<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Neural Mechanisms for Visual Memory and Their Role in Attention</title>
        <author>Robert Desimone</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Neural Mechanisms for Visual Memory and Their Role in Attention</title>
          <date>1996</date>
          <publisher>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">desimone1996-repetition-suppression</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">desimone1996-repetition-suppression.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">99332985f7bd22705e3163175cd474dd7fc03426</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>neuroscience</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>The neural basis of visual memory, including how repeated stimuli elicit reduced neural responses (repetition suppression).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>What neural mechanisms support visual memory, and how does repeated experience with a stimulus change neuronal responses?</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>Reviews evidence that neurons in visual cortex respond less to repeated than to novel stimuli (repetition suppression), the neural mechanism underlying repetition priming and implicit memory.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>repetition suppression (neural repetition priming)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THREE COMMONLY OBSERVED NEURONAL EFFECTS IN MEMORY-DEMANDING TASKS ARE REPETITION SUPPRESSION, ENHANCEMENT, AND DELAY ACTIVITY - repeated experience LEADS TO BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM SUPPRESSION, ENHANCEMENT WORKS IN AN OPPOSITE FASHION for OBJECTS WITH LEARNED BEHAVIORAL RELEVANCE, and delay activity holds information ON-LINE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and they do not share an anatomy: REPETITION SUPPRESSION APPEARS TO BE AN INTRINSIC PROPERTY OF VISUAL CORTICAL AREAS SUCH AS INFERIOR TEMPORAL CORTEX, whereas ENHANCEMENT AND DELAY ACTIVITY MAY DEPEND ON FEEDBACK TO TEMPORAL CORTEX FROM PREFRONTAL CORTEX</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the proposed reason suppression happens at all: REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS A BY-PRODUCT OF SHARPENING STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX - and STIMULUS REPETITION LEADS TO A SMALLER POPULATIONS OF ACTIVATED CELLS</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Only three short-term mechanisms are covered; long-term plasticity and perceptual learning are left out.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Hippocampal and medial temporal lobe memory (events, maps, scenes, episodes) is explicitly outside the scope.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The direct test of whether prefrontal feedback causes the IT match-enhancement effect has not been performed.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the review declares what it excludes: THE TYPES OF MEMORIES NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE STRUCTURES, INCLUDING MEMORIES OF MORE COMPLEX BEHAVIORAL EVENTS, MAPS, SCENES, EPISODES, ETC., ARE NOT CONSIDERED</label>
        <note>what this limits: reading this as an account of memory rather than of STIMULUS MEMORY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and that the three are a selection - WE HAVE CONSIDERED ONLY THREE SHORT-TERM MEMORY MECHANISMS IN THIS BRIEF REVIEW, and THESE ARE HARDLY EXHAUSTIVE</label>
        <note>what this limits: the coverage of the review: WE HAVE CONSIDERED ONLY THREE SHORT-TERM MEMORY MECHANISMS IN THIS BRIEF REVIEW ... THESE ARE HARDLY EXHAUSTIVE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>half the cells show none of it - FOR ABOUT HALF THE CELLS, RESPONSES TO THE TEST ITEMS WERE APPARENTLY UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK</label>
        <note>what this limits: reading &#x27;IT neurons carry the memory signal&#x27; as a statement about IT neurons rather than about half of them</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the mechanism that would complete the account is the one not established - THERE REMAINS ONE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT FOR SOLVING THE DMS TASK THAT IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PROPERTIES OF IT NEURONS DESCRIBED SO FAR IN THIS REVIEW - NAMELY, A MECHANISM FOR MAINTAINING THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE</label>
