<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories</title>
        <author>Karen M. Douglas</author>
        <author>Robbie M. Sutton</author>
        <author>Aleksandra Cichocka</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher>Current Directions in Psychological Science</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1177/0963721417718261</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">douglas2017-the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theor</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">douglas2017-the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theor.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">7534c003cde5881547d35e660da16a9e80212059</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>belief in conspiracy theories, and whether the motives that attract people to them are satisfied by them</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what psychological factors drive conspiracy belief, and what its consequences are for the believer</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>a three-motive organising schema - epistemic, existential, social - and the finding that the literature answers the drivers far better than the consequences</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>conspiracy belief as motivated social cognition that may thwart the very motives it answers</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>because the theory posits that conspirators use stealth and disinformation, any evidence against it can be read as part of the cover-up - including the debunker</label>
        <term>immunity to disconfirmation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>disconfirming evidence is recast as the product of a conspiracy, so a cherished belief survives contact with the evidence against it</label>
        <term>belief protection by reattribution</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>attributing negative outcomes to powerful others lets the self and in-group stay competent and moral while explaining their disadvantage</label>
        <term>compensatory blame</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the literature answers what drives conspiracy belief far more thoroughly than what it does to the believer</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the experimental samples are undergraduates and survey panellists who are neither threatened nor inclined to endorse conspiracy theories - not the population the claim is about</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>conspiracy theories sometimes turn out to be true, and have brought real elite misconduct to light</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>fair tests require controlled longitudinal work on disadvantaged and threatened populations, which has not been done</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the epistemic / existential / social motive taxonomy, carried from system-justification theory into the study of conspiracy belief</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>normative standards of causal explanation from the philosophy of science, used to characterise what conspiracy theories are</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>evidence from the population the claim is about - people whose psychological needs are chronically or experimentally threatened</label>
        <note>eliminates: rival readings of the needs-to-conspiracy link - and the paper&#x27;s point is that the existing samples CANNOT eliminate them, because the people studied are not the threatened population the claim is about · outcome: absent-stated-about-other</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an experimental baseline for the control manipulation, against which conspiracy belief was compared</label>
        <note>eliminates: a level of conspiracy belief being read as heightened when nothing establishes what the ordinary level is · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether exposure to conspiracy theories helps rather than harms - tested directly rather than assumed from the correlational pattern</label>
        <note>eliminates: a correlation between powerlessness and conspiracy belief being read as conspiracy theories SERVING the need - the experiment tests the direction the correlation cannot · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether the trust effect is specific to the institutions a given theory names</label>
        <note>eliminates: a fall in institutional trust that is about the institution the theory names rather than about institutions · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>conspiracy theories</label>
        <term>conspiracy theories</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>epistemic</label>
        <term>epistemic</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>existential</label>
        <term>existential</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>social</label>
        <term>social</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>system-justification theory</label>
        <term>system-justification theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>cheater detection</label>
        <term>cheater detection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>collective narcissism</label>
        <term>collective narcissism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>anomie</label>
        <term>anomie</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>motivated social cognition</label>
        <term>motivated social cognition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>&#x27;conspiracy theory&#x27; = an explanation of an important event by secret plots of powerful and malevolent groups</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>its three defining attributes are SPECULATIVE, COMPLEX and RESISTANT TO FALSIFICATION - properties of the explanation&#x27;s form, not its content</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>each attribute is the negation of a normative standard for causal explanation - empirically warranted, parsimonious, falsifiable</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the three-motive taxonomy is called &#x27;a useful HEURISTIC&#x27;, borrowed from system-justification theory rather than derived</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>&#x27;more appealing than satisfying&#x27; - the paper&#x27;s own summary of the gap between what draws people and what they get</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger" cert="0.6">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: critique — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>method: review</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: review — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>phenomenon: the epistemic, existential and social motives that draw people to conspiracy theories</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: conspiracy belief as motivated social cognition that may thwart the very motives it answers — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>qualifies → early theories holding that conspiracy belief gives compensatory satisfaction when needs are threatened</label>
        <note>note: the attraction is confirmed and the compensation is not - people turn to them when threatened, and are left less in control</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → system-justification theory, from which the three-motive taxonomy is taken</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>distinguishes-from → the normative standards of causal explanation used in science</label>
        <note>note: the definition of the object of study is stated as the negation of those standards</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>conspiracy theories —is-a→ motivated social cognition</label>
        <term>conspiracy theories</term>
        <term>motivated social cognition</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: offered as a possibility rather than asserted - &#x27;might be seen as an ironic or self-defeating manifestation&#x27;
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but conspiracy theories &#x27;might be seen as&#x27; a manifestation of motivated social cognition; hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>conspiracy theories —causes→ anomie</label>
        <term>conspiracy theories</term>
        <term>anomie</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.85 · direction on the measure (stated by the tagger, no quotation): increases · note: the paper states this as plausible and bidirectional - &#x27;not only a symptom but also a cause&#x27;
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but it is &#x27;plausible&#x27; that conspiracy theories cause anomie; hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>collective narcissism —causes→ conspiracy theories</label>
        <term>collective narcissism</term>
        <term>conspiracy theories</term>
        <note>status: ASSOCIATIONAL, IN A REVIEW OF SURVEY FINDINGS: &#x27;conspiracy belief is associated with narcissism ... Conspiracy belief is also predicted by collective narcissism&#x27;. &#x27;Associated with&#x27; and &#x27;predicted by&#x27; are the paper&#x27;s own verbs, and the edge type is stronger than either. · direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.85 · direction on the measure (stated by the tagger, no quotation): increases
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;conspiracy belief&#x27;, not &#x27;conspiracy theories&#x27; (named in the previous sentence).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Conspiracy belief appears to stem from epistemic, existential and social motives; research has yet to show it serves them.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>exposure suppresses the sense of autonomy and control and reduces willingness to vote or engage in party politics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>exposure decreases trust in governmental institutions even when the theory is unrelated to them</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>conspiracy belief correlates with lower analytic thinking, lower education, and perceiving agency where there is none</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>conspiracy theories</label>
        <term>conspiracy theories</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>collective narcissism</label>
        <term>collective narcissism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>anomie</label>
        <term>anomie</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>correlational association between conspiracy belief and analytic thinking</label>
        <term>correlational association between conspiracy belief and analytic thinking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>conspiracy belief</label>
        <term>conspiracy belief</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>narcissism</label>
        <term>narcissism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
