpus&#x27;s masked-priming records are arguing with - Holcomb2005 asks whether the N400 stage is automatic, Huang2018 restricts affective primacy to face stimuli, Kouider2008 asks about levels of processing. Here all three levels are claimed at once, from a single 43 ms numeral</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → studies of masked-face modulation of amygdala activity (refs 11, 12: Whalen et al. 1998; Morris, Öhman &amp; Dolan 1998)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → prior imaging of unconscious cerebral processing (refs 13, 14: Berns, Cohen &amp; Mintun 1997; Sahraie et al. 1997)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>prime —causes→ motor cortex</label>
        <term>prime</term>
        <term>motor cortex</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE PAPER&#x27;S CENTRAL CLAIM AND ITS MOST SURPRISING ONE: an unreportable stimulus produces measurable motor activation. &#x27;covert&#x27; and &#x27;can be attributed to&#x27; are both in the quote - the motor activation is measured, and its attribution to the prime is the inference. Weight 0.9 rather than 0.95 for that second half.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the unseen prime modulates brain activation and congruent responses</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>effect-size</label>
        <term>effect-size</term>
        <note>about this quote: THE MATHS LAYER OF THE STAGED TEXT WAS MOJIBAKE AND HAS BEEN REPAIRED. This paper&#x27;s extraction rendered &#x27;=&#x27; as U+00BC (the vulgar fraction one quarter) and &#x27;+&#x27; as U+00FE (thorn), so the quote read &#x27;p ¼ 0.01&#x27; where the paper says &#x27;p = 0.01&#x27;. It passed every check we own, because the staged text said the same wrong thing: the offsets were right and the recorded hash of the staged text matched. Repaired only where the character stands in an operator&#x27;s place - spaced, with a number after it - because the same U+00BC is a REAL QUARTER in six other papers (&#x27;a ¼ inch condenser microphone&#x27;). Original in evidence as extracted, pre-repair file in an internal file. QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. Correction, 18 September 2026: only &#x27;=&#x27; and &#x27;+&#x27; were repaired. In this quote the &#x27;:&#x27; in &#x27;P = 0:0027&#x27; is a decimal point (P = 0.0027) and still prints wrongly.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>false-discovery-rate</label>
        <term>false-discovery-rate</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a unicode and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a all and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1038/26967.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