        <note>what this limits: the account of how the DMS task is solved: THERE REMAINS ONE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT ... NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PROPERTIES OF IT NEURONS DESCRIBED SO FAR IN THIS REVIEW - NAMELY, A MECHANISM FOR MAINTAINING THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>repetition suppression looked for outside the task entirely</label>
        <note>eliminates: the effect being a product of the animal doing a memory task - REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND WHEN STIMULI ARE REPEATED DURING PASSIVE FIXATION AND IN MONKEYS UNDER ANESTHESIA · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the same effect looked for under a drug that destroys the behavior</label>
        <note>eliminates: the effect depending on successful performance - REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND IN MONKEYS GIVEN SYSTEMIC SCOPOLAMINE, WHICH GREATLY IMPAIRS THEIR BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE IN THE DMS TASK · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>prefrontal cortex cooled while recording in temporal cortex</label>
        <note>eliminates: delay activity in IT being generated there independently - IT DELAY ACTIVITY WAS Quotation withheld · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a task variant built so that one of the two mechanisms cannot solve it</label>
        <note>eliminates: an ambiguity the standard task leaves open - IN PRINCIPLE, THE ABBA TASK CANNOT BE SOLVED BY AN ANIMAL RELYING ONLY ON THE SUPPRESSIVE MECHANISM · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>prefrontal cortex cooled while recording in temporal cortex [RECOVERED 2026-08-26 from facet_results_clean203.json, written for the retired id Desimone1996-neural-mechanisms-... and merged into this record; 42 of its 45 quote-bearing tags landed and this one did not, because the quote began &#x27;ster et al.&#x27; - &#x27;Fuster&#x27; cut in half. The gate refuses a mid-word slice, so it was correctly rejected and then lost.]</label>
        <note>eliminates: delay activity in IT being generated there independently of prefrontal input · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>repetition priming</label>
        <term>repetition priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>visual memory</label>
        <term>visual memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE DIRECTION EVERYONE ASSUMES, REVERSED IN THE SECOND SENTENCE: ATTENTION IS OFTEN THOUGHT OF AS A GATEWAY TO LEARNING AND MEMORY... HOWEVER, THE CONVERSE IS EQUALLY TRUE - MECHANISMS FOR LEARNING AND MEMORY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE SELECTION PROCESS THAT DETERMINES WHICH STIMULI... ARE ATTENDED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the conclusion states it as a derivation: ATTENTION DERIVES, AT LEAST IN PART, FROM THE IMPACT OF MEMORY MECHANISMS ON CORTICAL SENSORY MECHANISMS, WHICH ARE INTRINSICALLY COMPETITIVE IN NATURE. `Attention` names an outcome of a competition rather than a process of its own</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>MEMORY DECIDES THE WINNER: ALL OF THESE MNEMONIC EFFECTS ON NEURONAL RESPONSES BIAS THE COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS THAT TAKE PLACE BETWEEN STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX WHEN THERE IS MORE THAN ONE STIMULUS IN THE VISUAL FIELD - AS A RESULT, MEMORY WILL OFTEN DETERMINE THE WINNER OF THESE COMPETITIONS AND, THUS, WILL DETERMINE WHICH STIMULUS IS ATTENDED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE TASK DESIGN DECIDES WHICH MECHANISM CAN BE INFERRED, STATED IN 1996: Quotation withheld Twenty-three years before Steinmetz2019 retires go/nogo for the same reason</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>TWO MECHANISMS PULLING AGAINST EACH OTHER, AND AGAINST THE ANIMAL: BECAUSE THE SUPPRESSION MECHANISM BIASED RESPONSES IN FAVOR OF THE NONTARGET STIMULUS (THE ONLY UNIQUE STIMULUS IN THE TRIAL), IT WORKED AGAINST BOTH THE ENHANCEMENT MECHANISM AND, PRESUMABLY, THE ANIMAL&#x27;S GOAL IN THE TASK</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE THREE EFFECTS DO NOT SHARE AN ANATOMY: Quotation withheld - BY CONTRAST, ENHANCEMENT AND DELAY ACTIVITY MAY DEPEND ON FEEDBACK TO TEMPORAL CORTEX FROM PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND ARE THOUGHT TO BE IMPORTANT FOR WORKING MEMORY</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>SUPPRESSION IS NOT ABOUT THE TASK AT ALL: REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND WHEN STIMULI ARE REPEATED DURING PASSIVE FIXATION AND IN MONKEYS UNDER ANESTHESIA - and in MONKEYS GIVEN SYSTEMIC SCOPOLAMINE, WHICH GREATLY IMPAIRS THEIR BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE