<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Relation Between Perception and Behavior, or How to Win a Game of Trivial Pursuit</title>
        <author>Ap Dijksterhuis</author>
        <author>Ad van Knippenberg</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Relation Between Perception and Behavior, or How to Win a Game of Trivial Pursuit</title>
          <date>1998</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.865</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">dijksterhuis1998-behavior-priming</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">dijksterhuis1998-behavior-priming.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">c7a900827018e6a2bc6c8f281885ee8411393f2f</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural priming by stereotype and trait activation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The explanatory model of how a primed trait produces specific performance-improving behaviours is crude and unrefined</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Alternative explanations of the findings cannot be ruled out with the data collected</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The post hoc account of why secretary-primed participants worked faster was not testable, because the relevant stereotype attributes were never pilot-tested</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The candidate mediating behaviours (concentration, strategy use, feeling of knowing) are speculative and were not measured</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the 42-item general knowledge instrument taken wholesale from Trivial Pursuit (1984/1987) and used as the dependent measure for primed intelligent behaviour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>three conditions - professor prime, secretary prime and NO prime - so that the secretary prime serves as a content control and the no-prime condition as a baseline</label>
        <note>eliminates: that any prime produces the effect, and that the effect is not simply a change from baseline · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>stereotype</label>
        <term>stereotype</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>behavior</label>
        <term>behavior</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>perception</label>
        <term>perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A DOSE-RESPONSE ON PRIME DURATION, MEASURED ON BEHAVIOUR: `the magnitude of the behavioral effects simply mirrored the magnitude of the perceptual input. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants who were primed for 9 min showed stronger behavioral effects than participants who were primed for 2 min.` Nine minutes against two, read off general-knowledge performance. srull-wyer1979 doses by FREQUENCY of activation and measures a judgement; this doses by DURATION and measures what someone does - and the two papers are 19 years and one dependent-variable class apart</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE INFERENCE DRAWN FROM THE DOSE IS THE STEP WORTH RECORDING SEPARATELY: `These results underscore the fact that the process under consideration can be characterized as rather PASSIVE.` Dose-dependence is taken as evidence of passivity - if the effect size simply tracks the amount of input, then no decision, strategy or correction is intervening to modulate it. That is a real argument and not an obvious one, and it is a different kind of claim from the measurement it rests on: the dose-response was measured, the passivity is inferred from its linearity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A CONCEPTUAL REPLICATION WITH EVERYTHING CHANGED AT ONCE: `Quotation withheld.` Three things varied simultaneously. That buys generality and spends diagnosticity - a FAILURE would not have said which of the three was responsible, and a success cannot say which mattered. In a corpus that holds several papers on when priming effects replicate, the shape of a replication is worth recording as plainly as its outcome</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE PAPER PLACES ITSELF IN THE ACCESSIBILITY LINEAGE EXPLICITLY: `Quotation withheld.` Both of those are in this corpus - higgins1977 and srull-wyer1979, tagged earlier tonight. The claimed step is from judgement to BEHAVIOUR while keeping the same mechanism, so the 1977-79 accessibility work is not merely cited but load-bearing: if accessibility does not drive judgement, this paper has no base to extend from</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Bargh, Chen, and Burrows (1996)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Bargh, Chen, and Burrows (1996)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>stereotype —causes→ behavior</label>
        <term>stereotype</term>
        <term>behavior</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE PAPER&#x27;S CENTRAL CLAIM, and &#x27;corresponding with specific attributes&#x27; is the part that matters and is in the quote: the effect is not general arousal or mood but takes the CONTENT of the stereotype - professors improve general knowledge, hooligans reduce it. Weight 0.9: this is the discussion&#x27;s opening summary of four experiments.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>perception —causes→ behavior</label>
        <term>perception</term>
        <term>behavior</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: &#x27;THE AUTHORS EXPLAIN…&#x27; IS THE HEDGE AND IT IS THE FIRST CLAUSE OF THE QUOTE. This is the paper&#x27;s interpretation of its own four experiments, not a measured quantity - the measured thing is the duration dose-response (first sense), and &#x27;direct and pervasive&#x27; is what the authors conclude from it. Weight 0.85 for that gap.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the claim is how &#x27;the authors explain their results&#x27;; attributed.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming an intelligent category improves later general-knowledge performance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming an unintelligent category impairs later performance (behavioral priming)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hypothesis-testing</label>
        <term>hypothesis-testing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.865.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