IN THE DMS TASK. The effect survives the removal of the behavior it is supposed to serve</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the proposed reason recasts it as a by-product: REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS A BY-PRODUCT OF SHARPENING STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>SEEING SOMETHING TWICE SHRINKS ITS REPRESENTATION: STIMULUS REPETITION LEADS TO A SMALLER POPULATIONS OF ACTIVATED CELLS, OR SMALLER STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and the change may not be temporary: A STUDY BY BROWN AND COLLEAGUES SUGGESTS THAT THESE EFFECTS MAY BE PERMANENT - PRESENTATION OF A SET OF STIMULI ON ONE DAY LEADS TO A REDUCED INCIDENCE OF CELLS ACTIVATED BY THOSE STIMULI ON A SUBSEQUENT DAY</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>HALF THE CELLS SHOW NONE OF IT: FOR ABOUT HALF THE CELLS, RESPONSES TO THE TEST ITEMS WERE APPARENTLY UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A PARTIAL NULL, REPORTED AS ONE: IT DELAY ACTIVITY WAS Quotation withheld. Not present-or-absent - the signal survived and lost its content</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE REVIEW NAMES WHAT IT LEAVES OUT: THE TYPES OF MEMORIES NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE STRUCTURES, INCLUDING MEMORIES OF MORE COMPLEX BEHAVIORAL EVENTS, MAPS, SCENES, EPISODES, ETC., ARE NOT CONSIDERED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>and that its three mechanisms are a choice: WE HAVE CONSIDERED ONLY THREE SHORT-TERM MEMORY MECHANISMS IN THIS BRIEF REVIEW... THESE ARE HARDLY EXHAUSTIVE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>AND THE PART THE ACCOUNT CANNOT SUPPLY IS NAMED: THERE REMAINS ONE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT FOR SOLVING THE DMS TASK THAT IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PROPERTIES OF IT NEURONS DESCRIBED SO FAR IN THIS REVIEW - NAMELY, A MECHANISM FOR MAINTAINING THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="senses" ana="#senses[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the task decomposed before any neuron is discussed: TO SOLVE THE DMS TASK THE MONKEY MUST, IN PRINCIPLE, SOLVE THREE PROBLEMS - DISCRIMINATE AMONG THE DIFFERENT STIMULI, RETAIN THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE, AND MAKE A DECISION ABOUT WHETHER THE CURRENT TEST STIMULUS MATCHES</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="senses" ana="#senses[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A PARTIAL NULL, REPORTED AS ONE: `IT delay activity was Quotation withheld.` Not present-or-absent - the signal survived and lost its content. A result with no place on a binary outcome axis. [RECOVERED 2026-08-26 from facet_results_clean203.json, written for the retired id Desimone1996-neural-mechanisms-... and merged into this record; 42 of its 45 quote-bearing tags landed and this one did not, because the quote began `ster et al.` - `Fuster` cut in half. The gate refuses a mid-word slice, so it was correctly rejected and then lost.]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → studies reporting that IT cells hold a sample stimulus in memory through stimulus-selective maintained delay activity (refs 27-33)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Nakamura and Kubota (ref 33)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>contradicts → the view that attention is the gateway to memory</label>
        <note>differs in: the direction of the dependence - MECHANISMS FOR LEARNING AND MEMORY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE SELECTION PROCESS THAT DETERMINES WHICH STIMULI... ARE ATTENDED</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>critiques → the standard delayed matching-to-sample design as evidence for a particular memory mechanism</label>
        <note>differs in: which mechanisms the design leaves open - THE STANDARD VERSION OF THE DMS TASK MIGHT BE SOLVED BY A MONKEY RELYING ON EITHER ENHANCEMENT OR SUPPRESSION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>builds-on → Brown and colleagues, that repetition effects may be permanent</label>
        <note>status: the paper&#x27;s own hedge: SUGGESTS THAT THESE EFFECTS MAY BE PERMANENT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>memory —causes→ attention</label>
        <term>memory</term>
        <term>attention</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: the reversal: MECHANISMS FOR LEARNING AND MEMORY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE SELECTION PROCESS THAT DETERMINES WHICH STIMULI OF THE MANY STIMULI IN A COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT ARE ATTENDED
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says attention derives in part from memory mechanisms; causes is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>repetition suppression —causes→ priming</label>
        <term>repetition suppression</term>
        <term>priming</term>
        <note>status: SAME SENTENCE, SECOND EDGE: &#x27;Repetition suppression ... Quotation withheld.&#x27; One hedged review sentence supplies three &#x27;causes&#x27; edges on this record ([3], [4] and [5]), and all three inherit its hedge. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Quotation withheld
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but repetition suppression is thought important for priming; causes states a hypothesis.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>delay activity —causes→ working memory</label>
        <term>delay activity</term>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note>status: SAME SENTENCE, THIRD EDGE: &#x27;By contrast, enhancement and DELAY ACTIVITY MAY DEPEND ON feedback&#x27; - the weakest clause of the three, carrying &#x27;may depend on&#x27; rather than a reported result. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: ENHANCEMENT AND DELAY ACTIVITY... ARE THOUGHT TO BE IMPORTANT FOR WORKING MEMORY
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but enhancement and delay activity &#x27;are thought to be important&#x27; for working memory; hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>prefrontal —causes→ delay activity</label>
        <term>prefrontal</term>
        <term>delay activity</term>
        <note>status: A PARTIAL NULL, AND THE EFFECT IS ON SELECTIVITY RATHER THAN PRESENCE: &#x27;not eliminated ... but it became less selective&#x27;. Cooling did not abolish the activity, so prefrontal input is not necessary for delay activity to occur - only for it to carry the stimulus. · strength of the relation: 0.5 — the record marks this weak · note: DIRECTION CORRECTED ON RECOVERY. The unmerged row read &#x27;delay activity -causes-&gt; prefrontal&#x27;. The experiment COOLED PREFRONTAL CORTEX and MEASURED IT DELAY ACTIVITY, so the manipulation is prefrontal and the readout is delay activity. The original arrow pointed from the readout to the manipulation. [RECOVERED 2026-08-26 from an internal file, written for the retired id Desimone1996-neural-mechanisms-... and merged into this record; 42 of its 45 quote-bearing tags landed and this one did not, because the quote began &#x27;ster et al.&#x27; - &#x27;Fuster&#x27; cut in half. The gate refuses a mid-word slice, so it was correctly rejected and then lost.]
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but IT delay activity was reduced but not eliminated during prefrontal cooling; causes is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>about half — the cells whose responses were UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>MEMORY WILL OFTEN DETERMINE THE WINNER OF THESE COMPETITIONS AND, THUS, WILL DETERMINE WHICH STIMULUS IS ATTENDED</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>IN PRINCIPLE, Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND WHEN STIMULI ARE REPEATED DURING PASSIVE FIXATION AND IN MONKEYS UNDER ANESTHESIA, and in MONKEYS GIVEN SYSTEMIC SCOPOLAMINE, WHICH GREATLY IMPAIRS THEIR BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>STIMULUS REPETITION LEADS TO A SMALLER POPULATIONS OF ACTIVATED CELLS, OR SMALLER STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>FOR ABOUT HALF THE CELLS, RESPONSES TO THE TEST ITEMS WERE APPARENTLY UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>IT DELAY ACTIVITY WAS Quotation withheld</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>BECAUSE THE SUPPRESSION MECHANISM BIASED RESPONSES IN FAVOR OF THE NONTARGET STIMULUS, IT WORKED AGAINST BOTH THE ENHANCEMENT MECHANISM AND, PRESUMABLY, THE ANIMAL&#x27;S GOAL IN THE TASK</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>repetition suppression</label>
        <term>repetition suppression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>REPEATED EXPERIENCE WITH THE SAME VISUAL STIMULUS LEADS TO BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM SUPPRESSION OF NEURONAL RESPONSES IN SUBPOPULATIONS OF VISUAL NEURONS</label>
        <term>repetition suppression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>FOUND IN TASKS IN WHICH ANIMALS ARE REQUIRED TO ACTIVELY HOLD SPECIFIC INFORMATION “on-line” FOR SHORT PERIODS</label>
        <term>delay activity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
